Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fishing in a Puddle of Doubt and Disbelief?: A Rejoinder to the Speed et al. Commentary

  • Philosophical Exploration
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the article “Religiously/Spiritually Involved, but in Doubt or Disbelief—Why? Healthy?”, Mrdjenovich (in J Relig Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0711-2, 2018) explored the practices of religious attendance and prayer among atheists and agnostic theists. Speed et al. (in J Relig Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01109-1, 2020) offered a commentary regarding Mrdjenovich’s (2018) article with attention to moderators of associations between religious/spiritual constructs and health outcomes. In this rejoinder, I review Speed et al.’s (2020) commentary and I identify a number of concerns, both with their observations and ostensive oversights involving qualitative research methodology, the utility of survey data, the domain of belief, and the impact of calls for a pluralistic approach in the religion-heath research field. I conclude that Mrdjenovich does not misunderstand mechanisms of the (non)religion-health relationship as much as Speed et al. seem to misinterpret Mrdjenovich’s (2018) purpose, perspective, and default position on the issues. I reiterate that a concerted effort is required to study health outcomes among religious minorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For example, health care providers (physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, etc.) might employ secular analogs of religious/spiritual constructs to reach the broadest group of patients (Carey & Mathisen, 2018; Koenig, 2007). Such an approach is distinct from using religious/spiritual or faith-integrated versions of secular treatments (Koenig, 2005).

  2. I suspect, although I am always prepared to be wrong, that such statements could be interpreted in very different ways depending on the theistic orientation of the reader and whether the reader imagines what the author’s theistic orientation might be. Recently, I conducted a survey of authors in the religion–health research field concerning their perceptions and practices of disclosing their theistic orientation in the context of their journal articles (Mrdjenovich, 2020). It may be that such disclosures would help researchers contextualize each other’s work.

References

  • Ai, A. L., Peterson, C., Tice, T. N., Bolling, S. F., & Koenig, H. G. (2004). Faith-based and secular pathways to hope and optimism sub-constructs in middle-aged and older cardiac patients. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ai, A. L., Wink, P., Gall, T. L., Dillon, M., & Tice, T. N. (2017). Assessing reverence in contexts: A positive emotion related to psychological functioning. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 57, 64–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review. Psychology and Health, 15, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, L. B., & Mathisen, B. A. (2018). Spiritual care for allied health practice: A person-centered approach. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, L. W. (2018). Focusing on the nonreligious reveals secular mechanisms underlying well-being and prosociality. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10, 296–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15, 446–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K., Hammer, J. H., & Cragun, R. T. (2011). Extending religion-health research to secular minorities: Issues and concerns. Journal of Religion and Health, 50, 608–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz, N. K., Champion, V. L., & Strecher, V. J. (2002). The Health Belief Model. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory research and practice (Vol. 3, pp. 45–66). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (2005). Faith and mental health. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (2007). Spirituality in patient care. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G., King, D. E., & Carson, V. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health (Vol. 2). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, C. J., & Mrdjenovich, A. J. (2013). Patient preference clinical trials: Why and when they will sometimes be preferred. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 56, 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, C. J., & Mrdjenovich, A. J. (2017). Beware dichotomies. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 59, 517–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrdjenovich, A. J. (2018). Religiously/spiritually involved, but in doubt or disbelief—Why? Healthy? Journal of Religion and Health, 58, 1488–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrdjenovich, A. J. (2020). Authors disclosing their theistic orientation in journal articles on religion and health? Journal of Religion and Health, 59, 651–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R.A. (2014). Ethics for experimental manipulation of religion. Retrieved May 24, 2019 from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e4ad/eb89a2902f8ba8c71d6d559d167e32896df8.pdf

  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34, 1189–1208.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, D. (2017). Unbelievable?! Theistic/epistemological viewpoint affects religion–health relationship. Journal of Religion and Health, 56, 238–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, D. (2018). Mixed blessings? Religion/spirituality predicts better and worse screening behaviours. Journal of Religion and Health., 57, 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, D., & Fowler, K. (2016). What’s God got to do with it? How religiosity predicts atheists’ health. Journal of Religion and Health, 55, 296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, D., & Fowler, K. (2017). Good for all? Hardly! Attending church does not benefit religiously unaffiliated. Journal of Religion and Health, 56, 986–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, D., & Hwang, K. (2017). Heretic, heal thyself! Atheism, nonreligion, and health. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, D., Hwang, K., Galen, L. W., et al. (2020). In Doubt and Disbelief: How Mrdjenovich 2018 Misunderstands the (Non)Religion–Health Relationship. Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01109-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. R., Pargament, K. I., Kunik, M. E., Lomax, J. W., II., & Stanley, M. A. (2012). Psychological distress among religious nonbelievers: A systematic review. Journal of Religion and Health, 51, 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P. J., & Coleman, P. G. (2010). Strong beliefs and coping in old age: A case-based comparison of atheism and religious faith. Aging and Society, 30, 337–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodberry, R., et al. (2012). The measure of American religious traditions: Theoretical and measurement considerations. Social Forces, 91, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam J. Mrdjenovich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no conflicts or competing interests to report.

Ethical approval

This research complies with The Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct of the American Psychological Association.

Human and Animal Rights

Human research participants were not involved.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mrdjenovich, A.J. Fishing in a Puddle of Doubt and Disbelief?: A Rejoinder to the Speed et al. Commentary. J Relig Health 61, 2323–2330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01200-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01200-1

Navigation