Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 25–40 | Cite as

Systematic Review of the Ability of Recovery Expectations to Predict Outcomes in Non-Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

  • Ross A. IlesEmail author
  • Megan Davidson
  • Nicholas F. Taylor
  • Paul O’Halloran


Objective The aim of the current review was to determine the predictive strength of low recovery expectations for activity limitation outcomes in people with non-chronic NSLBP. Methods A systematic review of prognostic studies was performed. Included studies took baseline measures in the non-chronic phase of NSLBP, included at least one baseline measure of recovery expectation, defined as a prediction or judgement made by the person with NSLBP regarding any aspect of prognosis, and studied a sample with at least 75% of participants with NSLBP. Results Recovery expectations measured using a time-based, specific single-item tool produced a strong prediction of work outcome. Recovery expectations measured within 3 weeks of NSLBP onset provide a strong prediction of outcome. It is not clear whether predictive strength of recovery expectations is affected by the length of time between the expectation measure and outcome measure. Conclusion Recovery expectations when measured using a specific, time-based measure within the first 3 weeks of NSLBP can identify people at risk of poor outcome.


Low back pain Recovery expectation Prognosis Review 


  1. 1.
    Iles RA, Davidson M, Taylor NF. A systematic review of psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65:507–17. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.036046.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ, editors. Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Truchon M, Fillion L. Biopsychosocial determinants of chronic disability and low-back pain: a review. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10:117–42. doi: 10.1023/A:1009452019715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waddell G. The epidemiology of low back pain. The back pain revolution. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p. 27–44.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loisel P, Durand M, Berthelette D, et al. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Disease Manag Health Outcomes. 2001;9:351–60. doi: 10.2165/00115677-200109070-00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rutjes A, Reitsma J, Di Nisio M et al. Design related bias and sources of variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. 12th Cochrane Colloquium: bridging the gaps, 2004, Oct 2–6; 2004; Ottawa, 2004. p. 49–50.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    WHO. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. 2002 [cited 23/11/2007]; Available from
  8. 8.
    Linton SJ, Gross D, Schultz IZ, et al. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:459–74. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8028-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McIntosh G, Frank J, Hogg-Johnson S, et al. Low back pain prognosis: structured review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10:101–15. doi: 10.1023/A:1009450102876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayden JA, Cote P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:427–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, et al. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:851–60. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.015842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:411–21. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garson DG. Mulitple regression. [cited 2007 15/10/07]; Available from 2007.
  14. 14.
    Hartvigsen J, Lings S, Leboeuf-Yde C, et al. Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:10p. (Online).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. St Louis: Mosby; 1994.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Enthoven P, Skargren E, Carstensen J, et al. Predictive factors for 1 and 5 year outcome for disability in a working population of patients with low back pain treated in primary care. Pain. 2006;122:137–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.022. see comment.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Skargren EI, Oberg BE. Predictive factors for 1 year outcome of low-back and neck pain in patients treated in primary care: comparison between the treatment strategies chiropractic and physiotherapy. Pain. 1998;77:201–7. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00101-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Cote P. It pays to be nice: employer-worker relationships and the management of back pain claims. J Occup Environ Med/Am College Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:214–25.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jamison J. Expectations: a case study describing the outcome expectations of chiropractors and their patients. Chiropr J Aust. 2001;31:133–8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bekkering GE, Hendriks HJ, van Tulder MW, et al. Prognostic factors for low back pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: comparing outcomes and varying modeling techniques. Spine. 2005;30:1881–6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000173901.64181.db.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boersma K, Linton SJ. Expectancy, fear and pain in the prediction of chronic pain and disability: a prospective analysis. Eur J Pain: Ejp. 2006;10:551–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.08.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gross D, Battie M. Predicting timely recovery and recurrence following multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with compensated low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:235–40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150485.51681.80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heymans Martijn M, de Vet Henrica CW, Knol Dirk L, et al. Workers beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:685–95. doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9058-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Merkesdal S, Mau W. Prediction of costs-of-illness in patients with low back pain undergoing orthopedic outpatient rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;28:119–26. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200506000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hazard R, Haugh L, Reid S, et al. Early prediction of chronic disability after occupational low back injury. Spine. 1996;21:945–51. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199604150-00008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shaw WS, Pransky G, Patterson W, et al. Patient clusters in acute, work-related back pain based on patterns of disability risk factors. J Occup Environ Med/Am College Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:185–93.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schultz IZ, Crook JM, Berkowitz J, et al. Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability. Spine. 2002;27:2720–5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212010-00012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Feuerstein M, Harrington CB, Lopez M, et al. How do job stress and ergonomic factors impact clinic visits in acute low back pain? A prospective study. J Occup Environ Med/Am College Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:607–14.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jellema P, van der Horst HE, Vlaeyen JW, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with (sub) acute low back pain differ across treatment groups. Spine. 2006;31:1699–705. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000224179.04964.aa.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dionne CE, Bourbonnais R, Fremont P, et al. A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back pain. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;172:1559–67. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turner JA, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, et al. Worker recovery expectations and fear-avoidance predict work disability in a population-based workers’ compensation back pain sample. Spine. 2006;31:682–9. doi: 10.1097/ Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kuijer W, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S, et al. Prediction of sickness absence in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:439–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shaw WS, Pransky G, Patterson W, et al. Early disability risk factors for low back pain assessed at outpatient occupational health clinics. Spine. 2005;30:572–80. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000154628.37515.ef.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Mutanen P, et al. Outcome determinants of subacute low back pain. Spine. 2003;28:2634–40. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099097.61495.2E.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hagen EM, Svensen E, Ericksen HR. Predictors and modifiers of treatment effect influencing sick leave in subacute low back pain patients. Spine. 2005;30:2717–23. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000190394.05359.c7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kapoor S, Shaw WS, Pransky G, et al. Initial patient and clinician expectations of return to work after acute onset of work-related low back pain. J Occup Environ Med/Am College Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:1173–80.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, et al. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004;107:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schultz IZ, Crook J, Berkowitz J, et al. Predicting return to work after low back injury using the psychosocial risk for occupational disability instrument: a validation study. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:365–76. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-5943-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Steenstra IA, Koopman FS, Knol DL, et al. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave due to low-back pain in dutch health care professionals. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:591–605. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8037-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hagen EM, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain? Spine. 2000;25:1973–6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Maher CG, et al. Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2003;327:323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7410.323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Waddell G. Pain and disability. The back pain revolution. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p.27–44.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford university press; 1995.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, et al. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:277–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1020278708861.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, et al. Statistics with confidence. 2nd ed. Bristol: BMJ Books; 2000.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Altman DG. Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2001;323:224–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Linton SJ. Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11:53–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1016656225318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R, et al. The process of return to work after injury: findings of a systematic review of qualitative studies (working paper #299). 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ross A. Iles
    • 1
    Email author
  • Megan Davidson
    • 1
  • Nicholas F. Taylor
    • 1
  • Paul O’Halloran
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PhysiotherapyLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations