Abstract
Computer-monitored flight mills were used to record the flight performance of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire. Flight performance of fed and unfed, and mated and unmated beetles of both sexes were recorded and compared. Mated females flew further per day and longer than unmated females or males. Mated females that were allowed to feed between flight periods flew an average of 1.3 km/day for four days; 10% flew more than 7 km/day. Measurements of free-flight speed using a mirror and a high-speed camera were used to calibrate the flight mill results, permitting absolute estimates of flight performance to be made. Free-flight speeds were approximately three times the speeds recorded by the flight mills. The median corrected distance flown by mated females was >3 km with 20% flying >10 km and 1% flying >20 km. The flight performance of mated females suggests a considerable capacity for range expansion by this invasive species. The implications for quarantine and control are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer LS, Miller DL, Taylor RAJ, Haack RA (2004) Flight potential of the emerald ash borer. In: Mastro V, Reardon R (eds) Proceedings of 2003 Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Port Huron, MI. USDA-FS, FHTET-2004-02. Morgantown, p 9
BenDor TK, Metcalf SS, Fontenot LE, Sangunett B, Hannon B (2006) Modeling the spread of emerald ash borer. Ecol Model 197:221–236
Cockbain AJ (1961) Fuel utilization and duration of flight in Aphis fabae Scop. J Exp Biol 38:163–174
Cooter RJ, Armes NJ (1993) Tethered flight technique for monitoring the flight performance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 22:339–345
Cooter RJ, Winder D, Chancellor TCB (2000) Tethered flight activity of Nephotettix virescens (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in the Philippines. Bull Entomol Res 90:49–55
Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Crook DJ, Khrimian A, Fraser I, Francese JA, Poland TM, Mastro VC (2008) Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) to host bark volatiles. Environ Entomol 37:356–365
de Groot P, Grant GG, Poland TM, Scharbach R, Buchan L, Nott RW, MacDonald L, Pitt D (2008) Electrophysiological response and attraction of emerald ash borer to green leaf volatiles (GLVs) emitted by host foliage. J Chem Ecol 34:1170–1179
Dingle H (1965) The relation between age and flight activity in Oncopeltus. J Exp Biol 42:269–283
El-Sayed AM, Gödde J, Arn H (2000) A computer-controlled video system for real-time recording of insect flight in three dimensions. J Insect Behav 13:881–900
Federal Register (2003) Emerald ash borer; quarantine regulations, interim rule and request for comments. Department of Agriculture, Docket No. 02-125-1. 68:59082–59091
Francese JA, Mastro VC, Oliver JB, Lance DR, Youssef N, Lavallee SG (2005) Evaluation of colors for trapping Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). J Entomol Sci 40:93–95
Gatehouse AG, Hackett DS (1980) A technique for studying flight behaviour of tethered Spodoptera exempta moths. Physiol Entomol 5:215–222
Gatehouse AG, Woodrow KP (1987) Simultaneous monitoring of flight and oviposition of individual velvetbean caterpillar moths (by Wales, Barfield and Leppla, 1985): a critique. Physiol Entomol 12:117–121
Han LZ, Gu HN, Zhai BP, Zhang XX (2008) Reproduction-flight relationship in the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 37:374–381
Johnson CG (1969) Migration and dispersal of insects by flight. Methuen, London
Kennedy JS, Booth CO (1963a) Free flight of aphids in the laboratory. J Exp Biol 40:67–85
Kennedy JS, Booth CO (1963b) Co-ordination of successive activities in an aphid. Depression of settling after flight. J Exp Biol 41:805–824
Krogh A, Weis-Fogh T (1951) The respiratory exchange of the desert locust (Schistocera gregaria) before, during and after flight. J Exp Biol 28:344–357
Krogh A, Weis-Fogh T (1952) A roundabout for studying sustained flight of locusts. J Exp Biol 29:211–219
Lelito JP, Fraser I, Mastro VC, Tumlinson JH, Böröczky K, Baker TC (2007) Visually mediated “paratrooper copulations” in the mating behavior of Agrilus plannipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), a highly destructive invasive pest of North American ash trees. J Insect Behav 20:537–552
Liu HP, Bauer LS, Gao RT, Zhao TH, Petrice TR, Haack RA (2003) Exploratory survey for the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), and its natural enemies in China. Great Lakes Entomol 36:191–204
Liu HP, Bauer LS, Miller DL, Zhao TH, Gao RT, Song L, Luan Q, Jin R, Gao C (2007) Seasonal abundance of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and its natural enemies Oobius agrili (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and Tetrastichus planipennisi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in China. Biol Control 42:61–71
MacFarlane DW, Meyer SP (2005) Characteristics and distribution of potential ash tree hosts for emerald ash borer. Forest Ecol Manage 213:15–24
Marchant KR (2006) Managing the emerald ash borer in Canada. In: Mastro V, Reardon R, Parra G (eds) Proceedings of 2005 Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA. USDA-FS, FHTET-2005-16, Morgantown, pp 3–4
Muirhead JR, Leung B, van Overdijk C, Kelly DW, Nandakumar K, Marchant KR, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Modelling local and long-distance dispersal of invasive emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera) in North America. Diversity Distrib 12:71–79
Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J Forestry 104:118–124
Pureswaran DS, Poland TM (2009) Role of olfactory cues in short range mate finding of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). J Insect Behav 22:205–216
Rebek EJ, Herms DA, Smitley DR (2008) Interspecific variation in resistance to emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) among North American and Asian ash (Fraxinus spp.). Environ Entomol 37:242–246
Riley JR, Downham MCA, Cooter RJ (1997) Comparison of the performance of Cicadulina leafhoppers on flight mills with that to be expected in free flight. Entomol Exp Appl 83:317–322
Rowley WA, Graham CL, Williams RE (1968) A flight mill system for the laboratory study of mosquito flight. Ann Entomol Soc Amer 61:1507–1514
Sawyer AJ (2007) Defining the “edge” of isolated emerald ash borer infestations: simulation results and implications for survey and host removal. In: Mastro V, Lance D, Reardon R, Parra G (eds) Proceedings of 2006 Emerald Ash Borer and Asian Longhorned Beetle Research and Technology Development Meeting, Cincinnati, OH. USDA-FS, FHTET-2007-04, Morgantown, pp 16–18
Shelton TG, Hu XP, Appel AG, Wagner TL (2006) Flight speed of tethered Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) alates. J Insect Behav 19:115–128
Siegert NW, Liebhold AM, McCullough DG (2008) Modeling the spatial and temporal dynamics of isolated emerald ash borer populations. In: Mastro V, Lance D, Reardon R, Parra G (eds) Proceedings of 2007 Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA. USDA-FS, FHTET-2008-07, Morgantown, p 6
Siegert NW, McCullagh DG, Liebhold AM, Telewski FW (2007) Resurrected from the ashes: a historical reconstruction of emerald ash borer dynamics through dendrochronological analyses. In: Mastro V, Lance D, Reardon R, Parra G (eds) Proceedings of 2006 Emerald Ash Borer and Asian Longhorned Beetle Research and Technology Development Meeting, Cincinnati, OH. USDA-FS, FHTET-2007-04, Morgantown, pp 18–19
Spiewok S, Schmolz E (2006) Changes in temperature and light alter the flight speed of hornets (Vespa crabro L.). Physiol Biochem Zool 79:188–193
Taylor LR (1974) Insect migration, flight periodicity and the boundary layer. J Anim Ecol 43:225–238
Taylor LR (1986) The four kinds of migration. In: Danthanarayana W (ed) Insect flight: dispersal and migration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 265–280
Taylor RAJ (1978) The relationship between density and distance of dispersing insects. Ecol Entomol 3:63–70
Taylor RAJ (1979) A simulation model of locust migratory behaviour. J Anim Ecol 48:577–602
Taylor RAJ (1980) A family of regression equations describing the density distribution of dispersing organisms. Nature 286:53–55
Taylor RAJ, Herms DA, Iverson LR (2008) Modeling emerald ash borer dispersal using percolation theory: estimating the rate of range expansion in a fragmented landscape. In: Mastro V, Lance D, Reardon R, Parra G (eds) Proceedings of 2007 Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA. USDA-FS, FHTET-2008-07, Morgantown, pp 7–9
Taylor RAJ, Nault LR, Styer WE, Cheng ZB (1992) Computer-monitored, 16-channel flight mill for recording the flight of leafhoppers (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Ann Entomol Soc Amer 85:627–632
Taylor RAJ, Poland TM, Bauer LS, Haack RA (2006) Is emerald ash borer an obligate migrant? In: Mastro V, Reardon R, Parra G (eds) Proceedings of 2005 Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA. USDA-FS, FHTET-2005-16, Morgantown, p 14
Taylor RAJ, Poland TM, Bauer LS, Windell KN, Lautz JL (2007) Emerald ash borer flight estimates revised. In: Mastro V, Lance D, Reardon R, Parra G (eds) Proceedings of 2006 Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Cincinnati, OH. USDA-FS, FHTET-2007-04, Morgantown, pp 10–12
USDA-APHIS (Animal, Plant Health, Inspection Service) (2009) Emerald ash borer overview. www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/emerald_ash_b/background.shtml
USDA-FS (Forest Service) (2009) Effects of urban forests and their management on human health and environmental quality, emerald ash borer. www.fs.fed.us/ne/syracuse/Data/Nation/data_list_eab.htm
van Dam WA, Williams RN, Taylor RAJ (2000) Comparison of flight in five Nitidulid (Coleoptera) beetles using a computer-monitored flight mill. J Agric Urban Entomol 17:143–151
Windell K, Kautz J (2007) Determining how much weight emerald ash borers can carry in flight? Forest Health Protection Technical Report 0734–2815, USDA-FS, pp 1–49
Acknowledgements
This research was conducted in part with funding from the USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station (NRS) (formerly North Central Research Station) (grant 03-JV-11231200-097), Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET), and The Ohio State University. We thank Drs. Joseph Charney and Robert Haack, USDA-FS NRS, and Frank Sapio, USDA-FS FHTET for assistance in acquiring funding for this RJVA; Deborah L. Miller and Christopher (Kit) O’Connor for assistance with handling, rearing, and flying EAB on the flight mills; Erin Clark for assistance with the free flight experiments; Dr. James Weinkam for reviewing the free flight calculations; and Drs. Larry Phelan, Noah Koller, and Mike Ulyshen for their helpful, careful, and critical reviews of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, R.A.J., Bauer, L.S., Poland, T.M. et al. Flight Performance of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on a Flight Mill and in Free Flight. J Insect Behav 23, 128–148 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-010-9202-3
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-010-9202-3