Skip to main content
Log in

Spirituality and Support: A Descriptive Analysis of Online Social Support for Depression

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined supportive messages in spiritual and non-spiritual online support groups for depression. Both social support and religiosity have been associated with reduced depressive symptomology. Proportions of three types of support (i.e., informational, emotional, and network) were considered; messages were further delineated as being either religious or non-religious in nature. Messages (N = 2,674) from two Christian and two unaffiliated online groups were analyzed. Results indicated that Christian groups communicated more informational support and General groups communicated more network support. Christian groups communicated more religious messages. This and future research is valuable to practitioners and clergy aiding depressed individuals and to the literature on social support and religion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The coding system includes two additional categories: Tangible aid (i.e., providing goods or services) and esteem support (i.e., communicating respect for and confidence in another). However, these are not relevant to online groups (Bambina 2007). In particular, tangible aid is extremely difficult to enact; because online groups are characterized by anonymity and geographical space, members are severely limited in their ability to “provide goods or services needed in the stressful situation” (Cutrona and Suhr 1992, p. 159). Also, esteem support, as it is conceptualized above, may be considered as a subcategory of emotional support, rather than its own supra-category (Bambina 2007); validation of others’ abilities is intrinsically an appeal to their self-efficacy and control, which implies encouragement, care, or concern.

  2. All random assignment procedures were conducted using a random number generator.

  3. The names of these groups have been changed to protect confidentiality. For any excerpts included, specific members are not identified; instead, fictional names are used. Additionally, it appears that since the data were collected, one group has restricted its use to members only and one group has been disassembled.

  4. Although the esteem support subcategories of “compliment” and “relief of blame” were removed per Bambina (2007), “validation” was considered a sub-category of emotional support.

  5. Two-tailed tests were used in all analyses in order to detect any differences that were opposite of those predicted.

References

  • Albrecht, T. L., & Goldsmith, D. J. (2003). Social support, social networks, and health. In A. Dorsey, K. I. Miller, R. Parrott, & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 263–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (2000). Psychology and religion: An introduction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambina, A. (2007). Online social support: The interplay of social networks and computer mediated communication. New York: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (2009). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, B. (2003). US survey probes depression care. Science News, 164, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123–151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R., Albrecht, T. L., & Sarason, I. G. (Eds.). (1994). Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, W. E., Bjorck, J. P., & Gorsuch, R. (2002). The religious support scale: Construction, validation, and cross-validation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 761–786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Jones, S. (2009). The social life of health information. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org.

  • Haber, J. R., Jacob, T., & Spangler, D. J. C. (2007). Dimensions of religion/spirituality and relevance to health research. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, N. C. (1998). Religion and mental health from the Catholic perspective. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 211–223). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kleman, E. E., Everett, M. K., & Egbert, N. (2009). Social support strategies among women of faith. Journal of Communication and Religion, 32, 157–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (Ed.). (1998). Handbook of religion and mental health. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Religion and mental health: Evidence for an association. International Review of Psychiatry, 13, 67–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G., & Pritchett, J. (1998). Religion and psychotherapy. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 323–336). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kral, G. (2006). Online communities for mutual help: Fears, fiction, and facts. In M. Murero & R. E. Rice (Eds.), The Internet and health care: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 215–232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, N., Ellison, C. G., Shaw, B. A., Marcum, J. P., & Boardman, J. D. (2001). Church-based social support and religious coping. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 647–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurencelle, R. M., Abell, S. C., & Schwartz, D. J. (2002). The relation between intrinsic religious faith and psychological well-being. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 12, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. S., & Chatters, L. M. (1998). Research on religion and mental health: An overview of empirical findings and theoretical issues. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 33–50). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. A., & Winzelberg, A. (2009). The relationship between religious expression and outcomes in online support groups: A partial replication. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 690–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macias, W., Lewis, L. S., & Smith, T. L. (2005). Health-related message boards/chat rooms on the web: Discussion content and implications for pharmaceutical sponsorships. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 209–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malony, H. N. (1998). Religion and mental health from the Protestant perspective. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 203–210). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Cancer Institute. (2007). HINTS: Health information national trends survey. Retrieved from http://hints.cancer.gov/hints/.

  • Nooney, J. G. (2005). Religion, stress, and mental health adolescence: Findings from Add Health. Review of Religious Research, 46, 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., & Brant, C. R. (1998). Religion and coping. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 111–128). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rains, S. A., & Young, V. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35, 309–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B., Han, J. Y., Kim, E., Gustafson, D., Hawkins, R., Cleary, J., et al. (2007). Effects of prayer and religious expression within computer support groups on women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 676–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanis, M. (2007). Online social support groups. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 139–153). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichon, J. G., & Shapiro, M. (2003). With a little health from my friends: Children, the internet, and social support. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 21, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. B., & Bell, S. B. (2003). Health-related support groups on the internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 39–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Steve Rains for guidance throughout the project and Alyssa Kata and Lu Wang for their work coding the messages. This project was aided by an undergraduate research grant from the University of Arizona Honors College.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Keating.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keating, D.M. Spirituality and Support: A Descriptive Analysis of Online Social Support for Depression. J Relig Health 52, 1014–1028 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9577-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9577-x

Keywords

Navigation