Advertisement

Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?

  • M. A. Rodríguez-PascuaEmail author
  • C. Benavente Escobar
  • L. Rosell Guevara
  • C. Grützner
  • L. Audin
  • R. Walker
  • B. García
  • E. Aguirre
Original Article

Abstract

The Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (Cusco, Peru) is one of the most important archaeological monuments in Peru and worldwide. Machu Picchu is classified as a UNESCO World Heritage site and at risk from climatic change. However, the seismic centennial history of Peru reports large earthquakes generated both along the subduction zone (Mw8) and on active crustal faults along the Andean Cordillera (Mw7). It is therefore important to know if Machu Picchu is located in an area of seismic hazard and then to take measures to mitigate potential seismic hazards. Due to the short historical earthquake catalogue (< 500 years) and the absence of significant recent instrumental seismicity in the site’s vicinity (radius of < 30 km), our knowledge about the seismic hazard in Machu Picchu is limited. The earthquakes of 1650 and 1950 affected Cusco city and surrounding areas, but without damage descriptions in Machu Picchu (80 km away) (Silgado Ferro 1978). In this study, we make the first attempt to use the analysis of earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs) and their differentiation from the effects generated by slope movements (creep) to investigate the past occurrence of strong earthquakes at the site. The application of geological structural analysis to the deformations observed in Machu Picchu shows two directions of the mean ground movement: N020° E and N110° E. Two earthquakes that affected Machu Picchu during its construction generated these directions. This kind of data should be used in the future to protect this important archaeological site.

Keywords

Machu Picchu Earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs) Ancient earthquakes Creep slope movement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements to the National Archaeological Park of Machu Picchu (NAPM, Ministry of Culture. Cusco, Peru) for their kind and strong support during the fieldwork. We are especially grateful to Fernando Astete Victoria (director of NAPM), Piedad Champi Monterroso (archaeologist, NAMP), and Ruth Verónica Ttito Mamani (geologist, NAPM).

Funding information

This work was supported by the Peruvian Project “Cusco-PATA” (Convenio 006-2016 FONDECYT), IRD, and by the Spanish Civil Society Rodríguez-Perucha.

References

  1. Audin L, Lacan P, Tavera H, Bondoux F (2008) Upper plate deformation and seismic barrier in front of Nazca subduction zone: the Chololo Fault System and active tectonics along the Coastal Cordillera, southern Peru. Tectonophysics 459:145–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.11.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benavente C, Delgado F, Taipe E, Audin L, Pari W (2013) Neotectónica y peligro sísmico en la región de Cusco. INGEMMET, Boletín Serie C: Geología Ambiental y Riesgo Geológico 55: 245 p & 1 mapGoogle Scholar
  3. Benavente C, Zerathe S, Audin L, Hall SR, Robert X, Delgado F, Team ASTER (2017) Active transpressional tectonics in the Andean forearc of southern Peru quantified by 10Be surface exposure dating of an active fault scarp. Tectonics 36(9):1662–1678.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017TC004523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouchard J, Carlotto V, Usselman P (1992) Machupicchu: Problemas de conservación de un sitio de ceja de selva. Boletín del Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos 21(3):905–927Google Scholar
  5. Cabrera J, Sébrier M (1998) Surface rupture associated with a 5.3-mb earthquake: the 5 April 1986 Cuzco earthquake and kinematics of the Chincheros-Quoricocha faults of the High Andes, Peru. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(1):242–255Google Scholar
  6. Canuti P, Margottini C, Mucho R, Casagli N, Delmonaco G, Ferretti A, Tarchi D (2005) Preliminary remarks on monitoring, geomorphological evolution and slope stability of Inca Citadel of Machu Picchu (C101-1). In: Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) Landslides. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 39–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28680-2_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlotto V, Cárdenas J, Fidel L (2007) La geología en la conservación de Machupicchu. Patrimonio y Geoturismo 1 (I). INGEMMET 305pGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuadra C, Karkee MB, Tokeshi K (2008) Earthquake risk to Inca’s historical constructions in Machupicchu. Advances in Engineering Software 39:336–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dziewonski AM, Chou TA, Woodhouse JH (1981) Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. Journal of Geophysical Research 86:2825–2852.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB086iB04p02825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewoński AM (2012) The global CMT project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 200–201:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ericksen GE, Concha JF, Silgado Ferro E (1954) The Cusco, Peru, earthquake of May 21, 1950. Bull Seismol Soc Am 44(2A):97–112Google Scholar
  12. Giner-Robles JL, Silva Barroso PG, Pérez-López R, Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Bardají Azcárate, T, Garduño-Monroy VH, Lario Gómez J (2011) Evaluación del daño sísmico en edificios históricos y yacimientos arqueológicos. In: Aplicación al estudio del riesgo sísmico. Proyecto EDASI. Serie Investigación. Fundación MAPFRE, p 96Google Scholar
  13. Giner-Robles JL, Pérez-López R, Silva PG, Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Martín-González F, Cabañas L (2012) Análisis estructural de danos orientados en el terremoto de Lorca del 11 de mayo de 2011a. Aplicaciones en Arqueosismología. Bol Geol Min 123(4):503–513Google Scholar
  14. Giner-Robles JL, Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Silva PG, Pérez-López R (2018) Efectos sísmicos en yacimientos arqueológicos: catalogación y cuantificación arqueosismológica. Boletín Geológico y Minero 129(1/2):451–467.  https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.129.1.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giner-Robles JL, Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Silva PG, Roquero E, Pérez-López R, Bardají T, Elez J, Perucha MA (2019) Geological structural analysis applied to seismic deformation in cultural heritage. J Seismol (this volume)Google Scholar
  16. Glave LM, Remy MI (1983) Estructura agraria y vida rural en una región andina/Ollantaitambo entre los siglos XVI y XIX. Centro de Estudios Andinos “San Bartolomé de las Casas. Arhcivos de Historia Andina 3, 584pGoogle Scholar
  17. Hinzen KG, Montabert A (2017) Rectangular blocks vs polygonal walls in archaeoseismology. Ann Geophys 60(4):S0443.  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kauffmann F (2014) Machu Picchu, Inca Treasure. Gheller Ediciones, Lima 129pGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee JC, Angelier J (1994) Paleostress trajectory maps based on the results of local determinations: the “lissage” program. Comput Geosci 20(2):161–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(94)90004-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Macharé J, Benavente C, Audin L (2009) Síntesis descriptiva del mapa neotectónico. INGEMMET, Boletín, Serie C: Geodinámica e Ingeniería Geológica 40:103pGoogle Scholar
  21. Pecchioli L, Cangi G, Marra F (2018) Evidence of seismic damages on ancient Roman buildings at Ostia: an arch mechanics approach. J Archaeol Sci Rep 21:117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perfettini H, Avouac JP, Tavera H, Kositsky A, Nocquet JM, Bondoux F, Chlieh M, Sladen A, Audin L, Farber DL, Soler P (2010) Seismic and aseismic slip on the Central Peru Megathrust. Nature 465(6):78–81.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Pérez-López R, Silva PG, Giner-Robles JL, Garduño-Monroy VH, Reicherter K (2011) A comprehensive classification of earthquake archaeological effects (EAE) for archaeoseismology. Quat Int 242:20–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.04.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Silva PG, Pérez-López R, Giner-Robles JL, Martín-González F, Perucha MA (2013) Preliminary intensity correlation between macroseismic scales (ESI07 and EMS98) and earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs). 4th International INQUA Meeting on Paleoseismology, Active Tectonics and Archeoseismology (PATA) 221–224Google Scholar
  25. Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Pérez-López R, Garduño-Monroy VH, Perucha MA, Israde-Alcántara I (2017) Estimation of the epicentral area of the 1912 Acambay earthquake (M 6.9, Mexico) determined from the earthquake archaeological effects (EAE) and the ESI07 macroseismic scale. Quat Int 451:74–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.06.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rowe JH (1990) Machu Picchu a la luz de los documentos del siglo XVI. Histórica 14(1):139–154Google Scholar
  27. Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang G, Wang F, Benavente E, Ugarte D, Astete FV (2005) Landslide investigation in Machu Picchu World Heritage, Cusco, Peru (C101-1). In: Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) Landslides. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 39–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28680-2_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silgado Ferro E (1978) Historia de los sismos más notables ocurridos en el Perú (1513-1974). Serie C Geodinámica e Ingeniería Geológica 3 http://bases.bireme.br/cgi-bin/wxislind.exe/iah/online/?IsisScript=iah/iah.xis&src=google&base=DESASTRES&lang=p&nextAction=lnk&exprSearch=9644&indexSearch=ID
  29. Suárez G, Molnar P, Burchfiel BC (1983) Seismicity, fault plane solutions, depth of faulting, and active tectonics of the Andes of Peru, Ecuador, and southern Colombia. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 88(B12):10403–10428.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB12p10403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tavera H, Agüero C, Fernández E (2016) Catálogo general de isosistas para sismos peruanos. Repositorio institucional - IGP. http://repositorio.igp.gob.pe/handle/IGP/791
  31. Torres HE (2014) Builders in pre-Hispanic Peruvian Andes: analytical approaches to knowledge their seismic resistance, in 9th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions. Peña F, Chávez M (eds), Mexico City, www.hms.civil.uminho.pt/sahc/2014/topic08-fullpaper034.pdf, last accessed June of 2019.
  32. Valcárcel LE (1964) Machu Picchu el más famoso monumento arqueológico del Perú. Editorial Eudeba, Buenos Aires, 103pGoogle Scholar
  33. Vega Centeno DM, Astete Victoria F, Palomino Sotomayor A, Uniysonco Pérez MM, Ccauca Marcavillaca R, Bastante Abuhadba JM, Aragón Collavino M, Portugal Velásquez J, Canal Beisaga R (2014) Machupicchu 100 años después. Ministerio de Cultura, Cusco, p 40Google Scholar
  34. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002Google Scholar
  35. Wimpenny S, Copley A, Benavente Escobar CL, Aguirre E (2018) Extension and Dynamics of the Andes inferred from the 2016 Parina (Huarichancara) Earthquake. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 123(9):8198–8228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yépez Valdés W (2001) Un intento…, para Machu Picchu. Visión Cultural (Instituto Nacional de Cultura – Cusco) 4:96–102Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Rodríguez-Pascua
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Benavente Escobar
    • 2
    • 3
  • L. Rosell Guevara
    • 2
  • C. Grützner
    • 4
  • L. Audin
    • 5
  • R. Walker
    • 6
  • B. García
    • 2
  • E. Aguirre
    • 2
  1. 1.Geological Survey of Spain (IGME)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Instituto Geológico Minero y Metalúrgico - INGEMMETLimaPeru
  3. 3.Especialidad Ingeniería Geológica, Facultad de Ciencias e IngenieríaPontificia Universidad Católica del PerúLimaPeru
  4. 4.Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Institute of Geological SciencesJenaGermany
  5. 5.Université Grenoble Alpes, IRD, IFSTTAR, CNRS, ISTerreGrenobleFrance
  6. 6.COMET, Dept. of Earth SciencesOxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations