Abstract
We present a method to monitor continuously the electrical conductivity of the solutions in both compartments of a diaphragm cell in which diffusion is occurring. This allows a much smaller initial concentration difference to be applied across the diaphragm rather than the usual larger initial concentration difference. Together with an improved filling procedure and a more reproducible stirring device, these improvements lead to the determination of differential diffusion coefficients with accuracies comparable to those of the precise optical interferometric methods. This is shown for aqueous solutions of NaCl, KC1, Na2SO4, and MgSO4 at 25 °C. By using aqueous solutions of HC1, the H+-exchange properties of the diaphragm and its influence on the measurements become detectable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tyrrell, H.J.V., Harris, K.R.: Diffusion in Liquids. Butterworths, London (1984)
Robinson, R.A., Stokes, R.H.: Electrolyte Solutions, 2nd edn. Butterworths, London (1959)
Mills, R., Woolf, L.A.: The Diaphragm Cell. Australian National University Press, Canberra (1969)
Rard, J.A., Miller, D.G.: The mutual diffusion coefficients of Na2SO4–H2O and MgSO4–H2O at 25°C. J. Solution Chem. 8, 755–756 (1979)
Albright, J.A., Miller, D.G.: Mutual-diffusion coefficients at 25° in the system silver nitrate–water. J. Phys. Chem. 76, 1853–1857 (1972)
Miller, D.G., Rard, J.A., Epstein, L.B., Albright, J.G.: Mutual diffusion coefficients and ionic transport coefficients l ij of MgCl2–H2O at 25 °C. J. Phys. Chem. 88, 5739–5748 (1984)
Baird, J.K., Frieden, R.W.: Rigorous theory of the diaphragm cell when the diffusion coefficient depends upon concentration. J. Phys. Chem. 91, 3920–3923 (1987)
Cain, J.B., Baird, J.K.: Series integration of the diaphragm cell transport equation when the diffusion coefficient is a function of concentration. J. Chem. Phys. 97, 4368–4371 (1992)
Stokes, R.H.: An improved diaphragm-cell for diffusion studies, and some tests of the method. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 763–767 (1950)
Laity, R.W., Miller, M.P.: Diaphragm-cell method for constant mass diffusion measurements. Interionic diffusion and friction coefficients in molten silver nitrate-sodium nitrate mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. 68, 2145–2150 (1964)
Alberty, W.J., Greenwood, A.R., Kibble, R.F.: Diffusion coefficients of carboxylic acids. Trans. Faraday Soc. 63, 360–368 (1967)
Sanni, S.A., Hutchison, H.P.: The diaphragm cell method for diffusion measurements at temperatures up to 60°C. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 1, 1101–1104 (1968)
Tanaka, K., Hashitani, T., Tamamushi, R.: Modified diffusion cell and its application to the determination of activity coefficients. Trans. Faraday Soc. 66, 74–79 (1970)
Collins, A.F., Hall, D.C., Mills, R., Woolf, L.A.: A conductance-monitored diaphragm cell for diffusion measurements. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 4, 425–428 (1971)
Fell, C.J.D., Hutchison, H.P.: Use of diaphragm cell at elevated temperatures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 10, 303–307 (1971)
Samohyl, L.: Measurement of diffusion in binary nonelectrolyte solutions by the diaphragm method with in situ analysis. I. Apparatus and method of measurement. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 36, 2405–2414 (1971)
Sipek, M.: Stanoveni difusnich keoficientu elektrolytu diafragmovou metodou s kontinualni analyzou in stiu. Chem. Listy 77, 1200–1205 (1981)
Cussler, E.L., Dunlop, P.J.: An experimental comparison of the Gouy and diaphragm cell methods for studying isothermal diffusion. J. Phys. Chem. 70, 1880–1888 (1966)
Kiggen, H.J., Laumen, H.: Self-balancing high-precision ac Wheatstone bridge for observing diffusion processes in electrolyte solutions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 1761–1764 (1981)
de Groot, K.: Eine Meßmethode zur kontinuierlichen Beobachtung der Diffusion in Elektrolytlösungen. Thesis, RWTH Aachen (1991)
Miller, D.G.: Application of irreversible thermodynamics to electrolyte solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 71, 2639–2659 (1966)
Breer, J.: Kontinuierliche beobachtung der diffusion in flüssigkeiten mit einen michelson-interferometer. Thesis, RWTH Aachen (1990)
Acknowledgments
I thank Drs. Donald G. Miller (deceased) and Joseph A. Rard for their aid in preparing this manuscript for publication. The delay in publishing our results is due to circumstances beyond the control of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Suggested Improvement
Appendix: Suggested Improvement
We have also tried to monitor continuously the concentration changes in the bottom and top half cells by an optical method, because a combination of both methods would permit measuring multicomponent diffusion coefficients without much difficulty. Although our use of the optical method has not yet reached the accuracy of the conductivity method (the standard deviation is greater by a factor of 4–5), we want to outline its construction. For details the reader is referred to Ref. [22].
The cell is situated in one half-arm of a laser-based Michelson interferometer which is installed on a vibration-damped disk. This apparatus is situated in a cellar or ground floor to insure good mechanical and thermal stability. It is completely enclosed by an air thermostat. Two optically-flat windows are mounted in the bottom half cells and two in the top half cells so that the light can pass through without any distortion. The interference fringes and their change with time are recorded by two photo-diodes. Figure 3 shows one sample output: one can see that at the start the interference patterns become constant. This marks the end of the filling process, which again is done by pumping. Then the diffusion experiment starts, and the time intervals between following fringes increase. One can also discern that there are deviations from a completely smooth and even progress of the fringes. This is due to small temperature variations (±0.02 K), which are nearly impossible to avoid with an air thermostat because of the size of the apparatus. These temperature changes can lead to about one changed fringe in 5–8 h, as evidenced by the reference beam that passes completely through air, when the number of fringes passed in the half cells is about 100. Results with aqueous KC1, NaCl, and MgSO4 had a relative standard deviation of ca. 0.7 %.
Unfortunately, we no longer have the possibility to continue this work and improve the apparatus, especially to make it smaller and more compact, thus reducing the temperature variations. However, we want to communicate our preliminary results, because they are better than the traditional integral diffusion coefficient diaphragm cell measurements.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Breer, J., de Groot, K. & Schönert, H. Diffusion in the Diaphragm Cell: Continuous Monitoring of the Concentrations and Determination of the Differential Diffusion Coefficient. J Solution Chem 43, 71–82 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-013-0020-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-013-0020-z