Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wood Residues as Raw Material for Biorefinery Systems: LCA Case Study on Bioethanol and Electricity Production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fossil energy and chemical sources are depleting. There is a critical need to change the current industry and human civilization to a sustainable manner, assuring that our way of life actual continues on the path of improvement after the depletion of fossil energy sources. The utilization of agricultural residues as raw materials in a biorefinery is a promising alternative to fossil resources for production of energy carriers and chemicals, thus mitigating climate change and enhancing energy security. Biorefinery is a concept of converting lignocellulosic biomass or grains (such as corn) to chemicals, materials and energy on which human civilization runs, replacing the need for petroleum, coal, natural gas, and other nonrenewable energy and chemical sources. Lignocellulosic biomass is renewable, that is plant synthesizes chemicals (by drawing energy from the sun and carbon dioxide) and water from the environment, while releasing oxygen. Combustion of biomass releases energy, carbon dioxide and water. Therefore, biorefinery plays a key role in satisfying human needs for energy and chemicals by using the biomass production and consumption cycle. This paper focuses on a biorefinery concept and in particular on the bioethanol production from wood residues. In order to evaluate the environmental reliability of the system under study, the biorefinery plant (producing bioethanol and electricity from wood residues) was compared, by using the LCA methodology, to both conventional refinery system (producing light fuel oil and electricity from petroleum) and biorefinery plant based on corn feedstock producing the same goods. Interesting considerations about LUC emissions effect on biorefinery sustainability are also reported. The obtained results show that by assigning reasonable values to the three damage categories used in the eco-indicator 99 methodology the biorefinery system is preferable, from an environmental point of view, to the conventional refinery system analysed. This finding confirms the high potentials of this innovative plant technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cherubini F, Jungmeier G (2010) LCA of a biorefinery concept producing bioethanol, bioenergy, and chemicals from switchgrass. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:53–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Signor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brehmer B, Boom RM, Sanders J (2009) Maximum fossil fuel feedstock replacement potential of petrochemicals via biorefineries. Chem Eng Res Des 87:1103–1119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Demirbas A (2010) Biorefinery technologies for biomass upgrading. Energy Sources Part A 32:1547–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Demirbas A (2008) Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections. Energy Convers Mgmt 49:2106–2116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Demirbas A (2008) Recent progress in biorenewable feedstocks. Energy Edu Sci Technol 22:69–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dincer K (2008) Lower emissions from biodiesel combustion. Energy Sources Part A 30:963–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo L, van der Voet E, Huppes G (2010) Biorefining of lignocellulosic feedstock—technical, economic and environmental considerations. Biores Tech 10:5023–5032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. NREL Biomass Research: http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/biorefinery.html

  10. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu TH (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1237–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Plevin RJ, Mueller S (2008) The effect of CO2 regulations on the cost of corn ethanol production. Environ Res Lett 3:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Righelato R, Spracklen DV (2007) Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests? Science 317:902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamm B, Kamm M (2004) Principles of biorefinery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64:137–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamandinger B, Gallasch SW (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:434–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goedkoop M, Oele M, Schryver M, Vieira M (2008) SimaPro database manual: methods library. PRé Consultants, the Netherlands, pp 22–25

  16. Frischknocht R, Jungbluth N (eds) (2007) Ecoinvent v.2 report: overview and methodology. PRé Consultants, the Netherlands

  17. Hofstetter P, Braunschweig A, Mettier M, Wenk RM, Tietje O (2008) The mixing triangle: correlation and graphical decision support for LCA-based comparison. J Ind Ecol 3:97–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jungbluth N (ed) (2007) Ecoinvent V.2 report: life cycle inventories of bioenergy. PRé Consultants, the Netherlands

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Piemonte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piemonte, V. Wood Residues as Raw Material for Biorefinery Systems: LCA Case Study on Bioethanol and Electricity Production. J Polym Environ 20, 299–304 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0396-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0396-z

Keywords

Navigation