Skip to main content
Log in

On the Evolution of a Lesson: Group Preparation for Teaching Contest as Teacher Professional Development Activity for Chinese Elementary Science Teachers

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group preparation for teaching contest, or lesson polishing, is a teacher professional development activity unique to China. Through participant observation and discourse analysis of a typical case, this study explores how a science lesson evolved through lesson-polishing process and how such process influenced individual learning and the development of local teaching community. Our work illustrates both the values and the issues of lesson polishing as a type of teacher professional development activity. On one hand, combining professional interactions and trial lessons, lesson-polishing activity opens up space for critical yet cooperative professional interactions and tryouts of different designs and teaching strategies, providing opportunities for individual learning and development of practical rationalities within local community. On the other hand, the functions of such activities are greatly limited by the tendency of refining every detail in lesson design, the existence of overriding dispositions and authorities with overriding power, as well as the focus on practical suggestions that can be directly implemented. Suggestions for improvement are made in the final discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We did not come across any valid source mentioning the origin of teaching contest. A teacher instructor told us in an interview that this tradition started before the Cultural Revolution when China built its educational system in alignment with that of the former Soviet Union, but this was only what he heard from an older teacher instructor.

  2. L and I are both male teachers; F is a female teacher. L has been a science teacher for eight years, while I and F were both in their seventh year teaching elementary science. They all have bachelor’s degrees and were all in their 30th.

  3. C and U were both male and in their 40th. Both of them had taught elementary science for more than eight years before switching to administrative positions.

  4. A was in his late 40th. He has been a teacher instructor for 10 years, before that he used to be a high school geography teacher.

  5. When K asked “who will welcome the daybreak earlier, Shanghai or New York?” the student representing New York was sitting right at “the daybreak,” while the student representing Shanghai was 12 h apart sitting on the other side. The students were given the question without learning about the meridian line or dateline, thus many made judgments based on relative positions and earth self-rotation direction only, which led to the answer of “New York”. Their judgment echoed S2’s idea that “there’s no before or after.”

References

  • Borko H (2004) Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educ Res 33:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1998) Practical reason: on the theory of action. Stanford University Press

  • Bryk AS, Schneider BL (2002) Trust in schools: a core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation Publications

  • Darling-hammond L (1997) The right to learn: a blueprint for creating schools that work. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond L (2005) Teaching as a profession: lessons in teacher preparation and professional development. Phi delta kappan 87(3):237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke ML, Carpenter TP, Levi L, Fennema E (2001) Capturing teachers’ generative change: a follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. Am Educ Res J 38:653–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood CR, Dinwiddie G, Terry B, Wade L, Stanley SO, Thibadeau S, Delquadri JC (1984) Teacher-versus peer-mediated instruction: an ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes. J Appl Behav Anal 17(4):521–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman P, Wineburg S, Woolworth S (2001) Toward a theory of teacher community. Teach Coll Rec 103:942–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer D, Russ R, Mikeska J, Scherr R (2008) Identifying inquiry and conceptualizing students’ abilities. In: Duschl RA, Grandy RE (eds) Teaching scientific inquiry: recommendations for research and implementation. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 138–156

  • Herbst V, Chazan D (2002) Exploring the practical rationality of mathematics teaching through conversations about videotaped episodes: the case of engaging students in proving. Learn Math 23(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst P, Nachlieli T, Chazan D (2011) Studying the practical rationality of mathematics teaching: what goes into “installing” a theorem in geometry? Cogn Instr 29(2):218–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu GW (2002) English language teaching in the People’s Republic of China. In: Silver RE, Hu GW, Iino M (eds) English language education in China, Japan, and Singapore. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Bao J (2006) Towards a model for teacher professional development in China: introducing Keli. J Math Teach Educ 9(3):279–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke JL (1990) Talking science: language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood

  • Levin DM, Hammer D, Coffey JE (2009) Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. J Teach Educ 60(2):142–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman A (1995) Practices that support teacher development: transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi delta kappan 76(8):591–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Little J (1990) The persistence of privacy: autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teach Coll Rec 91(4):509–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine L, Ma L (1993) Teachers working together: a dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. Int J Educ Res 19(8):675–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner G, Strike K, Hewson P, Gertzog W (1982) Accommodation of a scientific conception: towards a theory of conceptual change. Sci Educ 66(2):211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DC, Neale DC (1991) The construction of subject-matter knowledge in primary science teaching. In: Brophy J (ed) Advances in research on teaching. Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice, vol 2. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 187–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler JW, Stevenson HW (1991) How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection. Am Educ 15(1):12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Syst Think 9(5):2–3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by a grant from the 12th Five-year National Plan on Educational Research (Grant BFA110052, “How sociocultural learning environments influence the effectiveness of classroom scientific inquiry”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaowei Tang.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 The evolutionary route of the chosen lesson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, X., Shao, F. On the Evolution of a Lesson: Group Preparation for Teaching Contest as Teacher Professional Development Activity for Chinese Elementary Science Teachers. J Sci Educ Technol 23, 252–266 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9454-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9454-8

Keywords

Navigation