Abstract
The theoretical relationship between personality and character, as two approaches to conceptualizing individual differences, remains poorly defined. Attempts to clarify the relationship by analyzing leading personality and character frameworks—NEO-PI-3 and Peterson and Seligman’s Character Strengths and Virtues (CSV)—have yielded divergent, unclear results. In this paper, we use a qualitative thematic analysis method to systematically compare NEO-PI-3 and CSV trait descriptions. Our analysis found 35 overlapping facet-strength trait pairs, including 22 morally-toned facet-strength relationships. For the CSV, the overlap was spread out among the strengths, while the overlap for NEO-PI-3 was mostly located in the factors of Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. We also found traits that were uniquely evaluated or emphasized by each framework. NEO-PI-3 tended to emphasize traits related to emotions, tasks, and socializing; the CSV tended to emphasize self-management, prosocial, and worldview traits. Our analysis indicates that the two frameworks share substantial description of traits—including moral traits—but are not redundant. Our conceptual results were largely supported by empirical studies. Future research should continue to synthesize conceptual and empirical scholarship to advance understanding of the relationship between these two frameworks for evaluating individual differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Appreciation of Beauty (strength) and Aesthetics (facet); Humility and Modesty (strength) and Modesty (facet).
References
Allport. (1938). Personality A psychological interpretation. Henry Holt and Company, Inc. Accessed 1 February 2019.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i.
Audi, R. (2009). The psychology of character and the theology of virtue. In C. S. Titus (Ed.), The psychology of character and virtue (pp. 101–118). The Catholic University of America Press.
Banicki, K. (2017). The character–personality distinction: An historical, conceptual, and functional investigation. Theory & Psychology, 27(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316684689
Bluemke, M., Partsch, M., Saucier, G., & Lechner, C. (2021). Human character in the IPIP: Towards shorter, more content-valid, and cross-culturally comparable IPIP-VIA character strength scales. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k79qf
Brandt, R. B. (1970). Traits of character: A conceptual analysis. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7(1), 23–37.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brdar, I., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001
Cloninger, C. R. (1998). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. In J. Richter, K. Eisemann, K. Bollow, & D. Schläfke (Eds.), The development of psychiatry and its complexity (Vol. 50, pp. 1–16). Waxmann.
Couto, R. N., & da Fonsêca, P. N. (2019). Character strengths in the Brazilian northeast region: Contributions of personality beyond age and sex. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 36. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275201936e180137
Dametto, D. M., & Noronha, A. P. P. (2019). Study between personality traits and character strengths in adolescents. Current Psychology, (40), 2067–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0146-2
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1987). Personality and individual differences. Plenum Publishing Corporation.
Hart, D., Matsuba, M. K., Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). Urban neighborhoods as contexts for moral identity development. Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 214–231). Cambridge University Press.
Haslam, N., Bain, P., & Neal, D. (2004). The implicit structure of positive characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261893
Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Ten myths about character, virtue and virtue education–plus three well-founded misgivings. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.778386
Lapsley, D. K., Hill, P. L., Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, Daniel K. (2009). The development of the moral personality. In Personality, identity, and character (pp. 185–213). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125.009
Lefevor, G. T., & Fowers, B. J. (2016). Traits, situational factors, and their interactions as explanations of helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 159–163.
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2011). Character strengths in Israel. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000089
Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in action scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003
Masala, A., & Webber, J. (2016). From personality to virtue: Essays on the philosophy of character. Oxford University Press.
McAdams, D. P. (2009). The moral personality. In D. Narvaez & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 11–29). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125
McGrath, R. E. (2015). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994222
McGrath, R. E., Hall-Simmonds, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2020). Are measures of character and personality distinct? Evidence from observed-score and true-score analyses. Assessment, 27(1), 117–135.
Ng, V., Tay, L., & Kuykendall, L. (2018). The development and validation of a measure of character: The CIVIC. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 346–372.
Noftle, E. E., Schnitker, S. A., & Robins, R. W. (2011). Character and personality: Connections between positive psychology and personality psychology. Designing Positive Psychology: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373585.003.0014
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). The values in action inventory of character strengths for youth. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 13–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_2
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.
Ruch, W., Vylobkova, V., & Heintz, S. (2021). Two of a kind or distant relatives? A multimethod investigation of the overlap between personality traits and character strengths. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/93pbk
Ruch, W., Martínez-Martí, M. L., Proyer, R. T., & Harzer, C. (2014). The character strengths rating form (CSRF): Development and initial assessment of a 24-item rating scale to assess character strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 53–58.
Walker, L. J., Frimer, J. A., Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). Moral personality exemplified. Personality, identity and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 232–255). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627125.011
Weiner, I. B., & Greene, R. L. (2017). NEO personality inventory-3. In Handbook of personality assessment, 2nd edition. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119311263
Acknowledgements
We thank Margaret Chisolm, MD, Gerald Nestadt, MBBCh, MPH, and Paul Costa, PhD, for their feedback on the manuscript.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JA and KL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
This was not human subjects research and did not require IRB approval.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Excerpt page numbers
Primary text | Construct | Page number |
---|---|---|
Source for NEO-PI-3 trait descriptions Weiner, I. B., & Greene, R. L. (2007). Handbook of Personality Assessment. Wiley | Neuroticism | |
Anxiety | 327 | |
Angry Hostility | 327 | |
Depression | 327 | |
Self-Consciousness | 328 | |
Impulsiveness | 328 | |
Vulnerability | 328 | |
Extraversion | ||
Warmth | 329 | |
Gregariousness | 329 | |
Assertiveness | 329 | |
Activity | 329 | |
Excitement-Seeking | 329 | |
Positive Emotions | 330 | |
Openness | ||
Fantasy | 330 | |
Aesthetics | 330 | |
Feelings | 331 | |
Actions | 331 | |
Ideas | 331 | |
Values | 331 | |
Agreeableness | ||
Trust | 332 | |
Straightforwardness | 332 | |
Altruism | 332 | |
Compliance | 332 | |
Modesty | 332 | |
Tender-Mindedness | 333 | |
Conscientiousness | ||
Competence | 333 | |
Order | 333 | |
Dutifulness | 334 | |
Achievement Striving | 334 | |
Self-Discipline | 334 | |
Deliberation | 334 | |
Source for character strengths and virtues trait descriptions Peterson, C., & P., S. M. E. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. American Psychological Association | Courage (p. 36) | |
Bravery | 214 | |
Persistence | 229–230 | |
Integrity | 249–250 | |
Vitality | 273–275 | |
Humanity (p. 37–38) | ||
Love | 304–305 | |
Kindness | 326 | |
Social Intelligence | 338–339 | |
Justice | 36–37 | |
Citizenship | 370–371 | |
Fairness | 392–393 | |
Leadership | 414–415 | |
Temperance (p. 38) | ||
Forgiveness and Mercy | 446 | |
Humility and Modesty | 462 | |
Prudence | 479 | |
Self-Regulation | 500 | |
Transcendence (p. 38–39) | ||
Appreciation of Beauty | 539 | |
Gratitude | 554 | |
Hope | 570 | |
Humor | 586 | |
Spirituality | 603 | |
Wisdom (p. 39–40) | ||
Creativity | 110 | |
Curiosity | 125–127 | |
Open-mindedness | 144–145 | |
Love of learning | 163–164 | |
Perspective | 182–183 |
Appendix B: Codebook
Category | Sub-category (when applicable) | Code name |
---|---|---|
Aesthetic appreciation | Aesthetic | |
Aesthetic appreciation | ||
Appreciates beauty | ||
Appreciates goodness | ||
Appreciates others' accomplishments | ||
Appreciates skill | ||
Appreciates virtue | ||
Does not enjoy emotive art | ||
Enjoys emotive art | ||
Has low aesthetic appreciation | ||
Decision-making | Abstract reasoning for interpersonal relationships | |
Acts recklessly | ||
Calculating | ||
Considers the consequences of their actions/decisions | ||
Does not consider the consequences | ||
Does not rely on intuition | ||
Incorporates emotions into reasoning | ||
Is deliberative about life choices | ||
Is guided by evidence | ||
Is indecisive | ||
Keeps their thoughts grounded in reality | ||
Likes to keep their options open | ||
Makes intelligent decisions | ||
Tends to be spontaneous | ||
Uses intuition and reason when making decisions | ||
Emotional disposition towards others | Cooperation/competition | Fosters cooperation |
Is easily combative | ||
Prefers cooperation with others | ||
Emotional bonds with others | Affectionate | |
Does not have strong emotional attachments to others | ||
Finds joy in others | ||
Forms strong emotional attachments with friends | ||
Fosters community | ||
Has personal relationships | ||
Is emotionally cold | ||
Is emotionally warm | ||
Is passionate about another | ||
Emotional intelligence | Has emotional awareness | |
Has emotional intelligence | ||
Has emotional savvy | ||
Intelligence towards motives, feelings, and well-being | ||
Is emotionally unaware | ||
Is wise in relationships | ||
Recognizes emotional cues | ||
Social intelligence | ||
Understands social dynamics | ||
Emotional response to those in misfortune | Does not feel sympathy | |
Easily empathizes with others | ||
Feels sympathy for the less fortunate | ||
Is prone to be compassionate towards others | ||
Leadership | Does not assert themselves | |
Inspires others | ||
Is a natural leader | ||
Is dominant | ||
Is not a natural leader | ||
Is proud of managerial ability | ||
Makes decisions for the group | ||
Manages others well | ||
Motivates others | ||
Tends to be assertive | ||
Orientation towards the good of others | Altruism | |
Benefits self and others | ||
Is beneficent towards others | ||
Is charitable | ||
Is generous towards others | ||
Is not generous towards others | ||
Is oriented towards others | ||
Is perceived to be self-centred by others | ||
Pursues goodness | ||
Pursues the common good | ||
Tries to be considerate | ||
Other | Has low social shame | |
Easily experiences social shame | ||
Is paternalistic about exposing others to Diverse opinions | ||
Needs to be with others | ||
Prefers to be alone | ||
Perception of others | Can trust others | |
Dislikes inauthenticity | ||
Does not tend to view others negatively | ||
Interested in others | ||
Is cynical towards others | ||
Is not interested in others | ||
Is often disgusted with others | ||
Is prone to resentment | ||
Likes others | ||
Tends to be thankful | ||
Response to wrongdoing | Forgives easily | |
Has affective kindness | ||
Is kind to others | ||
Is lenient towards others | ||
Is not vengeful | ||
Seeks to repair relationships | ||
Tends to have positive feelings towards transgressor | ||
Tries to forgive | ||
Social graces | Has a good sense of humor | |
Is comfortable around others | ||
Is friendly | ||
Is fun to be with | ||
Is liked by others | ||
Is not talkative | ||
Is playful | ||
Is talkative | ||
Laughs easily | ||
Socializing | Does not enjoy socializing | |
Does not enjoy socializing in groups | ||
Does not like crowds | ||
Enjoys social environments | ||
Enjoys socializing | ||
Enjoys socializing in groups | ||
Emotional disposition towards various life rate and rhythms | Desire for intense-emotional experiences | Craves excitement |
Does not crave excitement | ||
Is thrill-seeking | ||
Seeks stimulating experiences | ||
Rate of life | Has enthusiasm for activities | |
Lives at a slow pace | ||
Lives leisurely | ||
Lives vigorously | ||
Often seems rushed | ||
Tends to be active | ||
Routines and rhythms | Adaptive | |
Desires new experiences | ||
Establishes habits | ||
Has a flexible approach to life | ||
Is open to new experiences | ||
Likes consistency in activities | ||
Prefers familiarity | ||
Seeks change | ||
Seeks societal change | ||
Tries new experiences | ||
Emotional dispositions | Expression of emotion | Authenticity and sincerity |
Expresses negative emotions candidly | ||
Is genuine | ||
Is not emotionally expressive | ||
Negative emotions | Anxiety | |
Is easily discouraged | ||
Is easily frustrated | ||
Is easily hopeless | ||
Is lighthearted | ||
Is not easily discouraged | ||
Is not prone to anger | ||
Is not prone to frustration | ||
Is not prone to low mood | ||
Is not prone to worry | ||
Is prone to anger | ||
Is prone to anxiety | ||
Is prone to fear | ||
Is prone to low mood | ||
Is prone to worry | ||
Is rarely fearful | ||
Tends to feel overwhelmed | ||
Other | Is able to feel ecstatic | |
Is cheerful/tries to cheer others | ||
Is easily awed | ||
Is optimistic | ||
Is reluctant to express anger | ||
Is romantic | ||
Is solemn | ||
Is stubborn | ||
Follows sense of right and wrong | Acts in line with their standards | |
Does the right thing | ||
Does the right thing despite sacrifice | ||
Dutifulness | ||
Engages in civic duty | ||
Has a sense of duty to group | ||
Is honest/values honesty | ||
Is not deceitful | ||
Is strong-willed | ||
Is willing to deceive to get what they need | ||
Lives by principles | ||
Maintains integrity despite potential loss | ||
Overcoming complacency | ||
Shirks civic duty | ||
Tends to be asthenic | ||
Form code | Multi-track disposition | |
Form of emotions | Active positive emotion | |
Does not experience strong emotions | ||
Experiences a wide range of emotions | ||
Experiences strong emotions | ||
Experiences strong positive feelings | ||
Is emotionally stable | ||
Is emotionally unstable | ||
Their emotions are stable | ||
Their emotions change quickly | ||
Intellectual dispositions | Disposition towards existential thought | Does not enjoy abstract thought |
Engages with existential questions | ||
Enjoys abstract thought | ||
Has low existential interest | ||
Disposition towards learning | Enjoys learning | |
Experiences positive feelings from learning | ||
Has optimism for capacity to learn | ||
Is intellectually curious | ||
Is open to new ideas | ||
likes to learn | ||
Pursues knowledge | ||
Other | Cognitively engaged | |
Corrects against bias | ||
Does not let their mind wander | ||
Easily engages cognitively with interests/new information/present task | ||
Enjoys problem-solving | ||
Excels at problem-solving | ||
Has capacity to give advice | ||
HAS diverse interests | ||
Has good judgment in life | ||
Has original ideas and behaviors | ||
Has practical intelligence | ||
Is competent | ||
Is imaginative | ||
Is knowledgeable in an area | ||
Is prudent | ||
Is reflective | ||
Is unimaginative | ||
Is willing to challenge one's beliefs | ||
Personal intelligence | ||
Sees big picture | ||
Stays informed | ||
Supports censorship | ||
Intra-text comparisons | Factor vs strength | |
Strength vs strength | ||
Management of self | Managing emotions | Capacity to overcome different types of fear |
Has poor emotional control | ||
Overcoming fear | ||
Overcoming fear of social loss | ||
Overcoming psychological fear | ||
Tends to overcome fear of physical injury | ||
Other | Does not overindulge | |
Has emotional control | ||
Has low temperance | ||
Has self-control | ||
Has self-discipline | ||
Has temperance | ||
Is able to control excess | ||
Is able to control their impulses | ||
IS impulsive | ||
Overcoming self | ||
Overcoming temptation | ||
Takes responsibility for feelings and behaviors | ||
Tends to overindulge | ||
Orientation towards (how one approaches, perceives) the future | Does not plan | |
Has long-term perspective | ||
Is future-oriented | ||
Is goal-oriented | ||
Is not goal oriented | ||
Is often unprepared | ||
Is willing to face risk | ||
Tends to plan | ||
Other | Actions | |
Acts in appreciation | ||
Avoids shocking or scary movies | ||
Is physically healthy | ||
Perception of self | Acknowledges limitations of self | |
Aspires to dominant roles | ||
Brags about oneself | ||
Credits others | ||
Does not focus on oneself | ||
Does not view self as superior | ||
Feels fortunate in good circumstances | ||
Feels inferior to others | ||
Has a moderate view of one's achievements | ||
Has an accurate perception of self | ||
Has good perspective of self | ||
Has good self-attitude | ||
Has good vital sense | ||
Has low self-attitude | ||
Is confident about competition | ||
Is self-aware | ||
Tries to be humble | ||
Views self as charitable | ||
Views self as superior | ||
Views self as tolerant | ||
Relationship to material environment (e.g. objects, things) | Is attracted to flashy styles | |
Is cleanly with their belongings | ||
Is disorganized | ||
Is organized | ||
Relationship with tasks | Fastidiousness | Does things the right way |
Is meticulous | ||
Other | Does not complete things | |
Is productive | ||
Is unreliable | ||
Is unsuccessful | ||
Lacks persistence | ||
Paces themselves to meet deadlines | ||
Performs assigned tasks | ||
Procrastinates | ||
Tends to complete jobs/commitments | ||
Works hard | ||
Responses to challenging circumstances | Acceptance of life events | |
chooses the hard path | ||
Has inner bravery | ||
Does not handle stress well | ||
Feels helpless when facing problems | ||
Handles stress well | ||
Is resilient | ||
Persists through hardship | ||
Unity of self | Harmonizes their goals and interests | |
Hates being thought of as a hypocrate | ||
Worldview | Moral beliefs | Believes all deserve respect |
Believes complete honesty is bad | ||
Believes in equal opportunity | ||
Believes in human value | ||
Believes in maximal charity | ||
Believes in pluralism | ||
Believes in responsibility | ||
Believes others are inclined towards good | ||
Believes that people are ends in themselves | ||
Believes values should remain stable | ||
Believes we should adapt | ||
Does not support discrimination | ||
Fairness | ||
Prefers justice over mercy | ||
Teleology | Believes in a deity | |
Believes in a purpose larger than ourselves | ||
Believes in afterlife, bigger purpose | ||
Believes in higher moral code | ||
Believes in non-physical dimension | ||
Believes in sacred force |
Appendix C: Complete findings of inquiry 1
Thematic overlap between VIA-FFM | Categories and sub-categories | Codes | NEO-PI3 excerpt | VIA excerpt |
---|---|---|---|---|
Long-term orientation | Decision-making | “Is deliberative about life choices” | “Individuals think things through and always consider the consequences before making a decision or taking action. They plan ahead carefully when they go on a trip.” Deliberation (C6, Conscientiousness) | “They show a style of thinking about everyday life choices that is reflective, deliberate, and practical.” Prudence [Temperance] |
“Considers the consequences of their actions/decisions” | “Individuals think things through and always consider the consequences before making a decision or taking action” Deliberation (C6, Conscientiousness) | “Prudent individuals show a farsighted and deliberative concern for the consequences of their actions and decisions, successfully resist impulses and other choices that satisfy shorter term goals at the expense of longer term ones, have a flexible and moderate approach to life, and strive for balance among their goals and ends.” Prudence [Temperance] “making life decisions by considering distant as well as immediate benefits and costs, and by paying heed to their probable consistency or conflict with one’s other plans” Prudence [Temperance] | ||
Orientation towards the future | “Is goal oriented” | “Have a clear set of goals, and work hard to accomplish them in an orderly fashion” Achievement Striving (C4, Conscientiousness) | “They take a foresighted stance toward their personal future, thinking and caring about it, planning for it, and holding long-term goals and aspirations.” Prudence [Temperance] I have a clear picture in my mind about what I want to happen in the future.” Hope [Transcendence] “voluntary continuation of a goal-directed action in spite of obstacles, difficulties, or discouragement.” Persistence [Courage] “person exerts control over his or her own responses so as to pursue goals and live up to standards.” Self-regulation [Temperance] | |
Rates and rhythms of life | Emotional disposition towards various life rate and rhythms category: desire for intense-emotional experiences | Craves excitement does not crave excitement is thrill-seeking seeks stimulating experiences | “Individuals often crave excitement and like to be where the action is” Excitement-Seeking (E5, Extraversion) “Individuals seldom crave excitement and they do not like to be where the action is. They tend to avoid movies that are shocking or scary” Excitement-Seeking, Low (E5, Extraversion) “They have sometimes done things just for the thrill of it.” Excitement-Seeking (E5, Extraversion) | “Novelty-seeking reflects an individual’s propensity for seeking novel and exciting experiences to Elevate stimulation to an optimal level” Curiosity [Wisdom] |
Emotional disposition towards various life rate and rhythms category: rate of life | Has enthusiasm for activities lives at a slow pace lives leisurely lives vigorously tends to be active often seems rushed | “Individuals are not as quick and lively as other people, and their work is likely to be slow and steady.” Activity, Low (E4, Extraversion) “They have a leisurely style in work and play.” Activity, Low (E4, Extraversion) “When they do things, they do them vigorously.” Activity (E4, Extraversion) “They often feel as if they are bursting with energy” Activity (E4, Extraversion) “Individuals are active and have a fast-paced life” Activity (E4, Extraversion) “usually seem to be in a hurry.” Activity (E4, Extraversion) | “Those with vitality also exhibit enthusiasm, which they direct toward whatever activities they choose to engage.” Vitality [Courage] “Dynamic aspect of well-being marked by the subjective experience of energy and aliveness” Vitality [Courage] “I feel alive and vital I have energy and spirit I nearly always feel awake and alert I feel energized.” Vitality [Courage] “Vigor is a word with similar meanings, being derived from the idea of liveliness. The New Merriam Webster Dictionary (1989) defines vigor as “active strength or energy of body or mind,” reflecting that it, like vitality, refers to both somatic and psychological wellness. That which invigorates also vitalizes, and thus we treat these terms as equivalent constructs” Vitality [Courage] “A person who is vital is energetic and fully functioning” Vitality [Courage] | |
Leadership qualities | Emotional disposition towards others: Leadership | “Makes decisions for the group (consider overlap with decisions)” “Is a natural leader” | “Often have been leaders of groups to which they belong.” Assertiveness (E3, Extraversion) “Other people look to them to make decisions” Assertiveness (E3, Extraversion) | “I am often able to plan a course of action for my group.” Leadership [Justice] |
Dispositions towards learning | Intellectual dispositions: Disposition towards learning | Enjoys learning experiences positive feelings from learning (consider also emotional dispositions) has optimism for capacity to learn is intellectually curious is open to new ideas likes to learn pursues knowledge | “Have a wide range of intellectual interests and a lot of intellectual curiosity.” Ideas (O5, Openness) “think that it is interesting to learn and develop new hobbies” Actions (O4, Openness) | “Learning is a positive experience.” Love of Learning [Wisdom] “I like to learn new things.” Love of Learning [Wisdom] “experience positive feelings in the process of acquiring skills, satisfying curiosity, building on existing knowledge, and/or learning something completely new” Love of Learning [Wisdom] |
“Enjoys abstract thought” | “Individuals enjoy playing with theories or abstract ideas” Ideas (O5, Openness) | “the individual to address important and difficult questions about the conduct and meaning of life” Perspective [Wisdom] | ||
“Enjoys problem-solving” | “Individuals enjoy… solving problems or puzzles” Ideas (O5, Openness) | “In contrast, specific curiosity should have stronger links to openness to new values and ideas, a future orientation, and the frequency and enjoyment of problem solving.” Curiosity [Wisdom] | ||
Emotional dispositions towards others: | Emotional bonds towards others | “Has personal relationships” | “They have strong emotional attachments to their friends.” Warmth (E1, Extraversion) | “there is someone in whose company I feel deep contentment.” Love (Humanity) |
“Is emotionally warm” | “Individuals are known as warm, friendly persons” Warmth (E1, Extraversion) | “Having a warm and generous affect seems to bring reassurance and joy to others.” Kindness (Humanity) | ||
“Is cheerful/tries to cheer others” | “Cheerful, high-spirited persons who laugh easily.” Positive Emotions (E6, Extraversion) | “(b) a composed and cheerful view on adversity that allows one to see its light side and thereby sustain a good mood” Humor [Transcendence] “Whenever my friends are in a gloomy mood, I try to tease them out of it I welcome the opportunity to brighten someone else’s day with laughter.” Humor [Transcendence] | ||
Good judgment | Intellectual dispositions: has good judgment in life | “Has good judgment in life” | “They pride themselves on their sound judgment” Competence (C1, Conscientiousness) | “Involves exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge about the conditions of life and human affairs and reflective judgment about the application of this knowledge” Wisdom “good judgment and advice about important but uncertain matters of life” Wisdom “is distinct from intelligence ▪ represents a superior level of knowledge, judgment, and capacity to give advice” Perspective [Wisdom] |
Emotional control | Management of self: has emotional control | “Has emotional control” | “They are able to keep their feelings under control.” Impulsiveness, Low (N5, Neuroticism) | “Person exerts control over his or her own responses so as to pursue goals and live up to standards.” Self-regulation [Temperance] “They may direct their thought processes in directions other than where their minds naturally wander, they may attempt to change their emotional responses away from how they initially feel, and they may restrain themselves from carrying out impulses and desires. They may try to perform better than they would normally do, such as by making themselves persist on a difficult task. Most acts of self-regulation involve stop- ping the self from having a response, such as when a dieter refrains from eating a tempting but fattening food. There are, however, some instances of self-regulation that entail initiating a response, such as when a sleepy man drags himself out of bed on a cold morning.” Self-regulation [Temperance] |
Appendix D: Complete findings of inquiry 2
Thematic overlap in moral codes between the VIA-FFM | Categories and sub-categories | Codes | NEO-PI3 excerpt | VIA excerpt |
---|---|---|---|---|
Moral dispositions towards treating others: The importance of caring for others Taking others needs into consideration Looking out for others’ good Actually helps those in needs | Worldview: moral beliefs Emotional disposition towards others: orientation towards the good of others Follows sense of right and wrong | “Believes in maximal charity” “tries to be considerate” “is charitable” “is generous towards others” “Is oriented towards others” “has a sense of duty to group” | “They believe that human needs always should take priority over economic considerations.” Tendermindness (A6, Agreeableness) “Individuals try to be courteous, thoughtful, and considerate.” Altruism (A3, Agreeableness) “They go out of their way to help others.” Altruism (A3, Agreeableness) “we can never do too much for the poor and elderly.” Tendermindness (A6, Agreeableness) | “People in need require care It is important to help everyone, not just family and friends.” Kindness [Humanity] “I have a wider perspective I have a strong need to contribute to others and society I take into consideration the needs of others.” Perspective [Wisdom] “treatment of others with care, as evident by helping those in need; sensitivity to the needs of others” Integrity [Courage] “generosity even when an equitable exchange would suffice,” Humanity “It is important to me personally that I work to correct social and eco- nomic inequalities It is important to me personally that I help others who are in difficulty It is important to me personally to be involved in programs to clean up the environment.” Citizenship [Justice] “social responsibility, loyalty, and teamwork represent a feeling of identification with and sense of obligation to a common good that includes the self but that stretches beyond one’s own self-interest.” Citizenship [Justice] “The common thread for people exhibiting these values is that they endorse public interest over self-interest goals as values by which to live. They identify with the common good and want to make the world a better place for future generations.” Citizenship [Justice] “Giving is more important than receiving Doing good for others with love and kindness is the best way to live. I care for the ungrateful as well the grateful.” Kindness [Humanity] “the fact remains that we are quite capable of and often willing to engage in acts of generosity, kindness, or benevolence that are consensually recognized and valued and that elevate those who witness them” Humanity “I try to be kind to everyone” Fairness [Justice] “Kindness, generosity, nurturance, care, compassion, and altruistic love are a net- work of closely related terms indicating a common orientation of the self to- ward the other.” Kindness [Humanity] |
Interpersonal relations: Honesty Trust Manipulative/deceitful Forgiveness/forgetting Prefers justice | Follows sense of right and wrong Emotional dispositions: Perception of others | “Is honest/values honesty” “is not deceitful” “is perceived to be self-centered by others” | “Individuals are not crafty or sly, and could not deceive anyone even if they wanted to.” Straightforwardness (A2, Agreeableness) “Individuals are willing to manipulate people to get what they need and sometimes trick people into doing what they want.” Straightforwardness, Low (A2, Agreeableness) | “When people keep telling the truth, things work out I would never lie just to get something I wanted from someone.” Integrity [Courage] “It is important to me to be open and honest about my feelings.” Integrity [Courage] “I wouldn’t want to cheat anyone, any more than I would want to be cheated.” Fairness [Justice] |
Emotional disposition towards others: responds to wrongdoing Worldview—moral beliefs | “Is lenient towards others” “is not vengeful” “Forgives easily” “seeks to repair relationships” prefers justice over mercy | “When they have been insulted, they just try to forgive and forget” Compliance (A4, Agreeableness) “They would rather be known as ‘just’ than ‘merciful.’” Tender-mindness, Low (A6, Agreeableness) | “I think it is important to do what I can to mend my relationships with people who have hurt or betrayed me in the past.” Forgiveness and mercy [Temperance] “When someone hurts my feelings, I manage to get over it fairly quickly I don’t hold a grudge for very long When people make me angry, I am usually able to get over my bad feelings toward them.” Forgiveness and mercy [Temperance] “Seeking revenge doesn’t help people to solve their problems I am not the type of person to harm someone simply because he or she harmed me I am not the type of person who spends hours thinking of how to get even with people who have done bad things to me.” Forgiveness and mercy [Temperance] “The core virtue justice, as already stated, refers generally to that which makes life fair” Justice “the shared notion is that some standard should be in practice to protect intuitive notions of what is fair” Justice “pragmatic rendition of justice, that of the laws that give fairness a fair shot” Justice | |
Moral actions: Acting in accordance with principles Acting in accordance with right and wrong despite sacrifice or societal non-conformity | Follows sense of right and wrong | “Lives by principles” “does the right thing” “acts in line with their standards” | “They adhere strictly to their ethical principles.” Dutifulness (C3, Conscientiousness) | “Those virtues are believed to mani-fest in the pursuit of a principled life and a life of goodness.” Spirituality [Transcendence] “My life is guided and given meaning by my code of values.” Integrity [Courage] “Self-regulation refers to how a person exerts control over his or her own re- sponses so as to pursue goals and live up to standards.” Self-regulation [Temperance] “I behave in a manner consistent with my own personal standards.” Perspective [Wisdom] “a focus on behaviors, attitudes, and experiences that are consistent with these values” Spirituality [Transcendence] “▪ My life is guided and given meaning by my code of values a regular pattern of behavior that is consistent with espoused values— practicing what one preaches” Integrity [Courage] “Having strength of character means having the capacity to do what is right and avoid what is wrong.” [Temperance] |
Follows sense of right and wrong Worldview: teleology | “Does the right thing” “despite sacrifice” “believes in higher moral code” | None | “Moral courage entails maintaining ethical integrity or authenticity at the risk of losing friends, employment, privacy, or prestige.” Courage “We mean courage to include physical valor, yes, but also integrity and perseverance—any act of willfully overcoming into what it is so easy to slip: security, comfort, complacency. We mean doing what is right, even when one has much to lose.” Courage “Bravery is usually considered doing what is right, including confronting the status quo or opposing an unhealthy idea, and as such, it takes on a moral tone.” Bravery [Courage] “I always follow through on my commitments, even when it costs me.” Integrity [Courage] “does not follow that the good citizen is blindly obedient. Rather he or she exercises informed judgment in the inter- ests of the whole. At times this can even involve a challenge to unjust laws” Spirituality [Transcendence] “Even if society says it’s all right to do something, if it doesn’t match my personal sense of what’s right, I wouldn’t do it.” Fairness [Justice] | |
Moral belief: inherent human worth | Worldview—moral beliefs | “Believes all deserve respect” “believes in human value” “believes that people are ends in themselves” | “Individuals believe that all human beings are worthy of respect” Tender-mindedness (A6, Agreeableness) | “Everyone deserves respect.” Fairness [Justice] “It’s wrong to use people Everyone deserves respect We’re all in this together People are ends in themselves.” Fairness [Justice] “Kindness and altruistic love require the assertion of a common humanity in which others are worthy of attention and affirmation for no utilitarian reasons but for their own sake” Kindness [Humanity] “Others are just as important as me All human beings are of equal worth.” Kindness [Humanity] |
Appendix E: Findings of inquiry 3
In our third inquiry, we identified categories and sub-categories that demonstrated comparative emphasis in the NEO-PI-3 or the CSV as judged by:
-
(1)
Qualitative detail
-
(2)
Extent of description
-
(3)
Range of coded traits
The Tables included here represent some of the qualitative data that we reviewed to support our claims about comparatively emphasized traits in our findings (Tables 7, 8).
Appendix F
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aluri, J.T., Li, K.C. Personality and Character: A Comparative Qualitative Analysis of Trait Descriptions in NEO-PI-3 and Character Strengths and Virtues. J Happiness Stud 23, 3055–3094 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00535-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00535-0