Abstract
Fossil energy and chemical sources are depleting. There is a critical need to change the current industry and human civilization to a sustainable manner, assuring that our way of life actual continues on the path of improvement after the depletion of fossil energy sources. The utilization of agricultural residues as raw materials in a biorefinery is a promising alternative to fossil resources for production of energy carriers and chemicals, thus mitigating climate change and enhancing energy security. Biorefinery is a concept of converting lignocellulosic biomass or grains (such as corn) to chemicals, materials and energy on which human civilization runs, replacing the need for petroleum, coal, natural gas, and other nonrenewable energy and chemical sources. Lignocellulosic biomass is renewable, that is plant synthesizes chemicals (by drawing energy from the sun and carbon dioxide) and water from the environment, while releasing oxygen. Combustion of biomass releases energy, carbon dioxide and water. Therefore, biorefinery plays a key role in satisfying human needs for energy and chemicals by using the biomass production and consumption cycle. This paper focuses on a biorefinery concept and in particular on the bioethanol production from wood residues. In order to evaluate the environmental reliability of the system under study, the biorefinery plant (producing bioethanol and electricity from wood residues) was compared, by using the LCA methodology, to both conventional refinery system (producing light fuel oil and electricity from petroleum) and biorefinery plant based on corn feedstock producing the same goods. Interesting considerations about LUC emissions effect on biorefinery sustainability are also reported. The obtained results show that by assigning reasonable values to the three damage categories used in the eco-indicator 99 methodology the biorefinery system is preferable, from an environmental point of view, to the conventional refinery system analysed. This finding confirms the high potentials of this innovative plant technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cherubini F, Jungmeier G (2010) LCA of a biorefinery concept producing bioethanol, bioenergy, and chemicals from switchgrass. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:53–66
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Signor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brehmer B, Boom RM, Sanders J (2009) Maximum fossil fuel feedstock replacement potential of petrochemicals via biorefineries. Chem Eng Res Des 87:1103–1119
Demirbas A (2010) Biorefinery technologies for biomass upgrading. Energy Sources Part A 32:1547–1558
Demirbas A (2008) Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections. Energy Convers Mgmt 49:2106–2116
Demirbas A (2008) Recent progress in biorenewable feedstocks. Energy Edu Sci Technol 22:69–95
Dincer K (2008) Lower emissions from biodiesel combustion. Energy Sources Part A 30:963–968
Luo L, van der Voet E, Huppes G (2010) Biorefining of lignocellulosic feedstock—technical, economic and environmental considerations. Biores Tech 10:5023–5032
NREL Biomass Research: http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/biorefinery.html
Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu TH (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1237–1241
Plevin RJ, Mueller S (2008) The effect of CO2 regulations on the cost of corn ethanol production. Environ Res Lett 3:1–9
Righelato R, Spracklen DV (2007) Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests? Science 317:902
Kamm B, Kamm M (2004) Principles of biorefinery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64:137–145
Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamandinger B, Gallasch SW (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:434–447
Goedkoop M, Oele M, Schryver M, Vieira M (2008) SimaPro database manual: methods library. PRé Consultants, the Netherlands, pp 22–25
Frischknocht R, Jungbluth N (eds) (2007) Ecoinvent v.2 report: overview and methodology. PRé Consultants, the Netherlands
Hofstetter P, Braunschweig A, Mettier M, Wenk RM, Tietje O (2008) The mixing triangle: correlation and graphical decision support for LCA-based comparison. J Ind Ecol 3:97–115
Jungbluth N (ed) (2007) Ecoinvent V.2 report: life cycle inventories of bioenergy. PRé Consultants, the Netherlands
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piemonte, V. Wood Residues as Raw Material for Biorefinery Systems: LCA Case Study on Bioethanol and Electricity Production. J Polym Environ 20, 299–304 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0396-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0396-z