Abstract
While the high efficiency of N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) in protecting humans against disease-transmitting arthropods is unquestioned, the mode of action of DEET on a physiological and behavioural level remains debated. Recent advances demonstrated that DEET modulates the function of the insects’ odorant receptor complex. In this study we aimed to evaluate how DEET affects the behaviour of insects towards attractive and repellent odours. In a series of experiments with larvae and adults of the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster, we were able to provide the first evidence that DEET, applied in a gaseous phase, interrupts not only positive but also negative responses to olfactory cues indicating that insects treated with DEET lose the ability to perceive and respond to odours. This effect was also observed if insects were exposed to DEET prior to but not during the behavioural experiments, but was reversible after some time. DEET functioned as deterrent in experiments where insects had direct contact to the substance. This dual function – the camouflage of hosts from a distance and the deterrence upon contact – may be the key for the high efficiency of DEET.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acree F, Turner RB, Gouck HK, Beroza M, Smith N (1968) L-lactic acid - a mosquito attractant isolated from humans. Science 161:1346
Bakker K (1959) Feeding period, growth, and pupation in larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Entomologia Expenmentalis et Applicata 2:171–186
Bohbot JD, Dickens JC (2010) Insect repellents: modulators of mosquito odorant receptor activity. PLoS ONE 5:e12138
Cobb M, Dannet F (1994) Multiple genetic-control of acetate-induced olfactory responses in Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Heredity 73:444–455
Crawley MJ (2005) Statistics - An introduction using R John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England
DeGennaro M, McBride CS, Seeholzer L, Nakagawa T, Dennis EJ, Goldman C, Jasinskiene N, James AA, Vosshall LB (2013) orco mutant mosquitoes lose strong preference for humans and are not repelled by volatile DEET. Nature 498:487–491
Dekker T, Ignell R, Ghebru M, Glinwood R, Hopkins R (2011) Identification of mosquito repellent odours from Ocimum forskolei. Parasite Vector 4:183
Development Core Team R (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Dicke M, Baldwin IT (2010) The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help’. Trends Plant Sci 15:167–175
Ditzen M, Pellegrino M, Vosshall LB (2008) Insect odorant receptors are molecular targets of the insect repellent DEET. Science 319:1838–1842
Dogan EB, Ayres JW, Rossignol PA (1999) Behavioural mode of action of deet: inhibition of lactic acid attraction. Med Vet Entomol 13:97–100
Dudareva N, Pichersky E (2006) Biology of floral scent. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA
Harborne JB (1995) Ökologische Biochemie. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford
Junker RR, Blüthgen N (2010) Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones. Ann Bot 105:777–782
Knaden M, Strutz A, Ahsan J, Sachse S, Hansson BS (2012) Spatial representation of odorant valence in an insect brain. Cell Rep 1:392–399
Louis M, Piccinotti S, Vosshall LB (2008) High-resolution measurement of odor-driven behavior in Drosophila larvae. J Vis Exp
Paluch G, Bartholomay L, Coats J (2010) Mosquito repellents: a review of chemical structure diversity and olfaction. Pest Manag Sci 66:925–935
Pellegrino M, Steinbach N, Stensmyr MC, Hansson BS, Vosshall LB (2011) A natural polymorphism alters odour and DEET sensitivity in an insect odorant receptor. Nature 478:511–U106
Raguso RA (2008) Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:549–569
Sanford JL, Shields VDC, Dickens JC (2013) Gustatory receptor neuron responds to DEET and other insect repellents in the yellow-fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Naturwissenschaften 100:269–273
Schaefer HM, Ruxton GD (2011) Plant-animal communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Soares SF, Braga RD, Ferreira LL, Louly CCB, de Sousa LAD, da Silva AC, Borges LMF (2010) Repellent activity of DEET against Amblyomma cajennense (Acari: Ixodidae) nymphs submitted to different laboratory bioassays. Rev Bras Parasitol V 19:12–16
Stanczyk NM, Brookfield JFY, Ignell R, Logan JG, Field LM (2010) Behavioral insensitivity to DEET in Aedes aegypti is a genetically determined trait residing in changes in sensillum function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:8575–8580
Syed Z, Leal WS (2008) Mosquitoes smell and avoid the insect repellent DEET. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:13598–13603
Syed Z, Pelletier J, Flounders E, Chitolina RF, Leal WS (2011) Generic insect repellent detector from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 6:e17705
Unsicker SB, Kunert G, Gershenzon J (2009) Protective perfumes: the role of vegetative volatiles in plant defense against herbivores. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:479–485
Acknowledgments
We thank Susanne Clemens-Richter and Monika Meyer for providing the insects and medium, Mariela Wolf for performing preliminary experiments. The work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG, JU 2856/1-1].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 117 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Junker, R.R., Klupsch, K. & Paulus, J. Prior Exposure to DEET Interrupts Positive and Negative Responses to Olfactory Cues in Drosophila Melanogaster . J Insect Behav 28, 1–14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-014-9476-y
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-014-9476-y