Skip to main content
Log in

Nietzsche’s Echo—A Dialogue with Thomas Altizer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prophets provoke psychological unrest, especially when exposing accepted beliefs as profound deceptions. The biblical prophets exemplify such confrontation as do certain atheists ardently opposed to the images of God created by those seers. The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche dramatically illustrates this type of counterforce to the Judeo-Christian tradition. His prophet Zarathustra is intended to be a model for the modern mind, one free of superstitions inflicted by antiquated religious dogma. Nietzsche’s credo “God is dead” served as a declaration for the nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, it became a theological diagnosis. As a “movement,” or “tenor,” the death of God or radical theology was spearheaded by Thomas Altizer, a well-published young professor center-staged during the turbulent 1960s. His work foreshadows a new strain of atheism currently represented by biologist Richard Dawkins (2006, The God delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin), philosopher Daniel Dennett (2006, Breaking the spell. New York: Penquin), neuroscientist Sam Harris (2004, The end of faith. New York: W.W. Norton; 2008, Letter to a Christian nation. New York: Vintage), journalist Christopher Hitchens (2007, God is not great. New York: Twelve), and mathematician John Allen Paulos (Paulos 2008, Irreligion. New York: Hill & Wang). This twenty-first century crusade against belief in God is best understood as a psychodynamic ignited by Altizer’s Christian atheism. The present dialogue reflects that dynamic while the prologue and epilogue reveal evidence of Providence amidst claims of God’s demise in contemporary history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altizer, T. J. J. (1955). A critical analysis of C. G. Jung’s understanding of religion. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Chicago.

  • Altizer, T. J. J. (1961). Oriental mysticism and biblical eschatology. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altizer, T. J. J. (1993). The genesis of God. Louisville: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altizer, T. J. J., & Hamilton, W. (1966). Radical theology and the death of God. New York: Bobbs Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniell, S. (1993). Graduate teaching assistants’ attitude toward and responses to academic dishonesty. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, University of Georgia.

  • Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell. New York: Penquin.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePalma, A. (1990, November 10). Plagiarism seen by scholars in King’s Ph.D. dissertation. New York Times, front page.

  • Harris, S. (2004). The end of faith. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2008). Letter to a Christian nation. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. (2007). God is not great. New York: Grand Central Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazantzakis, N. (1960). The saviors of God: Spiritual exercises. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1987). In the beginning was love: Psychoanalysis and faith. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1992). The samurai. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1992). The ethics of psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser, D. W., & Price, J. L. (Eds.). (1992). A new handbook of Christian theologians. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulos, J. A. (2008). Irreligion. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, I. (Ed.). (1993). Is psychoanalysis another religion?. London: The Freud Museum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, D.M. Nietzsche’s Echo—A Dialogue with Thomas Altizer. J Relig Health 49, 118–137 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-009-9239-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-009-9239-9

Keywords

Navigation