Skip to main content
Log in

The Greatest Priority for Genetic Counseling: Effectively Meeting Our Clients’ Needs 2014 NSGC Natalie Weissberger Paul National Achievement Award

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Receipt of the 2014 Natalie Weissberger Paul (NWP) National Achievement Award was a highlight of my career. Thank you to all who nominated me for this prestigious NSGC recognition. I am humbled to join past NWP award winners many of whom are admired mentors, treasured colleagues and friends. I would like to express what a privilege it is to honor Natalie Weissberger Paul for whom this award is named. Twenty-nine years ago I co-edited a volume of the Birth Defects Original Article Series with Natalie summarizing a conference co-funded by the March of Dimes and NSGC (Biesecker et al., 1987). Natalie demonstrated her devotion to children with special needs through her work at the March of Dimes. As such I believe she would concur with the focus of my remarks on the partners in our work: our clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J., Semaka, A., & Hadjipavlou, G. (2014). Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(6), 903–9. doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9728-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, B., Biesecker, B., & Mastromarino, C. (2000). Goals, benefits and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94, 189–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biesecker, B. B., Magyari, P. A., & Paul, N. W. (Eds.). (1987). Birth defects: original article series: strategies in genetic counseling: religious, cultural, and ethnic influences on the counseling process (6th ed., Vol. 23). White Plains, NY: March of Dimes Birth Defect Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwyn, G., Lloyd, A., May, C., van der Weijden, T., Stiggelbout, A., Edwards, A., Frosch, D. L., Rapley, T., Barr, P., Walsh, T., Grande, S. W., Montori, V., & Epstein, R. (2014). Collaborative deliberation: a model for patient care. Patient Education and Counseling, 97(2), 158–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, Y. (2015). Disclosing Alzheimer's genomic risk to family accompanied cognitively impaired patients. PhD Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University (in press).

  • Kessler, S. (1979). The genetic counselor as psychotherapist. Birth Defects Original Articles Series, 15(2), 187–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Resta, R., Biesecker, B., Bennett, R., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M., & Williams, J. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: the national society of genetic counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D., Ellington, L., Erby, L. H., Larson, S., & Dudley, W. (2006). The genetic counseling video project (GCVP): models of practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 209–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D. L., Erby, L. H., Larson, S., & Ellington, L. (2007). Assessing oral literacy demand in genetic counseling dialogue: preliminary test of a conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine, 65(7), 1442–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D. L., Erby, L., Larson, S., & Ellington, L. (2009). Oral literacy demand of prenatal genetic counseling dialogue: predictors of learning. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(3), 392–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veach, P. M., Bartels, D. M., & Leroy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 713–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Bowles Biesecker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Barbara Bowles Biesecker has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biesecker, B.B. The Greatest Priority for Genetic Counseling: Effectively Meeting Our Clients’ Needs 2014 NSGC Natalie Weissberger Paul National Achievement Award. J Genet Counsel 25, 621–624 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9962-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9962-9

Keywords

Navigation