Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Working Memory and Divided Attention in Metaphor Interpretation

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although several types of figurative language exist, neuropsychological tests of non-literal language have focused on proverbs. Metaphors in the form X is (a) Y (e.g., The body’s immunological response is a battle against disease.) place a lower demand on language skills and are more easily manipulated for novelty than proverbs. Forty healthy participants completed the Metaphor Interpretation Test (developed by the authors). The task includes 20 items chosen from a list of metaphors that were rated on several scales (e.g. imagery, aptness) in a study by Katz et al. (Metaphor Symb Act 3(4):191–214, 1988). Participants were asked to rate the familiarity and provide an explanation of each metaphor. A scoring system was developed to categorize answers into: abstract complete (AC), abstract partial (AP), concrete (CT), and other/unrelated (OT) types. Participants also completed short-term memory and divided attention tests. Overall, participants produced 56 % AC, 25.38 % AP, 7.88 % CT, and 10.88 % OT responses. It was found that a measure of verbal short-term memory span was the best predictor of performance on this task (adjusted \(R^{2}= .369\)). It appears that short-term memory span, not working memory or divided attention, contributes most to providing abstract responses in explaining metaphors. This is in line with the idea that when one accesses the semantic network associated with a novel metaphor, one must hold this information in mind long enough to search for and link similar cognitive networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, M. S., Wolfe, J., & Lafleche, G. (1990). Differences in abstraction ability with age. Psychology and Aging, 5(1), 94–100. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anil, A. E., Kivircik, B. B., Batur, S., Kabakçi, E., Kitis, A., Güven, E., et al. (2003). The Turkish version of the auditory consonant trigram test as a measure of working memory: A normative study. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(2), 159–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford England, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2002). Working memory and language processing. Advances in Cognitive Science, 4(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 295–308. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, K. B. (1999). Neuropsychological assessment of executive functions: Impact of age, education, gender, intellectual level, and vascular status on executive test scores. In B. L. Miller & J. L. Cummings (Eds.), The human frontal lobes: Functions and disorders (pp. 247–260). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • Boone, K. B., Pontón, M. O., Gorsuch, R. L., González, J. J., & Miller, B. L. (1998). Factor analysis of four measures of prefrontal lobe functioning. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13(7), 585–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 12–21. doi:10.1080/17470215808416249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J., Rourke, B. P., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1989). Reliability of tests and measures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3(4), 353–368. doi:10.1080/13854048908401484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, C., & Chiarello, C. (1996). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying metaphor comprehension and other figurative language. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(1), 67–84. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1101_4.

  • Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33(3), 386–404. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, D. L., & Chiappe, P. (2007). The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 172–188. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colom, R., Abad, F. J., Quiroga, M. Á., Shih, P. C., & Flores-Mendoza, C. (2008). Working memory and intelligence are highly related constructs, but why? Intelligence, 36(6), 584–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 331–335. Retrieved from http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11495122.

  • Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis–Kaplan executive function system examiner’s manual. San Antonio: NCS Pearson, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, K., Goldberg, T. E., Gold, J. M., & Weinberger, D. R. (1995). Verbal working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia: Use of a Brown-Peterson paradigm. Psychiatry Research, 56(2), 155–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Floden, D., Stuss, D. T., & Craik, F. I. (2000). Age differences in performance on two versions of the Brown-Peterson Task. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7(4), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1601–1618. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00006-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 92–96. Retrieved from http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/13646613/v07i0002/92_tpom.

  • Glucksberg, S. (2011). In K. Ahmad (Ed.), Understanding metaphors: The paradox of unlike things compared. Springer, Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1757-2_1.

  • Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 85–98. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honeck, R. P., & Hoffman, R. R. (1980). Cognition and figurative language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Johnson, A. T. (1996). Comprehension of metaphors and similes: A reaction time study. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(2), 145–159. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1102_3.

  • Katz, A. N., Paivio, A., Marschark, M., & Clark, J. M. (1988). Norms for 204 literary and 260 nonliterary metaphors on 10 psychological dimensions. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 3(4), 191–214. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/617576763?accountid=14789.

  • Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. New York: Springer. doi:10.3758/BF03212981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonoff, H., Fibiger, C. H., & Hutton, G. H. (1970). Neuropsychological patterns in chronic schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 150(4), 291–300. doi:10.1097/00005053-197004000-00004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067. doi:10.1037/a0020970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovits, H., Doyon, C., & Simoneau, M. (2002). Individual differences in working memory and conditional reasoning with concrete and abstract content. Thinking & Reasoning, 8(2), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85(3), 451–466. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00070-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, J. E., Volkert, K., & Diep, A. (2000). Sentence repetition test: Updated norms and clinical utility. Applied Neuropsychology, 7(3), 154–159. doi:10.1207/S15324826AN0703_6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogle, J. A., Lovett, B. J., Stawski, R. S., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2008). What’s so special about working memory? An examination of the relationships among working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1071–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, C., & Gillon, G. (2005). Inference comprehension of adolescents with traumatic brain injury: A working memory hypothesis. Brain Injury, 19(10), 743–751. doi:10.1080/02699050500110199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(2), 520–538. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, L. A., & Ryan, C. (2002). Normative data for a working memory test: The four word short-term memory test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(3), 373–380. doi:10.1076/clin.16.3.373.13850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., Uhden, L. D., & Schwarz, I. E. (1997). Proverb explanation through the lifespan: A developmental study of adolescents and adults. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 40(2), 245–253. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=1998076519&site=ehost-live.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(4), 465–477. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90283-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papagno, C. (2001). Comprehension of metaphors and idioms in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 124(7), 1450–1460. Retrieved from http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/00068950/v124i0007/1450_comaiipwad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer, M. L., & Pedreira, M. A. (2005). A neuropsychological theory of metaphor. Language Sciences, 27(1), 31–49. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2004.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1979). What is an intentional state? Mind, 88(349), 74–92. doi:10.2307/2253065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Wigboldus, D. H., & Dijksterhuis, A. P. (2008). Abstract thinking increases one’s sense of power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., Benton, A. L., & University of Victoria Neuropsychology Laboratory. (1977). Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (NCCEA): Manual of instructions. Victoria, BC: Department of Psychology, University of Victoria.

  • Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuss, D. T., Stethem, L. L., & Poirier, C. A. (1987). Comparison of three tests of attention and rapid information processing across six age groups. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1(2), 139–152. doi:10.1080/13854048708520046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulsky, D., Zhu, J., & Ledbetter, M. F. (1997). WAIS-III/WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uekermann, J., Thoma, P., & Daum, I. (2008). Proverb interpretation changes in aging. Brain and Cognition, 67(1), 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Utsumi, A. (2011). Computational exploration of metaphor comprehension processes using a semantic space model. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 251–296. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01144.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, M. E., & Black, F. W. (1984). Normative data for the Spreen-Benton sentence repetition test: Its relationship to age, intelligence, and memory. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 20(4), 585–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, D. L., & Pollack, J. B. (1985). Massively parallel parsing: A strongly interactive model of natural language interpretation. Cognitive Science, 9(1), 51–74. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(85)80009-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Third Edition and Wechsler Memory Scale—Third Edition technical manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corportation.

  • Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale\(\textregistered \) 4th Edition (WAIS\(\textregistered \)-IV). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

  • Winner, E., & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain, 100(4), 717–729. doi:10.1093/brain/100.4.717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON , N9B 3P4, Canada

    Sam Iskandar & Anne D. Baird

Authors
  1. Sam Iskandar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne D. Baird
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Iskandar.

Appendix

Appendix

See Appendix Table 4.

Table 4 Example responses
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iskandar, S., Baird, A.D. The Role of Working Memory and Divided Attention in Metaphor Interpretation. J Psycholinguist Res 43, 555–568 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9267-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9267-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation