Skip to main content
Log in

‘I Do Not Exist’: Pathologies of Self Among Western Buddhists

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a clinical case involving a patient suffering ‘depersonalisation’ who had a psychotic episode at a Buddhist retreat. Recent writing on possible psychological risks of meditation has discussed problems of depersonalisation associated with misunderstandings of the Buddhist conception of non-self (anātman) and emptiness (śūnyatā). Drawing on the work of Winnicott and Bion, this article helps us to realise some of what is at stake in the failure to achieve and maintain an effective sense of self. What does Buddhist talk of non-self really mean? What conditions enable a creatively engaged and meaningful relational life, a sense of aliveness, human flourishing and a capacity for alterity?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All identifying details have been changed to protect anonymity Eve is an anonymous, fictionalised amalgam of patients suffering disorders of self.

  2. Those who have taken bodhisattva vows incur a major root downfall if they teach scriptures relating to śūnyatā to those who are not ready, causing them to be terrified and then fall away from the path (Goodman 2016, pp. 64–65). The bodhisattva vows derive from the Ākāśagarbha Sūtra via Shantideva’s Shikshasamuccaya. A bodhisattva is one who, out of compassion, undertakes to bring all beings to the state of perfect Buddhahood.

  3. This phrase is an allusion to the third of Descartes’ Meditations (1664), concerning the relation between the res cogitans and the infinity of God.

  4. Holiness as defined by Rudolf Otto is ganze andere–wholly other.

  5. Empathy, as I understand it, has a complex linguistic history. Einfühlung was originally coined by the philosopher von Herder (1744–1803), in his text This Too a Philosophy of History for the Formation of Humanity (1774). Herder argued that it requires imagination to feel one’s way into another via Einfühlung 'feeling-with' or 'feeling into' what is different. Difference is the critical word here, for empathy is not based on identification but is heteropathic. Einfühlung as an inter-personal activity can be seen as an imaginative act that seeks to cross the divide between different forms of self-consciousness, different view-points, different cultures. Theodor Lipps extended Einfühlung to interpersonal understanding, viewing it as the primary mode by which we are able to feel our way into another’s reality. Lipps saw Einfühlung and sympathy as synonymous. Yet the American psychologist Titchener (1867–1927) held that Einfühlung and sympathy were not the same, so in 1909 coined the term ‘empathy’ to translate Einfühlung. Empathy came to be used extensively to depict our capacity to feel into another person’s experience. Sympathy came to be regarded rather derogatorily as a lesser capacity tinged with sentimentalism.

References

  • Bion, W. (1959). Attacks on linking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 40(5–6), 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1962). Learning from experience. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1963). Elements of psychoanalysis. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York, N.Y: Charles. Scribner’s Sons. (Original work published 1923).

  • Clark, G. (1983). A black hole in psyche. Harvest, 29, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. (1996). Lévinas: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1999). Adieu to Emmanuel Lévinas (P. Brault & M. Naas, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1997).

  • Dugas, L., & Moutier, F. (1911). La Dépersonnalisation. Paris: Felix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M. (1993). The psychotic core. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, M. (1957). New developments in analytical psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frie, R. (1997). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in modern philosophy and psychoanalysis: A study of Sartre, Binswanger, Lacan, and Habermas. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, C. (2016). The training anthology of Śāntideva: A translation of the Śikṣā-samuccaya. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotstein, J. (1990). The “black hole” as the basic psychotic experience: Some newer psychoanalytic and neuroscience perspectives on psychosis. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 18(1), 29–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guarisco, E. (2015). Secret map of the body: Visions of the human energy structure. Merigar: Shang Shung Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, H. (1975). Tantra: Its origin and presentation. In H. Guenther & C. Trungpa (Eds.), The Dawn of Tantra (pp. 6–12). Berkeley, CA: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, H. (1996). The teachings of padmasambhava. New York: Brill Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, R. (1974). Loneliness. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 19(1), 71–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, R. (1985). Forms of feeling. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (Original work published 1961).

  • Lévinas, E. (1985). Ethics and infinity (R. Cohen, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (Original work published 1982).

  • Lévinas, E. (1987a). Collected philosophical papers (A. Lingis, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Lévinas, E. (1987b). Time and the Other (R. Cohen, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (Original work 1982).

  • Lévinas, E., & Kearney, R. (1986). Dialogue with Emmanuel Lévinas. In R. Cohen (Ed.), Face to face with Lévinas (pp. 13–33). Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingyur, Y., & Swanson, E. (2007). The joy of living: Unlocking the secret science of happiness. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phuntsho, K. (2005). Mipham’s Dialectics and the debate on emptiness. London: Routledge Curzon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reik, T. (1949). Listening with the third ear: The inner experience of a psychoanalyst. New York, N.Y: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, A. (2003). Jung and the post-Jungians. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, M. (2009). Depersonalization: A new look at a neglected syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soloviev, V. (2010). The Justification of the good: An essay on moral philosophy (N. Duggington, Trans.). New York: Cosimo Classics. Original Work 1918.

  • Trungpa, C. (1975). Laying the foundation. In H. Guenther & C. Trungpa (Eds.), The dawn of tantra (pp. 6–12). Berkeley, CA: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tustin, F. (1988). The black hole: A significant element in autism. Free Associations, 11, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W. (1962). Ego integration and child development. In: Winnicott, D.W. ( Ed.), The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 56–63). London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1965a). The family and individual development. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1965b). Ego integration in child development. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 56–64). London: Karnac. 1990.

  • Winnicott, D. (1969). The use of an object. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50, 711–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1974). Fear of breakdown. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 1, 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1986). Holding and interpretation: Fragment of an analysis. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1988). Human nature. London: Free Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1992a). Primitive emotional development. In Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis: Collected papers (pp. 145–148). New York, N.Y: Brunner/Mazel. (Original work 1945).

  • Winnicott, D. (1992b). Mind and its relation to the psyche-soma. In Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis: Collected papers (pp. 243–255). New York, N.Y: Brunner/Mazel (Original work 1949).

  • Wordsworth, W. (1961). Recollections of early childhood. In A. Quiller-Crouch, (Ed.), Oxford book of English verse: 1250–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge invaluable contributions from participants at the original presentation at the Centro Incontri Umani in Ascona in July 2017, and in particular to Geoffrey Samuel for on-going critique and encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pickering, J. ‘I Do Not Exist’: Pathologies of Self Among Western Buddhists. J Relig Health 58, 748–769 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00794-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00794-x

Keywords

Navigation