Abstract
There have been increasing attempts by the UK government to link welfare provision to personal responsibility, trying to alter behaviour through the introduction of new policy instruments. This paper explores what it means to be responsible and what implications this has for policy. The first part of the paper discusses the UK government’s 2002 proposals to reform Housing Benefit and how the document refers to responsibility. In the second part I discuss what we mean by responsibility and explore some of the philosophical complexities of the concept. In the final part of the paper I attempt to suggest what form of responsibility is implied in the reform proposals and what implications this has for the proposed policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, W., Roberts, J., & Le Grand, J. (1998). Introduction: The development of quasi markets in the 1990s. In W. Bartlett, J. Roberts, & J. Le Grand (Eds.), A revolution in social policy: Quasi market reform in the 1990s (pp. 1–16). Bristol: Policy Press.
Brown T. (Ed.) (1999). Stakeholder housing: A third way. London: Pluto Press.
Brown, T., & King, P. (2005). The power to choose: effective choice and housing policy. European Journal of Housing Policy 5(1), 59–75.
Cowan, D., & Marsh, A. (2004). Community, neighbourhood and responsibility: Contemporary currents in housing studies. Housing Studies 19(6), 845–853.
Deacon, A. (2004). Justifying conditionality: the case of anti-social tenants. Housing Studies 19(6), 911–926.
Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999). Housing benefit and private landlords London: DETR.
Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions/Department of Social Security (2000). Quality and choice: A decent home for all. London: DETR/DSS.
Department of Health (2003). Choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS and social care. London: Department of Health.
Department of Social Security (1998). New ambitions for our country: A new contract for welfare. London: The Stationery Office.
Department of Work and Pensions (2002). Building choice and responsibility: A radical agenda for housing benefit. London: DWP.
Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. London: Fontana.
Field, F. (1996). Stakeholder welfare. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Flint, J. (2004). The responsible tenant: Housing governance and the politics of behaviour. Housing Studies 19(6), 875–892.
Goodin, R. (1998). Social welfare as a collective social responsibility. In Schmidtz & Goodin, pp. 97–195.
Gray, J. (1995). Enlightenment’s wake: Politics and culture at the close of the Modern Age. London: Routledge.
Indepen (2000): Reviewing rent restructuring. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.
Kemp, P. (2000). Shopping incentives’ and housing benefit reform. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/Chartered Institute of Housing.
King, P. (2000). Housing benefit: What the government ought to do, but won’t. London: Adam Smith Institute.
King, P. (2003) A social philosophy of housing. Aldershot:Ashgate.
Le Grand, J. (1992). Paying for or providing welfare?. Bristol: SAUS.
Marsland, D. (1996). Welfare or welfare state?: Contradictions and dilemmas in social policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Murray, C. (1996). Charles Murray and the underclass: The developing debate. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Pawson, H., & Sinclair, S. (2003). Shopping therapy? Incentive payments and tenant behaviour: Lessons for underoccupation schemes in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Housing Policy, 3(3), 289–311.
Scanlon, T. (1998): What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard.
Schmidtz, D. (1998). Taking responsibility. In Schmidtz & Goodin, pp. 1–96.
Schmidtz, D., & Goodin, R. (1998). Social welfare and individual responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Selbourne, D. (1994). The principle of duty: An essay on the foundations of the civic order. London: Sinclair-Stevenson.
Wilcox, S. (1997). Replacing housing benefit with housing credit. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.
Wilcox, S. (1999). Housing finance review, 1999–2000. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/Chartered Institute of Housing.
Wilcox, S. (2000). Housing finance review, 2000–2001. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/Chartered Institute of Housing.
Wilcox, S. (2002). UK housing review, 2002–2003. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/Chartered Institute of Housing/Council of Mortgage Lenders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, P. What do we mean by responsibility? The case of UK housing benefit reform. J Housing Built Environ 21, 111–125 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9037-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9037-6