Abstract
This study reports findings from two experiments testing whether a transposed-letter (TL) priming effect can be obtained when the transposition occurs across morphological boundaries. Previous studies have primarily tested derivationally complex words or compound words, but have not examined a more rule-based and productive morphological structure, i.e., inflectionally complex words, using masked priming. Experiment 1 tested TL priming with nonword primes and inflected targets (FOCUSING). Nonword primes were formed by transposing letters either within the root morpheme (fcousing) or across two morphemes (focuisng). Experiment 2 used the same nonword primes, but had the root words as targets (FOCUS). Both experiments showed similar TL priming effects for within-morpheme and across-boundary positions, indicating that morphological decomposition takes place only after letter positions in a word have been assigned. This finding provides additional evidence to previous research testing derived and compound words showing TL priming regardless of the position of transposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikhenvald, A. (2007). Typological distinctions in word-formation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 1–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beyersmann, E., McCormick, S. F., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2389–2410.
Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2006). Inflectional morphology. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 169–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blevins, J. P. (2006). English inflection and derivation. In B. Aarts & A. M. MacMahon (Eds.), Handbook of English linguistics (pp. 507–536). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1327–1339.
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 83–99.
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory and Cognition, 37, 895–908.
Dominguez, A., Segui, J., & Cuetos, F. (2002). The time-course of inflexional morphological priming. Linguistics, 40, 235–259.
Duñabeitia, J. A., Kinoshita, S., Carreiras, M., & Norris, D. (2011). Is morpho-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same-different task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 509–526.
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691–703.
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21, 1557–1575.
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 684–691.
Forster, K. I., & Azuma, T. (2000). Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 539–561.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 127–131.
Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577–600.
Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1–23). NY: Nova Science.
Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 58–59.
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54.
Longtin, C.-M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–41.
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334.
Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The influence of frequency across the time course of morphological processing: Evidence from the transposed-letter effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 781–799.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Odler, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.
Masserang, K. M., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications for morphological decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 476–495.
McCormick, S. F., Brysbaert, M., & Rastle, K. (2009). Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1706–1715.
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C.-M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471.
Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 375–380.
Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 418–422.
Perea, M., Gatt, A., Moret-Tatay, C., & Fabri, R. (2012). Are all Semitic languages immune to letter transpositions? The case of Maltese. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 942–947.
Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Luper (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97–120). NY: Psychology Press.
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Harper Perennial.
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past-tense debate: The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 456–463.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1090–1098.
Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 482–508.
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 988–996.
Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294.
Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 113–137). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765.
Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. Mental Lexicon, 1, 183–199.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.
Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2013). Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 917–938.
Trask, R. L. (1998). The typological position of Basque: Then and now. Language Sciences, 20, 313–324.
Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009). Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 285–302.
Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing. Cognition, 118, 141–156.
Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zargar, E.S., Witzel, N. Transposed-Letter Priming Across Inflectional Morpheme Boundaries. J Psycholinguist Res 46, 125–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9423-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9423-5