Design and fabrication techniques of metallic magnetic calorimeters have become very diverse and reliable over the last decades [19,20,21]. The design process usually starts with a specific application in mind. In particular the absorber dimensions are defined by the application, since the required stopping power or efficiency is defined by the used material and the absorber dimensions. With the given experimental conditions, e.g., operating temperature, other design parameters, e.g., read-out coil or sensor geometry, can be used to find an optimal detector design. Usually the optimum is rather broad; therefore, the design can be slightly altered without losing much performance. This gives the flexibility to fabricate detectors for different applications in one fabrication run or use the detector slightly outside its optimum.
Within the MetroMMC project two different types of measurements are being pursued, namely calorimetric spectrometry of the EC decay, where the whole spectrum, independent of decay channel is measured, and X-ray spectrometry, where only the radiative transitions of the decays are of interest. These measurement types have very different implications on the detector design, that will be discussed in the following section.
Calorimetric Spectrometry
The cleanest way to determine the fractional EC probabilities from the different atomic shells, without relying much on theoretical calculations, is to measure the decay calorimetrically, i.e., the whole decay energy at once, apart from the energy of the neutrino. This can be achieved by embedding the radionuclide in a \(4\pi \) absorber that fully absorbs the energy released by the decay and attaching the absorber to the temperature sensor of the MMC.
De-excitations after an EC event can both emit photons (X-ray, i.e., radiative transitions) or electrons (Auger, Coster–Kronig and super Coster–Kronig, i.e., non-radiative transitions) and both types of transitions need to be taken into consideration when determining the absorber dimensions. Since photons have the longer range in matter, compared to electrons, usually it is enough to determine the absorption efficiency for the highest energetic photons from the decay. If EC is accompanied by \(\beta ^{+}\)-decay or \(\gamma \)-transitions, these channels need to be included in the simulation as well. The interaction of the decay products was simulated for the nuclides in question with gold as absorber material, using the Monte-Carlo software PENELOPE, to determine the thickness of the material necessary for a stopping power of 99.99% with the results shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Highest energetic de-excitations of the six MetroMMC nuclides, that can be completely contained in the absorber, and the required gold thicknesses to reach 99.99% absorption efficiency, determined through Monte-Carlo simulations in PENELOPE. Higher energetic transitions [e.g., \(\gamma \)-transitions of \(^{54}\)Mn (\(834.848\,\mathrm {keV}\)) and \(^{65}\)Zn (\(1115.539\,\mathrm {keV}\))] cannot be contained, but their effect on the spectrum shape is considered The resulting minimal absorber thicknesses are used to define the absorber geometry to match the heat capacity requirements of detector designs of the precursory project MetroBeta, where five detector designs for \(\beta \)-spectrometry with end-point energies ranging from \(\sim 70\) to \(\sim 700\,\mathrm {keV}\) are available and described in detail in [14]. Due to the use of gold as absorber material and the allowed heat capacity for the different detector sizes, the maximum photon energy that can be completely contained in the absorber is limited to approximately \(E_{\gamma } < 100\,\mathrm {keV}\). Higher energetic photons still need to be considered for their effect on the shape of the spectrum, e.g., through Compton scattering.
In contrast to continuous \(\beta \)-spectra, calorimetric EC spectra show mono-energetic lines approximately at the binding energies of the captured electrons. To allow the measurement of the low energetic lines of EC from higher atomic shells, the detector threshold is of utmost importance. While shells with binding energies \(<20\,\mathrm {eV}\) are out of reach for even the smallest of the current detector designs, the measurement of energies \(>20\,\mathrm {eV}\) might only be limited by the detector and absorber size to reach the required stopping power and the accompanying threshold defined by energy resolution, which scales with the detector size.
High-energetic photons or \(\beta \)-particles require extremely large absorbers or deposit no or only part of their initial energy. To include this effect, it will be necessary to complement the analysis by sound Monte-Carlo simulations.
Another option is to split the measurements into two parts: one with full stopping power (large absorber) for the highest energy transitions and one for the lower energy transitions (small absorber), while allowing some of the higher energetic particles to escape. Such a two staged approach is currently planned for \(^{65}\hbox {Zn}\) and \(^{109}\hbox {Cd}\).
In particular for \(^{109}\)Cd, the approach seems to be promising. The measurement with large absorbers will permit to determine the decay rate of the \(88\,\mathrm {keV}\)\(\gamma \)-transition of the \(^{109\mathrm {m}}\hbox {Ag}\) (\(T_{1/2}=39\,\mathrm {s}\)) isomer. Consequently, the activity inside the absorber can be determined, which is a great advantage since the considered source preparation techniques (see Sect. 3) are non-quantitative methods. In addition, the measurement will determine the number of K capture events and hence, the absolute value of the fractional K capture probability can be derived. But even in ideal conditions, the threshold of the detector will be on the same order as the M capture energies. The second stage with a smaller absorber will then lead to better energy resolution and lower threshold and permit to determine probabilities of M or possibly even N capture relative to the K-EC probability.
X-Ray Spectrometry
The second step toward accurate nuclear decay data of EC decays is the measurement of the X-ray emission probabilities. These will also be performed using MMCs but require an entirely different setup. X-ray spectrometry is a widely used technique with MMCs, but the uncertainty budgets for metrology applications require special care in the experimental preparation and characterization of the detection efficiency (see e.g., [23, 24]).
Starting from the external X-ray source, its activity needs to be well known and traceable to primary activity determination methods, and a well-defined geometry and low self-absorption are essential. In our case, this will be achieved by electroplating the radionuclide to a 10-mm-diameter circle on a stainless steel disk. The activity will mainly be determined using \(4\pi \, \beta \)–\(\gamma \) coincidence counting and/or liquid scintillation counting methods independent of the MMC measurements.
MMCs with metallic absorbers usually have no possibility to distinguish between particle types; therefore, the detector needs to be shielded from non-radiative emissions of the source. A simple way to achieve this is to use beryllium windows, but especially for low-energy photons the absorption will be too large and hard to estimate with small uncertainties. Since all non-radiative particles from the decays are charged, magnetic fields will be used to deflect the particles, but special care needs to be taken to shield the detector since both the MMC and the read-out SQUID are susceptible to magnetic interference. A superconducting coil is ideal for this application since the induced magnetic field is not present during cool-down, which allows the use of superconducting shielding, e.g., made from niobium, for the detector, and the field strength on the order of \(10\,\mathrm {mT}\) can be adjusted to the expected particle energies. The exact operational parameters need be found in simulations and depend on the geometry, which has not been finalized at this time.
A collimator is used to define the available area of the absorber. Especially the edge geometry needs to be designed carefully to avoid scattered particles reaching the detector, while keeping the particle transmission through the collimator edge to a minimum. The design principles are, e.g., well described in [23]. The absorber needs to be characterized for its detection efficiency in the desired energy range, ideally both with simulations and experimentally [24]. In addition, the geometric efficiency needs to be calibrated very precisely, which will be done using a well characterized \(^{210}\hbox {Po}~\alpha \)-source of the same geometry as the X-ray sources.
For higher-energy X-rays, applicable to \(^{109}\hbox {Cd}\) and \(^{125}\hbox {I}\), the MMC detector system “SMX3” has already been set up, well characterized and used for similar measurements at LNE-LNHB, covering an energy range between 5 and 26 keV [25, 26].
The remaining radionuclides emit lower energy X-rays, which require a new detector design developed within this project, with a design drawing shown in Fig. 1. It features a segmented circular absorber with an active area of \(3\,\mathrm {mm^{2}}\) (\(\approx 2\,\mathrm {mm}\) diameter) with 8 pixels of equal absorber area on a \(5\times 5\,\mathrm {mm^{2}}\) substrate. The optimal gold absorber thickness was determined to be \(17\,\upmu \mathrm {m}\), yielding a detection efficiency of 99% at \(9\,\mathrm {keV}\). In addition, the design features crosses for precise alignment of the collimator.
Each of the 4 read-out channels can be connected to a SQUID on 2 of the 4 chip sides each, allowing a very flexible experimental setup. All 4 channels are connected in series for supply of the field generating current and the persistent current switch, which can be connected on two edges. The thermal layout features an on-chip heat bath, that connects to each pixel with a defined thermal link to provide a thermal decay time of \(\approx 10\,\mathrm {ms}\) and uses air bridges, which traverse exposed niobium leads. The energy resolution is expected to be better than \(5\,\mathrm {eV}\).