Skip to main content
Log in

Phonological Constraints on the Assembly of Skeletal Structure in Reading

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Linguistic research suggests that certain skeletal frames (e.g., CVC) are preferred to others (e.g., VCC). We examine whether such preferences constrain reading in the Stroop task. We demonstrate that CCVC nonwords facilitate naming the color black (\({{\rm /bl{\ae}k}}\)/, a CCVC frame) relative to CVC controls. Conversely, CCVC items inhibit red (a CVC frame) relative to CVC controls. These results suggest that readers are sensitive to the congruency between the skeletal structure of color names and printed nonwords. However, various frames are not all equally preferred: the color black is named faster with a VCC frame, an infrequent and ill-formed frame, relative to a CVC frame, a frequent and grammatically preferred frame. These findings suggest that the representation of printed words specifies distinct slots for consonants and vowels, and readers are equipped with preferences (either grammatical or statistical) concerning skeletal frames. These conclusions underscore the contribution of linguistic knowledge to skilled reading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson M., Goldinger S. D. (1997) What the reader’s eye tells the mind’s ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception and Psychophysics 59: 1059–1068

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berent I. (1997) Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23: 1727–1742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berent I., Bouissa R., Tuller B. (2001) The effect of shared structure and content on reading nonwords: Evidence for a CV skeleton. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27: 1042–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berent I., Lennertz T., Jun J., Moreno M. A., Smolensky P. (2008) Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 5321–5325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent I., Marom M. (2005) The skeletal structure of printed words: Evidence from the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 31: 328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent I., Steriade D., Lennertz T., Vaknin V. (2007) What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition 104: 591–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berent I., Tzelgov J., Bibi U. (2006) The autonomous computation of morphophonological structure in reading: Evidence from the Stroop task. The Mental Lexicon 1(2): 201–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besner D. (2001) The myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from the Stroop’s paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8: 324–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bibi U., Tzelgov J., Henik A. (2000) Stroop effect in words that differ from color words in one letter only. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7: 678–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa S., Marslen-Wilson W. D. (2004) Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV-Skeleton in Arabic. Cognition 92: 271–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza A., Miceli G. (1993) The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition 37: 243–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa A., Sebastian-Gallés N. (1998) Abstract structure in language production: Evidence from Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24: 886–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crump M. J., Gong Z., Milliken B. (2006) The context-specific proportion congruent stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13: 316–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand L., Segui J. (1998) The syllable’s role in speech production: Are syllables chunks, schemas, or both? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5: 253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin V. (1973) Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague, Mouton

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J. H. (1978) Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In: Greenberg J. H., Ferguson C. A., Moravcsik E. A. (eds) Universals of Human Language (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 243–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Kello C. T., Plaut D. C., MacWhinney B. (2000) The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 340–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz M. (1994) Phonology in generative grammar. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucera H., Francis W. (1967) Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press, Providence, RI

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. (1985). A metrical theory of syllabicity. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

  • Lukatela G., Eaton T., Turvey M. T. (2001) Does visual word identification involve a sub-phonemic level? Cognition 78: B41–B52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeilage P. F. (1998) The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 499–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J. (1981) A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 373–418

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J., Prince A. (1995) Prosodic morphology. In: Goldsmith J. A. (eds) Phonological theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 318–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer P. (1996) Suprasegmental structures in phonological encoding: The CV structure. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 840–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nespor M., Peña M., Mehler J. (2003) On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti C. A., Bell L. (1991) Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms. of word identification. Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 473–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince A., Smolensky P. (1993) Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Blackwell, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus F., Mehler J. (1999) Language identification with suprasegmental cues: A study based on speech resynthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105: 512–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus F., Nespor M., Mehler J. (1999) Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73: 265–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp B., Caramazza A. (1997) From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: Levels of representation in written spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23: 1130–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raz A., Fan J., Posner M. I. (2005) Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 9978–9983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevald C., Dell G., Cole J. (1995) Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory & Language 34: 807–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger J. P. (1984) Length as a suprasegmental: Evidence from speech errors. Language 60: 895–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop J. R. (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M., Kougious P. (2004) The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. Brain & Language 90: 9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman R., Mullennix J., Bijeljac-Babic R., Richmond-Welty D. (1995) The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124: 107–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzelgov J., Henik A., Berger J. (1992a) Controlling Stroop effect by manipulating expectation for color related stimuli. Memory & Cognition 20: 727–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzelgov J., Meyer J., Henik A. (1992b) Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 166–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden G. C. (1991) Phonological mediation is fundamental to reading. In: Besner D., Humphreys G. (eds) Basic process in reading: Visual word recognition. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 77–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Berent.

Additional information

This research was supported by NIDCD grant R01 DC003277 to Iris Berent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marom, M., Berent, I. Phonological Constraints on the Assembly of Skeletal Structure in Reading. J Psycholinguist Res 39, 67–88 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9126-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9126-2

Keywords

Navigation