Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Polarization Image Fusion Approach Using Local Energy and MDLatLRR Algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Russian Laser Research Aims and scope

Abstract

Polarization is one of the inherent properties of light that human eyes cannot recognize. The polarized image collected by the optical system can be used for target detection, image enhancement, and dehazing. Nevertheless, a single image only represents certain polarization information on the targets. The fusion of images representing different polarization information is more beneficial to improve the image quality. Therefore, in this paper, we utilize a multiscale decomposition method to decompose the polarization degree image and intensity images into a base layer and detail layers. The local energy method is then used to fuse the base layer, and the nuclear norm is utilized to combine the detail layers. The fused base and detail layers are reconstructed to obtain the final fusion image. The proposed method is analyzed and compared to six state-of-the-art algorithms to exactly evaluate how effective it is. Experiments show that our method increases the contrast and clarity of the fusion image and has excellent details and texture. In addition, the outline of the fused image is clear, and the target is prominent, which is conducive to the target recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. X. Wang, J. Zhao, and S. Jing, Spacecr. Recovery Remote Sens., 42, 9 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Kui, “Research on Remote Sensing Image Fusion Algorithm Based on Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform,” Ph. D. Theses, Anhui University, China (2015) [in Chinese].

  3. D. Y. Po and M. N. Do, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 15, 1610 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Wang, J. Meng, Y. Zhou, et al., J. Russ. Laser Res., 42, 443 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Li, Y. Lin, and X. Qu, Inf. Fusion, 71, 109 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Li and X. J. Wu, “Multifocus image fusion using dictionary learning and low-rank representation,” in: International Conference on Image and Graphics, Springer (2017), p. 675.

  7. J. Zhang, J. Shao, J. Chen, et al., Opt. Lett., 45, 1507 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Zhang, J. Shao, J. Chen, et al., Pattern Recognition, 118, 108045 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Li, X.-J. Wu, and J. Kittler, IEEE Trans. Image Process,, 29, 4733 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2020.2975984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Zhang, Y. F. Bao, and L. Ji, Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 52, 135 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Liu, Z. Lin, and Y. Yu, “Robust subspace segmentation by low-rank representation,” in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel, 2010; Omnipress (2010), p. 663.

  12. G. Liu and S. Yan, “Latent low-rank representation for subspace segmentation and feature extraction,” in: 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, Spain, 2011; IEEE Computer Society (2011), p. 1615; https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126422

  13. X. Zhang, G. Yang, Y. Yang, and J. Huang, Ship Electron. Eng., 36, 40 (2016) [in Chinese].

  14. J. Ma, C. Chen, C. Li, and J. Huang, Inf. Fusion, 31, 100 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Liu, X. Chen, J. Cheng, et al., Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolut. Inf. Process., 16, 1850018 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219691318500182

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Bai, and L. Zhang, Infrared Phys. Technol., 83, 227 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Ma, Z. Zhou, B. Wang, and H. Zong, Infrared Phys. Technol., 82, 8 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Zhou, W. Bo, L. Sun, and M. Dong, Inf. Fusion, 30, 227 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Roberts, J. van Aardt, and F. Ahmed, J. Appl. Remote. Sens., 2, 1 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2945910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Hossny, S. Nahavandi, and D. Creighton, Electron. Lett., 44, 1066 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20081754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y.-J. Rao, Meas. Sci. Technol., 8, 355 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/8/4/002

  22. H. R. Sheikh and A. C. Bovik, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 15, 430 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2005.859378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shifeng Wang.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, S., Meng, J., Zhang, P. et al. A Polarization Image Fusion Approach Using Local Energy and MDLatLRR Algorithm. J Russ Laser Res 43, 715–724 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-022-10099-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-022-10099-2

Keywords

Navigation