Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative Mating Tactics as Potential Prezygotic Barriers to Gene Flow Between Two Sister Species of Frugivorous Fruit Flies

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rhagoletis completa Cresson and Rhagoletis zoqui Bush, are two sister species in the suavis group that were thought to occupy non-overlapping geographical ranges. Recent discovery of a contact zone in North Eastern México where natural interspecific hybrids with intermediate morphotypes can be found has led to laboratory studies in small enclosures that failed to identify the existence of reproductive barriers capable of maintaining the genetic integrity of both species. Because the experimental approach used in such studies could have interfered with natural behavior of flies, a series of additional mating compatibility tests under much less restrictive conditions were performed. Our observations, confirmed the fact that males and females of both species engage in interspecific matings. However, R. completa females were more reluctant to engage in heterospecific matings than R. zoqui females, revealing asymmetries in sexual isolation. Also, careful scrutiny of male guarding behavior and species specific partitioning of mating location unveiled subtle differences that could result in reproductive isolation if reinforced during secondary contact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AliaNiazee MT (1988) Diapause modalities in some Rhagoletis species. Special report. Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 830:13–25

  • Aluja M, López M, Sivinski J (1998) Ecological evidence for diapause in four native and one exotic species of larval-pupal fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) parasitoids in tropical environments. Ann Entomol Soc Am 91:821–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Aluja M, Piñero J, López M, Zuñiga A, Piedra E, Fleischer F, Sivinski J (2000a) New host plant and distribution records in México for Anastrepha spp., Toxotrypana curvicauda Gesrtacker, Rhagoletis zoqui Bush, Rhagoletis sp., and Hexacheeta sp. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 102:802–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Aluja M, Piñero J, Jácome I, Díaz-Fleischer F, Sivinski J (2000b) Behavior of flies in the genus Anastrepha (Trypetinae: Toxotrypanini). In: Aluja M, Norrbom AL (eds) Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 375–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Aluja M, Lozada N, Piñero J, Birke A, Hernández-Ortíz V, Díaz-Fleischer F (2001) Basic behavior of Rhagoletis turpiniae (Diptera: Tephritidae) with comparative notes on the sexual behavior of Rhagoletis pomonella and Rhagoletis zoqui. Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Edvardsson M, Friberg U, Nilsson T (2000) Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:10460–10464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bush G (1966) The taxonomy, cytology, and evolution of the genus Rhagoletis in North America (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bull Mus Comp Zool 134:431–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush G (1968) Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorus flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evol 23:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush G, Smith J (1998) The genetic and ecology of sympatric speciation: a case study. Res Popul Ecol 40:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ, Iman RL (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 35:124–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (1989) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evol 43:362–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (1997) “Patterns of speciation in Drosophila” revisited. Evol 51:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winter JCF, Dodou D (2010) Five-Point Likert Items: t test versus Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon. A peer-reviewed electronic journal.15:11:ISSN1531-7714

  • Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1940) Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am Nat 74:312–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eason P, Hannon SJ (1994) New birds on the block-new neighbors increase defensive costs for territorial male willow ptarmigan. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelaar P, Siepielski AM, Clobert J (2008) Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evol 62:2462–2472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote H (1981) The genus Rhagoletis loew south of the United States (Diptera: tephritidae). USDA 1607:75

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ (1989) Macroevolutionary consequences of speciation: inferences from phytophagous insects. In: Otte D & Endler J (eds) Speciation and its Consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 557–578

  • Hendrichs J, Katsoyannos BI, Wornoayporn V, Hendrichs MA (1994) Odour-mediated foraging by yellow jacket wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): predation on leks of pheromone-calling Mediterranean fruit fly males (Diptera: Tephritidae). Oecologia 99:88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández V (1985) Descripción de una nueva especie mexicana del género Rhagoletis Loew (Diptera Tephritidae). Folia Entomol Méx 64:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood GR, Egan SP, Feder JL (2012) Evidence for sexual isolation as a prezygotic barrier to gene flow between morphologically divergent species of Rhagoletis fruit flies. Ecol Entomol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2012.01392.x

  • Hoskin CJ, Higgie M, McDonald KR, Moritz C (2005) Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353–1356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings J, Mazzi D, Ritchie M, Hoikkala A (2011) Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential. BMC Evoly Biol http://www.biomedcentral.com 11:68/1471-2148

  • Kaneshiro K (1976) Ethological isolation and phylogeny in the plan tibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evol 30:740–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro K (1983) Sexual selection and direction of evolution in the biosystematics of Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Ann Rev Entomol 28:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiester AR (1979) Conspecifics as cues: a mechanism for habitat selection in the Panamanian Grass Anole (Anolis auratus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondrashov A, Kondrashov F (1999) Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400:351–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korol A, Rashkovetsky E, Iliadi K, Michalak P, Ronin Y, Nevo E (2000) Nonrandom mating in Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations derived from closely adjacent ecologically contrasting slopes at “Evolution Canyon”. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:12637–12642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korol A, Rashkovetsky E, Iliadi K, Nevo E (2006) Drosophila flies in “Evolution Canyon” as a model for incipient sympatric speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:18184–18189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lukhtanov V (2011) Dobzhansky’s rule and reinforcement of prezygotic reproductive isolation in zones of secondary contact. Biol Bull Rev 2:2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallet J (2005) Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 20:229–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning WE (1957) The genus Juglans in Mexico and Central America. J Arnold Arboretum 38:121–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard UP, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor MAF (1999) Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP (2003) Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. R Soc Lond 270:1911–1918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Opp SB, Spisak SA, Telang A, Hammond SS (1996) Comparative mating systems of two Rhagoletis species: the adaptive significance of mate guarding. In: McPheron BA, Steck GJ (eds) Economic fruit flies: a world assesment of their biology and management. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez P, Calcagno J, Lovrich G (2011) Absence of a prezygotic behavioural barrier to gene flow between the two sympatric morphs of the squat lobster Munida gregaria (Fabricius, 1793) (Decapoda: Anomura: Galatheidae). Helgol Mar Res 65:513–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfectti F (2002) Especiación: modos y mecanismos. In Soler M (ed) Evolución: la base de la biología. Proyecto Sur, Granada, Spain, pp 307–322

  • Prokopy R, Papaj D (2000) Behavior of flies of the genera Rhagoletis, Zonosemata, and Carpomya (Trypetinae: Carpomyina). In: Aluja M, Norrbom AL (eds) Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 219–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie M (2007) Sexual selection and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:79–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rull J, Aluja M, Tadeo E, Guillen L, Feder J (unpublished) Distribution and host plant affiliation of walnut-infesting Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico

  • Rull J, Aluja M, Feder J, Berlocher S (2006) Distribution and host range of hawthorn-infesting Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico. Ann Entomol Soc Am 99:662–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rull J, Aluja M, Feder JL (2010) Evolution of intrinsic reproductive isolation among four North America populations of R. pomonella. Biol J Linn Soc 100:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rull J, Tadeo E, Aluja M, Guillen L, Egan S, Feder J (2012) Hybridization and sequential components of reproductive isolation between parapatric walnut-infesting sister species Rhagoletis completa and Rhagoletis zoqui. Biol J Linn Soc 107:886–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servedio MR, Noor MAF (2003) The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:339–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Bush G (1997) Phylogeny of the Genus Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II. Mol Phylogenet Evol 7:33–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps J, Buechner M, Alexander K, Davis J, Zuniga N (2005) Genotypic differences in space use and movementpatterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 70:609–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval B, Hendrichs J (2000) Behavior of flies in the genus Ceratitis (Dacinae: Ceratitidini). In: Aluja M, Norrbom AL (eds) Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 429–456

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Emilio Acosta (Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México [INECOL]) for technical help during collections of biological material and to Dr. Armando Martínez Chacón (Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana) for advice on statistical analysis of results. Eduardo Tadeo acknowledges a PhD scholarship from CONACyT during the course of this study. Juan Rull acknowledges funding by CONACyT (CB 2005-25889-50008Q).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Tadeo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tadeo, E., Aluja, M. & Rull, J. Alternative Mating Tactics as Potential Prezygotic Barriers to Gene Flow Between Two Sister Species of Frugivorous Fruit Flies. J Insect Behav 26, 708–720 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-013-9383-7

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-013-9383-7

Keywords

Navigation