1 Erratum to: J Low Temp Phys (2016) 183:169–174 DOI 10.1007/s10909-016-1543-7

In the original article, there was an error in Eq. 5. Following is the corrected equation:

$$\begin{aligned} \rho (S,l) l(t)^{4} = c_{S} \tilde{S}^{-\tau }\equiv \tilde{\rho }(\tilde{S}) \end{aligned}$$
(5)

In addition, there were errors in the vertical axes of Figs. 1 and 2. Following are the corrected figures.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Domain size distribution \(\rho _0(S)\) in the initial pattern with \(l=l_{0}\). A broken line represents the power law with the approximate value \(\tau =2\) of the Fisher exponent. The distribution \(\rho _0(S)\) obeys the power law in the scaling regime \(l_0^2 \ll S \ll L^{D_S}\) with the fractal dimension \(D_S=2-\beta /\nu \) with the critical exponents \(\beta =5/36\) and \(\nu =4/3\) of two-dimensional percolation theory

Fig. 2
figure 2

Dynamic scaling plot of the domain size distribution \(\rho (S,l)\) for \(l(t)/l_{0}= 0.8, 1.0, 1.4, 2.0 ,2.8, 3.9\), and 5.6 with the effective system sizes \(\tilde{L}=L/l(t)=81.5, 65.2, 46.6, 32.6, 23.3, 16.7\), and 11.6, respectively. The broken line represents the universal function \(\tilde{\rho }(\tilde{S})\) with \(c_S=0.1\) and \(\tau =2\). The positions of \(\tilde{S}=\tilde{L}^{D_S}\) for different values from \(l(t)/l_0=0.8\) to \(l(t)/l_0=5.6\) are represented by thick arrows from right to left (Color figure online)