Skip to main content
Log in

Transposed-Letter Priming Across Inflectional Morpheme Boundaries

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reports findings from two experiments testing whether a transposed-letter (TL) priming effect can be obtained when the transposition occurs across morphological boundaries. Previous studies have primarily tested derivationally complex words or compound words, but have not examined a more rule-based and productive morphological structure, i.e., inflectionally complex words, using masked priming. Experiment 1 tested TL priming with nonword primes and inflected targets (FOCUSING). Nonword primes were formed by transposing letters either within the root morpheme (fcousing) or across two morphemes (focuisng). Experiment 2 used the same nonword primes, but had the root words as targets (FOCUS). Both experiments showed similar TL priming effects for within-morpheme and across-boundary positions, indicating that morphological decomposition takes place only after letter positions in a word have been assigned. This finding provides additional evidence to previous research testing derived and compound words showing TL priming regardless of the position of transposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikhenvald, A. (2007). Typological distinctions in word-formation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 1–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beyersmann, E., McCormick, S. F., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2389–2410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2006). Inflectional morphology. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 169–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, J. P. (2006). English inflection and derivation. In B. Aarts & A. M. MacMahon (Eds.), Handbook of English linguistics (pp. 507–536). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1327–1339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory and Cognition, 37, 895–908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, A., Segui, J., & Cuetos, F. (2002). The time-course of inflexional morphological priming. Linguistics, 40, 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duñabeitia, J. A., Kinoshita, S., Carreiras, M., & Norris, D. (2011). Is morpho-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same-different task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 509–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21, 1557–1575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 684–691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., & Azuma, T. (2000). Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 127–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577–600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1–23). NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 58–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Longtin, C.-M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The influence of frequency across the time course of morphological processing: Evidence from the transposed-letter effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 781–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Odler, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masserang, K. M., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications for morphological decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 476–495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, S. F., Brysbaert, M., & Rastle, K. (2009). Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1706–1715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, F., & Longtin, C.-M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 375–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 418–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., Gatt, A., Moret-Tatay, C., & Fabri, R. (2012). Are all Semitic languages immune to letter transpositions? The case of Maltese. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 942–947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Luper (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97–120). NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past-tense debate: The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 456–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1090–1098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 482–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 988–996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 113–137). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. Mental Lexicon, 1, 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2013). Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 917–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trask, R. L. (1998). The typological position of Basque: Then and now. Language Sciences, 20, 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009). Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 285–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing. Cognition, 118, 141–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehsan Shafiee Zargar.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Items used in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zargar, E.S., Witzel, N. Transposed-Letter Priming Across Inflectional Morpheme Boundaries. J Psycholinguist Res 46, 125–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9423-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9423-5

Keywords

Navigation