Linear morphogenic earthquakes are large-magnitude earthquakes that are capable of generating or modifying the surface morphology instantaneously and permanently (Caputo 2005). It is well known that large earthquakes of magnitude >6–7 with shallow focal depths can produce distinctive co-seismic surface ruptures and cause strong ground deformation (Yeats et al. 1997; Lin et al. 2010, 2015a, 2015b). Co-seismic surface ruptures and ground deformation structures are generally characterized by distinctive landforms, for example, characterized by horizontal and vertical offsets of topographic markers such as streams, gullies, mountain ridges, flexure-folds of the ground surface, fault scarps, and surficial sediments. Geomorphological and field investigations of such features are relatively straightforward and can yield considerable information regarding fault mechanisms and the mechanics of large earthquakes. Co-seismic surface ruptures produced by the 2014 Nagano earthquake (E1) were observed both at the two trenches and at the fault outcrop analyzed in this study. Based on the observed topographic features and geological structures including faults and deformation of sediments, we identified seven linear morphogenic earthquakes (E2–E8) that occurred prior to the 2014 Nagano earthquake (E1); three of these correspond to historically recorded earthquakes that occurred in the study area, as discussed below (Fig. 13).
Event 2
At Loc. 5, all the sedimentary units exposed in the fault outcrop formed during the last millennium. Unit 5 is the youngest deposit (excepting the modern soil) that is composed of wedge-shaped fill and in tectonic contact with unit 4. Units 4 and 5 are bounded by faults F2–F4 (Fig. 12). This setting suggests that the most recent faulting event prior the 2014 earthquake occurred during the formation of unit 5, during the last 107 years BP (AD 1806–AD 1930; Table 1). Historical records show that an Mw 6.5 earthquake occurred on 11 November 1918 at the southern end of the Kamishiro Fault (Fig. 1b; Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion 2000), causing extensive damage and producing a 1-km long surface rupture zone in the northern Nagano Prefecture (Utsu et al. 1987; National Astronomical Observatory of Japan 2015). The geodetic and seismic analyses show that the seismogenic fault of the 1918 earthquake is a thrust fault striking N15°E and dipping east at angle of 75° (Tada and Hashimoto 1988), coincident with the Kamishiro Fault. We, thus, infer that this historical event corresponds to the most recent faulting event (E2) recognized in the fault outcrop.
Event 3
A penultimate faulting event (E3) identified at Loc. 5 within the fault outcrop wall occurred during the period between 193 and 457 years BP (AD 1733–1807 and AD 1418–1456; Table 1). The loose soil of unit 6 overlies the weakly consolidated sand–soil of unit 7, with an age gap of ca. 250 years (Fig. 12). Both units are fault-bounded and are in contact with unit 3 by fault F5. We infer that the sediments of unit 6 were sourced from a kind of colluvial material (formed at 193 years BP; Table 1) that overlies unit 7, on account of collapse of the F5 fault scarp after the formation of unit 7, possibly suggesting the occurrence of a morphogenic earthquake that occurred right before the formation of unit 6 (193 years BP or AD 1733–1897). Historical records describe a severe damaging following an Mw 6.8 earthquake in the southern area of the Kamishiro Fault on 23 July 1791 (Fig. 1b; Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion 2000; Utsu et al. 1987; Tokyo Astronomical Observatory, 2015). Accordingly, we suggest that the penultimate seismic faulting event identified in this study could be associated with the 1791 Mw 6.8 earthquake.
Based on the structural features observed in the exposed wall and topographic profile measured at Loc. 5, the amount of vertical offset across faults F1–F5 is 1.8 m, while the co-seismic vertical offset related to the 2014 event was 0.6 m (Figs. 7 and 12). These data indicate that the pre-existing fault scarp of 1.8 m is likely cumulative of two or more faulting events with magnitudes comparable to the 2014 earthquake. These older events occurred after formation of the alluvial deposits of unit 4 (1013 years BP; Table 1). An accumulation of vertical offset caused by multiple faulting events is also observed at Loc. 3, where the vertical offset on a pre-existing fault scarp is 1.3 m, while the 2014 co-seismic vertical offset is 0.6 m (Fig. 5). Furthermore, the slope angle in the upper part of the pre-existing fault scarp becomes gentler above a knick point (Fig. 9). Radiocarbon ages reveal that the fault scarp formed after the formation of sediments during the period of 1260–1018 years BP (AD 671–1017, Table 1).
The horizontal component of slip observed at trench A along faults F4 and F5 is estimated to be >1.5 m, while during the 2014 Mw 6.2 earthquake, it was only 0.7 m (fault F4). These data show that at least one slip event along fault F4, prior to the 2014 earthquake, occurred after the formation of unit 4 (1013–1121 years BP or AD 801–AD 989; Table 1).
Based on the observed topographic features and geological structures, as well as the 14C ages, we infer that two or three morphogenic events occurred prior to the 2014 earthquake in the last ca. 1000–2000 years at Locs. 3 and 5; these events probably correspond to the E2 and E3 events.
Event 4
The third event back (E4) inferred at Loc. 3 occurred during the period of 1080–1260 years BP, during the formation of unit 3 (AD 941–1017 and AD 671–778; Table 1). Unit 2, which yields 14C ages of 1502–1748 years BP, overlies the younger unit 3, which yield ages of 1080–1260 ± 20 years BP. Seven organic soil samples of unit 2 taken from the hanging wall of fault F5 yield consistent radiocarbon ages in the range of 1502–1748 years BP (Table 1), except for sample 2015-C26 (1210 years BP), which was collected at a shallower depth near the present-day surface; these dates are older than those of units 3 and 4 in the footwall of fault F5. These ages show that unit 2 overthrust the younger sediments of units 3 and 4 after the formation of unit 3, indicating that a seismic faulting event occurred during the period of 1080–1260 years BP (AD 671–AD 1017). Alternatively, the soil–sand layers of unit 4 unconformably overlie the older surficial soil materials of unit 5 and alluvial deposits of unit 6 along fault F3 (Fig. 9), suggesting that a faulting event occurred sometime during the period of formation of unit 4 (1150–1635 years BP or AD 377–AD 970) and unit 5 (1402–1761 years BP or AD 352–AD 636, Table 1).
Historical documents record a strong earthquake that caused extensive damage in the northern Nagano Prefecture on 3 August AD 841 (Utsu et al. 1987). Based on the damage distribution, this earthquake is inferred to have occurred on the active fault system of the ISTL, and its magnitude is estimated to have been 6.5 < Mw < 7.0 (Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion 1996). Accordingly, we suggest that one event (E4) corresponds to the AD 841 earthquake.
Event 5
At Loc. 3, the alluvial sediments of unit 4 unconformably overlie an old surficial soil (unit 5). This yellowish soil–sand layer of unit 4 is irregularly fault-bounded and overlain and underlain by dark-gray soil and soil with gravel layers (units 5 and 3, respectively). Based on the sediments and fault structures, we infer that a faulting event (E5) occurred during the period of 1492–1761 years BP (AD 538–AD 352), during the formation of the old dark-gray surficial soil of unit 5 (Fig. 9 and Table 1).
The topographic profile at Loc. 3 (Fig. 5) shows that a 0.6-m high co-seismic fault scarp caused by the 2014 earthquake coincides with the location of a 1.3-m high pre-existing fault scarp. The slope angle of the pre-existing fault scarp changes from 40° in the lower part of the scarp to 20° in the upper part. Considering the change in slope of the fault scarp and the amount of vertical offset caused by the 2014 earthquake, we infer that two faulting events occurred at this site after the formation of the old surficial soil of unit 5 (1492–1761 years BP or AD 215–AD 636; Table 1), with magnitudes similar to that of the 2014 earthquake.
Event 6
At Loc. 4, the radiocarbon ages of the soil deposits of unit 3 (2514–2589 years BP or BC 542–BC 812 ) are older than those of the brownish-gray soil layers of unit 4 (2243–2370 years BP or BC 318–BC 515; Table 1). Unit 4 is mainly composed of brownish-gray soil with minor amounts of weakly carbonized plant roots and is comparable in color and composition to the overlying soil deposits of unit 3. The 2014 Mw 6.2 earthquake caused horizontal shortening of 0.4–0.6 m across fault F3 (Lin et al. 2015a; Fig. 11), with a horizontal displacement of >2 m (Fig. 11). The occurrence of old soil overlaying younger soil and the structural features show that the soil deposits of unit 3 were thrust upon those of unit 4, indicating that at least one thrusting event occurred during the period of 2243–2370 years BP (BC 207–BC 515) after the formation of unit 4.
The topographic profiles at Loc. 4 also show the presence of a pre-existing step-shaped fault scarp with a change in slope angle at a knick-point (Figs. 6 and 11). The older vertical offset of 0.6–0.7 m is similar to that caused by the 2014 Nagano earthquake. This topographic feature also reveals that a fault-scarp-forming event occurred after the formation of unit 3. Therefore, we infer that at least one faulting event (E6) occurred after the formation of unit 4 (2243–2370 years BP or BC 207–BC 515).
At Loc. 3, the deposits of unit 6, which formed during 2059–3156 years BP (BC 166–BC 1499), unconformably overlie the alluvial deposits of units 7 and 8 (Fig. 9; Table 1). Based on the structural and sedimentary features of the deposits of unit 6, we tentatively infer that the boundary between units 6 and 7 is a fault (F2), along which the deposits of unit 6 were thrust over unit 7. This relationship suggests that a faulting event occurred during the formation of unit 6, during the period of 2059–3156 years BP (BC 166–BC 1499), possibly corresponding to event E5 recognized at Loc. 5.
Event 7
At Loc. 4, the deposits of unit 5, which formed at 3325 years BP, unconformably overlie (across fault F2) the sand–soil layers of unit 6 and the older surficial soil of unit 7 (4491–5470 years BP or BC 4260–BC 3092) (Fig. 11 and Table 1). On the northeast sides of both the northern and southern trench walls, the deposits of units 6 and 7 are cut and deformed by fault F2, across which the thickness of deposits changes sharply. Based on these structural features, we infer that a faulting event (E7) occurred after the formation of unit 5, in the period BC 1683–BC 1529 (3325 years BP).
The E7 faulting event is also identified at Loc. 3, where alluvial deposits of unit 7, which formed during the period of 2981–3733 years BP (BC 1118–BC 2205), are cut and folded by fault F2 and are overlain by alluvial deposits of the lower part of unit 6, which yields radiocarbon ages of 3096–3156 years BP (BC 1499–BC 1287, sample nos. 2015-C04 and 2015-C07). These relationships indicate that a faulting event occurred during the period of 2981–3733 years BP (BC 1118–BC 2205). Considering the error range of radiocarbon ages, we suggest that this event is associated with faulting event E7, as inferred at Loc. 4 (see above).
Event 8
Event E8 is identified at Loc. 4, where the dark-gray soil of unit 8, which yields ages of 5611–5986 years BP (BC 4361–BC 4948, sample nos. 2015-C34, and 2015-C40 to 2015-C43; see Fig. 11), is injected into the underlying sand–pebble alluvial deposits of unit 9. Unit 8 is covered by old surficial soils of unit 7 which formed at 4591–5470 years BP (BC 4260–BC 3092). This injection vein of soil materials indicates that a faulting event occurred in the period of 5611–5986 years BP (BC 4361–BC 4948), after the formation of unit 8 and prior to the formation of unit 7 (Fig. 11). After the formation of unit 9, the sand–pebble alluvial fan deposits were uplifted, and the old surficial soils of unit 7, which are brown–gray in color and contain numerous weakly carbonized plant roots, formed. Event E8 is the oldest faulting event identified in this study.