Skip to main content
Log in

Personality and Character: A Comparative Qualitative Analysis of Trait Descriptions in NEO-PI-3 and Character Strengths and Virtues

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theoretical relationship between personality and character, as two approaches to conceptualizing individual differences, remains poorly defined. Attempts to clarify the relationship by analyzing leading personality and character frameworks—NEO-PI-3 and Peterson and Seligman’s Character Strengths and Virtues (CSV)—have yielded divergent, unclear results. In this paper, we use a qualitative thematic analysis method to systematically compare NEO-PI-3 and CSV trait descriptions. Our analysis found 35 overlapping facet-strength trait pairs, including 22 morally-toned facet-strength relationships. For the CSV, the overlap was spread out among the strengths, while the overlap for NEO-PI-3 was mostly located in the factors of Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. We also found traits that were uniquely evaluated or emphasized by each framework. NEO-PI-3 tended to emphasize traits related to emotions, tasks, and socializing; the CSV tended to emphasize self-management, prosocial, and worldview traits. Our analysis indicates that the two frameworks share substantial description of traits—including moral traits—but are not redundant. Our conceptual results were largely supported by empirical studies. Future research should continue to synthesize conceptual and empirical scholarship to advance understanding of the relationship between these two frameworks for evaluating individual differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Appreciation of Beauty (strength) and Aesthetics (facet); Humility and Modesty (strength) and Modesty (facet).

References

  • Allport. (1938). Personality A psychological interpretation. Henry Holt and Company, Inc. Accessed 1 February 2019.

  • Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2009). The psychology of character and the theology of virtue. In C. S. Titus (Ed.), The psychology of character and virtue (pp. 101–118). The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banicki, K. (2017). The character–personality distinction: An historical, conceptual, and functional investigation. Theory & Psychology, 27(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316684689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluemke, M., Partsch, M., Saucier, G., & Lechner, C. (2021). Human character in the IPIP: Towards shorter, more content-valid, and cross-culturally comparable IPIP-VIA character strength scales. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k79qf

  • Brandt, R. B. (1970). Traits of character: A conceptual analysis. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7(1), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brdar, I., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R. (1998). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. In J. Richter, K. Eisemann, K. Bollow, & D. Schläfke (Eds.), The development of psychiatry and its complexity (Vol. 50, pp. 1–16). Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couto, R. N., & da Fonsêca, P. N. (2019). Character strengths in the Brazilian northeast region: Contributions of personality beyond age and sex. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 36. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275201936e180137

  • Dametto, D. M., & Noronha, A. P. P. (2019). Study between personality traits and character strengths in adolescents. Current Psychology, (40), 2067–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0146-2

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1987). Personality and individual differences. Plenum Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D., Matsuba, M. K., Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). Urban neighborhoods as contexts for moral identity development. Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 214–231). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N., Bain, P., & Neal, D. (2004). The implicit structure of positive characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Ten myths about character, virtue and virtue education–plus three well-founded misgivings. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.778386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, D. K., Hill, P. L., Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, Daniel K. (2009). The development of the moral personality. In Personality, identity, and character (pp. 185–213). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125.009

  • Lefevor, G. T., & Fowers, B. J. (2016). Traits, situational factors, and their interactions as explanations of helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2011). Character strengths in Israel. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000089

  • Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in action scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masala, A., & Webber, J. (2016). From personality to virtue: Essays on the philosophy of character. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (2009). The moral personality. In D. Narvaez & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 11–29). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E. (2015). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E., Hall-Simmonds, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2020). Are measures of character and personality distinct? Evidence from observed-score and true-score analyses. Assessment, 27(1), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, V., Tay, L., & Kuykendall, L. (2018). The development and validation of a measure of character: The CIVIC. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 346–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noftle, E. E., Schnitker, S. A., & Robins, R. W. (2011). Character and personality: Connections between positive psychology and personality psychology. Designing Positive Psychology: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373585.003.0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). The values in action inventory of character strengths for youth. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 13–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Vylobkova, V., & Heintz, S. (2021). Two of a kind or distant relatives? A multimethod investigation of the overlap between personality traits and character strengths. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/93pbk

  • Ruch, W., Martínez-Martí, M. L., Proyer, R. T., & Harzer, C. (2014). The character strengths rating form (CSRF): Development and initial assessment of a 24-item rating scale to assess character strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J., Frimer, J. A., Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). Moral personality exemplified. Personality, identity and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 232–255). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125.011

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, I. B., & Greene, R. L. (2017). NEO personality inventory-3. In Handbook of personality assessment, 2nd edition. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119311263

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Margaret Chisolm, MD, Gerald Nestadt, MBBCh, MPH, and Paul Costa, PhD, for their feedback on the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JA and KL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James T. Aluri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

This was not human subjects research and did not require IRB approval.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Excerpt page numbers

Primary text

Construct

Page number

Source for NEO-PI-3 trait descriptions

Weiner, I. B., & Greene, R. L. (2007). Handbook of Personality Assessment. Wiley

Neuroticism

Anxiety

327

Angry Hostility

327

Depression

327

Self-Consciousness

328

Impulsiveness

328

Vulnerability

328

Extraversion

Warmth

329

Gregariousness

329

Assertiveness

329

Activity

329

Excitement-Seeking

329

Positive Emotions

330

Openness

Fantasy

330

Aesthetics

330

Feelings

331

Actions

331

Ideas

331

Values

331

Agreeableness

Trust

332

Straightforwardness

332

Altruism

332

Compliance

332

Modesty

332

Tender-Mindedness

333

Conscientiousness

Competence

333

Order

333

Dutifulness

334

Achievement Striving

334

Self-Discipline

334

Deliberation

334

Source for character strengths and virtues trait descriptions

Peterson, C., & P., S. M. E. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. American Psychological Association

Courage (p. 36)

Bravery

214

Persistence

229–230

Integrity

249–250

Vitality

273–275

Humanity (p. 37–38)

Love

304–305

Kindness

326

Social Intelligence

338–339

Justice

36–37

Citizenship

370–371

Fairness

392–393

Leadership

414–415

Temperance (p. 38)

Forgiveness and Mercy

446

Humility and Modesty

462

Prudence

479

Self-Regulation

500

Transcendence (p. 38–39)

Appreciation of Beauty

539

Gratitude

554

Hope

570

Humor

586

Spirituality

603

Wisdom (p. 39–40)

Creativity

110

Curiosity

125–127

Open-mindedness

144–145

Love of learning

163–164

Perspective

182–183

Appendix B: Codebook

Category

Sub-category (when applicable)

Code name

Aesthetic appreciation

Aesthetic

Aesthetic appreciation

Appreciates beauty

Appreciates goodness

Appreciates others' accomplishments

Appreciates skill

Appreciates virtue

Does not enjoy emotive art

Enjoys emotive art

Has low aesthetic appreciation

Decision-making

Abstract reasoning for interpersonal relationships

Acts recklessly

Calculating

Considers the consequences of their actions/decisions

Does not consider the consequences

Does not rely on intuition

Incorporates emotions into reasoning

Is deliberative about life choices

Is guided by evidence

Is indecisive

Keeps their thoughts grounded in reality

Likes to keep their options open

Makes intelligent decisions

Tends to be spontaneous

Uses intuition and reason when making decisions

Emotional disposition towards others

Cooperation/competition

Fosters cooperation

Is easily combative

Prefers cooperation with others

Emotional bonds with others

Affectionate

Does not have strong emotional attachments to others

Finds joy in others

Forms strong emotional attachments with friends

Fosters community

Has personal relationships

Is emotionally cold

Is emotionally warm

Is passionate about another

Emotional intelligence

Has emotional awareness

Has emotional intelligence

Has emotional savvy

Intelligence towards motives, feelings, and well-being

Is emotionally unaware

Is wise in relationships

Recognizes emotional cues

Social intelligence

Understands social dynamics

Emotional response to those in misfortune

Does not feel sympathy

Easily empathizes with others

Feels sympathy for the less fortunate

Is prone to be compassionate towards others

Leadership

Does not assert themselves

Inspires others

Is a natural leader

Is dominant

Is not a natural leader

Is proud of managerial ability

Makes decisions for the group

Manages others well

Motivates others

Tends to be assertive

Orientation towards the good of others

Altruism

Benefits self and others

Is beneficent towards others

Is charitable

Is generous towards others

Is not generous towards others

Is oriented towards others

Is perceived to be self-centred by others

Pursues goodness

Pursues the common good

Tries to be considerate

Other

Has low social shame

Easily experiences social shame

Is paternalistic about exposing others to Diverse opinions

Needs to be with others

Prefers to be alone

Perception of others

Can trust others

Dislikes inauthenticity

Does not tend to view others negatively

Interested in others

Is cynical towards others

Is not interested in others

Is often disgusted with others

Is prone to resentment

Likes others

Tends to be thankful

Response to wrongdoing

Forgives easily

Has affective kindness

Is kind to others

Is lenient towards others

Is not vengeful

Seeks to repair relationships

Tends to have positive feelings towards transgressor

Tries to forgive

Social graces

Has a good sense of humor

Is comfortable around others

Is friendly

Is fun to be with

Is liked by others

Is not talkative

Is playful

Is talkative

Laughs easily

Socializing

Does not enjoy socializing

Does not enjoy socializing in groups

Does not like crowds

Enjoys social environments

Enjoys socializing

Enjoys socializing in groups

Emotional disposition towards various life rate and rhythms

Desire for intense-emotional experiences

Craves excitement

Does not crave excitement

Is thrill-seeking

Seeks stimulating experiences

Rate of life

Has enthusiasm for activities

Lives at a slow pace

Lives leisurely

Lives vigorously

Often seems rushed

Tends to be active

Routines and rhythms

Adaptive

Desires new experiences

Establishes habits

Has a flexible approach to life

Is open to new experiences

Likes consistency in activities

Prefers familiarity

Seeks change

Seeks societal change

Tries new experiences

Emotional dispositions

Expression of emotion

Authenticity and sincerity

Expresses negative emotions candidly

Is genuine

Is not emotionally expressive

Negative emotions

Anxiety

Is easily discouraged

Is easily frustrated

Is easily hopeless

Is lighthearted

Is not easily discouraged

Is not prone to anger

Is not prone to frustration

Is not prone to low mood

Is not prone to worry

Is prone to anger

Is prone to anxiety

Is prone to fear

Is prone to low mood

Is prone to worry

Is rarely fearful

Tends to feel overwhelmed

Other

Is able to feel ecstatic

Is cheerful/tries to cheer others

Is easily awed

Is optimistic

Is reluctant to express anger

Is romantic

Is solemn

Is stubborn

Follows sense of right and wrong

Acts in line with their standards

Does the right thing

Does the right thing despite sacrifice

Dutifulness

Engages in civic duty

Has a sense of duty to group

Is honest/values honesty

Is not deceitful

Is strong-willed

Is willing to deceive to get what they need

Lives by principles

Maintains integrity despite potential loss

Overcoming complacency

Shirks civic duty

Tends to be asthenic

Form code

Multi-track disposition

Form of emotions

Active positive emotion

Does not experience strong emotions

Experiences a wide range of emotions

Experiences strong emotions

Experiences strong positive feelings

Is emotionally stable

Is emotionally unstable

Their emotions are stable

Their emotions change quickly

Intellectual dispositions

Disposition towards existential thought

Does not enjoy abstract thought

Engages with existential questions

Enjoys abstract thought

Has low existential interest

Disposition towards learning

Enjoys learning

Experiences positive feelings from learning

Has optimism for capacity to learn

Is intellectually curious

Is open to new ideas

likes to learn

Pursues knowledge

Other

Cognitively engaged

Corrects against bias

Does not let their mind wander

Easily engages cognitively with interests/new information/present task

Enjoys problem-solving

Excels at problem-solving

Has capacity to give advice

HAS diverse interests

Has good judgment in life

Has original ideas and behaviors

Has practical intelligence

Is competent

Is imaginative

Is knowledgeable in an area

Is prudent

Is reflective

Is unimaginative

Is willing to challenge one's beliefs

Personal intelligence

Sees big picture

Stays informed

Supports censorship

Intra-text comparisons

Factor vs strength

Strength vs strength

Management of self

Managing emotions

Capacity to overcome different types of fear

Has poor emotional control

Overcoming fear

Overcoming fear of social loss

Overcoming psychological fear

Tends to overcome fear of physical injury

Other

Does not overindulge

Has emotional control

Has low temperance

Has self-control

Has self-discipline

Has temperance

Is able to control excess

Is able to control their impulses

IS impulsive

Overcoming self

Overcoming temptation

Takes responsibility for feelings and behaviors

Tends to overindulge

Orientation towards (how one approaches, perceives) the future

Does not plan

Has long-term perspective

Is future-oriented

Is goal-oriented

Is not goal oriented

Is often unprepared

Is willing to face risk

Tends to plan

Other

Actions

Acts in appreciation

Avoids shocking or scary movies

Is physically healthy

Perception of self

Acknowledges limitations of self

Aspires to dominant roles

Brags about oneself

Credits others

Does not focus on oneself

Does not view self as superior

Feels fortunate in good circumstances

Feels inferior to others

Has a moderate view of one's achievements

Has an accurate perception of self

Has good perspective of self

Has good self-attitude

Has good vital sense

Has low self-attitude

Is confident about competition

Is self-aware

Tries to be humble

Views self as charitable

Views self as superior

Views self as tolerant

Relationship to material environment (e.g. objects, things)

Is attracted to flashy styles

Is cleanly with their belongings

Is disorganized

Is organized

Relationship with tasks

Fastidiousness

Does things the right way

Is meticulous

Other

Does not complete things

Is productive

Is unreliable

Is unsuccessful

Lacks persistence

Paces themselves to meet deadlines

Performs assigned tasks

Procrastinates

Tends to complete jobs/commitments

Works hard

Responses to challenging circumstances

Acceptance of life events

chooses the hard path

Has inner bravery

Does not handle stress well

Feels helpless when facing problems

Handles stress well

Is resilient

Persists through hardship

Unity of self

Harmonizes their goals and interests

Hates being thought of as a hypocrate

Worldview

Moral beliefs

Believes all deserve respect

Believes complete honesty is bad

Believes in equal opportunity

Believes in human value

Believes in maximal charity

Believes in pluralism

Believes in responsibility

Believes others are inclined towards good

Believes that people are ends in themselves

Believes values should remain stable

Believes we should adapt

Does not support discrimination

Fairness

Prefers justice over mercy

Teleology

Believes in a deity

Believes in a purpose larger than ourselves

Believes in afterlife, bigger purpose

Believes in higher moral code

Believes in non-physical dimension

Believes in sacred force

Appendix C: Complete findings of inquiry 1

Thematic overlap between VIA-FFM

Categories and sub-categories

Codes

NEO-PI3 excerpt

VIA excerpt

Long-term orientation

Decision-making

“Is deliberative about life choices”

“Individuals think things through and always consider the consequences before making a decision or taking action. They plan ahead carefully when they go on a trip.” Deliberation (C6, Conscientiousness)

“They show a style of thinking about everyday life choices that is reflective, deliberate, and practical.” Prudence [Temperance]

“Considers the consequences of their actions/decisions”

“Individuals think things through and always consider the consequences before making a decision or taking action” Deliberation (C6, Conscientiousness)

“Prudent individuals show a farsighted and deliberative concern for the consequences of their actions and decisions, successfully resist impulses and other choices that satisfy shorter term goals at the expense of longer term ones, have a flexible and moderate approach to life, and strive for balance among their goals and ends.” Prudence [Temperance]

“making life decisions by considering distant as well as immediate benefits and costs, and by paying heed to their probable consistency or conflict with one’s other plans” Prudence [Temperance]

Orientation towards the future

“Is goal oriented”

“Have a clear set of goals, and work hard to accomplish them in an orderly fashion” Achievement Striving (C4, Conscientiousness)

“They take a foresighted stance toward their personal future, thinking and caring about it, planning for it, and holding long-term goals and aspirations.” Prudence [Temperance]

I have a clear picture in my mind about what I want to happen in the future.” Hope [Transcendence]

“voluntary continuation of a goal-directed action in spite of obstacles, difficulties, or discouragement.” Persistence [Courage]

“person exerts control over his or her own responses so as to pursue goals and live up to standards.” Self-regulation [Temperance]

Rates and rhythms of life

Emotional disposition towards various life rate and rhythms category: desire for intense-emotional experiences

Craves excitement does not crave excitement is thrill-seeking seeks stimulating experiences

“Individuals often crave excitement and like to be where the action is” Excitement-Seeking (E5, Extraversion)

“Individuals seldom crave excitement and they do not like to be where the action is. They tend to avoid movies that are shocking or scary” Excitement-Seeking, Low (E5, Extraversion)

“They have sometimes done things just for the thrill of it.” Excitement-Seeking (E5, Extraversion)

“Novelty-seeking reflects an individual’s propensity for seeking novel and exciting experiences to Elevate stimulation to an optimal level” Curiosity [Wisdom]

Emotional disposition towards various life rate and rhythms category: rate of life

Has enthusiasm for activities lives at a slow pace lives leisurely lives vigorously tends to be active often seems rushed

“Individuals are not as quick and lively as other people, and their work is likely to be slow and steady.” Activity, Low (E4, Extraversion)

“They have a leisurely style in work and play.” Activity, Low (E4, Extraversion)

“When they do things, they do them vigorously.” Activity (E4, Extraversion)

“They often feel as if they are bursting with energy” Activity (E4, Extraversion)

“Individuals are active and have a fast-paced life” Activity (E4, Extraversion)

“usually seem to be in a hurry.” Activity (E4, Extraversion)

“Those with vitality also exhibit enthusiasm, which they direct toward whatever activities they choose to engage.” Vitality [Courage]

“Dynamic aspect of well-being marked by the subjective experience of energy and aliveness” Vitality [Courage]

“I feel alive and vital

I have energy and spirit

I nearly always feel awake and alert

I feel energized.” Vitality [Courage]

“Vigor is a word with similar meanings, being derived from the idea of liveliness. The New Merriam Webster Dictionary (1989) defines vigor as “active strength or energy of body or mind,” reflecting that it, like vitality, refers to both somatic and psychological wellness. That which invigorates also vitalizes, and thus we treat these terms as equivalent constructs” Vitality [Courage]

“A person who is vital is energetic and fully functioning” Vitality [Courage]

Leadership qualities

Emotional disposition towards others: Leadership

“Makes decisions for the group (consider overlap with decisions)”

“Is a natural leader”

“Often have been leaders of groups to which they belong.” Assertiveness (E3, Extraversion)

“Other people look to them to make decisions” Assertiveness (E3, Extraversion)

“I am often able to plan a course of action for my group.” Leadership [Justice]

Dispositions towards learning

Intellectual dispositions: Disposition towards learning

Enjoys learning

experiences positive feelings from learning (consider also emotional dispositions) has optimism for capacity to learn is intellectually curious is open to new ideas likes to learn pursues knowledge

“Have a wide range of intellectual interests and a lot of intellectual curiosity.” Ideas (O5, Openness)

“think that it is interesting to learn and develop new hobbies” Actions (O4, Openness)

“Learning is a positive experience.” Love of Learning [Wisdom]

“I like to learn new things.” Love of Learning [Wisdom]

“experience positive feelings in the process of acquiring skills, satisfying curiosity, building on existing knowledge, and/or learning something completely new” Love of Learning [Wisdom]

“Enjoys abstract thought”

“Individuals enjoy playing with theories or abstract ideas” Ideas (O5, Openness)

“the individual to address important and difficult questions about the conduct and meaning of life” Perspective [Wisdom]

“Enjoys problem-solving”

“Individuals enjoy… solving problems or puzzles” Ideas (O5, Openness)

“In contrast, specific curiosity should have stronger links to openness to new values and ideas, a future orientation, and the frequency and enjoyment of problem solving.” Curiosity [Wisdom]

Emotional dispositions towards others:

Emotional bonds towards others

“Has personal relationships”

“They have strong emotional attachments to their friends.” Warmth (E1, Extraversion)

“there is someone in whose company I feel deep contentment.”

Love (Humanity)

“Is emotionally warm”

“Individuals are known as warm, friendly persons” Warmth (E1, Extraversion)

“Having a warm and generous affect seems to bring reassurance and joy to others.” Kindness (Humanity)

“Is cheerful/tries to cheer others”

“Cheerful, high-spirited persons who laugh easily.” Positive Emotions (E6, Extraversion)

“(b) a composed and cheerful view on adversity that allows one to see its light side and thereby sustain a good mood” Humor [Transcendence]

“Whenever my friends are in a gloomy mood, I try to tease them out of it

I welcome the opportunity to brighten someone else’s day with laughter.” Humor [Transcendence]

Good judgment

Intellectual dispositions: has good judgment in life

“Has good judgment in life”

“They pride themselves on their sound judgment” Competence (C1, Conscientiousness)

“Involves exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge about the conditions of life and human affairs and reflective judgment about the application of this knowledge” Wisdom

“good judgment and advice about important but uncertain matters of life” Wisdom

“is distinct from intelligence

▪ represents a superior level of knowledge, judgment, and capacity to give advice” Perspective [Wisdom]

Emotional control

Management of self: has emotional control

“Has emotional control”

“They are able to keep their feelings under control.” Impulsiveness, Low (N5, Neuroticism)

“Person exerts control over his or her own responses so as to pursue goals and live up to standards.” Self-regulation [Temperance]

“They may direct their thought processes in directions other than where their minds naturally wander, they may attempt to change their emotional responses away from how they initially feel, and they may restrain themselves from carrying out impulses and desires. They may try to perform better than they would normally do, such as by making themselves persist on a difficult task. Most acts of self-regulation involve stop- ping the self from having a response, such as when a dieter refrains from eating a tempting but fattening food. There are, however, some instances of self-regulation that entail initiating a response, such as when a sleepy man drags himself out of bed on a cold morning.” Self-regulation [Temperance]

  1. “Appendix C”. This table presents the complete findings of Theme 1: Areas of Overlap in Described Traits. All excerpts from the NEO-PI3 and the Character Strengths and Virtues are included under associated sub-themes (listed in the left-most column), along with the associated code names and their location in the codebook. Location in the codebook is denoted by category first. If there is a more specific sub-category, it will listed after a colon.

Appendix D: Complete findings of inquiry 2

Thematic overlap in moral codes between the VIA-FFM

Categories and sub-categories

Codes

NEO-PI3 excerpt

VIA excerpt

Moral dispositions towards treating others:

The importance of caring for others

Taking others needs into consideration

Looking out for others’ good

Actually helps those in needs

Worldview: moral beliefs

Emotional disposition towards others: orientation towards the good of others

Follows sense of right and wrong

“Believes in maximal charity”

“tries to be considerate”

“is charitable”

“is generous towards others”

“Is oriented towards others”

“has a sense of duty to group”

“They believe that human needs always should take priority over economic considerations.” Tendermindness (A6, Agreeableness)

“Individuals try to be courteous, thoughtful, and considerate.” Altruism (A3, Agreeableness)

“They go out of their way to help others.” Altruism (A3, Agreeableness)

“we can never do too much for the poor and elderly.” Tendermindness (A6, Agreeableness)

“People in need require care

It is important to help everyone, not just family and friends.” Kindness [Humanity]

“I have a wider perspective

I have a strong need to contribute to others and society

I take into consideration the needs of others.” Perspective [Wisdom]

“treatment of others with care, as evident by helping those in need; sensitivity to the needs of others” Integrity [Courage]

“generosity even when an equitable exchange would suffice,” Humanity

“It is important to me personally that I work to correct social and eco-

nomic inequalities

It is important to me personally that I help others who are in difficulty

It is important to me personally to be involved in programs to clean up

the environment.” Citizenship [Justice]

“social responsibility, loyalty, and teamwork represent a feeling of identification with and sense of obligation to a common good that includes the self but that stretches beyond one’s own self-interest.” Citizenship [Justice]

“The common thread for people exhibiting these values is that they endorse public interest over self-interest goals as values by which to live. They identify with the common good and want to make the world a better place for future generations.” Citizenship [Justice]

“Giving is more important than receiving

Doing good for others with love and kindness is the best way to live. I care for the ungrateful as well the grateful.” Kindness [Humanity]

“the fact remains that we are quite capable of and often willing to engage in acts of generosity, kindness, or benevolence that are consensually recognized and valued and that elevate those who witness them” Humanity

“I try to be kind to everyone” Fairness [Justice]

“Kindness, generosity, nurturance, care, compassion, and altruistic love are a net- work of closely related terms indicating a common orientation of the self to- ward the other.” Kindness [Humanity]

Interpersonal relations:

Honesty

Trust

Manipulative/deceitful

Forgiveness/forgetting

Prefers justice

Follows sense of right and wrong

Emotional dispositions: Perception of others

“Is honest/values honesty”

“is not deceitful”

“is perceived to be self-centered by others”

“Individuals are not crafty or sly, and could not deceive anyone even if they wanted to.” Straightforwardness (A2, Agreeableness)

“Individuals are willing to manipulate people to get what they need and sometimes trick people into doing what they want.” Straightforwardness, Low (A2, Agreeableness)

“When people keep telling the truth, things work out

I would never lie just to get something I wanted from someone.” Integrity [Courage]

“It is important to me to be open and honest about my feelings.” Integrity [Courage]

“I wouldn’t want to cheat anyone, any more than I would want to be cheated.” Fairness [Justice]

Emotional disposition towards others: responds to wrongdoing

Worldview—moral beliefs

“Is lenient towards others”

“is not vengeful”

“Forgives easily”

“seeks to repair relationships”

prefers justice over mercy

“When they have been insulted, they just try to forgive and forget” Compliance (A4, Agreeableness)

“They would rather be known as ‘just’ than ‘merciful.’” Tender-mindness, Low (A6, Agreeableness)

“I think it is important to do what I can to mend my relationships with people who have hurt or betrayed me in the past.” Forgiveness and mercy [Temperance]

“When someone hurts my feelings, I manage to get over it fairly quickly

I don’t hold a grudge for very long

When people make me angry, I am usually able to get over my bad

feelings toward them.” Forgiveness and mercy [Temperance]

“Seeking revenge doesn’t help people to solve their problems

I am not the type of person to harm someone simply because he or she

harmed me

I am not the type of person who spends hours thinking of how to get

even with people who have done bad things to me.” Forgiveness and mercy [Temperance]

“The core virtue justice, as already stated, refers generally to that which makes life fair” Justice

“the shared notion is that some standard should be in practice to protect intuitive notions of what is fair” Justice

“pragmatic rendition of justice, that of the laws that give fairness a fair shot” Justice

Moral actions:

Acting in accordance with principles

Acting in accordance with right and wrong despite sacrifice or societal non-conformity

Follows sense of right and wrong

“Lives by principles”

“does the right thing”

“acts in line with their standards”

“They adhere strictly to their ethical principles.” Dutifulness (C3, Conscientiousness)

“Those virtues are believed to mani-fest in the pursuit of a principled life and a life of goodness.” Spirituality [Transcendence]

“My life is guided and given meaning by my code of values.” Integrity [Courage]

“Self-regulation refers to how a person exerts control over his or her own re- sponses so as to pursue goals and live up to standards.” Self-regulation [Temperance]

“I behave in a manner consistent with my own personal standards.” Perspective [Wisdom]

“a focus on behaviors, attitudes, and experiences that are consistent with these values” Spirituality [Transcendence]

“▪ My life is guided and given meaning by my code of values

a regular pattern of behavior that is consistent with espoused values— practicing what one preaches” Integrity [Courage]

“Having strength of character means having the capacity to do what is right and avoid what is wrong.” [Temperance]

Follows sense of right and wrong

Worldview: teleology

“Does the right thing”

“despite sacrifice”

“believes in higher moral code”

None

“Moral courage entails maintaining ethical integrity or authenticity at the risk of losing friends, employment, privacy, or prestige.” Courage

“We mean courage to include physical valor, yes, but also integrity and perseverance—any act of willfully overcoming into what it is so easy to slip: security, comfort, complacency. We mean doing what is right, even when one has much to lose.” Courage

“Bravery is usually considered doing what is right, including confronting the status quo or opposing an unhealthy idea, and as such, it takes on a moral tone.” Bravery [Courage]

“I always follow through on my commitments, even when it costs me.” Integrity [Courage]

“does not follow that the good citizen is blindly obedient. Rather he or she exercises informed judgment in the inter- ests of the whole. At times this can even involve a challenge to unjust laws” Spirituality [Transcendence]

“Even if society says it’s all right to do something, if it doesn’t match my personal sense of what’s right, I wouldn’t do it.” Fairness [Justice]

Moral belief: inherent human worth

Worldview—moral beliefs

“Believes all deserve respect”

“believes in human value”

“believes that people are ends in themselves”

“Individuals believe that all human beings are worthy of respect” Tender-mindedness (A6, Agreeableness)

“Everyone deserves respect.” Fairness [Justice]

“It’s wrong to use people

Everyone deserves respect

We’re all in this together

People are ends in themselves.” Fairness [Justice]

“Kindness and altruistic love require the assertion of a common humanity in which others are worthy of attention and affirmation for no utilitarian reasons but for their own sake” Kindness [Humanity]

“Others are just as important as me

All human beings are of equal worth.” Kindness [Humanity]

  1. “Appendix D”. This table presents the complete findings of Theme 2: Moral Content. All excerpts from the NEO-PI3 and the Character Strengths and Virtues are included under associated sub-themes (listed in the left-most column), along with the associated code names and their location in the codebook. Location in the codebook is denoted by category first. If there is a more specific sub-category, it will listed after a colon.

Appendix E: Findings of inquiry 3

In our third inquiry, we identified categories and sub-categories that demonstrated comparative emphasis in the NEO-PI-3 or the CSV as judged by:

  1. (1)

    Qualitative detail

  2. (2)

    Extent of description

  3. (3)

    Range of coded traits

The Tables included here represent some of the qualitative data that we reviewed to support our claims about comparatively emphasized traits in our findings (Tables 7, 8).

Table 7 This Table demonstrates both the number of coded text segments, which we used as a proxy for (2) “Extent of description” and the number of facets or strengths/virtues that relate to a given theme to represent (3) the “Range of coded traits”
Table 8 This Table demonstrates (1) “Qualitative detail” as adjudged by the qualitative breadth of codes names included in each thematic category

Appendix F

  1. This appendix shows relationships between NEO-PI-3 facets (arranged in columns) and the CSV strengths (arranged in rows). The numbers in each cell represent the number of papers we found in our literature review that showed a relationship between that particular facet and strength. The reviewed papers include McGrath (2015), Noftle et al. (2011) and Ruch et al. (2021). Correlations for Ruch et al. were only counted if the correlation was found in both the German and UK population samples. We identified the 15 facet-strength relationships that were found by all three papers and highlighted them with diagonal green shading. The facet-strength conceptual relationships identified in analysis are highlighted in blue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aluri, J.T., Li, K.C. Personality and Character: A Comparative Qualitative Analysis of Trait Descriptions in NEO-PI-3 and Character Strengths and Virtues. J Happiness Stud 23, 3055–3094 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00535-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00535-0

Keywords

Navigation