Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of Verb Information in Parsing: Different Statistical Analyses Lead to Contradictory Conclusions

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research investigated how comprehenders use verb information during syntactic parsing. Two reading experiments investigated the relationship between verb-specific variables and reading time. These experiments were close replications of prior work; however, two statistical techniques were used, rather than one. These were item-by-item correlations and participant-by-participant regression. In Experiment 1, reading time was measured using a self-paced moving window. In Experiment 2, eye movements were recorded during reading. The results of both experiments showed that the results of two types of statistical analyses support contradictory conclusions. The analyses involving participant-by-participant regression analyses provided no evidence for the early use of verb information in parsing and support syntax-first approaches to parsing. In contrast, the results of item-by-item correlation were consistent with the prior research, supporting the view that verb information can guide initial parsing decisions. Implications for theories of parsing are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark H.H. (1973) The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 335–359. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton C. Jr., Duffy S. (2001) Sentence comprehension: Roles of linguistic structure. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 167–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L., Connine C. (1985) Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 696–708. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90426-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F., Henderson J. (1990) Use of verb information during syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye tracking and word by word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 555–568. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F., Henderson J. (1991) Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 725–745. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90034-H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford M., Bresnan J., Kaplan R.M. (1982) A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In: Bresnan J. (eds) The mental representation of grammatical relations. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis W.N., Kuèera H. (1982) Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Frazier L. (1987) Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In: Coltheart M. (eds) Attention and performance XII.. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 559–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier L. (1989) Against lexical generation of syntax. In: Marslen-Wilson W. (eds) Lexical representation and process. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 505–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier L., Fodor J.D. (1978) The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6: 1–34. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier L., Rayner K. (1982) Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14: 178–210. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey S.M., Pearlmutter N.J., Myers E., Lotocky M. (1997) The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 58–93. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes V.M., Stowe L.A., Cupples L. (1989) Lexical expectations in parsing complement verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 668–689. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90003-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy A., Murray W.S. (1984) Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 10: 833–847. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.6.833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A., Murray, W. S., Jennings, F., & Reid, C. (1989). Parsing complements: Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI 51–76.

  • Kennison S.M. (1999) American English usage frequencies for noun phrase and tensed sentence complement-taking verbs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 165–177. doi:10.1023/A:1023210309050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennison S.M. (2001) Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8: 132–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch R.F. Jr., Myers J.L. (1990) Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research: A comparison of three different methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 149–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald M. (1994) Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 157–201. doi:10.1080/01690969408402115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald M., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. (1994a) The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101: 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald M., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. (1994b) Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical ambiguity resolution. In: Clifton C., Frazier L., Rayner K. (eds) Perspectives on sentence processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 123–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D.C. (1984) An evaluation of subject-paced reading tasks and other methods of investigating immediate processes in reading. In: Kieras D.E., Just M. (eds) New methods in reading comprehension research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D.C. (1987) Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In: Coltheart M. (eds) Attention and performance XII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 601–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D.C. (1989) Verb guidance and other lexical effects in parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 4: 123–154. doi:10.1080/01690968908406366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D.C., Holmes V.M. (1985) The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 24: 542–559. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90045-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison R.E. (1984) Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 10: 667–682. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K., Carlson M., Frazier L. (1983) The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 358–374. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90236-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner K., Sereno S., Morris R., Schmauder R., Clifton C. Jr. (1989) Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 4: 21–50. doi:10.1080/01690968908406362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro L.P., Brookins B., Gordon B., Nagel N. (1991) Verb effects during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17: 983–996. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.5.983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro L.P., Nagel N., Levine B.A. (1993) Preferences for a verb’s complements and their use in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 96–114. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro L.P., Zurif E.B., Grimshaw J. (1989) Verb processing during sentence comprehension: Contextual impenetrability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18: 223–243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus M.K., Carlson G.N. (1989) Lexical structure and language comprehension. In: Marslen-Wilson W. (eds) Lexical representation and process. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 529–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueswell J., Tanenhaus M.K. (1994) Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In: Clifton C., Frazier L., Rayner K. (eds) Perspectives on sentence processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 155–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Kello C. (1993) Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19: 528–553. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 215 North Murray Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA

    Shelia M. Kennison

Authors
  1. Shelia M. Kennison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelia M. Kennison.

Additional information

This research was financially supported by Grants HD-07327 and HD-18708 awarded to the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and supported by a grant awarded to the author by the National Science Foundation (BCS 0446998).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennison, S.M. The Use of Verb Information in Parsing: Different Statistical Analyses Lead to Contradictory Conclusions. J Psycholinguist Res 38, 363–378 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9096-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9096-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation