Abstract
It is shown that the deterministic infinite trigonometric products
with parameters \( p\in (0,1]\ \& \ s>\frac{1}{2}\), and variable \(t\in \mathbb {R}\), are inverse Fourier transforms of the probability distributions for certain random series \(\Omega _{p}^\zeta (s)\) taking values in the real \(\omega \) line; i.e. the \({\text{ Cl }_{p;s}^{}}(t)\) are characteristic functions of the \(\Omega _{p}^\zeta (s)\). The special case \(p=1=s\) yields the familiar random harmonic series, while in general \(\Omega _{p}^\zeta (s)\) is a “random Riemann-\(\zeta \) function,” a notion which will be explained and illustrated—and connected to the Riemann hypothesis. It will be shown that \(\Omega _{p}^\zeta (s)\) is a very regular random variable, having a probability density function (PDF) on the \(\omega \) line which is a Schwartz function. More precisely, an elementary proof is given that there exists some \(K_{p;s}^{}>0\), and a function \(F_{p;s}^{}(|t|)\) bounded by \(|F_{p;s}^{}(|t|)|\!\le \! \exp \big (K_{p;s}^{} |t|^{1/(s+1)})\), and \(C_{p;s}^{}\!:=\!-\frac{1}{s}\int _0^\infty \ln |{1-p+p\cos \xi }|\frac{1}{\xi ^{1+1/s}}\mathrm{{d}}\xi \), such that
the regularity of \(\Omega _{p}^\zeta (s)\) follows. Incidentally, this theorem confirms a surmise by Benoit Cloitre, that \(\ln {\text{ Cl }_{{{1}/{3}};2}^{}}(t) \sim -C\sqrt{t}\; \left( t\rightarrow \infty \right) \) for some \(C>0\). Graphical evidence suggests that \({\text{ Cl }_{{{1}/{3}};2}^{}}(t)\) is an empirically unpredictable (chaotic) function of t. This is reflected in the rich structure of the pertinent PDF (the Fourier transform of \({\text{ Cl }_{{{1}/{3}};2}^{}}\)), and illustrated by random sampling of the Riemann-\(\zeta \) walks, whose branching rules allow the build-up of fractal-like structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Private communication by B.C. on 02.2016; we took the liberty to attach \(_{\text{ Cl }}\) at Cloitre’s P(t).
\(\zeta (s)\) and \(\zeta (2s)/\zeta (s)\) are possible outcomes also when \(p=1\), while \(1/\zeta (s)\) is not.
This is the statement that the number of primes less than x is asymptotically given by \(\int _2^x\frac{d\xi }{\ln \xi }\), with relative error going to zero as \(x\rightarrow \infty \); see [5].
If \(I\subset \mathbb {R}\) is any closed interval, then \(\int _I \delta _{\omega _k}^{} (d\omega )= 1\) if \(\omega _k^{}\in I\) and \(\int _I \delta _{\omega _k^{}}^{} (d\omega )= 0\) if \(\omega _k^{}\not \in I\).
We temporarily suppress the suffix “\(\zeta \)” so as not to overload the notation.
It may in principle happen for certain discrete values of s (but not of p) that different N-step paths lead to the same outcome \(\omega _{p}^{(N)}(s)\). However, since \(s>\frac{1}{2}\) is a continuous parameter, this degenerate situation is not generic. Note though that it may well happen that we humans “inadvertendly” pick precisely those non-generic cases, for instance if degeneracy occurs when \(s\in \mathbb {N}\)!
By substituting \(\pi /2\) for t and repeatedly using a trigonometric angle-halving identity one arrives at Viète’s infinite product for \(2/\pi \), allegedly the first infinite product ever proposed.
Those representations are not unique and one needs to consider their equivalence classes to identify them uniquely with their real outcome on [0, 1], cf. [8].
References
Berndt, B.C., Glasser, M.L.: A new class of Bessel function integrals. Aequ. Math. 16, 183–186 (1977)
Cloitre, B.: www.bcmathematics.monsite-orange.fr (2016)
Dettmann, C.P., Frankel, N.E., Taucher, T.: Structure factor of cantor sets. Phys. Rev. E 49, 3171–3178 (1994)
Dyson, F.J.: Birds and frogs. Not. AMS 56, 212–223 (2009)
Edwards, H.M.: Riemann’s Zeta Function. Dover Publications, Mineola (1974)
Garoni, T., Frankel, N.E.: On the ubiquity of the Lévy integral, its relationship with the generalised Euler-Jacobi series, and their asymptotics beyond all orders. Fractals 11, 93–100 (2003)
Glasser, M. L., unpublished manuscript (2016); in preparation for publication
Kac, M.: Statistical independence in probability, analysis, and number theory. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC (1959)
Kiessling, M.K.-H.: Order and chaos in some trigonometric series: curious adventures of a statistical mechanic. J. Stat. Phys. 150, 572–600 (2013)
Mandelbrot, B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, New York (1977)
Morrison, K.: Cosine products, Fourier transforms, and random sums. Am. Math. Mon. 102, 716–724 (1995)
Ninham, B.W., Hughes, B.D., Frankel, N.E., Glasser, M.L.: Möbius, Mellin, and mathematical physics. Phys. A 186, 441–481 (1992)
Peres, Y., Solomyak, B.: Absolute continuity of Bernoulli convolutions, a simple proof. Math. Res. Lett. 3, 231–239 (1996)
Peres, Y., Schlag, B., Solomyak, B.: Sixty years of Bernoulli convolutions. In: Bandt, C., Graf, S., Zahle, M. (eds.) Fractal Geometry and Stochastics II. Birkhäuser, Basel (2000)
Prohorov, YuV, Rozanov, YuA: Probability Theory. Springer, New York (1969)
Reed, M., Simon, B.: Functional Analysis. Academic Press, New York (1980)
Schumayer, D., Hutchinson, D.A.W.: Physics of the Riemann Hypothesis. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 307–330 (2011)
Schmuland, B.: Random harmonic series. Am. Math. Mon. 110, 407–416 (2003)
Sloane, N. J. A.: The online encyclopedia of integer sequences\(\textregistered \) (founded in 1964). https://oeis.org
Solomyak, B.: On the random series \(\Sigma \pm \lambda ^n\) (an Erdős problem). Ann. Math. 142, 611–625 (1995)
Watkin, M.R.: Statistical Mechanics and Number Theory. http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/physics2.htm
Acknowledgements
We truly thank: Benoit Cloitre for posing his problem; Alex Kontorovich for his enlightening explanations of the Riemann hypothesis; Norm Frankel and Larry Glasser for their interest in and helpful feedback on \(C_{p;s}^{}\); Neil Sloane for OEIS and for his comments; Doron Zeilberger for noting that the combinatorics in our evaluation of \(C_{p;s}^{}\) produces Catalan numbers. We also thank the referees for constructive comments. Some symbolic manipulations were obtained with MAPLE, as were the figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix on Power Walks
Appendix on Power Walks
If instead of a step size which decreases by the power law \(n\mapsto n^{-s}\) one uses an exponentially decreasing step size \(n\mapsto s^{-n}\) with \(s>1\), the outcome is a “random geometric series” (a sum over powers of 1 / s with random coefficients \(R_p^{}(n)\in \{-1,0,1\}\)),
the pertinent walks are called “geometric walks.” With more general random coefficients one simply speaks of “random power series” and their “power walks.”
All these random variables \(\Omega _{p}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(s)\) have characteristic functions with infinite trigonometric product representations obtainable from our (22) by replacing \({}^\zeta \rightarrow {}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}\) and \(n^{-s}\rightarrow s^{-n}\). Some of these can be evaluated in terms of elementary functions. We register a few special cases, beginning with three geometric walks and ending with a countable family of more general (but simple) power walks.
-
(i)
Setting \(p=1\) and \(s=2\) gives the chacteristic function (see formula (1) of [11])
$$\begin{aligned} \Phi ^{}_{\Omega _{1}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(2)}(t) = \prod _{n\in \mathbb {N}} \cos \left( \frac{t}{2^n}\right) \equiv \frac{\sin t}{t}, \end{aligned}$$(74)an infinite productFootnote 7 representation of the sinc function derived by Euler algebraically by exploiting the trigonometric angle-doubling formulas (see [11]). Recall that sinc\((t)=\int _{-1}^1\frac{1}{2} e^{it\omega }d\omega \) is the (inverse) Fourier transform of the PDF \(f_{\Omega ^{{\mathrm{unif}}}}(\omega )\) of the uniform random variable \(\Omega ^{{\mathrm{unif}}}\) on \([-1,1]\), i.e. \(f_{\Omega ^{{\mathrm{unif}}}}(\omega ) = \frac{1}{2}\) if \(\omega \in [-1,1]\), and \(f_{\Omega ^{{\mathrm{unif}}}}(\omega ) =0\) otherwise. Indeed, \(\Omega _{1}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(2)\) is a random walk representation of \(\Omega ^{{\mathrm{unif}}}\) equivalent to the binary representation of [0, 1]: recalling that any real number \(x\in [0,1]\) has a binary representationFootnote 8 \(x = 0.b_1b_2b_3\ldots \equiv \sum _{n\in \mathbb {N}} b_n /2^n\) with \(b_n\in \{0,1\}\), and noting that if \(x\in [0,1]\) then \(\omega :=2x-1\in [-1,1]\), it follows that any real number \(\omega \in [-1,1]\) has a binary representation \(\omega = \sum _{n\in \mathbb {N}} r_2^{}(n) /2^n\) with \(r^{}_2(n)\in \{-1,1\}\). It is manifest that any such representation of \(\omega \) is an outcome of \(\Omega _{1}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(2)\).
-
(ii)
\(\Omega _{1}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(3)\) is the random variable for which the characteristic function
$$\begin{aligned} \Phi ^{}_{\Omega _{1}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(3)}(t) = \prod _{n\in \mathbb {N}} \cos \left( \frac{t}{3^n}\right) =:\Phi ^{}_{\Omega ^{{\mathrm{Cantor}}}}(t/2) \end{aligned}$$(75)is a trigonometric product discussed in [11]. Morrison explains that \(\Phi ^{}_{\Omega ^{{\mathrm{Cantor}}}}(t)\) is the characteristic function of a random variable \({\Omega ^{{\mathrm{Cantor}}}}\) that is uniformly distributed over the Cantor set constructed from \([-1,1]\) by removing middle thirds ad infinitum. For uniform distributions on other Cantor sets, see [3]. We remark that this is a nice example of a random walk whose endpoints are distributed by a singular distribution, in the sense that the Cantor set obtained from \([-1,1]\) has Lebesgue measure 0. As pointed out to us by an anonymous referee, the distribution of \(\Omega _{1}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(s)\) is singular and concentrated on some Cantor set for all \(s>2\), while for \(1< s < 2\) the story is more complicated: Solomyak [20] proved that the distribution of \(\Omega _{1}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(s)\) is absolutely continuous (i.e., it is equivalent to a PDF, an integrable function) for almost every \(s \in (1, 2)\); see also [13]. However, the distribution of \(\Omega _{1}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(s)\) is not absolutely continuous for all \(s\in (1,2)\)—in 1939 Erdős found values of \(s\in (1,2)\) for which the distribution is singular; these are still the only ones known. See [14] for further reading.
-
(iii)
Setting \(p=\frac{2}{3}\) and \(s=3\) yields
$$\begin{aligned} \Phi ^{}_{\Omega _{2/3}^{{\mathrm{pow}}}(3)}(t) = \prod _{n\in \mathbb {N}}\left[ \frac{1}{3} +\frac{2}{3}\cos \left( \frac{t}{3^{n}}\right) \right] \equiv \frac{\sin (t/2)}{t/2} , \end{aligned}$$(76)which becomes formula (9) of [11] under the rescaling \(t\mapsto 2t\) (see also Exercise 3 on page 11 of [8].) Recalling our discussion of example (i), we conclude that (76) is the characteristic function of the uniform random variable on the interval \([-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}]\), expressed as a random walk equivalent to the ternary representation of the real numbers in [0, 1], shifted to the left by \(-\frac{1}{2}\).
-
(iv)
The sinc representations (74) and (76) (after rescaling \(t\mapsto 2t\)) are merely the first two members of a countable family of infinite trigonometric product representations of \(\sin t / t\) derived by Kent Morrison [11], and given by
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\sin t}{t} = \prod _{n\in \mathbb {N}}\sum _{m=1-s}^{s-1}\frac{1-(-1)^{s+m}}{2s} \cos \left( \frac{m}{s^n}t\right) ,\; 1<s\in \mathbb {N}; \end{aligned}$$(77)s even in (77) is formula (12) in [11], s odd in (77) is formula (13) in [11]. These representations of the characteristic function of the uniform random variable over \([-1,1]\) are obtained by considering random walks that enter with equal likelihood into any one of s branches which “s-furkate” off of every vertex of a symmetric tree centered at 0, equivalent to the usual “s-ary” representation of the real numbers in [0, 1] (shifted to the left by \(-\frac{1}{2}\) and scaled up by a factor 2). When \(s>3\) these are no longer random geometric series, but still simple random power series.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albert, L., Kiessling, M.KH. Order and Chaos in Some Deterministic Infinite Trigonometric Products. J Stat Phys 168, 595–619 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-017-1811-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-017-1811-1