Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Nonpolar Solvents on the Solubilization of Pepsin into Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Sodium Sulfosuccinate and Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Reverse Micelles

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solubilization of pepsin by bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) reverse micelles has been studied at 20C. Isooctane, cyclohexane and hexane were used as solvents, and n-butanol, amyl alcohol and hexanol were used as cosurfactants for CTAB. AOT concentrations were varied from 50 to 500 mM and pepsin concentrations were varied from 2 to 10 mg-mL−1. At 250 mM, AOT can solubilize more than 85% of the Pepsin in each solvent. The effect of aqueous-phase pH on the solubilization of Pepsin has been studied from pH 1 to 8. The maximum solubilization of pepsin was observed below the isoelectric point (pI = 1.5) of the protein at pH 1.0 with 300 mM of AOT. The CTAB solutions were prepared by dissolving CTAB in isooctane with varying concentrations (0–100% v/v) of n-butanol, amyl alcohol or hexanol cosurfactants. It was found that 5% cosurfactant with 100 mM of CTAB was sufficient to solubilize more than 90% of the total pepsin. Pepsin solubilization by AOT reverse micelles increases with increasing polarizability and molar volume of the solvents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. A. Hatton and J. F. Harewell (Ed.), Surfactant-based Separation Processes, (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989) p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Martinek, A. V. Levashov, N. Klyachko, Y. L. Khelnitri, and L. V. Berezin, Eur. J. Biochem. 155, 453 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. L. Luisi, M. Giocomini, M. P. Pieline, and B. H. Robinson, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 947, 209 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Q. Chang, J. Chem. Biotech. Bioeng. 46, 172 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Q. Chang, J. Chen, and L. Huizhou, Enzyme Microbiob. Tech. 16, 970 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. A. Krei and H. Husted, Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 99 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. L. Abbot and T. A. Hatton, Chem. Eng. Progress 31 (1988).

  8. O. H. Lowery, N. J. Rosenbrough, A. J. Farr, and R. J. Randall, J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Q. Lu, C. Hongyan, L. Kuanhong, and S. Yajun, Biochem. Eng. J. 145, 45 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Dekker, R. Hilhorst, and C. Laane, Anal. Biochem. 178, 217 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. R. Rabie and J. H. Vera, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 3665 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. B. Leodidis and T. A. Hatton, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 6400 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. H. Logdail and M. J. Slater (Ed), Solvent Extraction in the Process Industries, Vol. 2, (Elsevier, London, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Zulauf and H. F. Eicke, J. Phys. Chem. 83, 480 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. A. Martin and L. J. Magid, J. Phys. Chem. 85, 3938 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Wong, J. K. Thomas, and M. Gratzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 2391 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. M. Kosower, An Introduction to Physical Organic Chemistry, (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. J. Kamlet, J. L. Abbound, and R. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 6027 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Grei and H. Hustedt, Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 99 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Sivasamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sivasamy, A., Rasoanto, P.I., Ramabrahmam, B.V. et al. Effects of Nonpolar Solvents on the Solubilization of Pepsin into Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Sodium Sulfosuccinate and Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Reverse Micelles. J Solution Chem 34, 33–42 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-005-2066-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-005-2066-z

Keywords

Navigation