Skip to main content
Log in

Does Body Size Influence Male Care? Investigating an Alternative Reproductive Tactic in Manogea porracea (Araneae: Araneidae), a Spider with Amphisexual Care

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The balance between the investment of time and energy by males in searching for new partners and in protecting and/or feeding offspring can influence reproductive strategies. Strong competitors may enhance their mating effort, while weak competitors may compensate their disadvantage in intrasexual competition by investing in the increase of offspring survival. This balance and its implications to male reproductive strategies have been extensively investigated in vertebrate species but remain poorly understood in invertebrates, because paternal care is rare. Manogea porracea is the only described solitary spider in which extended male care occurs in the absence of females (i.e. amphisexual care). Large males usually win disputes and prefer large, more fecund females. Therefore, they may increase their reproductive success by prioritizing the investment in the search for additional partners, while small males may compensate their competitive disadvantage by increasing their own parental efforts. We tested the prediction that lighter males will invest in the care of the offspring more often than heavier ones. However, our results indicate that males care for offspring regardless of their size. We discuss how the benefits of parental care may override the costs of reducing the number of potential mates for M. porracea males and suggest new directions for further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alissa LM, Muniz DG, Machado G (2017) Devoted fathers or selfish lovers? Conflict between mating effort and parental care in a harem-defending arachnid. J Evol Biol 30:191–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade MCB (1996) Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian Redback spider. Science 271:70–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade MCB (2003) Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spiders. Behav Ecol 14:531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 2:349–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR (1998) Sperm competition in birds: mechanisms and function. In: Birkhead TR, Moller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London, pp 578–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollache L, Cézilly F (2004) Sexual selection on male body size and assortative pairing in Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda): field surveys and laboratory experiments. J Zool 264:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann HJ, Taborsky M (2008) The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions. In: Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (eds) Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann HJ (2008) Alternative reproductive tactics in insects. In: Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Jane H (eds) Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley NT, Hamedani E, Symanski C (2018) Mate choice decision rules: trait synergisms and preference shifts. Ecol Evol 8:2380–2394. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3831

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Busso JP, Davis Rabosky AR (2016) Disruptive selection on male reproductive polymorphism in a jumping spider, Maevia inclemens. Anim Behav 120:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson TE (1984) Alternative reproductive tactics in spiders. Am Zool 24:321–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ (1989) Causes of assortative mating in arthropods. Anim Behav 38:980–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • De Young S, Wilgers DJ (2016) The effects of male competition on the expression and success of alternative mating tactics in the wolf spider Rabidosa punctulata. J Arachnol 44:380–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward DA, Chapman T (2011) The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 26:647–654

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forstmeier W (2002) Factors contributing to male mating success in the polygynous dusky warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus). Behaviour 139:1361–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth A, Montgomerie RD (1987) Alternative reproductive tactics in the territorial damselfly Calopteryx maculata: sneaking by older males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghislandi PG, Pekár S, Matzke M et al (2018) Resource availability, mating opportunity and sexual selection intensity influence the expression of male alternative reproductive tactics. J Evol Biol 31:1035–1046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2008) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross MR (1991) Evolution of alternative reproductive strategies: frequency-dependent sexual selection in male bluegill sunfish. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 332:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefler CD (2007) Male mate choice and size-assortative pairing in a jumping spider, Phidippus clarus. Anim Behav 73:943–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Janicke T, Haderer IK, Lajeunesse MJ, Anthes N (2016) Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Sci Adv 2:e1500983–e1500983

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Bonsall MB (2014) What are the benefits of parental care? The importance of parental effects on developmental rate. Ecol Evol 4:2330–2351

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21:919–948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Johnstone RA (2002) Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 357:319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackey ACR, Martin MD, Tinghitella RM (2018) Male competition and speciation: expanding our framework for speciation by sexual selection. Curr Zool 64:69–73

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath MJL, Komdeur J (2003) Is male care compromised by additional mating opportunity? Trends Ecol Evol 18:424–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden JH (1989) Bodybuilding dragonflies: costs and benefits of maximizing flight muscle. Physiol Zool 62:505–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DP, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Freeman-Gallant CR (2007) Attractive males provide less parental care in two populations of the common yellowthroat. Anim Behav 73:165–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller AP, Thornhill R (1998) Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Anim Behav 55:1507–1515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moura RR, Gonzaga MO (2017) Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care. Sci Nat 104:28

    Google Scholar 

  • Moura RR, Vasconcellos-Neto J, de Gonzaga MO (2017) Extended male care in Manogea porracea (Araneae: Araneidae): the exceptional case of a spider with amphisexual care. Anim Behav 123:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann R, Schneider JM (2015) Differential investment and size-related mating strategies facilitate extreme size variation in contesting male spiders. Anim Behav 101:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Peixoto PEC, Benson WW (2011) Fat and body mass predict residency status in two tropical satyrine butterflies. Ethology 117:722–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1997) Why do females care more than males? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 264:1555–1557

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team R (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing

  • Requena GS, Machado G (2015) Effects of egg attendance on male mating success in a harvestman with exclusive paternal care. Behav Ecol 26:926–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Guevara A, Hurme KJ (2018) Intrasexually selected weapons. Biol Rev 94:60–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Segoli M, Arieli R, Sierwald P et al (2008) Sexual cannibalism in the brown widow spider (Latrodectus geometricus). Ethology 114:279–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira MC, Peixoto PEC (2013) Winners and losers: a meta-analysis of functional determinants of fighting ability in arthropod contests. Funct Ecol 27:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J (1998) Paternity and paternal care. In: Birkhead TR, Moller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London, pp 117–145

    Google Scholar 

  • WSC (2018) World Spider Catalog. Version 19.0. In: Nat. Hist. Museum Bern

  • Yip EC, Rayor LS (2014) Maternal care and subsocial behaviour in spiders. Biol Rev 89:427–449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank MSc. Giancarlo Ângelo Ferreira and Yuri Lima Vasconcelos Ferreira for providing transport to the study area in several occasions. This project was supported Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP: Proc. 14196-5/2017, 465562/2014-0), Duratex S.A., Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Hymenoptera Parasitoides da Região Sudeste (HYMPAR/Sudeste - CNPq/CAPES/FAPESP), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG: Proc. APQ-02984-17, APQ-02104-14, CRA-30058/12, APQ-03202-13), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq: Proc. 311823/2017-3; 403733/2012-0; 445832/2014-2; 465562/2014-0; 441225/2016-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael R. Moura.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moura, R.R., Pinto, N.S., Vasconcellos-Neto, J. et al. Does Body Size Influence Male Care? Investigating an Alternative Reproductive Tactic in Manogea porracea (Araneae: Araneidae), a Spider with Amphisexual Care. J Insect Behav 32, 201–206 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-019-09725-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-019-09725-w

Keywords

Navigation