Abstract
Allergic diseases are a socially significant problem of global importance. The number of people suffering from pollen allergies has increased dramatically in recent decades. Pollen allergies affect up to 30% of the world population. Pollen of the common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) is one of the most aggressive allergens in the world. We have used a series of immunoinformatics approaches to design an effective epitope-based vaccine, which might induce a competent immunity against a major allergen Amb a 11. CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell epitopes and their corresponding MHC restricted alleles were identified by prediction tools provided by immune epitope database (IEDB). Among T-cell epitopes, MHC class I peptide (GLMEPAFTYV) and MHC class II peptide (LVCFSFSLVLILGLV) were identified as most suitable. From all predicted B-cell epitopes, only one epitope (GKLVKFSEQQLVDC) containing sequence from the conserved region was chosen for next processing. Selected epitopes have been validated by molecular docking analysis. These epitopes showed a very strong binding affinity to MHC I molecule and MHC II molecule with binding energy scores − 729.3 and − 725.0 kcal/mole respectively. Performed experimental validation showed that only the MHC class II peptide (LVCFSFSLVLILGLV) can stimulate T cells from ragweed allergic patients and IgE antibodies specific to the ragweed pollen do not recognize this epitope. Therefore, this peptide could be potentially used as a vaccine against the major allergen Amb a 11. The B-cell epitope GKLVKFSEQQLVDC forms a stable complex with the IgE molecule (energy weighted score − 695,0 kcal/mole). Tested sera from patients with ragweed allergy showed that the ragweed specific IgE antibodies can bind to the identified B-cell epitope. Population coverage analysis was performed for CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell epitopes. It was predicted that CD4+ T-cell epitope (LVCFSFSLVLILGLV) covers 90.56% of the population of Europe and 99.36% of the world population. CD8+ T-cell epitope (GLMEPAFTYV) has a population coverage of 77.37% for Europe and 71.35% for all the world.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Pollen allergens are one of the major factors leading to severe type I respiratory allergies, which affect up to 30% of the human population [1]. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) and its pollen cause serious losses in the economy and in various spheres of life. Ambrosia artemisiifolia is the most important from the allergic point of view, as its pollen is extremely allergenic and very low concentrations can trigger allergic reactions (allergic rhinitis, asthma or contact dermatitis) in sensitive patients. Allergy to pollen from Ambrosia artemisiifolia is a serious health issue exerting a strong negative impact on the quality of life of allergic patients [2, 3].
Ambrosia artemisiifolia belongs to genus Ambrosia (Asteraceae). This genus includes about 40 species and it is associated with severe and widespread allergies caused by the pollen of its representatives. Short ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) is native to Northern and Central America, but it has been introduced and subsequently naturalized in many countries including a large part of Europe [4, 5]. In Europe, Ambrosia artemisiifolia is predominant among all Ambrosia species. Short ragweed is mainly found in France, Germany, Hungary, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Poland, Northern Italy, and Eastern Austria [6,7,8,9,10].
It is important to underline that the pollen of Ambrosia artemisiifolia is produced in enormous amounts (a plant may produce 100 million–3 billion pollen grains) and even low exposure (5–10 pollen/m3 in air) is sufficient to initiate allergic reactions in sensitive individuals [11, 12]. To date, 11 ragweed allergens have been identified in the Ambrosia artemisiifolia pollen. Among them, the pectate lyase Amb a 1 and the cysteine protease Amb a 11 are described as major allergens. Within the ragweed pollen-allergic patients, they have a sensitization rate of 90 and 66%, respectively [13, 14]. Amb a 2 (a pectate lyase), Amb a 3 and Amb a 7 (two plastocyanins), Amb a 4 (homolog to the major mugwort allergen Art v 1), Amb a 5 (with unknown function), Amb a 6 (a nonspecific lipid transfer protein), Amb a 8 (profilin), and Amb a 9 and Amb a 10 (calcium-binding proteins) are considered as minor allergens. Sensitization rates of the minor allergens vary between 10 and 50% [15, 16]. There is significant cross-reactivity between the common ragweed and other Ambrosia species, mugwort, marsh elder or other grass pollens. The molecular weights of ragweed allergens range from 5 to 38 kDa, and they are grouped according to their biological differences [17].
Amb a 11 is 28 kDa glycosylated protein belonging to the peptidase family C1, subfamily C1A. It is very similar to the mite allergens Der p 1 and Der f 1, one of the most powerful known allergens. Recently, Amb a 11 was suggested as a novel major allergen with strong allergenicity (66%) [18]. Twenty different isoforms and glycoforms of the major allergen Amb a 11 were described in the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature database [15].
Immunoinformatics is a branch of bioinformatics that has been successfully used in the field of vaccinology. The immunoinformatics approach is the most efficient method for development of the epitope-based peptide vaccines [19, 20]. In recent years, epitope-based vaccines are preferable than the traditional vaccines because of several advantages: they are focused on the immune response, enhancing immunity and avoiding undesirable epitopes, more convenient production, and reducing costs [21].
Due to the climate change (warmer temperatures and increased carbon dioxide concentrations enable ragweed to produce more pollen), the number of individuals sensitive to ragweed pollen is increasing continuously in the United States and Europe [22, 23]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to design an efficient epitope-based peptide vaccine against the major allergen Amb a 11 using potential T-cell (CD8 + and CD4 +) and B-cell epitopes.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Retrieval of Amb a 11 and Identification of Conserved Regions Among Homologous Pollen Allergen of Amb a 11
The amino acids sequence and 3D structure of Amb a 11 allergenic protein was extracted from UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/) [24] in FASTA and PDB formats. In structural database of allergenic proteins (SDAP) [25], FAO/WHO Allergenicity Rules, which are based on sequence homology for full FASTA alignment, showed that the sequence of “V5LU01” contains 22 sequences of allergens with E-values < 0.01. The protein sequences of selected pollen allergens were extracted from Swiss-prot in FASTA format. Conservancy can be defined as the portion of protein sequences that restrain the epitope measured at or exceeding a specific level of identity. To identify the conserved regions of Amb a 11 protein, the sequence was aligned with retrieved sequences of selected pollen allergens by using the ClustalW program of the phylogenetic software MEGA-7 [26]. Phylogenetic tree of the retrieved sequences of the Amb a 11 and the pollen allergens was created using MEGA-7 software [26]. The evolutionary distances were calculated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method within the software.
2.2 Prediction of CD8 + T-cell Epitopes and Their MHC Binding HLA-Alleles
MHC I prediction tool of the immune epitope database (IEDB) (http://tools.iedb.org/mhc1) [27] was used to determine the ability of the selected sequence to bind to a specific MHC class I molecule. Linear CD8 + T-cell epitopes were recognized by consensus approaches using various methods such as artificial neural network (ANN) [28], which was used to calculate IC50 values of peptide binding to MHC I molecules and determination of the HLA alleles; Stabilized matrix method (SMM) [29], which was applied to predict peptide binding to MHC molecules, proteasomal cleavage of protein sequences and peptide transport by the transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP). For both, frequent and non-frequent alleles, peptide length was set to 10 amino acids. On the basis of low IC50 values, only 10 potential peptides were chosen for next processing.
2.3 Prediction of CD4 + T-cell Epitopes and Their MHC Binding HLA-Alleles
The MHC II groove has the ability to bind peptides of different lengths, making the prediction more difficult and less accurate. MHC II prediction tool provided by the immune epitope database (IEDB) was used to predict 15 amino acid long CD4 + T-cell epitopes. MHC II binding prediction was achieved using a consensus approach, which combines NN-align, SMM-align [30], and Combinatorial library methods. All epitopes that bind to many alleles at score equal or less than 1000 half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) were selected for further analysis.
2.4 Population Coverage Prediction for CD8 + and CD4 + T-cell Epitopes and Their Alleles
The population coverage for identified T-cell epitopes was calculated by using epitope analysis tools of IEDB analysis resource server (http://tools.iedb.org/population/) [31]. All finally predicted CD8+ and CD4 + T-cell epitopes and their MHC I and MHC II molecules were assessed for the European and world population.
2.5 Identification of B-cell Epitopes
The prediction of B-cell epitopes is a main step for epitope-based vaccine development as it produces antibodies that assure humoral immunity. Recognition of B-cell epitopes was depended on various physico-chemical properties such as antigenicity, accessibility of surface, flexibility, turns, exposed surface, polarity hydrophilicity and predictions of linear epitope [32]. Potential B-cell epitopes were characterized by B-cell epitope prediction tools (http://tools.iedb.org/bcell/) of the immune epitope database using B-cell prediction methods such as Kolaskar and Tongaonkar antigenicity scale [33], Bepipred linear epitope prediction [34] Emini surface accessibility prediction [35], Karplus and Schulz flexibilty prediction [36], Parker hydrophilicity prediction [37] and Chou and Fashman beta turn prediction tool [38].
2.6 In Silico Molecular Docking
Peptide structure prediction server (PEP-FOLD 3) (https://bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/services/PEP-FOLD3/) was utilized to predict the three dimensional structure of the selected epitopes [39]. The crystal structures of HLA‐A0201 (PDB ID: 4UQ3) and DQA1*03:01/DQB1*02:01 (PDB ID: 4D8P) were downloaded from the RCSB protein data bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do) as PDB format [40, 41]. Crystal structures were in the complex form of protein and ligand, hence the discovery studio v16.1.0 [42]. was used to separate the protein and ligand from the complex structures. All water molecules and heteroatoms were then removed. In silico docking simulation was done in order to estimate the binding affinities between the epitopes and specific HLA proteins (MHC I & MHC II) and immunoglobulin E (IgE). Docking simulation study was performed through automated online server ClusPro 2.0 (https://cluspro.bu.edu/home.php) [43].
2.7 Experimental Validation
Ten subjects (7 females and 3 males, 30–45 years old) with proven allergy to ragweed pollen and 10 healthy age-matched controls (4 females and 6 males, 32–43 years old) were enrolled in this study. The selection of allergic patients was performed in collaboration with an experienced allergist based on a positive prick test to ragweed pollen (ALK-Abelló A/S Hørsholm, Denmark) and presence of IgE antibodies specific to ragweed pollen extract (ImmunoCAP, ImmunoDiagnostics Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden). Recruited healthy individuals had negative prick tests to ragweed pollen and no clinical histories of pollen allergies. None of the participants had received corticosteroids or allergen-specific immunotherapy during the last 2 months before taking blood samples.
Peripheral venous blood samples (3 mL) were collected from each participant into BD Vacutainer® K2EDTA tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Oakville, ON, USA) and centrifuged at 1500 g for 15 min. The sera were transferred to 2 mL cryotubes and stored at − 80 °C until further analyses. Then, red blood cells were lysed with 0.84% NH4Cl, and after washing with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS, Gibco®, Life Technologies™, Paisley, Scotland, UK), the remaining cells were resuspended at a concentration of 2.5 × 106 cells/mL in RPMI-1640 medium, supplemented with a stabilized antibiotic antimycotic solution (penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B) and 10% fetal bovine serum (all from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany).
Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 in the presence of 5 µg/mL of the identified T-cell (MHC class-I peptide GLMEPAFTYV and MHC class-II peptide LVCFSFSLVLILGLV) and B-cell (GKLVKFSEQQLVDC) epitopes in a volume of 200 μL in 96-well plates (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland). Peptides representing T- and B-cell epitopes were synthesized by Schafer-N (Copenhagen, Denmark).
After 72 h, the production of IL-2 in the culture supernatant was measured by LEGEND MAX™ Human IL-2 kit (BioLegend Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sensitivity of the assay was 4 pg/mL.
IgE antibodies specific to the identified epitopes were assayed by ELISA. Briefly, plates were coated overnight at 4 °C with 10 μg/mL of the synthetic peptides that represent the epitopes (50 μL/well). After blocking with D-PBS, 0.05% Tween 20 and 1% BSA, the plates were washed and sera diluted 1:5 (100 μL/well) were applied onto the coated plates in triplicates and incubated overnight at 4 °C. IgE was detected with peroxidase-conjugated monoclonal anti-human IgE (clone GE-1, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). 2,2-azino-di-[2-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate] diammonium salt (ABTS tablets, Roche Diagnostics) was used as substrate, and OD values were determined by a microplate reader (ELx800™, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) at 405 nm.
All tests and analyses were performed in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki ethical guidelines and was approved by the local Ethics committee at the Paisii Hilendarski University of Plovdiv. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
2.8 Statistics
All experiments related to the experimental validation were conducted in triplicate and results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 10). To compare non-parametric data for statistical significance, the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied using the StatView program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
3 Results
3.1 Retrieving of Amb a 11 Protein Sequences and Identification of Conserved Domains
In this study, the amino acids sequence of the Amb a 11 was retrieved from the UniProt database and then applied FAO/WHO Allergenicity Rules based on sequence homology in the SDAP allergen database. We identified 22 homologous allergens of the pollen allergen Amb a 11 as shown in Table 1. Multiple sequence alignment was performed to identify conserved sequences with varying lengths (Table 2). The conserved region analysis helps us to identify the essential functional parts of the target protein sequences. A phylogenetic tree was created to indicate the evolutionary relationship of the pollen allergen Amb a 11 and the identified 22 allergens (Fig. 1).
3.2 Prediction of CD8 + T-cell Epitopes and Their MHC Binding HLA-Alleles
In this experiment, we utilized the MHC I binding prediction tool from the immune epitope database (IEDB) to calculate IC50 value and percentile rank for peptides binding to specific MHC I molecules. Peptides that have the ability to bind to a larger number of alleles are identified as the most suitable because of their potential to elicit a potent protective response. Only ten CD8 + T-cell epitopes were selected as potential vaccine candidates according to the low percentile rank and IC50 values for their respective alleles (Table 3).
3.3 Prediction of CD4 + T-cell Epitopes and Their MHC Binding HLA-Alleles
In this study, the amino acids sequence of Amb a 11 allergen was analyzed using IEDB MHC II binding prediction tool to determine the ability of the submitted sequence to bind to a specific MHC II molecule. A consensus approach, which combines NN-align, SMM-align, and Combinatorial library methods were used for the prediction of peptides, which can interact with MHC class II alleles. The list of the most promising CD4 + T-cell epitopes and their correspondent binding MHC II alleles are shown in Table 4.
3.4 Analysis of Population Coverage
The population coverage analysis is a vital factor in the design of epitope-based vaccines. High population coverage of vaccine compounds is significant due to a lot of people can be benefited by only one vaccine preparation. In this study, IEDB population coverage tool (http://tools.iedb.org/population/) was applied to determine the population coverage of the predicted CD8 + and CD4 + T-cell epitopes. The population coverage analysis results showed a great coverage of the European and world population (Table 5).
3.5 B-cell Epitope Prediction
B-cell epitope identification is an essential characteristic in the design of an epitope-based peptide vaccine because an ideal epitope-based vaccine contains T- and B-cell epitopes. The amino acid sequence of Amb a 11 allergenic protein was subjected to Parker Hydrophilicity, Chou & Fasman Beta-Turn, Karplus & Schulz Flexibility, Emini surface accessibility, and Kolaskar and Tongaonkar antigenicity methods in IEDB, to determine the binding to B cell, being in the surface and to test the immunogenicity. From all predicted B-cell epitopes, only one epitope (“GKLVKFSEQQLVDC”) was chosen for next processing (Table 6). Predicted linear B-cell epitope and the accessibility, antigenicity, hydrophilicity, flexibility and beta-turn prediction score for each residue are summarized in Table 6. This peptide contains the sequence “SEQQLVDC”, which is presented in the conserved region of pollen allergen Amb a 11 (Table 2).
3.6 Docking Study of B-Cell and T-Cell Epitopes
A web-based server, PEP-FOLD 3 was used to create 3D structures of the predicted T- and B-cell epitopes (“GLMEPAFTYV”, “LVCFSFSLVLILGLV” and “GKLVKFSEQQLVDC”) (Fig. 2). Five models were created for each peptide and the structure with the lowest energy was chosen for further analysis. The selected models were docked through ClusPro v2.0 with the MHC receptors and the immunoglobulin protein E, respectively. CD8 + T-cell peptide showed significant binding affinity to the MHC I molecule (Fig. 3B). The 3D structures of the best docked-complexes are illustrated in Fig. 3.
3.7 Functional Validation of Predicted Epitopes
In order to validate the functional activity of the predicted epitopes we have tested whether the T-cells and antibodies from patients allergic to ragweed pollen recognize these epitopes. As can be seen in Fig. 4, T-cell response was observed only for the cells isolated from allergic patients against T-cell epitope 2 (LVCFSFSLVLILGLV) presented from MHC class II molecules. Stimulation of T cells with this peptide significantly increased production of IL-2 in the group of patients with ragweed allergy compared to the healthy controls (Fig. 4). There was no response against predicted T-cell epitope 1 (GLMEPAFTYV) and the B-cell epitope (GKLVKFSEQQLVDC).
When we evaluated the sera collected from the same allergic and healthy subjects for presence of specific IgE antibodies, we detected in the allergic group IgE that specifically recognized the identified B-cell epitope (Fig. 5). Compared to the control group, levels of these antibodies were significantly higher.
Our data showed that predicted T-cell epitope 2 (LVCFSFSLVLILGLV) and the B-cell epitope (GKLVKFSEQQLVDC) are functional. They can be recognized by T-cells and antibodies, respectively.
4 Discussion
Nowadays, the development of new vaccines mainly depends on the design of peptide-based vaccines. The synthetic peptide-based vaccines are an alternative solution to overcome all the adverse effects of the classical vaccines. The improvement in the field of immunoinformatics has become a potential field for predicting the efficacy of the peptide-based vaccines [44].
In the current study, potential T- and B-cell epitopes were evaluated as possible epitope-based peptide vaccines against the allergen Amb a 11. The obtained results of FAO/WHO Allergenicity Rules based on Sequence Homology showed that Amb a 11 shares homology with other major allergens belonging to the same protease family, such as Act d 1 from Actinidia deliciosa (37.0%), Ana c 2 from Ananas comosus (34.1%), and Der f/Der p 1 from Dermatophagoides farinae/Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (26.0/24.4%;). These results correspond to the results obtained by Bouley et al. [18]. Car p papain from Carica papaya (34.6%), Blo t 1 from Blomia tropicalis (34.6%), Eur m 1 from Euroglyphus maynei, and Gly m 1 from Glycine max were newly established. Multiple sequence alignment with other allergens was performed to identify the conserved sequences (Table 2). A phylogenetic tree was created to indicate the evolutionary relationship of the pollen allergen Amb a 11 and the identified twenty two homologous allergens (Fig. 1). The phylogenetic analysis showed a close evolutionary relationship between the homologous allergens.
The binding between T-cell epitopes and the MHC molecules is crucial for the cellular immune response. The selection of T-cell epitopes was performed according to the binding affinity of the highest numbers of alleles and the lowest IC50 value. The CD8 + T-cell peptide “GLMEPAFTYV” was found to interact with seven alleles (HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*02:03, HLA-A*02:06, HLA-A*68:02, HLA-B*15:01, HLA-A*03:01, HLA-A*31:01), while the CD4 + T-cell peptide “LVCFSFSLVLILGLV” interacts with a large number of alleles including HLA-DQA1*03:01/DQB1*02:01, HLA-DPA1*03:01/DPB1*04:02, HLA-DPA1*01/DPB1*04:01, HLA-DPA1*01:03/DPB1*02:01, HLA-DPA1*02:01/DPB1*01:01, respectively.
B-cell epitope prediction is an essential characteristic in the design of an epitope-based vaccine [45]. The prediction scores of Emini surface accessibility [35], Parker hydrophilicity [37], Karplus and Schulz flexibility [36], and Chou and Fashman beta turn [38] for each residue of the peptide “GKLVKFSEQQLVDC” as a part of the amino acid sequence of Amb a 11, reveal that this peptide is the most possible B-cell epitope presented in this pollen allergen.
The population coverage is an important analysis step that might reflect to the possibility of the epitope to be used in vaccine design [46]. The selected T-cell peptides were subjected to MHC I and MHC II based population coverage analysis in Europe and worldwide as shown in Table 5. It was predicted that CD4 + T-cell epitope “LVCFSFSLVLILGLV” covers 90.56% of the population of Europe and 99.36% of the world population. CD8 + T-cell epitope “GLMEPAFTYV” has a population coverage of 77.37% for Europe and 71.35% worldwide. So, it may be concluded that these epitopes may cover a high amount of population when applied as a vaccine.
Our validation experiments demonstrate that T-cell epitope 2 (LVCFSFSLVLILGLV) could be used as a potential vaccine against the major allergen Amb a 11, because it can activate T cells leading to production of IgG antibodies against the ragweed pollen (neutralizing antibodies), but at the same time it is not recognized by the IgE antibodies. Thus, this peptide should not cause an allergic reaction.
An in silico molecular docking was done to explore the binding affinity between the selected peptides and their immune receptors (MHC-I and MHC-II molecules and IgE). The HLA‐A0201, HLA‐DQA1*03:01/DQB1*02:01 and immunoglobulin E “4poz” were selected as the macromolecules for docking. Docking study of CD8 + T-cell epitope “GLMEPAFTYV” with HLA‐A0201, showed lowest binding energy − 729.3 kcal/mole. Interaction between CD4 + T-cell epitope “LVCFSFSLVLILGLV” with MHC II allelic protein HLA‐DQA1*03:01/DQB1*02:01 with binding energy − 725.0 kcal/mole is shown in Fig. 3A. The B-cell epitope GKLVKFSEQQLVDC forms a stable complex with the IgE molecule (energy weighted score − 695,0) (Fig. 3C). The 3D structures of the best docked-complexes are illustrated in Fig. 3.
5 Conclusion
At the moment, in Europe, short ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) is of great concern because it is one of the most prominent invasive species. The development of allergy to the short ragweed pollen is a major health problem. Therefore, in this study we designed an epitope-based peptide vaccine against Amb a 11 (a new major allergen belonging to the cysteine protease family) by using an immunoinformatics approach. The proposed T- and B-cell epitopes (“GLMEPAFTYV”, “LVCFSFSLVLILGLV” and “GKLVKFSEQQLVDC”) showed high susceptibility and can be proceeded for further experimental verification for vaccine designing against the allergen Amb a 11. The MHC class II peptide (LVCFSFSLVLILGLV) is a promising candidate as a specific vaccine against the major allergen Amb a 11 because it can stimulate T cells from ragweed allergic patients.
References
Smith M, Cecchi L, Skjoth CA, Karrer G, Sikoparija B (2013) Common ragweed: a threat to environmental health in Europe. Environ Int 61:115–126
Taramarcaz P, Lambelet B, Clot B, Keimer C, Hauser C (2005) Ragweed (Ambrosia) progression and its health risks: will Switzerland resist this invasion? Swiss Med Wkly 135:538–548
Lehoczky E, Szabo R, Nelima MO, Nagy P, Beres I (2010) Examination of common ragweed’s (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) allelopathic effect on some weed species. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 75:107–111
D’Amato G, Cecchi L, Bonini S, Nunes C, Annesi-Maesano I, Behrendt H et al (2007) Allergenic pollen and pollen allergy in Europe. Allergy 62:976–990
Quimby PC Jr, DeLoach CJ, Wineriter SA, Goolsby JA, Sobhian R, Boyette CD et al (2003) Biological control of weeds: research by the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service: selected case studies. Pest Manage Sci 59:671–680
Fumanal B, Chauvel B, Bretagnolle F (2007) Estimation of pollen and seed production of common ragweed in France. Ann Agric Environ Med 14:233–236
Burbach GJ, Heinzerling LM, Rohnelt C, Bergmann KC, Behrendt H, Zuberbier T et al (2009) Ragweed sensitization in Europe—GA(2)LEN study suggests increasing prevalence. Allergy 64:664–665
Sikoparija B, Smith M, Skjoth CA, Radisic P, Milkovska S, Simic S et al (2009) The Pannonian plain as a source of Ambrosia pollen in the Balkans. Int J Biometeorol 53:263–272
Cunze S, Leiblein MC, Tackenberg O (2013) Range expansion of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe is promoted by climate change. ISRN Ecol 2013:610126
Chapman DS, Haynes T, Beal S, Essl F, Bullock JM (2014) Phenology predicts the native and invasive range limits of common ragweed. Glob Chang Biol 20:192–202
Emberlin J (1994) The effects of patterns in climate and pollen abundance on allergy. Allergy 49:15–20
DellaValle CT, Triche EW, Leaderer BP, Bell ML (2012) Effects of ambient pollen concentrations on frequency and severity of asthma symptoms among asthmatic children. Epidemiology 23:55–63
Asero R, Wopfner N, Gruber P, Gadermaier G, Ferreira F (2006) Artemisia and Ambrosia hypersensitivity: co-sensitization or co-recognition? Clin Exp Allergy 36:658–665
Gadermaier G, Wopfner N, Wallner M, Egger M, Didierlaurent A, Regl G et al (2008) Array-based profiling of ragweed and mugwort pollen allergens. Allergy 63:1543–1549
Goodman RE, Breiteneder H (2019) The WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature. Allergy 74:429–431
Bordas-Le Floch V, Groeme R, Chabre H, Baron-Bodo V, Nony E, Mascarell L et al (2015) New insights into ragweed pollen allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 15:63
Stemeseder T, Hemmer W, Hawranek T, Gadermaier G (2014) Marker allergens of weed pollen—basic considerations and diagnostic benefits in the clinical routine: part 16 of the series molecular allergology. Allergo J Int 23:274–280
Bouley J, Groeme R, Le Mignon M, Jain K, Chabre H, Bordas-Le Floch V et al (2015) Identification of the cysteine protease Amb a 11 as a novel major allergen from short ragweed. J Allergy Clin Immunol 136:1055–1064
Mahendran R, Jeyabaskar S, Sitharaman G, Michael RD, Paul AV (2016) Computer-aided vaccine designing approach against fish pathogens Edwardsiella tarda and Flavobacterium columnare using bioinformatics softwares. Drug Des Dev Ther 10:1703–1714
Zahroh H, Ma’rup A, Tambunan US, Parikesit AA (2016) Immunoinformatics approach in designing epitope-based vaccine against meningitis-inducing bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae Type b). Drug Target Insights 10:19–29
Hirayama M, Nishimura Y (2016) The present status and future prospects of peptide-based cancer vaccines. Int Immunol 28:319–328
Cunze S, Heydel F, Tackenberg O (2013) Are plant species able to keep pace with the rapidly changing climate? PLoS ONE 8:e67909
Ring J, Kramer U, Schafer T, Behrendt H (2001) Why are allergies increasing? Curr Opin Immunol 13:701–708
Groeme R, Airouche S, Kopecny D, Jaekel J, Savko M, Berjont N et al (2016) Structural and functional characterization of the major allergen Amb a 11 from short ragweed pollen. J Biol Chem 291:13076–13087
Ivanciuc O, Schein CH, Braun W (2003) SDAP: database and computational tools for allergenic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 31:359–362
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874
Vita R, Mahajan S, Overton JA, Dhanda SK, Martini S, Cantrell JR et al (2019) The immune epitope database (IEDB): 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D339–D343
Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Worning P, Lauemoller SL, Lamberth K, Buus S et al (2003) Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations. Protein Sci 12:1007–1017
Peters B, Sette A (2005) Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method. BMC Bioinform 6:132
Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Lund O (2007) Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method. BMC Bioinform 8:238
Bui HH, Sidney J, Dinh K, Southwood S, Newman MJ, Sette A (2006) Predicting population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines. BMC Bioinform 7:153
Fieser TM, Tainer JA, Geysen HM, Houghten RA, Lerner RA (1987) Influence of protein flexibility and peptide conformation on reactivity of monoclonal anti-peptide antibodies with a protein alpha-helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:8568–8572
Kolaskar AS, Tongaonkar PC (1990) A semi-empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. FEBS Lett 276:172–174
Larsen JE, Lund O, Nielsen M (2006) Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes. Immunome Res 2:2
Emini EA, Hughes JV, Perlow DS, Boger J (1985) Induction of hepatitis A virus-neutralizing antibody by a virus-specific synthetic peptide. J Virol 55:836–839
Karplus PA, Schulz GE (1985) Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins. Naturwissenschaften 72:212–213
Parker JM, Guo D, Hodges RS (1986) New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry 25:5425–5432
Yang JT (1996) Prediction of protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence. J Protein Chem 15:185–191
Shen Y, Maupetit J, Derreumaux P, Tuffery P (2014) Improved PEP-FOLD approach for peptide and miniprotein structure prediction. J Chem Theory Comput 10:4745–4758
Tollefsen S, Hotta K, Chen X, Simonsen B, Swaminathan K, Mathews II et al (2012) Structural and functional studies of trans-encoded HLA-DQ2.3 (DQA1*03:01/DQB1*02:01) protein molecule. J Biol Chem 287:13611–13619
Choo JA, Thong SY, Yap J, van Esch WJ, Raida M, Meijers R et al (2014) Bioorthogonal cleavage and exchange of major histocompatibility complex ligands by employing azobenzene-containing peptides. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53:13390–13394
Gao YD, Huang JF (2011) An extension strategy of discovery studio 2.0 for non-bonded interaction energy automatic calculation at the residue level. Dongwuxue Yanjiu 32:262–266
Kozakov D, Hall DR, Xia B, Porter KA, Padhorny D, Yueh C et al (2017) The ClusPro web server for protein-protein docking. Nat Protoc 12:255–278
Pandey RK, Bhatt TK, Prajapati VK (2018) Novel immunoinformatics approaches to design multi-epitope subunit vaccine for malaria by investigating anopheles salivary protein. Sci Rep 8:1125
Bibi S, Ullah I, Zhu B, Adnan M, Liaqat R, Kong W-B et al (2021) In silico analysis of epitope-based vaccine candidate against tuberculosis using reverse vaccinology. Sci Rep 11:1249
Fleri W, Paul S, Dhanda SK, Mahajan S, Xu X, Peters B et al (2017) The immune epitope database and analysis resource in epitope discovery and synthetic vaccine design. Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00278
Funding
This work was supported by the Bulgarian National Research Fund; contract number KP-06-M31/2. The National program “Young Researchers and Postdocs, 2021” financed by the Ministryof Education and Science, Bulgaria, is highly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Concept and planning were done by DM and BD; data preparing and computational analysis were done by DM, DK, KT and TM; the manuscript was written by DM and BD; the manuscript was reviewed and rewritten by DM, DK, KT, TM and BD.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moten, D., Kolchakova, D., Todorov, K. et al. Design of an Epitope-Based Peptide Vaccine Against the Major Allergen Amb a 11 Using Immunoinformatic Approaches. Protein J 41, 315–326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-022-10050-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-022-10050-z