Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 1825–1846

The Happiness of Giving: Evidence from the German Socioeconomic Panel That Happier People Are More Generous

Research Paper

Abstract

This study explores the causal direction between happiness and charitable giving. Through the application of Cohen’s path analysis, the main purpose of the study is to find evidence which of the possible causal directions—the one from giving to happiness or from happiness to giving—is the more dominant one. To that aim the authors use data from the German Socio-Economic Panel 2009/10. In a sample of 6906 donors, the relationships between monetary giving and life satisfaction were assed. Furthermore, we controlled for different variables such as age, gender, and marital status. Contradictory to the hypotheses development, the results of the Cohen’s path analysis indicate that the causal direction from happiness to charitable giving is the more dominant one. Through the study and our initial results we contribute to theory by highlighting the ambiguous causal relationship between the focal constructs and provide a statistical method to investigate such unclear causal relationships. We discuss how happiness, particularly the affective aspect, can be utilized by nonprofit managers to raise fundraising effectiveness and suggest areas for further research.

Keywords

Happiness Charitable giving Bi-directional relationship Cohen’s path analysis Nonprofit organizations German Socioeconomic Panel 

References

  1. Aaker, J. L., & Akutsu, S. (2009). Why do people give? The role of integrity in giving. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., et al. (2013a). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Whillans, A. V., Grant, A. M., & Norton, M. I. (2013b). Making a difference matters: Impact unlocks the emotional benefits of prosocial spending. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 88(April), 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andreoni, J. (1993). An experimental test of the public-goods crowding-out hypothesis. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1317–1327.Google Scholar
  8. Andreoni, J., Brown, E., & Rischall, A. (2003). Charitable giving by married couples. Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ball, R., & Chernova, K. (2008). Absolute income, relative income, and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 88(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same construct. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bindl, U. K., Parker, S. K., Totterdell, P., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2012). Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to proactive goal regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boenigk, S., & Helmig, B. (2013). Why do donors donate? Effects of organizational identification and identity salience on the relationships among satisfaction, loyalty, and donation behavior. Journal of Service Research, 16(4), 533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Booth, A. L., & van Ours, J. C. (2008). Job satisfaction and family happiness: The part-time work puzzle. The Economic Journal, 118(526), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Borghesi, S., & Vercelli, A. (2012). Happiness and health: Two paradoxes. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Borgonovi, F. (2008). Doing well by doing good. The relationship between formal volunteering and self-reported health and happiness. Social Science and Medicine, 66(11), 2321–2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Callaghan, W., Wilson, B., Ringle, C. M., & Henseler, J. (2007). Exploring causal path directionality for a marketing model using Cohen’s path method. In H. Martens, T. Næs, & M. Martens (Eds.), Proceedings of PLS’07—The 5th international symposium on PLS and related methods (pp. 57–61). Ås: Matforsk.Google Scholar
  21. Cherepanov, V., Feddersen, T., & Sandroni, A. (2013). Revealed preferences and aspirations in warm glow theory. Economic Theory, 54(3), 501–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, P. R., Carlson, A., Ballesteros, L., & Amand, R. (1993). Automating path analysis for building causal models from data. Proceedings of the tenth international conference on machine learning, technical report, 93-38 (pp. 57–64). Amherst: Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  25. Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Diener, E., Shigehiro, O., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Forgas, J. P., Dunn, E., & Granland, S. (2008). Are you being served…? An unobtrusive experiment of affective influences on helping in a department store. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Funk, L. (2012). The German economy during the financial and economics crisis since 2008/2009: An unexpected success story revisited. Berlin: KAS.Google Scholar
  37. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Harbaugh, W. T. (1998). What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2014). Social capital and well-being in times of crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(1), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henseler, J. (2007). A new and simple approach to multi-group analysis in partial least squares path modeling. In H. Martens, T. Næs, & M. Martens (Eds.), Proceedings of PLS’07—The 5th international symposium on PLS and related methods (pp. 104–107). Ås: Matforsk.Google Scholar
  42. Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53(10), 1111–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Houston, D. J. (2006). “Walking the walk” of public service motivation: Public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 203–253). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Isen, A. M. (2008). Some ways in which positive affect influences problem solving and decision making. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (Ch. 34, pp. 548–573). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Isen, A. M., Horn, N., & Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). Effects of success and failure on children’s generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(2), 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Konow, J., & Earley, J. (2008). The hedonistic paradox: Is homo economicus happier? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1/2), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krishna, A. (2011). Can supporting a cause decrease donations and happiness? The cause marketing paradox. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lacey, H. P., Smith, D. M., & Ubel, P. A. (2006). Hope I die before I get old: Mispredicting happiness across the adult lifespan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee, B., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (1997). Discovery and representation of causal relationships in MIS research: A methodological framework. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leung, A., Kier, C., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R. (2011). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(3), 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lindenberger, U., Marsiske, M., & Baltes, P. B. (2000). Memorizing while walking: Increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 417–436.Google Scholar
  54. Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lopes, M. P., da Palma, P. J., & e Cunha, M. P. (2011). Tolerance is not enough: The moderating role of optimism on perceptions of regional economic performance. Social Indicators Research, 102(2), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Manning, W. G. (1998). The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. Journal of Health Economics, 17(3), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Economica, 75(297), 39–59.Google Scholar
  59. Moore, M. H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pflug, J. (2009). Folk theories of happiness: A cross-cultural comparison of conceptions of happiness in Germany and South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ranganathan, S. K., & Henley, W. H. (2008). Determinants of charitable donation intentions: A structural equation model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reid, M., & Wood, A. (2008). An investigation into blood donation intentions among non-donors. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS quarterly, 36(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  64. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). Hamburg: University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  65. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). Altruism, nonprofits, and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 701–728.Google Scholar
  66. Rosenbaum, M. S., Corus, C., Ostrom, A. L., Anderson, L., Risk, R. P., Gallan, A. S., et al. (2011). Conceptualisation and aspirations of transformative service research. Journal of Research for Consumers, 19, 1–6.Google Scholar
  67. Rosenhan, D. L., Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1974). Affect moderates self-gratification and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 546–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sargeant, A., Wymer, W., & Hilton, Toni. (2006). Marketing bequest club membership: An exploratory study of legacy pledgers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 384–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger, & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Measurement and research methods in international marketing, advances in international marketing (Vol. 22, pp. 195–218). London: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, V. H., Kehoe, M. R., & Cremer, M. E. (1995). The private provision of public goods: Altruism and voluntary giving. Journal of Public Economics, 58(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation Study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Steinberg, R. (1990). Labor economics and the nonprofit sector: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: An alternative approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(9), 618–645.Google Scholar
  74. Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2007). Culture and subjective well-being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 691–713). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  76. Veenhoven, R. (2010a). Greater happiness for a greater number. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(5), 605–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Veenhoven, R. (2010b). World database of happiness, ongoing register of scientific research on subjective enjoyment of life. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl
  78. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (GSOEP)—Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar
  79. Wang, L., & Graddy, E. (2008). Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Watson, G. (1930). Happiness among adult students of education. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(2), 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Webb, D. J., Green, C. L., & Brashear, T. G. (2000). Development and validation of scales to measure attitudes influencing monetary donations to charitable organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Willems, J., Boenigk, S., & Jegers, M. (2014). Seven trade-offs in measuring nonprofit performance and effectiveness. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25, 1648–1670. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-9446-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Williams, S., & Shiaw, W. T. (1999). Mood and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of positive affect on employee organizational citizenship behavior intentions. Journal of Psychology, 133(6), 656–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67(4), 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations