Abstract
Although some recent morphological and molecular studies agree that Cetacea is closely related to Hippopotamidae, there is little consensus on the phylogeny within Cetartiodactyla. We addressed this problem by conducting two analyses: (1) a simultaneous cladistic analysis of intrinsic data (morphology and molecules) and (2) a stratocladistic analysis, which included morphological, molecular, and stratigraphic data. Unlike previous simultaneous analyses, we had the opportunity to include data from the recently described hindlimbs of protocetid and pakicetid cetaceans. Our intrinsic dataset includes 73 taxa scored for 8,229 informative characters, of which 208 are morphological and 8,021 molecular. Both analyses supported the exclusion of Mesonychia from Cetartiodactyla and a close phylogenetic relationship between Hippopotamidae and Cetacea. Many polytomies in the strict consensus of the most parsimonious trees for the intrinsic dataset can be attributed to differing positions for Raoellidae, which in some trees is the sister-group to Cetacea. Pruning Raoellidae and 18 other taxa from all most parsimonious produced a fully resolved agreement subtree, which indicates that the Old World taxa Cebochoerus and Mixtotherium are successive stem taxa to Whippomorpha (i.e., Cetacea + Hippopotamidae). The main result of adding stratigraphic information to the intrinsic dataset was that we found fewer most parsimonious trees, which in most respects were congruent with a subset of the shortest trees for the intrinsic dataset. Our stratocladistic analysis supports species of Diacodexis as the most basal cetartiodactyls, a clade of suiform cetartiodactyls, a monophyletic Tylopoda that includes Protoceratidae, and a monophyletic Carnivora. We were unable to identify any pre-Miocene stem taxa to Hippopotamidae, thus its ghost lineage is still 39 million years long. The relatively low Bremer support for many nodes in our trees indicates that our phylogenetic hypotheses should be subjected to further testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnason, U., Gullberg, A., Gretarsdottir, S., Ursing, B., and Janke, A. (2000). The mitochondrial genome of the sperm whale and a new molecular reference for estimating eutherian divergence dates. J. Mol. Evol. 50: 569–578.
Asher, R. J., Novacek, M. J., and Geisler, J. H. (2003). Relationships of endemic African mammals and their fossil relatives based on morphological and molecular evidence. J. Mamm. Evol. 2: 157–184.
Bajpai, S., and Gingerich, P. D. (1998). A new Eocene archaeocete (Mammalia, Cetacea) from India and the time of origin of whales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 15464–15468.
Behrensmeyer, A. K., Deino, A. L., Hill, A., Kingston, J. D., and Saunders, J. J. (2002). Geology and geochronology of the middle Miocene Kipsaramon site complex, Muruyur beds, Tugen Hills, Kenya. J. Hum. Evol. 42: 11–38.
Bodenbender, B. E., and Fisher, D. C. (2001). Stratocladistic analysis of blastoid phylogeny. J. Paleontol. 75: 351–369.
Bremer, K. (1988). The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 785–803.
Bremer, K. (1994). Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295–304.
Colbert, E. H. (1935). Distributional and phylogenetic studies on Indian fossil mammals. IV. The phylogeny of the Indian Suidae and the origin of the Hippopotamidae. Am. Mus. Novit. 799: 1–22.
Fisher, D. C. (1992). Stratigraphic parsimony. In: MacClade 3.0 Manual, W. P. Maddison and D. R. Maddison, eds., pp. 124–129, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Fisher, D. C. (1994). Stratocladistics: Morphological and temporal patterns and their relation to phylogenetic process. In: Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature, L. Grande and O. Rieppel, eds., pp. 133–171, Academic Press, San Diego.
Fox, D. L., Fisher, D. C., and Leighton, L. R. (1999). Reconstructing phylogeny with and without temporal data. Science 284: 1816–1819.
Gatesy, J. (1997). More DNA support for a Cetacea/Hippopotamidae clade: The blood-clotting protein gamma-fibrinogen. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 537–543.
Gatesy, J. (1998). Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic affinities of Cetacea. In: The Emergence of Whales, J. G. M. Thewissen, ed., pp. 63–111, Plenum, New York.
Gatesy, J., and O'Leary, M. A. (2001). Deciphering whale origins with molecules and fossils. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 562–570.
Gatesy, J., Hayashi, C., Cronin, A., and Arctander, P. (1996). Evidence from milk casein genes that cetaceans are close relatives of hippopotamid artiodactyls. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 954–963.
Gatesy, J., Milinkovitch, M., Waddell, V., and Stanhope, M. (1999). Stability of cladistic relationships between Cetacea and higher-level artiodactyl taxa. Syst. Biol. 48: 6–20.
Gatesy, J., Matthee, C., DeSalle, R., and Hayashi, C. (2002). Resolution of the supertree/supermatrix paradox. Syst. Biol. 51: 652–664.
Geisler, J. H. (2001). New morphological evidence for the phylogeny of Artiodactyla, Cetacea, and Mesonychidae. Am. Mus. Novit. 3344: 1–53.
Geisler, J. H., and Luo, Z. (1998). Relationships of Cetacea to terrestrial ungulates and the evolution of cranial vasculature in Cete. In: The Emergence of Whales, J. G. M. Thewissen, ed., pp. 163–212, Plenum, New York.
Geisler, J. H., and Uhen, M. D. (2003). Morphological support for a close relationship between hippos and whales. J Vertebr. Paleontol. 23: 991–996.
Gentry, A. W., and Hooker, J. J. (1988). The phylogeny of Artiodactyla. In: The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Mammals, vol. 2., M. J. Benton, ed., pp. 235–272, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gingerich, P. D., Haq, M. U., Zalmout, I. S., Khan, I. H., and Malakani, M. S. (2001). Origin of whales from early artiodactyls: Hands and feet of Eocene Protocetidae from Pakistan. Science 293: 2239–2242.
Gregory, W. K. (1910). The orders of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 27: 1–524.
Heller, F. (1934). Anthracobunodon weigelti n. gen. et n. sp., ein Artiodactyle aus dem Mitteleozän Geiseltales bei Halle a. S. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 16: 247–263.
Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Hooker, J. J., and Thomas, K. M. (2001). A new species of Amphirhagatherium (Choeropotamidae, Artiodactyla, Mammalia) from the Late Eocene Headon Hill Formation of Southern England and phylogeny of endemic European ‘anthracotherioids.’ Palaeontology 44: 827–853.
Hulbert, R. C., Jr. (1998). Postcranial osteology of the North American Middle Eocene protocetid Georgiacetus. In: The Emergence of Whales, J. G. M. Thewissen, ed., pp. 235–267, Plenum, New York.
Joeckel, R. M., and Stavas, J. M. (1996). Basicranial anatomy of Syndyoceras cooki (Artiodactyla, Protoceratidae) and the need for a reappraisal of tylopod relationships. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 16: 320–327.
Kluge, A. G. (1989). A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serepentes). Syst. Zool. 38: 7–25.
Kluge, A. G., and Wolf, A. J. (1993). Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9: 183–199.
Krishtalka, L., and Stucky, R. K. (1985). Revision of the Wind River faunas, early, Eocene of Central Wyoming. Part 7. Revision of Diacodexis (Mammalia, Artiodactyla). Ann. Carnegie Mus. 54: 413–486.
Kumar, K., and Sahni, A. (1985). Eocene mammals from the Upper Subathu Group, Kashmir Himalaya, India. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 5: 153–168.
Langer, P. (2001). Evidence form the digestive tract on phylogenetic relationships in ungulates and whales. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 39: 77–90.
Luo, Z., and Gingerich, P. D. (1999). Terrestrial Mesonychia to aquatic Cetacea: Transformation of the basicranium and evolution of hearing in whales. Univ. Michigan Pap. Paleontol. 31: 1–98.
Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. (2000). MacClade, Version 4.0, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. Available at http://www.sinauer.com/.
Madsen, O., Scally, M., Douady, C. J., Kao, D. J., DeBry, R. W., Adkins, R., Amrine, H. M., Stanhope, M. J., de Jong, W. W., and Springer, M. S. (2001). Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature 409: 610–614.
Matthee, C. A., Burzlaff, J. D., Taylor, J. F., and Davis, S. K. (2001). Mining the mammalian genome for artiodactyl systematics. Syst. Biol. 50: 367–390.
Matthew, W. D. (1905). Notice of two new genera of mammals from the Oligocene of South Dakota. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 21: 21–26.
Matthew, W. D. (1929) Reclassification of the artiodactyl families. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 40: 403–408.
Matthew, W. D. (1934). A phylogenetic chart of the Artiodactyla. J. Mammal. 15: 207–209.
McKenna, M. C., and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level, Columbia University Press, New York.
Montgelard, C., Catzeflis, F. M., and Douzery, E. (1997). Phylogenetic relationships of artiodactyls and cetaceans as deduced from the comparison of cytochrome b and 12S RNA mitochondrial sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 550–559.
Murphy, W. J., Eizirik, E., Johnson, W. E., Zhang, Y., Ryder, O. A., and O'Brien, S. J. (2001). Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409: 614–618.
Nikaido, M., Rooney, A. P., and Okada, N. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interspersed elements: Hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 10261–10266.
Nixon, K. C., and Carpenter, J. M. (1996). On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12: 221–241.
O'Leary, M. A. (1999). Parsimony analysis of total evidence from extinct and extant taxa and the cetacean-artiodactyl question (Mammalia, Ungulata). Cladistics 15: 315–330.
O'Leary, M. A. (2001). The phylogenetic position of cetaceans: Further combined data analyses, comparisons with the stratigraphic record and a discussion of character optimization. Am. Zool. 41: 487–506.
O'Leary, M. A., and Geisler, J. H. (1999). The position of Cetacea within Mammalia: Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data from extinct and extant taxa. Syst. Biol. 48: 455–490.
O'Leary, M. A., and Uhen, M. D. (1999). The time of origin of whales and the role of behavioral changes in the terrestrial-aquatic transition. Paleobiology 25: 534–556.
Patton, T. H., and Taylor, B. E. (1973). The Protoceratinae (Mammalia, Tylopoda, Protoceratidae) and the systematics of the Protoceratidae. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 150: 351–413.
Pickford, M. (1983). On the origins of Hippopotamidae together with descriptions of two new species, a new genus and a new subfamily from the Miocene of Kenya. Geobios 16: 193–217.
Radinsky, L. B. (1966). The adaptive radiation of the phenacodontid condylarths and the origin of the Perissodactyla. Evolution 20: 408–417.
Rose, K. D. (1985). Comparative osteology of North American dichobunid artiodactyls. J. Paleontol. 59: 1203–1226.
Scott, W. B. (1898). Preliminary note on the selenodont artiodactyls of the Uinta Formation. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 37: 1–9.
Scott, W. B. (1940). The mammalian fauna of the White River Oligocene, Part IV. Artiodactyla. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 28: 363–746.
Shimamura, M., Yasue, H., Ohshima, K., Abe, H., Kato, H., Kishiro, T., Goto, M., Munechika, I., and Okada, N. (1997). Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature 388: 666–670.
Shimamura, M., Abe, H., Nikaido, M., Ohshima, K., and Okada, N. (1999). Genealogy of families of SINEs in cetaceans and artiodactyls: the presence of a huge superfamily of tRNAGlu-derived families of SINEs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 1046–1060.
Sorenson, M. D. (1996). TreeRot, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Available at http://people.bu.edu/msoren/TreeRot.html.
Sumrall, C. D., and Brochu, C. A. (2003). Resolution, sampling, higher taxa and assumptions in stratocladistic analysis. J. Paleontol. 77: 189–194.
Swofford, D. L. (2002). PAUP,∗ Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (∗ and Other Methods), Version 4.0b10, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Available at http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/.
Theodor, M. J., and Foss, S. E. (2005). Deciduous dentitions of Eocene cebochoerid artiodactyls and cetartiodactyl relationships. J. Mamm. Evol. 12 (in press).
Thewissen, J. G. M., and Domning, D. P. (1992). The role of phenacodontids in the origin of the modern orders of ungulate mammals. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 12: 494–504.
Thewissen, J. G. M., Williams, E. M., and Hussain, S. T. (2001a). Eocene mammal faunas from Northern Indo-Pakistan. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 21: 347–366.
Thewissen, J. G. M., Williams, E. M., Roe, L. J. and Hussain, S. T. (2001b). Skeletons of terrestrial cetaceans and the relationship of whales to artiodactyls. Nature 413: 277–281.
Uhen, M. D. (1999). New species of protocetid archaeocete whale, Eocetus wardii (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the Middle Eocene of North Carolina. J. Paleontol. 73: 512–528.
Uhen, M. D. (2001). New material of Eocetus wardii (Mammalia, Cetacea), from the Middle Eocene of North Carolina. Southeastern Geol. 40: 135–148.
Viret, J. (1961). Artiodactyla. In: Traité de paléontologie, tome 6, J. Piveteau, ed., pp. 887–1021, Masson et Cie, Paris.
Waddell, P. J., and Shelley, S. (2003). Evaluating placental inter-ordinal phylogenies with novel sequences including RAG1, γ-fibrinogen, ND6, and mt-tRNA, plus MCMC-driven nucleotide, amino acid, and codon models. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28: 197–224.
Webb, S. D., and Taylor, B. E. (1980). The phylogeny of hornless ruminants and a description of the cranium of Archaeomeryx. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 167: 121–157.
Williams, E. M. (1998). Synopsis of the earliest cetaceans: Pakicetidae, Ambulocetidae, Remingtonocetidae, and Protocetidae. In: The Emergence of Whales, J. G. M. Thewissen, ed., pp. 1–28, Plenum, New York.
Wilkinson, M. (1992). Ordered versus unordered characters. Cladistics 8: 375–385.
Wortman, J. L. (1898). The extinct Camelidae of North America and some associated forms. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 9: 93–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geisler, J.H., Uhen, M.D. Phylogenetic Relationships of Extinct Cetartiodactyls: Results of Simultaneous Analyses of Molecular, Morphological, and Stratigraphic Data. J Mammal Evol 12, 145–160 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-005-4963-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-005-4963-8