Abstract
Traditionally, reading research has focused on a limited number of languages and scripts. In order to delineate between universal and orthography-specific processes as well as build more comprehensive and representative universal models of reading, it is essential that we broaden this research (see Frost 2012). Although the overall goal of reading is to form a meaningful mental representation of text through decoding various visually complex symbols, the processes involved in attaining this goal substantially differ between orthographies. In order to effectively read and comprehend a text, readers need to attend to the distinctive visual features of the script which interface with the language of the reader. In this chapter, research on Thai has been used to illustrate how the distinctive features of orthography can influence the visual and attentional processes involved in visual word recognition and reading. The four areas of research that are focused on are (1) reading without interword spaces, (2) prominence of initial letter position and transposed-letter effects, (3) parafoveal-on-foveal effects, and (4) processing of lexical tone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Tones are marked in the Thai examples cited in this paper as follows; 0 = mid, 1 = low, 2 = falling, 3 = high, 4 = rising. This is based on the system that was developed at the Linguistics Research Unit (LRU) of Chulalongkorn University (Luksaneeyanawin 1993). IPA transcription is used for the transcription of all other Thai text.
References
Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277–1287.
Bertram, R., Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2004). Morphological parsing and the use of segmentation cues in reading Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 325–345.
Calvo, M. G., & Meseguer, E. (2002). Eye movements and processing stages in reading: Relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 5, 66–77.
Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., & Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 585–589.
Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225–241.
Chen, J.-Y., Lin, W.-C., & Ferrand, L. (2003). Masked priming of the syllable in Mandarin Chinese speech production. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45, 107–120.
Drieghe, D. (2011). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading. In S. Liversedge, I. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 839–855). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621–636.
Estes, W. K., Allmeyer, D. H., & Reder, S. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 1–15.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698.
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279.
Gandour, J. T. (2013). A functional deficit in the sensorimotor interface component as revealed by oral reading in Thai conduction aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 337–347.
Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577–601.
Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35.
Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1–24). New York: Nova Science.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1993). Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 201–221.
Hudak, T. J. (1990). Thai. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The major languages of East and South-East Asia (pp. 757–773). London: Routledge.
Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2004). Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 104–127.
Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., & Thomas, S. M. (2003). Assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, serial-position processing and retinal eccentricity in lateralized word perception. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 49–71.
Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 291–316.
Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153–168.
Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35.
Lee, C.-Y. (2007). Does horse activate mother? Processing lexical tone in form priming. Language and Speech, 50, 101–123.
Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530–542.
Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 268–281.
New, B., Araujo, V., & Nazzi, T. (2008). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1223–1227.
Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201–2217.
O’Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, 78–92.
O’Reagan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Reviews of oculomotor research (Vol. 4, pp. 395–453)., Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Perea, M. (1998). Orthographic neighbours are not all equal: Evidence using an identification technique. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 77–90.
Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49, 1994–2000.
Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600–1613.
Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246.
Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). La posición de las letras externas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras. Psicothema, 19, 559–564.
Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., García-Orza, J., & Carreiras, M. (2011a). Masked priming effects are modulated by expertise in the script. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 902–919.
Perea, M., Nakatani, C., & van Leeuwen, C. (2011b). Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: Are they orthographic in nature? Memory and Cognition, 39, 700–707.
Perea, M., Winskel, H., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: The case of Thai. Experimental Psychology., 59(2), 68–73.
Pynte, J., & Kennedy, A. (2006). An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French. Vision Research, 46, 3786–3801.
Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading. Past controversies, current deficits and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3–26.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
Rayner, K., & Kaiser, J. S. (1975). Reading mutilated text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 301–306.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129–1144.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476.
Sainio, M., Hyönä, J., Bingushi, K., & Bertram, R. (2007). The role of interword spacing in reading Japanese: An eye movement study. Vision Research, 47, 2575–2584.
Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.
Schroyens, W., Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1999). Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52(A), 1021–1046.
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.
Spragins, A. B., Lefton, L. A., & Fischer, D. F. (1976). Eye movements while reading and searching spatially transformed text: A developmental perspective. Memory and Cognition, 4, 36–42.
Tydgat, I., & Grainger, J. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 480–498.
Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141–156.
White, S. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 205–223.
White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 52–78.
White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1261–1276.
Winskel, H. (2011). Orthographic and phonological parafoveal processing of consonants, vowels, and tones when reading Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(4), 739–759.
Winskel, H. (2014). Learning to read and write in Thai. In H. Winskel & P. Padakannaya (Eds.). South and Southeast Asian Psycholinguistics (pp. 171–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winskel, H., & Iemwanthong, K. (2010). Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 1021–1053.
Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2014a). Does tonal information affect the early stages of visual-word processing in Thai? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2), 209–219.
Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2014b). Can parafoveal-on-foveal effects be obtained when reading an unspaced alphasyllabic script (Thai)? Writing Systems Research, 6, 94–104.
Winskel, H., Radach, R., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2009). Eye movements when reading spaced and unspaced Thai and English: A comparison of Thai-English bilinguals and English monolinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 339–351.
Winskel, H., Perea, M., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: Evidence from eye movements when reading Thai. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(8), 1522–1536.
Winskel, H., Padakannaya, P., & Pandey, A. (2014). Eye movements and reading in the alphasyllabic scripts of South and Southeast Asia. In H. Winskel & P. Padakannaya (Eds.). South and Southeast Asian Psycholinguistics (pp. 315–328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wotschack, C., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 548–562.
You, W.-P., Zhang, Q.-F., & Verdonschot, R. G. (2012). Masked syllable priming effects in word and picture naming in Chinese. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e46595.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winskel, H. (2015). Reading in Thai: Visual and Attentional Processes. In: Mishra, R., Srinivasan, N., Huettig, F. (eds) Attention and Vision in Language Processing. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2443-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2443-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2442-6
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2443-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)