Abstract
Past studies of sentiment analysis have mainly applied algorithms based on vocabulary categories and emotional characteristics to detect the emotionality of text. However, the collocation of state-changing words and emotional vocabulary affects emotions. For example, adverbs of degree strengthen emotions, and negative adverbs reverse emotions. This study investigated the weighted effect of state-changing words on emotion. The research material comprised 73 state-changing words that were collocated with four emotions: happiness, sadness, fear, and anger. A total of 84 participants participated in the vocabulary assessment. The results revealed that state-changing words could be classified into four types: intensifying, weakening, neutralizing, and reversing. In a comparison of the weighting factors among emotions, the weighting effect of the same state-changing word in the positive emotion category was particularly evident. The results could serve as a reference for follow-up studies on detecting emotions in text.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010). Sentiwordnet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Paper presented at the Lrec.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical report C-1, the center for research in psychophysiology, University of Florida.
Chan, Y. L., & Ko, H. W. (2010). The relationship between connectives and reading processes: Evidence from eye movements. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 42(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20100128
Chang, S. M., Liao, Y. P., & Huang, L. T. (2006). Comparison analysis of Mandarin and Taiwanese adverbs: A case study on negative adverbs and adverbs of degree. In Proceeding of the first conference on Taiwanese language and culture, Taichung: Department of Taiwanese Languages, Chung Shan Medical University.
Chang, L. L., Chen, K. J., & Huang, C. R. (2000). A lexical-semantic analysis of mandarin Chinese verbs: Representation and methodology. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30019/ijclclp.200002.0001
Chang, S. M. (2003). The syntactic distribution of mandarin adverbs and adverbials. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and Literature, 1, 147–168. https://doi.org/10.6710/jtll.200301_(1).0007
Chao, C. Y. (2011). Exploring degree adverbs in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Applied Chinese, 9, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.6391/jac.201108.0203
Chen, H. C., Chan, Y. C., & Feng, Y. J. (2013). Taiwan copora of Chinese emotions and relevant psychophysiological data-A norm of emotion metaphors in Chinese. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 525–553. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20130112b
Cheng, Y. (2000). The syntactic characteristics of Chinese auxiliaries based on the Sinica Corpus. In Proceedings of research on computational linguistics conference XIII (pp. 157–170). Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng, C. M., Chen, Y. T., Cho, S. L., & Chen, H. C. (2013). A structure analysis of Chinese emotions. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20130319b
Cho, S. L., Chen, H. C., & Cheng, C. M. (2013). Taiwan corpora of chinese emotions and relevant psychophysiological data-A study on the norm of Chinese emotional words. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 493–523. https://doi.org/10.6129/cjp.20131026
Dodds, P. S., Clark, E. M., Desu, S., Frank, M. R., Reagan, A. J., Williams, J. R., et al. (2015). Human language reveals a universal positivity bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(8), 2389–2394. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411678112
Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164(3875), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3875.86
Farooq, U., Nongaillard, A., Ouzrout, Y., & Qadir, M. A. (2013). Product reputation evaluation: the impact of conjunction on sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on software, knowledge, information management and applications (SKIMA’2013) (pp. 590–602). Chiang-Mai, China.
Fung, C. K., Moore, M. M., Karcher, N. R., Kerns, J. G., & Martin, E. A. (2017). Emotional word usage in groups at risk for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: An objective investigation of attention to emotion. Psychiatry Research, 252, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.098
Gao, X., & Lee, S. Y. M. (2018). Exclamative sentences in emotion expressions in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based approach. In Proceedings of the 32nd Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation. Hong Kong.
Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2008). Conscious emotional experience emerges as a function of multilevel, appraisal-driven response synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.019
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
Hamilton, M. A., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The effect of language intensity on receiver evaluations of message, source, and topic. In M. Allen & R. W. Presiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 99–138). Hampton Press.
Hosseini, A. S. (2017). Sentence-level emotion mining based on combination of adaptive meta-level features and sentence syntactic features. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 65, 361–374.
Jaffe, E. (2014). What big data means for psychological science. APS Observer, 27(6).
Jing-Schmidt, Z. (2007). Negativity bias in language: A cognitive-affective model of emotive intensifiers. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3), 417–443. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.023
Kauschke, C., Bahn, D., Vesker, M., & Schwarzer, G. (2019). The role of emotional valence for the processing of facial and verbal stimuli—positivity or negativity bias? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1654.
Kiefer, M., Schuch, S., Schenck, W., & Fiedler, K. (2007). Mood states modulate activity in semantic brain areas during emotional word encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 17(7), 1516–1530. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl062
Ku, L.-W., Huang, T.-H., & Chen, H.-H. (2009). Using morphological and syntactic structures for Chinese opinion analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
Ku, L.-W., & Chen, H.-H. (2007). Mining opinions from the Web: Beyond relevance retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1838–1850. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20630
Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065.
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015) Emotion and decision making. Vol. 66. Annual Review of Psychology (pp. 799–823).
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
Liebrecht, C., Hustinx, L., & van Mulken, M. (2019). The relative power of negativity: The influence of language intensity on perceived strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(2), 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18808562
Lin, S.-Y., Chen, H.-C., Chang, T.-H., Lee, W.-E., & Sung, Y.-T. (2019). CLAD: A corpus-derived Chinese Lexical Association Database. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2310–2336. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01208-2
Mohammad, S. M. (2016). 9-Sentiment analysis: Detecting valence, emotions, and other affectual states from text. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Emotion measurement (pp. 201–237). Woodhead Publishing.
Okeefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 30(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2006.11679054
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. New York: University of Illinois Press.
Plutchik, R. (1982). A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions. Social Science Information, 21(4–5), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021004003
Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.311
Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation: Experimental studies of the sources of gregariousness. Stanford University Press.
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1061–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061
Siemund, P. (2017). English exclamative clauses and interrogative degree modification. In M. Napoli & M. Ravetto (Eds.), Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 207–228). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.189.11sie
Sintsova, V., Jiménez, M. B., & Pu, P. (2017). Modeling the impact of modifiers on emotional statements. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), International conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 71–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_6
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
St-Hilaire, A., Cohen, A., & Docherty, N. (2008). Emotion word use in the conversational speech of schizophrenia patients. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 13(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546800802250560
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 267–307. https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00049
Tang, T. C. (1986). Functional explanations in chinese syntax: with special reference to a contrastive study of Chinese and English. Journal Research in Education Sciences, 31, 437–469.
Tsai, W. T. D. (1999). The hows of why and the whys of how. UCI Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, 155–184.
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
Wei, W. J., & Chen, K. J. (1991). The grammar representation of conjunctions: A representation based on ICG. In Proceedings of Rocling IV computational linguistics conference IV (pp. 79–95). Pingtung, Taiwan.
Wu, J.-Y. (2015). University students’ Motivated Attention and use of regulation strategies on social media. Computers and Education, 89, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.016
Funding
This work was financially supported by the grant MOST-111-2634-F-002-004 from Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan, the MOST AI Biomedical Research Center, and the “Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences” and “Chinese Language and Technology Center” of National Taiwan Normal University from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
The study was approved by the institutional review board of National Taiwan Normal University. All participants were informed of the procedures and gave their informed consent before the experiment began.
Consent to Participate
Thank you for participating in this research. Next, you need to spend about 30Â min to complete this questionnaire. During the research, please follow the instructions of the teacher and the instructions of the questionnaire, and complete the questionnaire according to the steps. The purpose of this study is to understand the impact of various state-changing words (such as degree words and negative words) on emotional states. Any information you fill in is not named and is only used for this study. The results of this study will be used as an academic reference, and the research materials are only for the use of relevant personnel in this study, and will not be outflowed. We will keep them confidential, please answer them with peace of mind. If you have any questions about the above research description, please ask the teacher. If there are no questions, please sign at the signature below and follow the instructions to start answering.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, CY., Tsai, MN., Sung, YT. et al. Weighting Assessment of the Effect of Chinese State-Changing Words on Emotions. J Psycholinguist Res 52, 2545–2566 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09986-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09986-9