Aquilino, W. S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(2), 210–240.
Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436–455.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons.
Breyer, B., & Bluemke, M. (2016). Work-family conflict scale (ISSP). GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für: Mannheim.
Currivan, D. B., Nyman, A. L., Turner, C. F., & Biener, L. (2004). Does telephone audio computer-assisted self-interviewing improve the accuracy of prevalence estimates of youth smoking? evidence from the umass tobacco study. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(4), 542–564.
Daikeler, J., Bošnjak, M., & Lozar Manfreda, K. (2020). Web versus other survey modes: An updated and extended meta-analysis comparing response rates. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(3), 513–539.
De Jong Gierveld, J., & van Tilburg, T. (2006). A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness: Confirmatory tests on survey data. Research on Aging, 28(5), 582–598.
De Jong Gierveld, J., & van Tilburg, T. (2010). The de jong gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: Tested on data from 7 countries in the un generations and gender surveys. European Journal of Ageing, 7(2), 121–130.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons
Dolan, P., & Kavetsos, G. (2016). Happy talk: Mode of administration effects on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(3), 1273–1291.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Dryden Press.
Epstein, J. F., Barker, P. R., & Kroutil, L. A. (2001). Mode effects in self-reported mental health data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(4), 529–549.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.
Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Zivnuska, S., & Whitten, D. (2012). Support at work and home: The path to satisfaction through balance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 299–307.
Ferrer-i Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.
Fisher, R. J., & Dube, L. (2005). Gender differences in responses to emotional advertising: A social desirability perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 850–858.
Garbarski, D., Schaeffer, N. C., & Dykema, J. (2019). The effects of features of survey measurement on self-rated health: Response option order and scale orientation. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 14(2), 545–560.
Gauthier, A. H., Cabaço, S. L. F., & Emery, T. (2018). Generations and gender survey study profile. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 9(4), 456–465.
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work-life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373.
Hagqvist, E., Gådin, K. G., & Nordenmark, M. (2017). Work-family conflict and well-being across europe: The role of gender context. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 785–797.
Heerwegh, D. (2009). Mode differences between face-to-face and web surveys: An experimental investigation of data quality and social desirability effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(1), 111–121.
Heerwig, J. A., & McCabe, B. J. (2009). Education and social desirability bias: The case of a black presidential candidate. Social Science Quarterly, 90(3), 674–686.
Helliwell, J. F., & Barrington-Leigh, C. P. (2010). Measuring and understanding subjective well-being. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 43(3), 729–753.
Hendriks, M., Burger, M., Ray, J., & Esipova, N. (2018). Do international migrants increase their happiness and that of their families by migrating. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard & J. Sachs (Eds.), World Happiness Report 2018 (pp. 44–65). UN SDSN.
Hitchcott, P. K., Penna, M. P., & Fastame, M. C. (2020). Age trends in well-being and depressive symptoms: The role of social desirability. Psychiatric Quarterly, 91(2), 463–473.
Jackle, A., Roberts, C., & Lynn, P. (2010). Assessing the effect of data collection mode on measurement. International Statistical Review, 78(1), 3–20.
Koen, B., Loosveldt, G., Vandenplas, C., & Stoop, I. (2018). Response rates in the european social survey: Increasing, decreasing, or a matter of fieldwork efforts? Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/?p=9673, 1–12.
Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveysthe effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 847–865.
Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047.
Lugtig, P., Toepoel, V., Emery, T., Cabaço, S. L. F., Bujard, M., Naderi, R., Schumann, A., Lück, D., et al. (2022). Can we successfully move a cross-national survey online? results from a large three-country experiment in the gender and generations programme survey. SocArXiv. February, 13.
Lunau, T., Bambra, C., Eikemo, T. A., van Der Wel, K. A., & Dragano, N. (2014). A balancing act? work-life balance, health and well-being in european welfare states. The European Journal of Public Health, 24(3), 422–427.
Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79–104.
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(19), 50–60.
Martin, P. & Lynn, P. (2011). The effects of mixed mode survey designs on simple and complex analyses. Technical report, ISER Working Paper Series.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 127–143.
Muurlink, O., Peetz, D., & Murray, G. (2014). Work-related influences on marital satisfaction amongst shiftworkers and their partners: A large, matched-pairs study. Community, Work & Family, 17(3), 288–307.
Neumark, D. (1988). Employers’ discriminatory behavior and the estimation of wage discrimination. Journal of Human resources, 23(3), 279–295.
Noda, H. (2020). Work-life balance and life satisfaction in OECD countries: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(4), 1325–1348.
Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709.
Oaxaca, R. L., & Ransom, M. R. (1994). On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials. Journal of Econometrics, 61(1), 5–21.
Pandita, R. (2017). Internet: A change agent an overview of internet penetration & growth across the world. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 7(2), 83–91.
Pichler, F. (2009). Determinants of work-life balance: Shortcomings in the contemporary measurement of WLB in large-scale surveys. Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 449–469.
Sanchez Tome, R. (2018). The impact of mode of data collection on measures of subjective wellbeing. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des sciences sociales et politiques.
Sarracino, F. (2013). Determinants of subjective well-being in high and low income countries: Do happiness equations differ across countries. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 42(C), 51–66.
Sarracino, F., Riillo, C. F. A., & Mikucka, M. (2017). Comparability of web and telephone survey modes for the measurement of subjective well-being. Survey Research Methods, 11(2), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i2.6740.
Schnettler, B., Miranda-Zapata, E., Grunert, K. G., Lobos, G., Lapo, M., & Hueche, C. (2021). Testing the spillover-crossover model between work-life balance and satisfaction in different domains of life in dual-earner households. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16, 1475–1501.
Schork, J., Riillo, C. A., & Neumayr, J. (2021). Survey mode effects on objective and subjective questions: Evidence from the labour force survey. Journal of Official Statistics (JOS), 37(1), 213–237.
Sirgy, M. J., & Lee, D.-J. (2018). Work-life balance: An integrative review. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(1), 229–254.
Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D.-J., Park, S., Joshanloo, M., & Kim, M. (2020). Work-family spillover and subjective well-being: The moderating role of coping strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(8), 2909–2929.
Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). Influence of social desirability on age differences in self-reports of mood and personality. Journal of personality, 79(4), 741–762.
Toepoel, V. (2015). Doing surveys online. California.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883.
Uglanova, E., & Dettmers, J. (2018). Sustained effects of flexible working time arrangements on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(6), 1727–1748.
Van Tilburg, T., & de Leeuw, E. (1991). Stability of scale quality under various data collection procedures: A mode comparison on the De Jong-Gierveld loneliness scale. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3(1), 69–85.
Walter, S. L., Seibert, S. E., Goering, D., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2019). A tale of two sample sources: Do results from online panel data and conventional data converge? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4), 425–452.
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Some uses of statistics in plant pathology. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(4), 41–45.
Zhang, X., Kuchinke, L., Woud, M. L., Velten, J., & Margraf, J. (2017). Survey method matters: Online/offline questionnaires and face-to-face or telephone interviews differ. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 172–180.
Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21–29.