Abstract
Arabic is a diglossic language, where two language varieties are used: spoken Arabic (SpA) and standard Arabic (StA). The words may be "identical" (maintaining the same phonological expression in the SpA and StA) or “unique” to StA). This study examined the effect of diglossia on reading according to the lexical distance between the SpA and StA forms and whether this influence changes with age. The participants were 137 first-graders that were followed to the second grade. The findings indicated a significant effect of grade level with higher performance in the second grade. A significant association was obtained between the lexical distance and reading accuracy and rate with better performance for identical than unique items across grade levels. No significant interaction between lexical distance and grade level was found. The results indicate the contribution of reading unique and identical forms in the first grade to reading in the second grade. The advantage in reading identical among unique words is discussed in light of the lexical quality hypothesis and dual-route model. The implications of these results were discussed in the context of diglossia, especially the need for StA oral language enrichment at the preschool level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Rabia, S. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type and vowelization. Reading and Writing, 10(2), 105–119.
Abu-Rabia, S. (1999). The effect of Arabic vowels on the reading comprehension of second-and sixth-grade native Arab children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 93–101.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in a diglossic situation. Reading and Writing, 13(1), 147–157.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading Arabic among normal and dyslexic readers in grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9035-6
Arad, M. (2006). Roots and patterns: Hebrew morpho-syntax (Vol. 63). Springer.
Asaad, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2013). The effects of orthographic complexity and diglossia on letter naming in Arabic: Developmental changes. Writing Systems Research, 5, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.862163
Asaad, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2014). Learning to read in Arabic: The Long and winding road. Reading and Writing, 27, 649–664.
Asadi, I. A. (2019). How the characteristics of phonemes and syllabic structures can impact the phonological awareness of kindergarten and first-grade Arabic-speaking children. Reading Psychology, 40(8), 768–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1674431
Asadi, I. A. (2020). Predicting reading comprehension in Arabic-speaking middle schoolers using linguistic measures. Reading Psychology, 41(2), 87–109.
Asadi, I. A., & Abu-Rabia, S. (2019). The impact of the position of phonemes and lexical status on phonological awareness in the diglossic Arabic language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(5), 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09646-x
Asadi, I. A., & Abu-Rabia, S. (2021). The impact of diglossia on phonological processing. Reading Psychology, 42(7), 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1864608
Asadi, I. A., Asli-Badarneh, A., Janaideh, R. A., & Khatib, A. (2023). Word reading by sequential trilingual: The relative strength of lexical and sub-lexical processing in Arabic and English orthographies. Reading and Writing, 1–18.
Asadi, I. A., & Kawar, K. (2023). Learning to read in Arabic diglossia: The relation of spoken and literary oral Arabic language in kindergarten to reading skills in first grade. Literacy Research and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2023.2217274
Asadi, I. A., & Khateb, A. (2017). Predicting reading in vowelized and unvowelized Arabic script: An investigation of reading in first and second grades. Reading Psychology, 38(5), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1299821
Asadi, I. A., Khateb, A., Ibrahim, R., & Taha, H. (2017). How do the different cognitive and linguistic factors contribute toreading in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(9), 1835–1867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9755-z
Asadi, I. A., Khateb, A., Mansour-Adwan, J., & Metanis, A. (2022). When developmental language disorder meets diglossia: A cross-sectional investigation of listening comprehension among native Arabic-speaking preschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(5), 1083–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09885-5
Asli-Badarneh, A., & Leikin, M. (2019). Morphological ability among monolingual and bilingual speakers in early childhood: The case of two Semitic languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(5), 1087–1105.
Asli-Badarneh, A., Hipfner-Boucher, K., Bumgardner, X. C., AlJanaideh, R., & Saiegh Haddad, E. (2022). Narrative microstructure and macrostructure skills in Arabic diglossia: The case of Arab immigrant children in Canada. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13670069221077306.
Bateson, M. C. (1967). Arabic language handbook (Vol. 3). Georgetown University Press.
Bick, S. B., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2011). Hebrew brain vs. English brain: Language modulates the way it is processed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2280–2290. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21583
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV-skeleton in Arabic. Cognition, 92(3), 271–303.
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2011). Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 624–652.
Bowers, J. S., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Beyond phonics: The case for teaching children the logic of the English spelling system. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 124–141.
Cheng, J., & Matthews, J. (2018). The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing, 35(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216676851
Coltheart, M. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 6–23). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch1
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (2013). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Exploring Cognition: Damaged Brains and Neural Networks: Readings in Cognitive Neuropsychology and Connectionist Modelling, 100(4), 367.
Corcos, E., & Willows, D. M. (2009). Processing words varying in personal familiarity (based on reading and spelling) by poor readers and age-matched and reading-matched controls. Remedial and Special Education, 30(4), 195–206.
Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., Karelitz, T. M., & Simon, A. B. (2019). Speed of reading texts in Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 32(3), 537–559.
Ferguson, C.A. (1959). Diglossia. In P. P. Giglioli (Ed.), Languages and social context (pp. 232–251).
Fodor, J. A. (1985). Precis of the modularity of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 1–5.
Fracasso, L. E., Bangs, K., & Binder, K. S. (2016). The contributions of phonological and morphological awareness to literacy skills in the adult basic education population. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(2), 140–151.
Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (2016). Phonological skills and learning to read. New York: Psychology Press & Routledge Classic Editions. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317441557.
Hermena, E. W., Drieghe, D., Hellmuth, S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Processing of Arabic diacritical marks: Phonological-syntactic disambiguation of homographic verbs and visual crowding effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000032
Ibrahim, R. (2013). Reading in Arabic: New evidence for the role of vowel signs. Creative Education, 4(04), 248.
Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of arabic orthography slow its processing. Neuropsychology, 16(3), 322.
Idrissi, A. (2018). Experimental data and arabic morphology. In E. Benmamoun & R. Bassiouney (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of arabic linguistics (pp. 282–298). Taylor & Francis.
Idrissi, A., Mustafawi, E., Khwaileh, T., & Muralikrishnan, R. (2021). A neurophysiological study of noun-adjective agreement in Arabic: The impact of animacy and diglossia on the dynamics of language processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 58, 100964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100964
Idrissi, A., Prunet, J.-F., & Béland, R. (2008). On the mental representation of Arabic roots. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(2), 221–259.
Khamis-Dakwar, R., Froud, K., & Gordon, P. (2012). Acquiring diglossia: Mutual influences of formal and colloquial Arabic on children’s grammaticality judgments. Journal of Child Language, 39(1), 61–89.
Khamis-Dakwar, R., & Makhoul, B. (2022). The relationship between children’s explicit knowledge and awareness of diglossia and success in learning Arabic: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.2025243
Kim, Y. S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003
Krepel, A., de Bree, E. H., Mulder, E., van de Ven, M., Segers, E., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2021). The unique contribution of vocabulary in the reading development of English as a foreign language. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 453–474.
Mancilla-Martinez, J., Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., Christodoulou, J. A., & Snow, C. E. (2011). Investigating English reading comprehension growth in adolescent language minority learners: Some insights from the simple view. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9215-5
McCarthy, J. (1979). Formal problems in semitic phonology and morphology [Doctoral dissertation]. MIT.
McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(3), 373–418.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00238.x
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (2006). The effects of learning to spell on children’s awareness of morphology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9025-y
OECD. (2018). PISA for development assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-en
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
PIRLS. (2003). International report: IEA’s study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools in 2001. Boston College.
Prunet, J.-F. (2006). External evidence and the Semitic root. Morphology, 16(1), 41–67.
Prunet, J.-F., Béland, R., & Idrissi, A. (2000). The mental representation of semitic words. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 609–648. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554497
Ravid, D., & Malenky, D. (2001). Awareness of linear and non-linear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272370102106102
Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701344306
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000225
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudo-words in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(4), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001249
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 559–582.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints children’s ability to isolate phonemes in diglossic Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070336
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2018). MAWRID: A model of Arabic word reading in development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(5), 454–462.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Haj, L. (2018). Does phonological distance impact quality of phonological representations? Evidence from Arabic diglossia. Journal of Child Language, 45(6), 1377–1399.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 3–28). Springer.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Joshi, M. (2014). Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives. London New York Springer -Dordrecht.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990365
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Schiff, R. (2016). The impact of diglossia on voweled and unvoweled word reading in Arabic: A developmental study from childhood to adolescence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(4), 311–324.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Shahbari-Kassem, A., & Schiff, R. (2020). Phonological awareness in Arabic: The role of phonological distance, phonological-unit size, and SES. Reading and Writing, 33(6), 1649–1674.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Spolsky, B. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In Handbook of Arabic literacy (pp. 225–240). Springer.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Taha, H. (2017). The role of morphological and phonological awareness in the early development of word spelling and reading in typically developing and disabled Arabic readers. Dyslexia, 23(4), 345–371.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19(1), 1–30.
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Morphological analogies in Hebrew-Speaking University students with dyslexia compared with typically developing grade schoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9043-6
Schiff, R., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). When diglossia meets dyslexia: The effect of diglossia on voweled and unvoweled word reading among native Arabic-speaking dyslexic children. Reading and Writing, 30(5), 1089–1113.
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
Shatil, E., & Share, D. L. (2003). Cognitive antecedents of early reading ability: A test of the modularity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00106-1
Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 23–55.
Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 24.
Tallas-Mahajna, N., Elhija, D. A., & Asli-Badarneh, A. (2022). Representation of Arabic narratives in Digital Media - A case study. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 10(20), 188–205.
Tibi, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2017). Morphological awareness: Construct and predictive validity in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1019–1043.
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Toth, D., Csepe, V., Reis, A., Faisca, L., Saine, N., Lyytinen, H., Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: a cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21(4), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
Zorzi, M. (2010). The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloud. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 836–860.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the staff and the children from the participating schools for their cooperation as well as students in the Master’s degree program in learning disabilities for their role in data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. We certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Asadi, I.A., Asli-Badarneh, A. The impact of Diglossia-Effect on Reading Acquisition Among Arabic-Speaking Children: A Longitudinal Study. J Psycholinguist Res 52, 1919–1937 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09969-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09969-w