Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Differences in the Behavior of the Harvestman Leiobunum vittatum (Opiliones, Sclerosomatidae) Towards Conspecific Cues

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preliminary observations of the harvestman Leiobunum vittatum found that individuals rub their bodies against the substrate, presenting the possibility of chemical marking. To determine whether or not L. vittatum individuals can detect substrate-borne chemical cues, we compared responses of L. vittatum males and females to substrate-borne male and female cues. We found that individuals of L. vittatum do respond to conspecific cues and that their responses are sex-specific. In response to substrate-borne conspecific cues, male L. vittatum spent more time, engaged in more scraping with their sensory legs I, and engaged in pedipalpal tapping more often in the presence versus absence of conspecific cues (male and female equally). Furthermore, in the presence of conspecific cues, males engaged in two behaviors never observed in females—(a) “fast approach” and (b) “jerking”, the latter of which was never observed in the presence of cricket cues. In contrast to males, females did not spend more time on conspecific cues, but did spend more time tapping their pedipalps in the presence of male vs female cues, suggesting an ability to distinguish between them. A final experiment explored the possibility that females could discriminate among males of varying histories of agonistic interactions based upon their chemical cues. We found no support for this hypothesis. Our results demonstrate that L. vitattum do respond to conspecific cues, and introduce the possibility that intraspecific communication may be mediated in part by chemical cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agosta WC (1992) Chemical communication—the language of pheromones. New York Scientific American, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Akino T, Yamaoka R (2005) Trail discrimination signal of Lasius japonicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Chemoecology 15:21–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (2002) A spider’s world: senses and behavior. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Breithaupt T, Thiel M (2010) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell P (2001) Sensory ecology and orientational behaviors. In: Brownell P, Polis G (eds) Scorpion biology and research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 159–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucherl W (1955) Escorpiões e escorpionismo no Brasil. Mem Instit But 27:121–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Delago A, Aonuma H (2006) Experience-based agonistic behavior in female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Sci 23:775–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson ZR, Grether GF (2007) Tradition without social learning: scent-mark-based communal roost formation in a Neotropical harvestman (Prionostemma sp.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:801–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias DO, Kasumovic MM, Punzalan D, Andrade MCB, Mason AC (2008) Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders. Anim Behav 76:901–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Čokl LA, Ramires EN, Marques-da-Silva E, Delay C, Fontana JD, Donatti L, Schneider VF, Marques FA (2009) Sound is involved in multimodal communication of Loxosceles intermedia Mello-Leitão, 1934 (Araneae; Sicariidae). Behav Proc 82:236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foelix RF (1996) Biology of spiders, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffin DD, Brownell PH (2001) Chemosensory behavior and physiology. In: Brownell P, Polis G (eds) Scorpion biology and research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 184–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskett AC (2007) Spider sex pheromones: emission, reception, structures, and functions. Biol Rev 82:27–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JS, Uetz GW (2008) Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success. Anim Behav 75:1253–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grether GF, Donaldson ZR (2006) Communal roost site selection in a Neotropical harvestman: habitat limitation versus tradition. Ethology 113:290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD (1997) The evolution of communication. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt J (1996) Fine structure of the trichobothria and their regeneration during moulting in the whip scorpion Typopeltis crucifer Pocock, 1894. Acta Zool 77:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA (2003) Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc Nat Acad Sci 100:13390–13395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA (2008) Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991. Behav Ecol 19:1250–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA, Elias DO, Mason AC, Miller GL, Stratton GE (2008) Substrate-dependent signalling success in the wolf spider, Schizocosa retrorsa. Anim Behav 75:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA, Cuasay K, Rivlin PK (2006) The role of visual ornamentation in female choice of a multimodal male courtship display. Ethology 112:1062–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immel V (1954) Zur Biologie und Physiologie von Nemastoma quadripunctatum (Opiliones, Dyspnoi). Zool Jahr Abt Syst 83:129–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki M, Delago A, Nishino H, Aonuma H (2006) Effects of previous experience on the agonistic behaviour of male crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Sci 23:863–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juberthie C (1957) Présence d’organes de stridulation chez deux Nemastomatidae (Opilions). Bull Mus 29:210–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Juberthie C (1968) Organes de stridulation chez un opilion cavernicole, Abasola sarea (Travuniidae). Ann Spéléol 23:479–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Juberthie J, Lopez A, Juberthie-Jupeau L (1981) Étude ultrastructurale des sensilles thoraciques dorsales et paramédianes chez Sabacon paradoxum Simon (Palpatores, Sabaconidae). Atti Dell Soc Tosc Di Sci Nat, Memoire, Serie B 88(Suppl):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortet R, Hedrick A (2005) The scent of dominance: female field crickets use odour to predict the outcome of male competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhang Z, Liu F, Liu Q, Gan W, Chen J, Lim MLM, Li D (2008) UVB-based mate-choice cues used by females of the jumping spider Phintella vittata. Curr Biol 18:699–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim MLM, Li J, Li D (2008) Effect of UV-reflecting markings on female mate-choice decisions in Cosmophasis umbratica, a jumping spider from Singapore. Behav Ecol 19:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado G, Macías-Ordóñez R (2007) Reproduction. In: Pinto-da-Rocha R, Machado G, Giribet G (eds) Harvestmen: the biology of opiliones. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 414–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Macías-Ordóñez R (1997) The mating system of Leiobunum vittatum Say 1821 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Palpatores): resource defense polygyny in the striped harvestman. Ph.D. thesis. Lehigh University, Bethlehem, USA

  • Macías-Ordóñez R, Machado G, Perez-Gonzalez A, Shultz JW (2010) Genitalic evolution in Opiliones. In: Leonard JL, Córdoba-Aguilar A (eds) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals, vol 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 285–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiessen FA (1968) On the sexual behaviour of some Brazilian scorpions. Rev Bras Pesq Med Biol 1:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2005) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Rochow VB, Liddle AL (1988) Structure and function of the eyes of two species of opilionid from New Zealand glow-worm caves (Megalopsalis tumida: Palpatores, and Hendea myersi cavernicola: Laniatores). Proc R Soc Lond B 233:293–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reissland A, Görner P (1985) Trichobothria. In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer, Berlin, pp 138–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JA, Uetz GW (2005) Information content of female chemical signals in the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata: male discrimination of reproductive state and receptivity. Anim Behav 70:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rypstra AL, Wieg C, Walker SE, Persons MH (2003) Mutual mate assessment in wolf spiders: differences in the cues used by males and females. Ethology 109:315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santer RD, Hebets EA (2008) Agonistic signals received by an arthropod filiform hair allude to the prevalence of near-field sound communication. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz S (2004) Semiochemistry of spiders. In: Cardé RT, Miller JG (eds) Advances in insect chemical ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 110–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Secondi J, Haerty W, Lode T (2005) Female attraction to conspecific chemical cues in the palmate newt Triturus helveticus. Ethology 111:726–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JW, Pinto-da-Rocha R (2007) Morphology and functional anatomy. In: Pinto-da-Rocha R, Machado G, Giribet G (eds) Harvestmen: the biology of opiliones. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 14–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Siljander E, Penman D, Harlan H, Gries G (2007) Evidence for male- and juvenile-specific contact pheromones of the common bed bug Cimex lectularius. Ent Exp Appl 125:215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshine DE (2004) Pheromones and other semiochemicals of ticks and their use in tick control. Parasitology 129:S405–S425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshine DE (2006) Tick pheromones and their use in tick control. Annu Rev Entomol 51:557–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz I, Schmolz E, Ruther J (2003) Cuticular lipids as trail pheromone in a social wasp. Proc R Soc B 270:385–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svetec N, Cobb M, Ferveur J-F (2005) Chemical stimuli induce courtship dominance in Drosophila. Curr Biol 15:R790–R792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Switzer PV, Forsythe PS, Escajeda K, Kruse KC (2004) Effects of environmental and social conditions on homosexual pairing in the Japanese Beetle (Popillia japonica Newman). J Insect Behav 17:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds MRE, Elgar MA (2008) The evolution of pheromone diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 23:220–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarsitano M, Jackson RR, Kirchner WH (2000) Signals and signal choices made by the araneophagic jumping spider Portia fimbriata while hunting the orb-weaving web spiders Zygiella x-notata and Zosis geniculatus. Ethology 106:595–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Roberts JA (2002) Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav Evol 59:222–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vainikka A, Seppälä O, Löytynoja K, Rantala MJ (2006) Fitness consequences of female preference for male pheromones in Tenebrio molitor. Evol Ecol Res 8:943–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Weygoldt P (2000) Whip spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi). Their biology, morphology and systematics. Apollo Books, Steenstrup

  • Willemart RH, Chelini MC (2007) Experimental demonstration of close-range olfaction and contact chemoreception in the Brazilian harvestman Iporangaia pustulosa. Ent Exp Appl 123:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemart RH, Chelini MC, Andrade R, Gnaspini P (2007) An ethological approach to a SEM survey on sensory structures and tegumental gland openings of two neotropical harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones, Gonyleptidae). Ital J Zool 74:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemart RH, Farine J-P, Gnaspini P (2009a) Sensory biology of Phalangida harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones): a review, with new morphological data on 18 species. Acta Zool 90:209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemart RH, Osses F, Chelini M-C, Macías-Ordóñez R, Machado G (2009b) Sexually dimorphic legs in a neotropical harvestman (Arachnida, Opiliones): ornament or weapon? Behav Proc 80:1–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt TD (2004) Pheromones and animal behaviour, communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemek R, Bouman EAP, Dusbábek F (2007) The influence of conspecific chemical cues on walking behavior of Ixodes ricinus males. Exp Appl Acarol 41:255–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to J. Shultz for kindly identifying the harvestmen, and to D. Wilgers, K. Santer, K. Fowler-Finn, R. Santer and S. Schwartz for helping with spider and harvestmen collection and for helpful discussions. Special thanks to K. Santer for helping with scoring tapes. RHW was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Prashant Sharma and two anonymous reviewers carefully revised the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. H. Willemart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Willemart, R.H., Hebets, E.A. Sexual Differences in the Behavior of the Harvestman Leiobunum vittatum (Opiliones, Sclerosomatidae) Towards Conspecific Cues. J Insect Behav 25, 12–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-011-9268-6

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-011-9268-6

Keywords

Navigation