Abstract
This paper analyzes how people’s subjective well-being adapts to income poverty in Switzerland and Germany and presents two empirical findings. First, financial satisfaction (FS) does not adapt in either country. However, life satisfaction fully adapts in Switzerland but not in Germany. Second, people in income poverty have income lower than their reference income. In the long run, those who remain in income poverty are trapped in the situation of insufficient income. Therefore, FS has limited, if any, adaptation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
This study was conducted using the data collected by the Swiss Household Panel (SHP), which is based at the Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences FORS. The project is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The second dataset, German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), was made available by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin. The data can be accessed by agreeing to confidential conditions and restrictions with the institutions.
Notes
Clark, D’Ambrosio, and Ghislandi (2016) also consider satisfaction with income but relegate the findings to a footnote (P595).
The following theories/models do not compare stimuli to a reference point: opponent-process theory, dynamic equilibrium, set point theory and its revision, and SWB homeostasis theory.
For summary of income and MRI, observations with monthly household income or minimum required income larger than 100,000 are also excluded as outliers (27 observations). This exclusion has negligible effects on average except greatly reducing the standard errors of those incomes.
The 1997 and 2018 MRI values are imputed based on a linear combination of “somewhat inadequate income” and “barely adequate income” using the method described below. First, the MRI is regressed on these two types of income based on the 2007 survey, for which all variables are available. Second, the 1997 and 2018 MRI values are predicted. “Somewhat inadequate income" (“barely adequate income”) is derived from the following question: What do you consider to be a somewhat inadequate income (barely adequate income) in relation to your personal living conditions and living standards? Intuitively, the MRI ranges between these two income levels. The result is consistent with intuition. The empirical results of this paper remain similar when the imputed 1997 and 2018 data are excluded.
Since MRI is available for limited years, the income and MRI are derived from observations with both variables to enable a direct comparison. Moreover, outliers with income or MRI above 50,000 are excluded. This exclusion has negligible effects on mean value except greatly reducing the standard errors.
https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/life-satisfaction/, accessed on 11/21/2021.
According to the World Bank data in https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.pcap.cd?most_recent_value_desc=true, accessed on Oct 28, 2019.
References
Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2005). Consumption versus expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 919–948. https://doi.org/10.1086/491590
Anusic, I., Yap, S. C. Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Testing set-point theory in a swiss national sample: reaction and adaptation to major life events. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1265–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0541-2
Baetschmann, G., Staub, K. E., & Winkelmann, R. (2015). Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (statistics in Society). https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12090
Ballas, D. (2013). What makes a ‘Happy City’? Cities, Current Research on Cities, 32(July), S39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.009
Blau, G., Petrucci, T., & McClendon, J. (2013). Correlates of life satisfaction and unemployment stigma and the impact of length of unemployment on a unique unemployed sample. Career Development International, 18(3), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-10-2012-0095
Brzozowski, M., & Visano, B. S. (2020). “Havin’ money’s not everything, not havin’ it is”: the importance of financial satisfaction for life satisfaction in financially stressed households. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(2), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00091-0
Chetty, R., & Szeidl, A. (2007). Consumption commitments and risk preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 831–877. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.2.831
Chetty, R., & Szeidl, A. (2016). Consumption commitments and habit formation. Econometrica, 84(2), 855–890. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9390
Clark, A. E. (2016). Adaptation and the easterlin paradox. In T. Tachibanaki (Ed.), Advances in happiness research. Creative economy (pp. 75–94). Japan: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55753-1_6
Clark, A. E. (2018). Four decades of the economics of happiness: Where next? Review of Income and Wealth, 64(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12369
Clark, A. E., D’Ambrosio, C., & Ghislandi, S. (2016). Adaptation to poverty in long-run panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3), 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00544
Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Yannis, G., & Richard, E. L. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118(529), F222–F243.
Clark, A. E., Sarah, F., & Claudia, S. (2014). The great happiness moderation. In A. E. Clark & C. Senik (Eds.), Happiness and economic growth: Lessons from developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. E., & Georgellis, Y. (2013). Back to baseline in Britain: Adaptation in the British household panel survey. Economica, 80(319), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12007
Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594.
Crettaz, E., & Suter, C. (2013). The impact of adaptive preferences on subjective indicators: An analysis of poverty indicators. Social Indicators Research, 114(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0388-6
Dang, H. –A. H., Michael, M. L., Kseniya, A. (2019). Did the poor adapt to their circumstances? Evidence from long-run russian panel data. Economics Bulletin 39 (4). http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/eb/default.aspx?topic=Abstract&PaperID=EB-19-00718
De Vos, K., & Thesia, I. G. (1991). An evaluation of subjective poverty definitions: Comparing results from the U.S. and the Netherlands. Review of Income and Wealth, 37(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1991.tb00371.x
Diener, E., & Robert, B.-D. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014411319119
Donaldson, D., & Pendakur, K. (2006). The identification of fixed costs from consumer behavior. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500106000000035
Edin, K. J., Luke Shaefer, H. (2015). $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=11090710
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.
Garner, T. I., & de Vos, K. (1995). Income sufficiency v. Poverty results from the united states and The Netherlands. Journal of Population Economics, 8(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166646
Graham, C. (2016) Subjective well-being in economics. In M. D. Adler, M Fleurbaey (ed) The Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199325818-e-10
Graham, L., & Oswald, A. J. (2010). Hedonic capital, adaptation and resilience. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.07.003
Haisken-DeNew, J. P., Joachim, R. F. (2005). Desktop companion to the german socio-economic panel (GSOEP). Technical report. https://www.diw.de/documents/dokumentenarchiv/17/diw_01.c.38951.de/dtc.409713.pdf
Halleröd, B. (2006). Sour grapes: Relative deprivation, adaptive preferences and the measurement of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 35(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279406009834
Hsieh, C.-M., Li, Q., & Lyu, H. (2020). A comparison of normalized and non-normalized multiplicative subjective importance weighting in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 152(2), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02457-x
Jantsch, A., Ruut, V. (2019). Private wealth and happiness. In G. Brulé, C. Suter (ed.) Wealth(s) and subjective well-being (pp. 17–50). Social Indicators Research Series. Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05535-6_2
Liebow, E. (2003). Tally’s corner: A study of negro streetcorner men (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Luhmann, M., Sabrina I. (2018). Hedonic adaptation and the set point for subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, and L. Tay (Eds.) Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers. https://www.nobascholar.com/books/1
Luo, J. (2020). A pecuniary explanation for the heterogeneous effects of unemployment on happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00198-4
Luo, J. (2021). Happiness adaptation to high income: Evidence from german panel data. Economics Letters, 206(September), 109995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109995
Luo, J. J. (2022). Is Work a burden? The role of the living standard. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02878-w
Paul, K. I., Alice, H., Klaus, M. (2018). Individual consequences of job loss and unemployment. In U.- C. Klehe, E. A. J. Van Hooft (Eds.) The oxford handbook of job loss and job search. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199764921.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199764921-e-028
Postlewaite, A., Samuelson, L., & Silverman, D. (2008). Consumption commitments and employment contracts. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(2), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00472.x
Powdthavee, N., & Alois, S. (2014). Chapter 11 - economic approaches to understanding change in happiness. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness (pp. 219–244). US: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411478-4.00011-4
Ravallion, M. (2012). Poverty lines across the world. In P. N. Jefferson (Ed.), The oxford handbook of the economics of poverty. Oxford University Press.
Ravallion, M. (2016). The economics of poverty: History, measurement, and policy. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212766.001.0001/acprof-9780190212766
Rayo, L., & Becker, G. S. (2007). Evolutionary efficiency and happiness. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 302–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/516737
Romich, J. L., & Weisner, T. (2000). How families view and use the EITC: Advance payment versus lump sum delivery. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 1245–1265.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom (1st ed.). Knopf.
Shore, S. H., & Sinai, T. (2010). Commitment, risk, and consumption: Do birds of a feather have bigger nests? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2010.11380
Stutzer, A. (2004). The Role of Income Aspirations in Individual Happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.04.003
Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. (2004). Reported subjective well-being: A challenge for economic theory and economic policy. Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies/zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts- Und Sozialwissenschaften, 124(2), 191–231.
Tillmann, R., Maurizia, M., Monica, B. (2016). Poverty, precarity, prosperity and wellbeing in Switzerland. In F. Ehrler, F. Bühlmann, P. Farago, F. Höpflinger, D. Joye, P. Perrig-Chiello, and C. Suter (Eds.) Swiss social report 2016: Wellbeing, (pp. 162–78). Seismo.
Tillmann, R., Marieke, V., Erika, A., Ursina, K., Florence, L., Valérie-Anne, R., Oliver, L., and Boris W. (2016). The Swiss Household Panel Study: Observing Social Change since 1999. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v7i1.360.
Van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3
Scheve, V., Christian, F. E., & Schupp, J. (2017). The emotional timeline of unemployment: Anticipation, reaction, and adaptation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(4), 1231–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9773-6
Whelan, C. T., Damian, H., & Sean, C. (1991). Unemployment, poverty and psychological distress. Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute.
Wilson, William Julius. 1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. Knopf.
Wilson, W. J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. University of Chicago Press.
Yap, S. C. Y., Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British household panel survey. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.005
Acknowledgements
I am indebted to Neel Rao for his helpful advice. I thank Alex Anas, Jinquan Gong, and Peter Morgan for their comments.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, J. Is Happiness Adaptation to Poverty Limited? The Role of Reference Income. J Happiness Stud 23, 2491–2516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00508-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00508-3