Skip to main content
Log in

How do Chinese-English Bilinguals and Tibetan-Chinese-English Trilinguals Differ in Explicit and Implicit Aptitude?

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study seeks to empirically explore the relation between multilingual learning experiences and language aptitude. Through employing LLAMA aptitude test battery (Meara, 2005) and a probabilistic version of the serial reaction time (SRT) task (Kaufman et al., 2010), scores from 24 Chinese-English bilinguals and 24 Tibetan-Chinese-English trilinguals were analyzed with One-way Analyses of Variance (ANOVA). LLAMA-B, E, and F sub-tests measured explicit language aptitude, while LLAMA-D sub-test and SRT task measured implicit language aptitude, a cutting-edge that has gained sway in aptitude research. Qualitative and quantitative results showed that trilingual group performed better on the LLAMA-E sub-test than bilingual group, whereas bilingual group outperformed trilingual group on the SRT task. These findings suggested that trilinguals might possess higher explicit aptitude but lower implicit aptitude than bilinguals. Thus, prior language learning experiences might be positively (for explicit aptitude) or negatively (for implicit aptitude) correlated with language aptitude. Additionally, explicit aptitude and implicit aptitude might have a competitive relationship. Possible implications were discussed in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Available Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Two Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Item No. 21lzujbkyjh001 and Item No. 21lzujbkyxs023) and The Education and Teaching Research Project of Lanzhou University (Item No. 2020009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ci Jiang: Conceptualization; Methodology; Software; Validation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Resources; Data curation; Visualization; Writing-Original Draft; Writing-Review & Editing;

Fang Liu: Methodology; Software; Validation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Resources; Data curation;

Yi Cao: Investigation; Resources; Data curation;

Jianlin Chen: Methodology; Validation; Investigation; Resources; Writing-Review & Editing; Supervision; Project administration; Funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianlin Chen.

Ethics declarations

All authors declare that No conflict of interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, C., Liu, F., Gong, Y. et al. How do Chinese-English Bilinguals and Tibetan-Chinese-English Trilinguals Differ in Explicit and Implicit Aptitude?. J Psycholinguist Res 52, 869–885 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09914-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09914-3

Keywords

Navigation