Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevention and Management of Work Disability in Asia Pacific: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: The economic growth in Asia Pacific brings with it challenges and opportunities in many areas of work and health. As economies grow and work demands increase so do accidents, injures and work disability. Methods: Burns, chemical exposures, and construction related injuries are often catastrophic in severity and lead to work disability, major acute medical and subsequent rehabilitation efforts. In addition to these acute injuries, musculoskeletal and chronic illnesses are also sources of work disability. Results: Industrial injuries and health problems are often explained and managed based on the classic unidimensional hazard prevention model. In contrast, work disability is a multi-factorial problem and requires more complex conceptualizations than an exposure outcome model. The economic impact of disability, limitations of the widely used impairment based disability determination method, lack of adherence to wide scale implementation of evidence based clinical approaches, the need for meaningful stakeholder involvement and the potential of a multivariable view of work disability, in all aspects of work disability prevention, management and policy are discussed in the context of Asia Pacific economic growth. Conclusions: With ideal alignment of diverse goals and incentives along with consideration of past efforts in disability prevention and management, new models, processes and policies can be created as commerce in these countries continues to grow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pransky G, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Loisel P. Improving return to work research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):453–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caicoya M, Delclos GL. Work demands and musculoskeletal disorders from the Spanish National Survey. Occup Med (Lond). 2010;60(6):447–50. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

  3. Rahman ZA, Atiya AS. Prevalence of work-related upper limbs symptoms (WRULS) among office workers. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2009;21(3):252–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lötters FJ, Foets M, Burdorf A. Work and health, a blind spot in curative healthcare? A pilot study. J Occup Rehabil. 2010. [Epub ahead of print].

  5. Takala J. Workplace safety and health as a strategy for success. Singapore WSH Conference, Symposium 1: Development & Implementation of National WSH Strategies Presentation. 2010 Sept [cited 2010 Dec 28]: [about 2 p.]. Available from: http://www.osha.europa.eu/en/press/articles/presentation-whs-singapore-2010.

  6. Gerr F, Marcus F, Monteilh C, Hannan L, Ortiz D, Kleinbaum D. A randomised controlled trial of postural interventions for prevention of musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:478–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: low back and upper extremities. Panel on Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace. Commission on behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001.

  8. Melzak R. Pain and stress. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, editors. Psychosocial factors in pain: critical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 103.

  9. Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, Webster B. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Norlund A, Ropponen A, Alexanderson K. Multidisciplinary interventions: review of studies of return to work after rehabilitation for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):115–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spitzer WO, Le Blanc FE, Dupuis M. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the quebec task force on spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987;12(7 Suppl):S1–59.

  12. Williams DA, Feuerstein M, Durbin D, Pezzullo J. Health care and indemnity costs across the natural history of disability in occupational low back pain. Spine. 1998;23(21):2329–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Costa Lda C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Hancock MJ, Herbert RD, Refshauge KM, Henschke N. Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b3829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krause N, Ragland DR. Occupational disability due to low back pain: a new interdisciplinary classification based on a phase model of disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(9):1011–20.

  15. Turner JA, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Stover B, Wu R, Gluck JV, Wickizer, TM. Early predictors of chronic work disability: a prospective, population-based study of workers with back injuries. SPINE. 2008;33(25):2809–18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schröer CAP, Janssen M, van Amelsvoort LGPM, Bosma H, Swaen GMH, Nijhuis FJN, van Eijk J. Organizational characteristics as predictors of work disability: a prospective study among sick employees of for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(3):435–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li AL, Yen D. Changes in referral pattern to a surgeon for low back pain: 1996 versus 2009. Healthc Q. 2010;13(3):91–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feuerstein M, Marcus SC, Huang GD. National trends in nonoperative care for nonspecific back pain. Spine J. 2004;4(1):56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koes BW, Van Tulder MW, Ostelo R. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine. 2001;26:2504–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2075–94. Epub 2010 Jul 3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feuerstein M, Hartzell M, Rogers HL, Marcus SC. Evidence-based practice for acute low back pain in primary care: patient outcomes and cost of care. Pain. 2006;124(1–2):140–9. Epub 2006 May 16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Medically certified sickness absence. BMJ. 2008;337:a1174. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1174.

  23. Feuerstein M. Work and cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz M, Bruns GL, Stoler M, Nassif T, Yu X. Work and cancer survivors: a conceptual framework. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:415–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Impairment Resources [Internet]. Framingham MA: Impairment Resources, LLC; c2010 [updated 2010; cited 2010 Dec 28]. Use of AMA Guides; [1 screen]. Available from: http://www.impairment.com/Use_of_AMA_Guides.htm.

  26. Holmes EB. Impairment rating and disability determination. eMedicine [serial online]. 2008 May [cited 2010 Dec 28]: [about 3 p.]. Available from: http://www.emedicine.medscape.com/article/314195-overview.

  27. Parks KA, Crichton KS, Goldford RJ, McGill SM. A comparison of lumbar range of motion and functional ability scores in patients with low back pain: assessment for range of motion validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(4):380–4.

  28. van Oosterom FJ, Ettema AM, Mulder PG, Hovius SE. Impairment and disability after severe hand injuries with multiple phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(1):91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. de Boer AG, Taskila T, Ojajärvi A, van Dijk FJ, Verbeek JH. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA. 2009;301(7):753–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):349–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:327–52.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nachemson A. Work for all. For those with low back pain as well. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;179:77–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Habeck RV, Hunt HA, VanTol B. Workplace factors associated with preventing and managing work disability. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 1998;42(4):98–143.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehab. 1991;1(1):5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Feuerstein M. Introduction: the world challenge of work disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):451–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is very grateful to Professors Chetwyn Chan, Grace Stezo and Andy Chang for the opportunity to collaborate with them as they forge ahead in the development of occupational rehabilitation and Work Disability Prevention in Hong Kong and mainland China with their many colleagues in China. Paper based on a keynote address, Serena Yang Lecture Series, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, October, 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Feuerstein.

Additional information

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as being official or as reflecting the views of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or the Department of Defense.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feuerstein, M. Prevention and Management of Work Disability in Asia Pacific: Challenges and Opportunities. J Occup Rehabil 21 (Suppl 1), 5–14 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9295-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9295-3

Keywords

Navigation