Abstract
There were three purposes to this study; (a) ascertain why students chose to enroll in online courses and the number taken to date in their academic careers in the College of Business at a regional University, (b) determine the preferences of 300 and 400 level course participants regarding online interaction, feedback, and course design, and (c) find out participants’ specific complaints about faculty members’ practices and elicit recommendations for course design improvements. Results from the study indicated; (a) the average number of online courses taken by course participants was 8.5; (b) course participants: valued interaction with faculty, appreciated supplemental course materials (e.g., videos, web links, etc.), did not expect an online class to be similar to a face-to-face class, were nearly equally split regarding the value of graded discussions, valued simplicity of course design, content and amount of interaction in online courses, and did not value audio feedback on written assignments. Finally, replies to two qualitative questions regarding course improvements and things that aggravated online students indicated that, while there were statistically significant differences between 300 and 400 level participants’ online course expectations both groups point to the need for faculty improvements in terms of course design and instructional methodology. Four recommendations were made for future research and implementation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
All HarvardX Offerings (All time) (2015). Retrieved from http://harvardx.harvard.edu/harvardx-insights/world-map-enrollment
Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States (2012). Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/survey_report/changing-course-ten-years-tracking-online-education-united-states/
Drouin M (2008) The relationship between students’ perceived sense of community and satisfaction, achievement and retention in an online course. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 9:3
Eskey M, Schulte M (2012) Comparing attitudes of online instructors and online college students: quantitative results for training, evaluation and administration. Online J. Distance Learn. Adm. 15:5
Schmidt SW, Hodge EM, Tschida CM (2013) How university faculty members developed their online teaching skills. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 14(3):131–140
Sebastianelli R, Tamimi N (2011) Business statistics and management science online: teaching strategies and assessment of student learning. J. Educ. Bus. 86(6):317–325. doi:10.1080/08832323.2010.525545
Sun Q, Ganesh G (2014) Developing and teaching an online MBA marketing research class: implications for online learning effectiveness. J. Educ. Bus. 89(7):337–345. doi:10.1080/08832323.2013.806885
Vonderwell S, Boboc M (2013) Promoting formative assessment in online teaching and learning. Techtrends: Linking Res. Pract. Improv. Learn. 57(4):22–27. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0673-x
Wagar TH, Carroll WR (2012) Examining student preferences of group work evaluation approaches: evidence from business management undergraduate students. J. Educ. Bus. 87(6):358–362. doi:10.1080/08832323.2011.628345
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank Dr. Allen Klingenberg, Ms. Nerea Delgado Fernández and Ms. Mary Mutua for their roles in the statistical analysis in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Keller, G.F. (2016). Examining the Preferences of Online Business Course Students. In: Soh, S. (eds) Selected Papers from the Asia Conference on Economics & Business Research 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0986-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0986-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0985-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0986-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)