Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated Notification of Relevant Expected or Incidental Findings in Imaging Exams in a Verticalized Healthcare System

  • Implementation Science & Operations Management
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe the implementation of a standardized code system for notification of relevant expected or incidental findings in imaging exams and use of an automated textual mining tool of radiological report narratives, created to facilitate directing patients to specific lines of care, reducing the waiting time for interventions, consultations, and minimizing delays to treatment. We report our 12-month initial experience with the process. A standardized code was attached to every radiology report when a relevant finding was observed. On a daily basis, the notifications was sent to a dedicated medical team to review the notified abnormality and decide a proper action. Between October 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021, 40,296 sectional examinations (CT and MR scans) were evaluated in 35,944 patients. The main findings reported were calcified plaques on the trunk of the left coronary artery or trunk like, pulmonary nodule/mass and suspected liver disease. Data of follow-up was available in 10,019 patients. The age ranged from 24 to 101 years (mean of 71.3 years) and 6,626 were female (66.1%). In 2,548 patients a complementary study or procedure was indicated, and 3,300 patients were referred to a specialist. Customized database searches looking for critical or relevant findings may facilitate patient referral to specific care lines, reduce the waiting time for interventions or consultations, and minimize delays to treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin-Sanchez F, Verspoor K (2014). Big data in medicine is driving big changes. Yearb Med Inform 9:14–20. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2014-0020

  2. Dixon BE, Rosenman M, Xia Y, Grannis SJ (2013). A vision for the systematic monitoring and improvement of the quality of electronic health data. Stud Health Technol Inform 192:884-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen PB, Jensen LJ, Brunak S (2012). Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat Rev Genet 13:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pons E, et al (2016). Natural language processing in radiology: A systematic review. Radiology 279:2:329–343

  5. Pinto A, Caranci F, et al (2012). Learning from errors in radiology: a comprehensive review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2012;33:379-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choy G, Khalilzadeh O, et al (2018). Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology. Radiology. 288(2):318-328. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olthof AW, et al (2020). Contextual structured reporting in radiology: Implementation and long-term evaluation in improving the communication of critical findings. J Med Syst 28;44(9):148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01609-3

  8. Hanna T P, King W D et al (2020). Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ 371:m4087. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mariotto AB, Enewold L, et al (2020). Medical Care Costs Associated with Cancer Survivorship in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 29(7):1304-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by ENOF, FPM and MFAA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by FPM, MFAA and PNVPB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Barbosa.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This research received approval from the institution’s Research Ethics Committee (CAAE 43084721.0.0000.8114, approved on February 24, 2021).

Informed consent

The written informed consent was not required by the institution’s Research Ethics Committee.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Implementation Science & Operations Management

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira Filho, E.N., Machado, F.P., Almeida, M.F.A. et al. Automated Notification of Relevant Expected or Incidental Findings in Imaging Exams in a Verticalized Healthcare System. J Med Syst 46, 55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01842-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01842-y

Keywords

Navigation