Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Harnessing the Environmental Professional Expertise of Engineering Students—The Course: “Environmental Management Systems in the Industry”

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More and more technical universities now advocate integrating sustainability in higher education and including it as a strategic goal for improving education’s quality and relevance to society. This study examines 30 fourth-year chemical engineering students, graduates of a university course designed to combine their terminological domain with sustainability-oriented goals, focusing on topics like corporate sustainability, developing environmental policy, introduction to ISO 14001—Environmental Management Systems (EMS), and environmental legislation. The study explores their perception of industrial-environmental issues and asks—How did the study unit influence the students’ ability to use their preexisting scientific knowledge, while relating to industrial-environmental issues? Our findings indicate that engineering students can develop industrial-environmental awareness, and make use of interdisciplinary knowledge beyond that strictly related to the realm of engineering. Regarding the research’s particular aim—i.e. determining the study unit’s influence on students’ ability to relate industrial-environmental issues to their own field of engineering—the findings indeed show a change in the students’ conceptions of environmental elements related to industry. The course graduates became more attentive to the environmental aspects associated with building and opening a factory, and the concepts they raised in connection with the topic gained in variety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams-Webber J (2006) A review of repertory grid theory, research, and applications. J Construct Psychol 19:351–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allenby BR, Allen DT, Davidson CI (2007) Teaching sustainable engineering. J Ind Ecol 11:8–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allenby B, Murphy CF, Allen D, Davidson C (2009) Sustainable engineering education in the United States. Sustain Sci 4:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford NA (2004) Major challenges to engineering education for sustainable development. Int J Sustainab High Educ 239–250

  • Azapagic A, Perdan S, Shallcross D (2005) How much do engineering students know about sustainable development? The findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum. Eur J Eng Educ 30:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babakri KA, Bennet RA, Franchetti M (2003) Critical factors for implementing ISO 14001 standard in United States industrial companies. J Clean Prod 11:749–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee SB, Iyer ES, Kashyap RK (2003) Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and influence of industry type. J Market 67:106–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab SA, Duffy TM (2000) From practice fields to communities of practice. In: Jonassen DH, Land SM (eds) Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 25–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton P (2002) Meeting the need for scientists, engineers, and an educated citizenry in a technological society. Educational Testing Service, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze L, Bowen M, Alsop S (2006) Teachers’ tendencies to promote student-led science projects: associations with their views about science. Sci Educ 90:400–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi-Assaraf O, Damri S (2009) The state of industrial environmental literacy among science graduate students. J Sci Educ Technol (In press)

  • Ben-Zvi-Assaraf O, Orion N (2005) Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. J Res Sci Teach 42:518–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezzi A (1999) What is this thing called geoscience? Epistemological dimensions elicited with the repertory grid and their implications for scientific literacy. Sci Educ 83:675–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw JM, Ford KM, Adams-Webber JR, Boose JH (1993) Beyond the repertory grid: new approaches to constructivist knowledge acquisition tool development. Int J Intell Syst 8:287–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee RW, Fuchs B (2006) Preparing the 21st-century workforce: a new reform in science and technology education. J Res Sci Teach 43:349–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carew AL, Mitchell CA (2008) Teaching sustainability as a contested concept: capitalizing on variation in engineering educators’ conceptions of environmental, social and economic sustainability. J Clean Prod 16:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerin P (2002) Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 9:46–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin C, Brown DE, Bruce BC (2002) Student-generated questions: a meaningful aspect of learning in science. Int J Sci Educ 24:521–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawe G, Jucker R, Martin S (2005) Sustainable development in higher education: current practice and future developments. The Higher Education Academy, York

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas MA (2003) In search of ISO: an institutional perspective on adoption of management standards. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dori YJ, Herscovitz O (1999) Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: analysis of an environmental case study. J Res Sci Teach 36:411–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SR, Zeidler DL, Sadler TD (2008) Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. Int J Sci Teach Educ 31:279–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs VJ, Mihelcic JR (2006) Engineering education for international sustainability: curriculum design under the sustainable futures model. In: Proceedings of 5th annual ASEE global colloquium on engineering education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 9–12

  • Gallopin GC, Funtowicz S, O’Connor M (2001) Science for the twenty-first century: from social contract to the scientific core. Int Soc Sci J 53:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin K (2002) Repertory grid technique. In: Partington D (ed) Essential skills for management research. Sage, London, pp 199–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman D, Yavetz B, Pe’er S (2006) Environmental literacy in teacher training: environmental behavior of beginner students. J Environ Educ 38:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierez-Martin F, Hu¨ttenhain SH (2003) Environmental education: new paradigms and engineering syllabus. J Clean Prod 11:247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE (2005) Sustainable development in higher education—consultation on a support strategy and action plan. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_01/

  • Hirsh KW, Tree JJ (2001) Word association norms for two cohorts of British adults. J Neurolinguist 14:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg J, Svanström M, Peet DJ, Mulder K, Ferrer-Balas D, Segalàs J (2008) Embedding sustainability in higher education through interaction with lecturers: case studies from three European technical universities. Eur J Eng Educ 33:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson P, Hughesb P, Layera G (2008) Sustainable graduates: linking formal, informal and campus curricula to embed education for sustainable development in the student learning experience. Environ Educ Res 14:435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovardas TK, Korfiatis J (2006) Word associations as a tool for assessing conceptual change in science education. Learn Instr 16:416–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford H, Volk T, Wilke R, Champeau R, Marcinkowski T, May T, Bluhm B, McKeown-Ice R (1994) Environmental education literacy consortium. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntzinger DN, Hutchins MJ, Gierke JS, Sutherland JW (2007) Enabling sustainable thinking in undergraduate engineering education. Int J Eng Educ 23:218–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplowitz MD, Levine R (2005) How environmental knowledge measures up at a Big Ten University. Environ Educ Res 11:143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly G (1955) The psychology of personal constructs, vol I. W. W. Norton and Co., Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Latta GF, Swigger K (1992) Validation of the repertory grid for use in modeling knowledge. J Am Soc Inf Sci 43:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugg A (2007) Developing sustainability-literate citizens through outdoor learning: possibilities for outdoor education in higher education. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn 2:97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihelcic J, Crittenden J, Small M, Shonnard D, Hokanson D, Zhang Q, Chen H, Sorby S, James V, Sutherland J, Schnoor J (2003) Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environ Sci Technol 37:5314–5324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody GL, Hartel PG (2007) Evaluating an environmental literacy requirement chosen as a method to produce environmentally literate university student. Int J Sustain High Educ 8:355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody G, Alkaff H, Garrison D, Golley F (2005) Assessing the environmental literacy requirement at the University of Georgia. J Environ Educ 36:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (2005) Seven recommendations for creating sustainability education at the university level. Int J Sustain High Educ 6:326–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder KF (2006) Engineering curricula in sustainable development. An evaluation of changes at Delft University of Technology. Eur J Eng Educ 31:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak R (2006) Sustainable corporations in Australia, Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Business and Enterprise, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria, Australia, January 2006

  • Nicholls G (2005) New lecturers’ constructions of learning, teaching and research in higher education. Stud High Educ 30:611–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid A, Petocz P (2006) University lecturers’ understanding of sustainability. High Educ 51:105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Observatory EESD Report (2006) The observatory status of engineering education for sustainable development in European higher education, 2006. ISBN978-91-976327-0-6. http://www.upc.edu/eesd-observatory/

  • Rondinelli DA, Vastag G (2000) Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. Eur Manage J 18:499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross TP (2003) The reliability of cluster and switch scores for the controlled oral word association test. Arch Clin Neuropsyshol 18:153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe D (2002) Environmental literacy and sustainability as core requirements: success stories and models. In: Filho WL (ed) Teaching sustainability at Universities: towards curriculum greening. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp 79–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler T, Donelly L (2006) Socioscientific argumentation: the effects of content knowledge and morality. Int J Sci Educ 28:1463–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler T, Zeidler D (2005) The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socicoscientific issues: applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Sci Educ 89:71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffacher M, Walter AI, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2006) Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective. The transdisciplinary case study approach. Int J Sustain High Educ 7:252–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone L (2000) When case studies are not enough: the influence of corporate culture and employee attitudes on the success of cleaner production initiatives. J Clean Prod 8:353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukumaran B, Chen J, Mehta Y, Mirchandani D, Hollar K (2004) A sustained effort for educating students about sustainable development. Proceedings of the 2004 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition

  • Summers M, Childs A (2007) Student science teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: an empirical study of three postgraduate training cohorts. J Res Sci Technol Educ 25:307–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tikka PM, Kuitunen MT, Tynys SM (2000) Effects of educational background on students’ attitudes, activity levels, and knowledge concerning the environment. J Environ Educ 31:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner W, Valencia J, Elejabarrieta F (1996) Relevance, discourse and the hot stable core of social representations—a structural analysis of word associations. Br J Soc Psychol 35:331–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee YS, Quazi HA (2005) Development and validation of critical factors of environmental management. Ind Manage Data Syst 105:96–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White R, Gunstone R (1992) Probing understanding. Palmer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe V (2001) A survey of the environmental education of students in non-environmental majors at four year institutions in the USA. Int J Sustain High Educ 2:301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright TSA (2002) Definitions and frameworks for environmental sustainability in higher education. High Educ Policy 15:105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang O, Zimmerman J, Mihelcic JR, Vanasupa L (2008) Learning materials and teaching strategies for sustainability integration in engineering education. Presented in: the 12th annual green chemistry and engineering conference (June 24–26, 2008), Washington, DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orit Ben-Zvi-Assaraf.

Appendix: The Students’ Final Exam

Appendix: The Students’ Final Exam

(1) The agenda 21 question: Agenda 21 is the guiding document for environmental policy. It influences the setting of environmental goals, environmental policies and development policies of states and cities. State four central principles of sustainable development and how these are expressed in the various chapters of the agenda.

(2) The government policy question: In 2002 the Israeli government declared that its policy will be based on the principles of sustainable development. Suggest three goals for three offices based on those principals.

(3) The sustainability report question: You have been promoted to be the CEO of the “Ways of Peace” bus company. The board directors have asked you to present the company’s “Environmental Vision”. Using the ISO 14001 and the sustainable report principals (according to the GRI guidelines), explain which elements of ISO 14001 will be presented in the “Ways of Peace sustainability report”.

(4) The Deming Cycle question: You are the organization’s environmental consultant. At your request the plant engineer has analyzed the production line using the Deming Cycle (PDCA).You need to evaluate the document. In relation to the Deming Cycle, specify three principals and explain their importance.

(5) International environmental treaties question: The Barcelona treaty was signed in 1995 by 27 nations around the Mediterranean Sea concerned with its preservation. Present four elements in the treaty that express sustainable development principals.

(6) Criteria and auditing EMS question: In relation to the events described below, note and elaborate in an explicit way the non-conformities you identify:

  • First scenario: During an audit at the chemical warehouse you have found, in the same secondary containment tank, two barrels of Caustic Soda (NaOH)—200 l each and one barrel of concentrated Sulfuric Acid H2SO4. When you ask for the reason it is so, an internal procedure from 1983 is presented. It states that all dangerous chemicals must be positioned at the far end of the warehouse. According to the operator this was the most updated work-order. When you ask about the MSDS for those chemicals the operator says that since they were written in German he did not bother to look at them.

    At a prior conversation, at the documentation center, you were shown a new set of internal procedures from 1988. In the “Read and Sign” table you recognized the warehouse supervisor’s signature.

  • Second scenario: During an audit at the organization’s yard a Diesel tanker arrives. The tank farm operator verifies the weight of the Diesel, as stated on the receipt from the weighbridge. He connects the grounding wire, examines the volume-meter of the big upright tank climbed to the top and, putting his head through the top opening examines the tank from the inside. Only then does he allow the tanker driver to start pumping diesel from the tanker to the tank.

    You hold internal procedure # PS22222—“Filling and storing of Diesel”. None of the actions carried out contradicts the procedure but some of them were added.

    After the tanker has left you ask the tank farm operator why did he climb up? He answers: “the meter is broken—I reported it more than two months ago” he explains that he climbed up to estimate the volume of the Diesel in the tank. As for the smell, he adds “one gets used to it after a while.”

(7) Implementation of ISO 14001 question: According to ISO 14001, the following people must be briefed on relevant environmental topics:

  1. a.

    The person in charge of safety

  2. b.

    The senior managers.

  3. c.

    Those employees whose work significantly impacts the environment.

  4. d.

    The design and manufacturing engineers.

Suggest, for each of the above, two briefing topics that are relevant to their position and the environmental interaction it entails.

(8) Montreal protocol question: How does the decline of the ozone layer affect Earth’s ability to maintain a life-supporting environment for its biosphere, in which humanity is included? Explain how the Montreal protocol reflects the notion that states must reduce or eradicate non-sustainable production and consumption patterns in order to attain sustainable development and a higher quality of life for all of humanity.

(9) Global warming question: What are the reciprocal relations between Earth’s systems (geosphere, biosphere, atmosphere and hydrosphere) that are observable in the phenomenon of global warming. How does this phenomenon impact biochemical cycles such as those of water, oxygen and nitrogen and carbon dioxide?

(10) Environmental communication question: As spokesperson for one of the plants addressed in the notice below, you have been asked to issue a statement to the press based on the principles of environmental communication, according to the guidelines of ISO 14063. Provide, for each principle, sentences to appear in the spokesperson’s statement.

From the website of the office for environmental protection: 13/7/2009; 50% of the production plants assessed in the year 2008 exceed the permissible limits for the emission of air pollutants. In 2008, 466 surprise inspections were carried out in 42 plants and 72 installations. These inspections included the taking and analyzing of air samples from chimneys. 20 of these air-sampled plants were found to be exceeding prescribed limits, and sanctions were enforced against their managers. Most of the plants have taken steps to reduce pollution and uphold the required standards following the disclosure of the results and the proceedings for administrative enforcement.

(11) The sustainability agenda question: As a new CEO in the Chemical global corporation you forced to deal with some unprecedented challenges and uncertainties due to the worldwide economic crisis. Offer a vision in order to create financial value at the same time as addressing environmental, social and governance issues in an integrated manner of sustainability agenda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Zvi-Assaraf, O., Ayal, N. Harnessing the Environmental Professional Expertise of Engineering Students—The Course: “Environmental Management Systems in the Industry”. J Sci Educ Technol 19, 532–545 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9219-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9219-6

Keywords

Navigation