Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Learning Effects of a Multidisciplinary Professional Development Programme

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Professional development becomes relevant and effective when teachers are actively involved, collaborate, and when it is linked to teachers’ daily school practice (Hunzicker in Prof Dev Educ 37:177–179, 2011). Preparation of teachers for a curriculum implementation such as the new subject Nature, Life, and Technology can be done by a professional development programme where teachers are actively involved (Visser et al. 2010). This study evaluates the designed and implemented professional development programme with respect to its effectiveness in terms of degree of teacher learning and development. Effects are evaluated for five learning areas: Instructional strategies, differences in students’ prior knowledge, adjustments to the module, assessment methods and instruments, and field trips and guest lectures. Eleven teachers from four different schools participated in two professional development programmes, six teachers in the first professional development programme and five teachers in the programme for the subsequent module. Questionnaires and interviews were used to assess the effects in the different learning areas. The findings show that the professional development programme is a useful venture for teachers’ professional growth in different learning areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolhuis SM, Simons PR (1999) Leren en werken [Learning and working]. Kluwer, Deventer

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko H (2004) Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educ Res 33(8):3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko H, Jacobs J, Koellner K (2010) Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In: Peterson P, Baker E, McGaw B (eds) International encyclopedia of education, vol 3. Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 548–555

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coenders FGM (2010) Teachers’ professional growth during the development and class enactment of context-based chemistry student learning material. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands

  • Cotton DRE (2006) Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: the importance of teachers’ beliefs. J Curric Stud 38(1):67–83. doi:10.1080/00220270500038644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede C, Ketelhut DJ, Whitehouse P, Breit L, McCloskey EM (2009) A research agenda for online teacher professional development. J Teach Educ 60(1):8–19. doi:10.1177/0022487108327554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone LM (2009) Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educ Res 38(3):181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut M (2004) Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Continu Educ 26(2):247–273. doi:10.1080/158037042000225245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman BJ, Marx RW, Best S, Tal R (2003) Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teach Teach Educ 19(6):643–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman BF, Yoon KS (2001) What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. Am Educ Res J 38(4):915–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurlitt J, Renkl A (2010) Prior knowledge activation: how different concept mapping tasks lead to substantial differences in cognitive processes, learning outcomes, and perceived self-efficacy. Instr Sci 38(4):417–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey TR (2002) Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educ Leadersh 59(6):45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Heus de P, van der Leeden R, Ganzendam B (1995) Toegepaste data-analyse: Technieken voor niet-experimenteel onderzoek in de sociale wetenschappen [Applied data-analysis. Methods for non-experimental research in social sciences]. Lemma, Utrecht

  • Hunzicker J (2011) Effective professional development for teachers: a checklist. Prof Dev Educ 37(2):177–179. doi:10.1080/19415257.2010.523955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanpierre B, Oberhauser K, Freeman C (2005) Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. J Res Sci Teach 42(6):668–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman A, Pointer Mace DH (2008) Teacher learning: the key to educational reform. J Teach Educ 59(3):226–234. doi:10.1177/0022487108317020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman A, Pointer Mace DH (2010) Making practice public: teacher learning in the 21st century. J Teach Educ 61(1–2):77–88. doi:10.1177/0022487109347319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley S, Love N, Stiles KE, Mundry S, Hewson PW (2003) Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, 2nd edn. Corwin Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowden CS (2005) Evaluating the impact of professional development. J Res Prof Learn. Retrieved from http://institute.nsta.org/learningcenter/pdp/NSDC_Evaluating_Impact_PD.pdf

  • Luft JA (2001) Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: the impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. Int J Sci Educ 23(5):517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe AT (2007) Research-based professional development: teachers engaged in professional learning communities. J Sci Teach Educ 18(1):125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margalef Garcia L, Pareja Roblin N (2008) Innovation, research and professional development in higher education: learning from our own expertise. Teach Teach Educ 24(1):104–116. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meirink JA (2007) Individual teacher learning in a context of collaboration in teams. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden, The Netherlands

  • Meirink JA, Imants JGM, Meijer P, Verloop N (2010) Teacher learning and collaboration in interdisciplinary teams. Camb J Educ 40(2):161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn J (2002) Ownership and transformation: teachers using curriculum innovations. Phys Educ 37(2):142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penuel WR, Fishman BJ, Yamaguchi R, Gallagher LP (2007) What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. Am Educ Res J 44(4):921–958. doi:10.3102/0002831207308221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter D, Kunter M, Klusmann U, Lüdtke O, Baumert J (2011) Professional development across the teaching career: teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teach Teach Educ 27(1):116–126. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovai AP (2003) A practical framework for evaluating online distance education programs. Internet High Educ 6:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee NLT (2007) Outline of a new subject in the sciences. A vision of an interdisciplinary subject: advanced science, Mathematics and Technology (ASMaT) [Contouren van een nieuw bètavak. Visie op een interdisciplinair vak: Natuur, Leven en Technologie (NLT)], from http://betavak-nlt.nl/Landelijk/Invoerscholen/Criteria/

  • Stolk MJ, De Jong O, Bulte AMW, Pilot A (2011) Exploring a framework for professional development in curriculum innovation: empowering teachers for designing context-based chemistry education. Res Sci Educ 41(3):369–388. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9170-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser TC, Coenders FGM, Terlouw C, Pieters JM (2010) Essential characteristics for a professional development program for promoting the implementation of a multidisciplinary science module. J Sci Teacher Educ 21(6):623–642. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9212-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser TC, Coenders FGM, Terlouw, C, Pieters JM (2012) Evaluating teachers’ satisfaction about a professional development programme for implementation of a multidisciplinary science subject (Submitted)

  • Voogt J, Fisser P, Pareja Roblin N, Tondeur J, van Braak J (2012) Technological pedagogical content knowledge—a review of the literature. J Comput Assist Learn. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x

  • Wikeley F (2005) Evaluating effective school improvement. Sch Eff Sch Improv 16(4):387–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Case study research, design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Twente, Postbus 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Talitha Christine Visser, Fer G. M. Coenders & Jules M. Pieters

  2. Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Cees Terlouw

Authors
  1. Talitha Christine Visser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fer G. M. Coenders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jules M. Pieters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cees Terlouw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talitha Christine Visser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, T.C., Coenders, F.G.M., Pieters, J.M. et al. The Learning Effects of a Multidisciplinary Professional Development Programme. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 807–824 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9432-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9432-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation