Effect of Temperature and Composition on Density and Viscosity
The experimental data of density, ρ, and dynamic viscosity, η, as a function of mole fraction, x
1, of the {[BMPYR][TCM] (1) + benzothiophene (2)} system at different temperatures are listed in Table 2.
Table 2 Experimental density, ρ, excess molar volume, V
E, dynamic viscosity, η, and viscosity deviation, ∆η for the {[BMPYR][TCM] (1) + benzothiophene (2)} binary system as a function of temperature and composition
Fit parameters with R
2 = 1 for the empirical correlation (see Eqs. 1 and 2) of the density as a function of temperature (a
0, a
1and a
2) and concentration (b
i
), for pure substances and for mixtures, are listed in Tables 1S and 2S in the supplementary material (SM), respectively:
$$ \rho = a_{2} T^{2} + a_{1} T + a_{0} $$
(1)
$$ \rho = b_{4} x_{1}^{4} + b_{3} x_{1}^{3} + b_{2} x_{1}^{2} + b_{1} x_{1} + b_{0} $$
(2)
The density of [BMPYR][TCM] is lower than that of benzothiophene, but the viscosity is almost ten times higher. The densities of the IL range in values from 1.00076 g·cm−3 at T = 308.15 K (ρ = 1.00066 g·cm−3, extrapolated value from [22]) to 0.97100 g·cm−3 at T = 358.15 K, and of benzothiophene from 1.15081 g·cm−3 at T = 308.15 K to 1.10592 g·cm−3 at T = 358.15 K. Immiscibility in the binary solutions of {[BMPYR][TCM] (1) + benzothiophene (2)} was observed in our ternary LLE measurements [13, 28]. The data presented in this work do not cover the compositions at the immiscibility gap (see Figs. 1, 2).
The viscosity decreases with increasing benzothiophene content. The dynamic viscosity of the pure IL and the mixtures as a function of temperature, through the whole composition range, was correlated by the well-known Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann, VFT equation [29–31],
$$ \eta = CT^{0.5} \exp \left(\frac{D}{{T - T_{0} }}\right) $$
(3)
The fit parameters, determined empirically, are in general C,
D and T
0 when a linear relation is observed between logarithmic value of ηT
0.5 and (T − T
0)−1. For the best correlation of the experimental curves, the value of T
0 = 118.01 K (T
g,1 = 178.01 K [32] −60 K) was used in the calculations. A single value of the parameter T
0 was used for different concentrations. Figure 3 depicts the dynamic viscosity as a function of temperature. The temperature dependence of viscosity becomes distinctly nonlinear, especially at low benzothiophene content. The parameters C and D from Eq. 3 change smoothly with composition for the system, as shown in Table 3S in the supplementary material.
The composition dependence of viscosity was described by the following polynomial:
$$ \eta = c_{3} x_{1}^{3} + c_{2} x_{1}^{2} + c_{1} x_{1}^{{}} + c_{0} $$
(4)
The parameters of the correlation are listed in Table 4S in the supplementary material and the calculated lines are shown in Fig. 4. The dynamic viscosity of the IL changes from 20.56 mPa·s at T = 308.15 K to 6.47 mPa·s at T = 358.15 K, and for benzothiophene from 2.94 mPa·s at T = 308.15 K to 1.14 mPa·s at T = 358.15 K. The values of viscosity presented in this work are higher than that reported for [EMIM][TCM] [18], which was suggested as a very good entrainer for the extraction of sulfur compounds from alkanes. ILs exhibit high viscosities that are usually higher than those for molecular organic solvents. Both density and viscosity decrease with an increase of temperature.
The values of excess molar volumes, V
E
m
, of the mixtures formed from two polar compounds are the result of a number of effects which may contribute terms differing in sign. Disruption of H-bonds in the IL molecules makes a positive contribution, but specific interaction between two dissimilar molecules makes negative contributions to V
E
m
. The free-volume effect, which depends on differences in the characteristic pressures and temperatures of the components (described by Flory formalism [33]), makes a negative contribution. Packing effects or conformational changes of the molecules in the mixtures are more difficult to categorize. However, interstitial accommodation and the effect of the condensation give further negative contributions.
Experimental excess molar volume V
E
m
data of {[BMPYR][TCM] (1) + benzothiophene (2)} are listed in Table 2. The data were correlated by the well-known polynomial Redlich–Kister equation (Eq. 5):
$$ V_{m}^{\text {E}} = x_{1} (x_{1} - 1)\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{i = 3} {A_{i} (1 - 2x_{1} )}^{i - 1} $$
(5)
$$ \sigma_{V} = \left[ \left\{ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {(V_{m}^{{\text {E}({\text{exp}}.)}} - V_{m}^{{\text {E} ( {\text{calc}} . )}} )} /(n - k) \right\} \right]^{1/2} $$
(6)
where x
1 is the mole fraction of the IL and V
E
m
is the molar excess volume. The values of the parameters (A
i
) were determined using the least-squares method. The fit parameters are summarized in Table 5S in the supplementary material, along with the corresponding standard deviations, σ
V
, for the correlations (Eq. 6), where n is the number of experimental points and k is the number of coefficients. The values of V
E
m
, as well as the Redlich–Kister fits, are plotted in Fig. 5 as a function of the mole fraction. The V
E
m
values exhibit negative deviations from ideality over the entire composition range. The graph also shows the unsymmetrical variation of these excess molar volumes with composition. The minimum of V
E
m
is close to −1.8067 cm3·mol−1, at mole fraction x
1 = 0.3233 (at T = 308.15 K) and is shifted to lower values of mole fraction of the IL. The values of V
E
m
decrease as the temperature increases. The strength of interactions between the IL and benzothiophene is at its highest and most negative at the higher temperature. This has to be the result of a more efficient packing effect rather than due to interactions at higher temperature.
The values of the excess dynamic viscosity, Δη, are listed in Table 2. These values were correlated with the following Redlich–Kister equation:
$$ \varDelta \eta = x_{1} (x_{1} - 1)\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{i = 3} {B_{i} (1 - 2x_{1} )}^{i - 1} $$
(7)
$$ \sigma_{\Delta \eta } \, = \,\left[ { \left\{ \sum\limits_{{{{i}} = 1}}^{{n}} {(\Delta \eta^{{{ \exp } }} - \Delta\eta^{{{\text{calc}} }} )} /({{n}} - {{k}}) \right\} } \right]^{1/2} $$
(8)
The parameters are listed in Table 6S in the supplementary material. Figure 6 shows the positive values of the excess dynamic viscosity for this binary system with Δη
max minimally shifted to a lower IL mole fraction.
Effect of Temperature and Composition on the Surface Tension
The values of surface tension, σ, of [BMPYR][TCM] at different temperatures (308.15 K to 338.15 K) are listed in Table 3. Within the present study, the surface tension of [BMPYR][TCM] at T = 308.15 K is 48.04 mN·m−1. This value is much higher than those for other, mainly imidazolium, ILs [19], but is very similar to the tricyanamide-based IL [EMIM][TCM] measured by us (49.91 mN·m−1 at T = 298.15 K) [18]. The surface tension is much higher for the IL than for benzothiophene and decreases with increasing concentration of benzothiophene, implying that the benzothiophene molecules tend to adsorb at the air–solution interface due to it hydrophobicity. The surface tension decreases with an increase of temperature, which is typical for organic solvents.
Table 3 Experimental surface tension, σ, and surface tension deviation, ∆σ, for the {[BMPYR][TCM] (1) + benzothiophene (2)} binary system as a function of temperature and composition
The correlation of the surface tension as a function of temperature and composition was represented with the equations:
$$ \sigma = d_{1} T + d_{0} $$
(9)
$$ \sigma = e_{3} x_{1}^{3} + e_{2} x_{1}^{2} + e_{1} x_{1} + e_{0} $$
(10)
The obtained parameters are shown in Tables 7S and 8S in the supplementary material for temperature and composition dependences, respectively. The surface tension decreases with an increase of temperature and of benzothiophene content in the binary mixtures (see Figs. 7, 8).
The absence of a breakpoint in this mixture confirms the special interactions observed in the LLE in its ternary system [11–14]. These properties cannot be deduced using phase equilibrium data only. A regularly increasing value of the solution surface tension indicates that the two compounds, the IL and benzothiophene, are present at the gas/liquid interface. The [BMPYR][TCM] IL is a complex molecule, in which the Columbic forces, hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces all are present in the interaction between the cation and anion, as well as between the dissimilar molecules in the solution, with the hydrogen bonds being probably the most important forces in the IL at higher mole fractions. This can be explained by the high capacity of benzothiophene to form π-π interactions, making possible an easy accommodation of benzothiophene into the IL’s structure. On the other hand benzothiophene, in comparison with alcohols, is not a substance forming associates between similar molecules, and thus theoretically fewer molecules are free to interact with the IL in the solution and adsorb on the air–liquid surface. The surface tension of the {[BMPYR][TCM] + benzothiophene} solutions present formally similar patterns to those measured earlier [EMIM][TCM] [18]. According to our results, the regular decrease of the surface tension observed with decreasing IL mole fraction confirms that this behavior can be explained by strong interaction (IL + benzothiophene) within the investigated mole fraction region (see Fig. 8).
For the better understanding the results of this work, the surface tension deviation (Δσ) was calculated according to the equation:
$$ \Delta \sigma = \sigma - \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{2} {x_{i} \sigma_{i} } $$
(11)
where x
i
and Δσ
i
are the mole fraction and surface tension deviation of component i, respectively. The surface tension deviations were correlated by means of the Redlich–Kister equation in the following form:
$$ \Delta \sigma = x_{1} (x_{1} - 1)\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{i = 3} {C_{i} (1 - 2x_{1} )}^{i - 1} $$
(12)
where x
i
and Δσ
i
are the mole fraction and surface tension deviation of component i, respectively. The surface tension deviations at different temperatures are listed in Table 3. The values of parameters C
i
/(mN·m−1) have been determined using the least-squares method:
$$ \sigma_{\Delta \sigma } = \left[ \left\{ \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {(\Delta \sigma^{{{\text{exp}}}} - \Delta \sigma^{{{\text{calc}}}} )} /(n - k) \right\} \right]^{1/2} $$
(13)
The standard deviation, σ
Δσ
, is given by the formula (Eq. 13) where n is the number of experimental points and k is the number of coefficients. The parameters and standard deviations σ
Δσ
are listed in Table 9S in the supplementary material. The values of Δσ
i
are positive for all compositions of {[BMPYR][TCM] (1) + benzothiophene (22)} over the measured composition range as can be seen in Fig. 9. The maximum value of Δσ
i
is 5.36 N·m−1 and shifts to a lower mole fraction of the IL, x
1 = 0.3233 at T = 388.15 K. Values of Δσ
i
increase with an increase of temperature. This is similar to observations for [EMIM][TCM] [18], but opposite to that observed for (IL + an alcohol) binary mixtures [34–36]. Changes with temperature may be attributed to diminishing of the hydrogen bonding between cation and anion in the IL, and then a new distribution of interactions exists at the surface and in the bulk region.
The measurements of the surface tension as a function of temperature provide the possibility of calculating the surface thermodynamic functions in the measured temperature range (308.15–338.15) K. The surface entropy (S
σ) and the surface enthalpy (H
σ) were calculated from the following equations [37, 38]:
$$ S^{\sigma } = - \frac{\text{d}\sigma }{\text{d}T} $$
(14)
$$ H^{\sigma } = \sigma - T\left( {\frac{\text{d}\sigma }{\text{d}T}} \right) $$
(15)
The thermodynamic functions for [BMPYR][TCM] at T = 308.15 K are listed in Table 4. The surface entropy is quite high {S
σ = (55.00 ± 0.05) × 10−6 N·m−1·K−1 at T = 308.15 K}, but lower than that for [EMIM][TCM] {S
σ = (10.61 ± 0.08) × 10−5 N·m−1·K−1 at T = 298.15 K [18] }, and higher than those for many ionic liquids [16, 17, 19, 36]. The lower is the surface entropy, the lower is the surface organization of the solution. The lower value of entropy of the IL shows that the partial molar entropy of the IL decreases at the contact between the IL and air in the surface region. The surface enthalpy {H
σ = (64.98 ± 0.05) × 10−3 N·m−1 at T = 308.15 K} is lower than those observed for [EMIM][TCM] (T = 298.15 K) [18] and other ionic liquids [16, 17, 19, 36].
Table 4 Surface thermodynamic functions for the pure ionic liquid [BMPYR][TCM] at temperature T = 308.15 K: surface entropy, S
σ, surface enthalpy, H
σ, critical temperatures, \( T_{\text{c}}^{\text{E}} \) and \( T_{\text{c}}^{\text{G}} \), and surface energy, E
σ
Because of the negligible vapour pressure of the IL, the critical temperature, (T
c) can be estimated from the measurements of surface tension as a function of temperature according to following two formulae:
$$ \sigma \left( {\frac{M}{\rho }} \right)^{{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{$2$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 3}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{$3$}}}} = K\left( {T_{\text{c}}^{\text{E}} - T} \right) $$
(16)
$$ \sigma = E^{\sigma } \left( {1 - \frac{T}{{T_{c}^{\text{G}} }}} \right)^{{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{${11}$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{11} 9}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{$9$}}}} $$
(17)
The critical temperature may be calculated from the Eötvös equation, (Eq. 16) [39], where K is a constant, ρ/(g·cm−3) is the density, M/(g·mol−1) is the molar mass, T/(K) is the temperature of the measured surface tension σ/(N·m−1), and \( T_{\text{c}}^{\text{E}} \) /(K) is the Eötvös critical temperature. The critical temperature can be also calculated from the alternative van der Waals–Guggenheim equation (Eq. 17) for traditional organic liquids [38, 40], where E
σ is the total surface energy of the IL, which equals the surface enthalpy as long as there is negligible volume change due to thermal expansion at temperatures well removed from the Guggenheim critical temperature \( T_{\text{c}}^{\text{G}} \) /(K). The critical temperatures in this work, calculated from (Eqs. 16 and 17) and the total surface energy of the IL, are presented in Table 4. The two obtained values of the critical temperatures differ slightly from each other, (\( T_{\text{c}}^{\text{E}} \) /(K) = 1646 and \( T_{\text{c}}^{\text{G}} \) /(K) = 1377), and are higher than those of other ILs [16, 17, 19, 36]. The total surface energy of the IL is equal to 65.46 ± 0.05 mN·m−1 at T = 308.15 K, which is twice as large as that for 1-butyl-3-cyanopyridinium bis{(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl}imide, [BCN3Py][NTf2] [17], and similar to [EMIM][TCM] (T = 298.15 K) [18]. According to the corresponding states correlations, in both equations (Eqs. 16 and 17) the surface tension becomes null at the critical temperature [40].
Using the definition of parachor (Eq. 18) and the measured density in a range of temperature (308.15 to 338.15) K, the parachor was calculated and the values are listed in Table 5.
Table 5 The parachor, P, for the pure IL [BMPYR][TCM] in the temperature range T = (308.15–338.15) K
$$ P = \frac{{M\sigma^{1/4}}}{\rho } $$
(18)
The obtained value, 616.18 at T = 308.15 K (mN·m−1)1/4·cm3·mol−1, is similar to many values published earlier for other ILs [16, 17, 19, 36].