Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Institutional stakeholder collaborations (ISCs): a conceptual framework for housing research

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Housing development calls for collaboration through a multipronged and concerted effort from all stakeholders to acquire resources within institutional arrangements set by state and local governments. Despite growing attention by UN-Habitat towards the New Urban Agenda for affordable housing, the role of institutional collaboration among stakeholders has been overlooked. For purpose of the present research, a structured literature review was conducted based on 33 papers collaborative archetypes in the affordable housing sector. A typology of key collaborative approaches in housing research and practice is presented jointly to juxtapose these approaches emphasizing the integration of stakeholder engagement with institutional patterns of resource acquisition. The present study offers a conceptual framework of Institutional Stakeholder Collaborations (ISCs) beyond the conventional definitions and concepts of collaboration. The ISCs framework offers a two-level agenda, encouraging scholars and academicians to examine stakeholder engagements and resource dependency patterns within the institutional arrangements for future empirical research, to navigate the affordable housing provision effectively. Finally, this research advances the collaboration theory integrating resource dependence, institutional, and stakeholder theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Malik (2020)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adegun, O. B., & Olusoga, O. O. (2019). Self-help housing: cooperative societies’ contributions and professionals’ views in Akure, Nigeria. Built Environment, 45(3), 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, A., Iqbal, N., & Siddiqui, R. (2018). Determinants of housing demand in urban areas of Pakistan: Evidence from the PSLM. The Pakistan Development Review, 57(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aligica, P. D. (2006). Institutional and stakeholder mapping: frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change. Public Organization Review, 6(1), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almi, N. A., & Husin, K. (2017). Success factors of housing delivery system among Malaysian.

  • Andriof, J., & Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, & S. Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory responsibility and engagement (pp. 19–42). Greenleaf: Sheffield, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aris, N. A. M., Fathi, M. S., Harun, A. N., & Mohamed, Z. (2019). Towards a sustainable supply of affordable housing with prefabrication technology: An overview. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies, 15(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asalam, K. A., & Sattar, H. (2018). Enhancing Builder Financing in Pakistan: 1–2. Karandaz.

  • Ashworth, R., & Skelcher, C. (2005). Meta-evaluation of the local government modernisation agenda: Progress report on accountability in local government. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. ODPM Publications.

  • Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, A. R. A. (2010). Housing private-public partnerships: Perspectives from the Government Agencies. Paper presented at the 4th NAPREC Conference, (September 2010).

  • Begum, H., Heywood, P. R., & Susilawati, C. (2018). Assisted Community housing initiative in Dhaka: Rethinking role of NGOs in affordable housing development. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 9(2), 214–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund-Snodgrass, L., Högström, E., Fjellfeldt, M., & Markström, U. (2020). Organizing cross-sectoral housing provision planning: Settings, problems and knowledge. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1792416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisseuil, C. (2019). Governing ambiguity and implementing cross-sectoral programmes: Urban regeneration for social mix in Paris. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34, 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09644-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, M., Raufflet, E. J. N., & Quarterly, V. S. (2019). Domesticating the beast: A “resource profile” framework of power relations in nonprofit–business collaboration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(6), 1186–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brester, B. (2012). Housing policy, neighborhood development, and civic participation in Cuba the social microbrigades of santa clara. Berkeley Planning Journal. https://doi.org/10.5070/BP325111715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2008). SAS2: A guide to collaborative inquiry and social engagement. SAGE Publishing India.

  • Cleophas, C., Cottrill, C., Ehmke, J. F., & Tierney, K. (2019). Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 273(3), 801–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, R. M., Witt, G. B., & Lacey, J. (2016). Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: Insights from practitioners to go beyond the ‘usual suspects.’ Land Use Policy, 52, 266–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. D. (2001). Housing matters: Why our communities must have low-income housing. Wm. Mitchell L. Rev., 28, 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czischke, D. (2018). Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 28, 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000028006.

  • Deloitte. (2016). Mainstreaming affordable housing in India: Moving towards Housing for All by 2022. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India.

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Elias, E. K. (2015). The present housing challenge in tanzania and. 28th National Conference 2015 of The Institution of Engineers, Tanzania (pp. 1–21). Dar Es Salaam: National Housing and Building Research Agency.

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entrop, A. G., Brouwers, H. J. H., & Reinders, A. H. M. E. (2010). Evaluation of energy performance indicators and financial aspects of energy saving techniques in residential real estate. Energy and Buildings, 42(5), 618–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eweje, G., Sajjad, A., & Nath, S. D. (2020). Multi-stakeholder partnerships: a catalyst to achieve sustainable development goals. Marketing Intelligence and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-04-2020-0135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewurum, N. I., Aniagolu, C. O., & Igwe, C. P. (2020). Sustainable Public Housing Delivery in Nigeria: A Conceptual Stakeholder Management Model.

  • Eyiah-Botwe, E., & Aigbavboa, C. O. (2019). Curbing PPP construction projects’ failure using enhanced stakeholder management success in developing countries. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2018-0035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

  • Fuseini, I. (2020). Decentralisation, entrepreneurialism and democratization processes in urban governance in Tamale, Ghana. Area Development and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2020.1750303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, J., Zhao, Y., Luo, X., & Lin, M. (2020). Study on the suitability of green building technology for affordable housing: A case study on Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, A., Loader, K., Doherty, B., & Scott, J. M. (2016). A multi-organizational cross-sectoral collaboration: Empirical evidence from an ‘Empty Homes’ project. Public Money and Management, 36(1), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Googins, B. K., & Rochlin, S. A. (2000). Creating the partnership society: understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalan, K., & Venkataraman, M. (2015). Low-income housing: Policy and practice in India. IIMB Management Review, 27(2), 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38(10), 911–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass.

  • Gray, B., & Wood, D. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubbauer, M. (2020). Assisted self-help housing in Mexico: Advocacy, (Micro) finance and the making of markets. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagbert, P., & Malmqvist, T. (2019). Actors in transition: shifting roles in Swedish sustainable housing development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(3), 697–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, A. A. (2010). IIED Density Study 04 Cases of Housing in Karachi.

  • Helkkula, A., Kowalkowski, C., & Tronvoll, B. (2018). Archetypes of service innovation: implications for value cocreation. Journal of Service Research, 21(3), 284–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilesanmi, A. (2012). Housing, neighborhood quality and quality of life in public housing in Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal for Housing Science and its Applications, 36(4), 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, A. (2015). LAHORE VISION 2035. Lahore: Centre for Public Policy and Governance.

  • Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., Khare, A. T., & Kim, J. E. (2019). The organizational challenges of mixed-income development: Privatizing public housing through cross-sector collaboration. Urban Research and Practice, 12(1), 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavishe, N., Jefferson, I., & Chileshe, N. (2019). Evaluating issues and outcomes associated with public–private partnership housing project delivery: Tanzanian practitioners’ preliminary observations. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(4), 354–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S. L., & Woo, K. H. (2020). Making sense of place-making in Penang island’s affordable housing schemes: voices from key stakeholders. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 12(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivits, R. A. (2013). Multi-dimensional stakeholder analysis: A methodology applied to Australian capital city airports (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Cross University).

  • Kwofie, T. E., Afram, S., & Botchway, E. (2016). A critical success model for PPP public housing delivery in Ghana. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(1), 58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, R., Carriou, C., & Czischke, D. (2020). Collaborative housing research (1990–2017): A systematic review and thematic analysis of the field. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 10–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessing, J., & Brege, S. (2015). Business models for product-oriented house-building companies–experience from two Swedish case studies. Construction Innovation, 15(4), 449–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodsgård, L., & Aagaard, A. (2017). Creating value through CSR across company functions and NGO collaborations: A Scandinavian cross-industry case study. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(3), 162–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, J. (2013). Overcoming collaboration barriers in affordable housing public-private partnerships. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2011, No. 1, pp. 1–6). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

  • Mafukidze, J., & Hoosen, F. (2009). Housing shortages in South Africa: A discussion of the after effects of community participation in housing provision in Diepkloof. Urban Forum, 20, 379–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majale, M. (2011). Enabling Shelter Strategies: Design and Implementation Guide for Policymakers (Vol. 2). Nairobi, Kenya: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S. (2020). Resources and stakeholders: Rethinking collaboration for affordable housing provision. Retrieved from https://www.housing-studies-association.org/posts/200-resources-stakeholders-rethinking-collaboration-for-affordable-housing-provision

  • Malik, S., Roosli, R., & Tariq, F. (2020b). Investigation of informal housing challenges and issues: Experiences from slum and squatter of Lahore. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 35(1), 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S., Roosli, R., Tariq, F., & Yusof, N. A. (2020a). Policy framework and institutional arrangements: Case of affordable housing delivery for low-income groups in Punjab, Pakistan. Housing Policy Debate, 30(2), 243–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathéy, K. (1989). Microbrigadas in Cuba a collective form of self-help housing. The Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02498031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, S. K., & Angel, S. (1993). Housing: Enabling markets to work. In Housing: enabling markets to work: World Bank, Policy Paper.

  • McDonald, S. (2014). Social partnerships addressing affordable housing and homelessness in Australia. International journal of housing markets and analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-10-2012-0046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekawy, H. S. (2014). Effectual role of local level partnership schemes in affordable housing delivery. International Journal of Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 8(4), 1006–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Sage.

  • Minnesota Housing Partnership. (2016). Building community through collaboration. Minnesota Housing Partnership.

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder engagement: a case study of affordable housing in Whistler. School of Resource and Environmental Management-Simon Fraser University.

  • Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., González, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Introduction: social innovation and governance in European cities: urban development between path dependency and radical innovation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407077737

  • Muhammad, Z., & Johar, F. (2019). Critical success factors of public–private partnership projects: a comparative analysis of the housing sector between Malaysia and Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(3), 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhija, V. (2001). Enabling slum redevelopment in Mumbai: Policy paradox in practice. Housing Studies, 16(6), 791–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myeni, S. L., & Mvuyana, B. Y. (2018). Participatory processes in planning for self-help housing provision in South Africa: Policies and challenges. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 5(1), 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanyam, V. N., Sawhney, A., & Gupta, P. A. (2017). Evaluating offsite technologies for affordable housing. Procedia Engineering, 196, 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelles, J., Kohns, S., Spies, J., Bröhl, C., Brandl, C., Mertens, A., & Schlick, C. M. (2017). Best-practice approach for a solution-oriented technology assessment: ethical, legal, and social issues in the context of human-robot collaboration. In Advances in ergonomic design of systems, products and processes (pp. 1–14): Springer.

  • Newcombe, R. (2003). From client to project stakeholders: A stakeholder mapping approach. Construction Management and Economics, 21(8), 841–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidugala, G. K., & Shukla, R. (2017). Madhya Pradesh housing and infrastructure development board: affordable housing via public–private partnership mode. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(4), e1623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, J., & Huovila, P. (2000). QFD in design process decision-making. In A. Sarja (Ed.), PRO 14: International RILEM/CIB/ISO symposium on integrated life cycle design of materials and structures (ILCDES 2000) (pp. 51–56). Tromso: RILEM.

  • Oni-Jimoh, T., Liyanage, C., Oyebanji, A., & Gerges, M. J. H. (2018). Urbanization and meeting the need for affordable housing in Nigeria. In A. Almusaed, & A. Almssad (Eds.), Housing, (Vol 7, pp. 73–91). IntechOpen.

  • Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. (2018). Public sector’s perspective on implementing public–private partnership (PPP) policy in Ghana and Hong Kong. Journal of Facilities Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-06-2017-0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, S., Kandemir, D., Eng, T. Y., & Gupta, S. (2019). Vertical stakeholder collaborations for firm innovativeness in new product development: The moderating roles of legal bonds and operational linkages. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., & Pan, M. (2020). A ‘demand-supply-regulation-institution’stakeholder partnership model of delivering zero carbon buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 62, 102359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagiannis, F. A. (2017). An ontologically innovative design of CSR strategies: Enabling value added institutional collaborations. In Corporate social responsibility in the post-financial crisis era (pp. 83–96).Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Patel, K. (2016). Sowing the seeds of conflict? Low income housing delivery, community participation and inclusive citizenship in South Africa. Urban Studies, 53(13), 2738–2757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.

  • Poocharoen, O., & Ting, B. (2015). Collaboration, co-production, networks: Convergence of theories. Public Management Review, 17(4), 587–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quelin, B. V., Cabral, S., Lazzarini, S., & Kivleniece, I. J. O. S. (2019). The private scope in public-private collaborations: An institutional and capability-based perspective. Organization Science, 30(4), 831–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. N., III. (2020). Capitalizing on community: Affordable housing markets in the age of participation. Politics and Society, 48(2), 171–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzer, C., Wallbaum, H., Lopez, L. F., & Kouyoumji, J. L. (2016). Sustainability of social housing in Asia: A holistic multi-perspective development process for bamboo-based construction in the Philippines. Sustainability, 8(2), 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, B., & Mukhija, V. (2001). Institutional pluralism and housing delivery: A case of unforeseen conflicts in Mumbai, India. World Development, 29(12), 2043–2057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. Great minds in management: The process of theory development, 37(2005), 460–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations. Sage.

  • Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, U. (2006). Government intervention and public-private partnerships in housing delivery in Kolkata. Habitat International, 30(3), 448–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehn, L., & Bergstrom, M. (2002). Integrated design and production of multi-storey timber frame houses–production effects caused by customer-oriented design. International Journal of Production Economics, 77(3), 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susilawati, C., & Armitage, L. (2004). Do public private partnerships facilitate affordable housing outcomes in Queensland? Australian Property Journal, 38(3), 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tariq, F., Zafar, Z., Salman, M., Hasan, J., Nawaz, M., Gul, A., Malik, S., & Sheikh, N. B. (2018). Developing countries perspective on housing affordability: Recommendations for Pakistan. Technical Journal, 23(02), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toole, T. M. (1998). Uncertainty and homebuilders’ adoption of technological innovations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(4), 323–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunas, D., & Peresthu, A. (2010). The self-help housing in Indonesia: The only option for the poor? Habitat International, 34(3), 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, F., Sepasgozar, S. M., & Wang, C. (2018). A systematic review of smart real estate technology: Drivers of, and barriers to, the use of digital disruptive technologies and online platforms. Sustainability, 10(9), 3142.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat. (2016). New Urban Agenda Paper presented at the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development, Quito.

  • Waddell, S. (2005). Societal learning and change: How governments, business and civil society are creating solutions to complex multi-stakeholder problems. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Post, J. E. (1995). Catalytic alliances for social problem solving. Human Relations, 48(8), 951–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. P. P. (2016). Self-help or public housing? Lessons from co-managed slum upgrading via participatory budget. Habitat International, 55, 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wang, N., Jiang, L., Yang, Z., & Cui, V. (2016). Managing relationships with power advantage buyers: The role of supplier initiated bonding tactics in long-term buyer–supplier collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5587–5596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangari, M. G. (2018). Stakeholder Involvement And Service Delivery: Provision Of Affordable Housing By National Housing Corporation In Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, School Of Business, University of Nairobi).

  • Wetzstein, S. J. U. S. (2017). The global urban housing affordability crisis. Urban Studies, 54(14), 3159–3177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitzman, C. (2017). Participatory action research in affordable housing partnerships: Collaborative rationality, or sleeping with the growth machine? Planning Practice and Research, 32(5), 495–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, G. (2017). Megaproject stakeholder management. The Oxford handbook of megaproject management (pp. 339–361). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Wong, C. (1998). Determining factors for local economic development: the perception of practitioners in the North West and Eastern regions of the UK. Regional Studies, 32(8), 707–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., & Chiu, M. L. (2018). Examining supply chain collaboration with determinants and performance impact: Social capital, justice, and technology use perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, W. W., Jr., & Samu, S. (2003). Dimensions of business and nonprofit collaborative relationships. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. (2012). A framework of promoting stakeholder mutual benefits for sustainable housing implementation. (Doctoral Dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).

  • Yap, K. S., & De Wandeler, K. (2010). Self-help housing in Bangkok. Habitat International, 34(3), 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainul Abidin, N., Yusof, N. A., & Othman, A. A. (2013). Enablers and challenges of a sustainable housing industry in Malaysia. Construction Innovation, 13(1), 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zairul, M., & Ibrahim, R. (2008). Identifying Economical and Sustainable Elements in Enhancing the BTS (Build then Sell) Concept for Malaysia Housing Development. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Built Environment in Developing Countries.

  • Zucker, L. G. (1988). Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment, 20(3), 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia

    Sana Malik, Ruhizal Roosli & Nor’aini Yusof

  2. School of Architecture & Planning, University of Management & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

    Sana Malik

Authors
  1. Sana Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruhizal Roosli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nor’aini Yusof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sana Malik.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, S., Roosli, R. & Yusof, N. Institutional stakeholder collaborations (ISCs): a conceptual framework for housing research. J Hous and the Built Environ 37, 213–239 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09834-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09834-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation