Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 351–365 | Cite as

The Psychology of Esports: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Fanni Bányai
  • Mark D. Griffiths
  • Orsolya Király
  • Zsolt DemetrovicsEmail author
Review Paper


Recently, the skill involved in playing and mastering video games has led to the professionalization of the activity in the form of ‘esports’ (electronic sports). The aim of the present paper was to review the main topics of psychological interest about esports and then to examine the similarities of esports to professional and problem gambling. As a result of a systematic literature search, eight studies were identified that had investigated three topics: (1) the process of becoming an esport player, (2) the characteristics of esport players such as mental skills and motivations, and (3) the motivations of esport spectators. These findings draw attention to the new research field of professional video game playing and provides some preliminary insight into the psychology of esports players. The paper also examines the similarities between esport players and professional gamblers (and more specifically poker players). It is suggested that future research should focus on esport players’ psychological vulnerability because some studies have begun to investigate the difference between problematic and professional gambling and this might provide insights into whether the playing of esports could also be potentially problematic for some players.


Esport Professional video gaming Competitive video gaming Gambling Poker Video games Gaming motivations 



This study was supported by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Grant Nos. K111938, KKP126835). Orsolya Király was supported by the ÚNKP New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities. This study was supported by the COST Action (Grant No. CA16207) funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union. The funding institutions had no role in the study design or the data collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Three of the authors (FB, OK, ZS) declare that they do not have any interests that could constitute a real, potential or apparent conflict of interest with respect to their involvement in the publication. The authors also declare that they do not have any financial or other relations (e.g., directorship, consultancy or speaker fee) with companies, trade associations, unions or groups (including civic associations and public interest groups) that may gain or lose financially from the results or conclusions in the study. Sources of funding are acknowledged. MG carries out consultancy with the gambling companies in the area of responsible gambling, harm minimization and player protection. Some of his research has also received funding from GambleAware, a charity that is funded by gambling industry donations.


  1. Adamus, T. (2012). Playing computer games as electronic sport: In search of a theoretical framework for a new research field. In J. Fromme & A. Unger (Eds.), Computer games and new media cultures: A handbook of digital games studies (pp. 477–490). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brock, T. (2017). Roger Caillois and e-sports: On the problems of treating play as work. Games and Culture, 12(4), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play and games. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, J. (1965). Hero with 1000 faces. New York: World.Google Scholar
  5. Demetrovics, Z., Urbán, R., Nagygyörgy, K., Farkas, J., Zilahy, D., Mervó, B., et al. (2011). Why do you play? The development of the motives for online gaming questionnaire (MOGQ). Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 814–825.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nuring, 62(1), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Entertainment Software Association. (2017). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Retrieved February 8, 2017, from
  11. Faust, K., Meyer, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2013). Competitive and professional gaming: Discussing potential benefits of scientific study. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 3(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher, S. E., & Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Current trends in slot machine gambling: Research and policy issues. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11, 239–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology, 12, 27–49.Google Scholar
  14. Greenberg, B. S., Sherry, J., Lachlan, K., Lucas, K., & Holmstrom, A. (2010). Orientations to video games among gender and age groups. Simulation & Gaming, 41(2), 238–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffiths, M. D. (1991). Amusement machine playing in childhood and adolescence: A comparative analysis of video games and fruit machines. Journal of Adolescence, 14, 53–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffiths, M. (2017). The psychosocial impact of professional gambling, professional video gaming and eSports. Casino & Gaming International, 28, 59–63.Google Scholar
  17. Griffiths, M. D., King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2014). The technological convergence of gambling and gaming practices. In D. C. S. Richard, A. Blaszczynski, & L. Nower (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of disordered gambling (pp. 327–346). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Guttmann, A. (2004). From ritual to record: The nature of modern sports. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hamari, J., & Sjöblom, M. (2017). What is eSports and why do people watch it? Internet Research, 27(2), 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hemphill, D. (2005). Cybersport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 32(2), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Himmelstein, D., Liu, Y., & Shapiro, J. L. (2017). An exploration of mental skills among competitive League of Legend players. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 9(2), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hing, N., Russell, A. M., Gainsbury, S. M., & Blaszczynski, A. (2016). A case of mistaken identity? A comparison of professional and amateur problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(1), 277–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. International e-Sports Federation. (2017). Member Nations. Retrieved February 8, 2018, from
  24. Jenny, S. E., Manning, R. D., Keiper, M. C., & Olrich, T. W. (2016). Virtual(ly) athletes: Where esports fit within the definition of “sport”. Quest. Scholar
  25. Johansson, A., & Götestam, K. G. (2004). Problems with computer games without monetary reward: Similarity to pathological gambling. Psychological Reports, 95(2), 641–650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jonasson, K., & Thiborg, J. (2010). Electronic sport and its impact on future sport. Sport in Society, 13(2), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, Y., & Ross, S. D. (2006). An exploration of motives in sport video gaming. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 8(1), 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim, S. H., & Thomas, M. K. (2015). A stage theory model of professional video game players in South Korea: The socio-cultural dimensions of the development of expertise. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 14(5), 176–186.Google Scholar
  30. King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2010). Video game structural characteristics: A new psychological taxonomy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8, 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, D. L., Gainsbury, S. M., Delfabbro, P. H., Hing, N., & Abarbanel, B. (2015). Distinguishing between gaming and gambling activities in addiction research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(4), 215–220.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Király, O., Nagygyörgy, K., Koronczai, B., Griffiths, M. D., & Demetrovics, Z. (2015). Assessment of problematic internet use and online video gaming. In E. Aboujaoude & V. Starcevic (Eds.), Mental health in the digital age: Grave dangers, great promise (pp. 46–68). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Pontes, H. M. (2016). Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: Issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(2), 103–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Pontes, H. M. (2017). DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: Some ways forward in overcoming issues and concerns in the gaming studies field: Response to the commentaries. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(2), 133–141.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, J.-Y., An, J.-W., & Lee, S.-W. (2014). Factors affecting eSports audience satisfaction-The case of League of Legends. Journal of Korea Game Society, 14(3), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, D., Cheon, W., Judge, L., Shin, H., & Kim, K. (2012). Motives and marketing stimuli affecting esports consumption: Cross-cultural perspectives. International Journal of Sport Management, 13(2), 203–223.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, D., & Schoenstedt, L. J. (2011). Comparison of eSports and traditional sports consumption motives. The ICHPER-SD Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance, 6(2), 39–44.Google Scholar
  38. Lopez-Gonzalez, H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Understanding the convergence of markets in online sports betting. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Scholar
  39. Ma, H., Wu, Y., & Wu, X. (2013). Research on essential difference of e-sport and online game. In W. Du (Ed.), Informatics and management science V (pp. 615–621). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martončik, M. (2015). e-Sports: Playing just for fun or playing to satisfy life goals? Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mäyrä, F. (2008). An introduction to game studies. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  42. McCormack, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). What differentiates professional poker players from recreational poker players? A qualitative interview study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10(2), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Newzoo. (2017). Global Esports Market Report 2017. Retrieved February 8, 2018, from
  44. Phillips, C. A., Rolls, S., Rouse, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Home video game playing in schoolchildren: A study of incidence and patterns of play. Journal of Adolescence, 18(6), 687–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pöhlmann, K., & Brunstein, J. C. (1997). GOALS: Ein fragebogen zur messung von lebenszielen. Diagnostica, 43(1), 103–119.Google Scholar
  46. Recher, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). An exploratory qualitative study of online poker professional players. Social Psychological Review, 14(2), 13–25.Google Scholar
  47. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seo, Y. (2016). Professionalized consumption and identity transformations in the field of eSports. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 264–272. Scholar
  50. Seo, Y., & Jung, S.-U. (2016). Beyond solitary play in computer games: The social practices of eSports. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sherry, J. L., Lucas, K., Greenberg, B. S., & Lachlan, K. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 213–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  52. Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific Sociological Review, 25(2), 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suits, B. (2007). The elements of sport. Ethics in Sport, 2, 9–19.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, T. (2012). Raising the stakes: E-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson, C. J. (1997). Interpreting consumers: A hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers’ consumption stories. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 438–455.Google Scholar
  56. van Hilvoorde, I. (2016). Sport and play in a digital world. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 10(1), 1–4. Scholar
  57. van Hilvoorde, I., & Pot, N. (2016). Embodiment and fundamental motor skills in eSports. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 10(1), 14–27. Scholar
  58. Vorderer, P. (2000). Interactive entertainment and beyond. In D. Zillman & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 21–36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  59. Vorderer, P., Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2003, May). Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: The role of competition. Paper presented at the proceedings of the second international conference on entertainment computing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
  60. Wagner, M. G. (2006). On the scientific relevance of eSports. In: International conference on internet computing & conference on computer games development. LasVegas, NV: ICOMP.Google Scholar
  61. Weinstock, J., Massura, C. E., & Petry, N. M. (2013). Professional and pathological gamblers: Similarities and differences. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(2), 205–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weiss, T., & Schiele, S. (2013). Virtual worlds in competitive contexts: Analyzing eSports consumer needs. Electronic Markets, 23(4), 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whalen, S. J. (2013). Cyberathletes’ lived experience of video game tournaments. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
  64. Witkowski, E. (2009). Probing the sportiness of eSports. In J. Christophers & T. Scholz (Eds.), eSports yearbook (pp. 53–56). Norderstedt: Books on Demand GmbH.Google Scholar
  65. Witkowski, E. (2012). On the digital playing field: How we “do sport” with networked computer games. Games and Culture, 7(5), 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wood, R. T. A., Griffiths, M. D., Chappell, D., & Davies, M. N. O. (2004a). The structural characteristics of video games: A psycho-structural analysis. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wood, R. T. A., Gupta, R., Derevensky, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004b). Video game playing and gambling in adolescents: Common risk factors. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 14, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yee, N. (2006a). The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(3), 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yee, N. (2006b). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyELTE Eötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Doctoral School of PsychologyELTE Eötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  3. 3.International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology DepartmentNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations