Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Case Management after Long-term Absence from Work in China: A Case Report

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Return-to-work (RTW) after occupational injuries is an important and challenging issue. Case managers are expected to play a vital role in successful RTW. In China, RTW intervention is in its early phase and requires further research and practice. Objectives This case report describes Mr. H’s RTW process for illustrating the work of a case management team in China. Suggestions on developing and optimizing the process in China are given. Methods After 9 years of absence from work due to severe burn injuries at work, Mr. H was referred for RTW interventions. Mr. H received social and occupational rehabilitation services of 3 months, and the following workplace visits and work trials. After the job placement, the case manager continued the liaison with the worker and employer. Results Mr. H showed positive changes in occupational and social adjustment after the case management interventions. This was reflected from the shift from the contemplation to action stage on the Lam Assessment of Stages of Employment Readiness. Despite he did not show significant changes on functional capacity and fear avoidance beliefs, Mr. H passed the job credential test and was offered a maintenance technician position at a new company. Both the worker and the employer were satisfied with the outcome of the case management. Conclusions The RTW interventions carried out by the case managers appeared to be effective within the Chinese system. The results suggested that professional training of case managers, RTW-related policies and technological standards, early integrated interventions should be further developed in China. Disability Adjustment Group Therapy and RTW Support Groups perhaps are useful approaches in workers’ returning to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Durand MJ, Loisel P. Therapeutic return to work: rehabilitation in the workplace. Work. 2001;17:57–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pransky G, Gatchel R, Linton JS, Loisel P. Improving return to work research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):453–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pamela JT, Sharon EB, Calvin H, Kathryn G. Changing to an outcome-focused program improves return to work outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:473–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw W, Hong Q, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tompa E, Oliveira C, Dolinschi R, Irvin E. A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harten JA. Functional capacity evaluation. Occup Med. 1998;13(1):209–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee KC, Chiu TT, Lam TH. Psychometric properties of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in patients with neck pain. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(10):909–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan H, Li-Tsang C, Chan C, Lam CS, Lo K, Bard C. Validation of lam assessment of employment readiness (C-LASER) for Chinese injured workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):697–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu Y, Chan C, Lam CS, Li-Tsang C, Lo K, Gatchel JR. Rehabilitation of injured workers with chronic pain: a stage of change phenomenon. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):727–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai H, Chan C. Implementing a pilot work injury management program in Hong Kong. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):712–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friesen M, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17:11–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan M, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, Linton S, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):475–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gard G, Sandberg AC. Motivating factors for return to work. Physiother Res Int. 1998;3(2):100–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Salazar M, Graham KY. Evaluation of a case management program: summary and integration of findings. AAOHN J. 1999;47(9):416–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Frank W, Brooker S, DeMaio S, Kerr S, Maetze A, Shannon S, et al. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain, Part II: what do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine. 1996;21(24):2918–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Baril R, Gervais J, Falardeau M. Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):581–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pransky G, Shaw W, Franche RL, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers—current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(11):625–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Franche R, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas W, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Young A, Roessler R, Wasiak R, McPherson K, Poppel M, Anema J. A developmental conceptualization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return-to-work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):233–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehabil. 1991;1(1):5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kregel J, West M, Wehman P, Sherron P, Kreutzer J. Return to work for persons with severe traumatic brain injury: a data-based approach to program development. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10(1):27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonghua He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, D., Yu, I.T.S., Luo, X. et al. Case Management after Long-term Absence from Work in China: A Case Report. J Occup Rehabil 21 (Suppl 1), 55–61 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9280-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9280-2

Keywords

Navigation