Skip to main content
Log in

Novel Wing-Flashing Behavior in a Scorpionfly (Panorpa debilis) May be Competitive

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scorpionflies (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) are important models for studying sexual selection and mating strategies. However, much is still unknown about their behavior and natural history. Here we describe a wing-flashing behavior in a population of Panorpa debilis Westwood from central New York. Wing-flashing has been previously observed, but not described in Mecoptera. We use a combination of direct observation and video analysis in an attempt to understand the motivation behind this behavior: is wing-flashing behavior used for attraction of mates, for control of food resources, or perhaps neither? If wing-flashing is involved in mate attraction, we would expect skewed wing-flashing ratios between males and females and a high rate of wing-flashing aimed at conspecifics of the opposite sex. If the behavior is instead used for intraspecific competition for resources, we would expect a high degree of wing-flashing aimed at conspecifics of the same sex or indiscriminate of sex. We demonstrate that this behavior is non-random — and most likely competitive in nature — by showing that wing-flashing preferentially occurs near other individuals, and by comparing wing-flashing rates across males and females in a variety of situations. Both sexes used wing-flashes in response to the opposite sex, though most wing-flashes were female to female signals. Wing-flashing was even observed as a response to potentially competitive arthropods like harvestmen (Leiobunum spp.). In addition to their suitability as study organisms for mating behavior, P. debilis, may be a useful organism for studying animal communication and signaling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with image J. Biophoton Int 11:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamo SA, Hanlon RT (1996) Do cuttlefish (Cephalopoda) signal their intentions to conspecifics during agonistic encounters? Anim Behav 52:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J, Pyle WD (1979) The complex courtship behavior of Physiphora demandata (F.) (Diptera: Otitidae). Z Tierpsychol 49:352–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD (1961) Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour 17:130–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aluja, M., & Norrbom, A. (Eds.). (1999). Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 376–401.

  • Bakker K (1962) An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Néerl Zool 14:200–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth RH Jr (1964) The mating behavior of Byrsotria fumigata (Guerin) (Blattidae, Blaberinae). Behaviour 23:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs JD (1972) Aggressive behavior in the adult apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae). The Canadian Entomologist 104:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briceño RD, Ramos D, Eberhard WG (1996) Courtship behavior of male Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in captivity. Fla Entomol 79:130–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burk T (1983) Behavioral ecology of mating in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew)(Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 66:330–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush GL (1969) Mating behavior, host specificity, and the ecological significance of sibling species in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Am Nat 103:669–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers GW (1963) The life history of Panorpa nuptialis (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 56:142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers GW, Thornhill R (1983) Biology of the Mecoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 28:203–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:125–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L (2009) Should I stay or should I go? Condition- and status-dependent courtship decisions in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata. Anim Behav 78:491–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L, Sauer KP (2003) Influence of nutrition on courtship and mating in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata (Mecoptera, Insecta). Ethology 109:911–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficken MS (1962) Agonistic behavior and territory in the American redstart. Auk 79:607–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard MB, Elias DO, Kasumovic MM (2015) Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders. Proc R Soc B 282:2015–2222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim Behav 42:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halaj J, Cady AB (2000) Diet composition and significance of earthworms as food of harvestmen (Arachnida: Opiliones). Am Midl Nat 143:487–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartbauer M, Gepp J, Hinteregger K, Koblmüller S (2015) Diversity of wing patterns and abdomen- generated substrate sounds in 3 European scorpionfly species. Insect science 22:521–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JMP®, Version 10 [Computer software]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2007. Available from http://www.jmp.com

  • Misof B, Liu S, Meusemann K, Peters RS, Donath A, Mayer C et al (2014) Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science 346:763–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht R (1974) Vibrationssignale bei der Paarung von Panorpa (Mecoptera/Insecta). Experientia 30:340–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

  • Simpson MJA (1968) The display of the Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Anim Behav Monogr 1:1–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner P (1929) Studien an Panorpa communis L. Z Morphol Okol Tiere 17:1–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BT, Strahl SD (1990) Nesting behavior of sunbitterns (Eurypyga helias) in Venezuela. Condor 92:576–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1979) Male pair-formation pheromones in Panorpa scorpionflies (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Environ Entomol 8:886–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1980) Competition and coexistence among Panorpa scorpionflies (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Ecol Monogr 50:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1981) Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) scorpionflies: systems for understanding resource-defense polygyny and alternative male reproductive efforts. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:355–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting MF (2002) Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera. Zoologica Scripta 31:93–104

  • Wijnhoven H (2011) Notes on the biology of the unidentified invasive harvestman Leiobunum sp. (Arachnida: Opiliones). Arachnologische Mitteilungen 41:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Erika Mudrak from the Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit for her help with data analysis, along with Francoise Vermeylen and Lynn Johnson. We are also grateful to Cole Gilbert for his valuable input, and to two anonymous reviewers, whose comments improved the manuscript greatly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian R. Magnier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magnier, B.R., Montgomery, G.A. Novel Wing-Flashing Behavior in a Scorpionfly (Panorpa debilis) May be Competitive. J Insect Behav 30, 247–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-017-9613-5

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-017-9613-5

Keywords

Navigation