Abstract
Purpose
Cyber dating abuse (CDA) has proliferated alongside the use of electronic communication technologies. Research indicates that further understanding into the individual and relational correlates of CDA will aid efforts to prevent harmful cyber dating behaviors. This study examined whether positive or negative romantic relationship quality act as intermediary variables between emotion regulation and CDA perpetration within and between romantic partners.
Method
A sample of 65 emerging adult heterosexual couples completed self-report measures on emotion regulation, positive and negative romantic relationship quality, and CDA perpetration. Data were analyzed using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model for Mediation.
Results
The results revealed that a person’s higher emotion regulation indirectly related to their own lower CDA perpetration through their own lower negative relationship quality for both women and men. Results also showed that women’s and men’s own higher emotion regulation related to their partner’s lower reports on negative relationship quality which, in turn, related to that partner’s lower reports on CDA perpetration.
Conclusions
The findings provide insight into how a sense of emptiness in romantic relationships can explain the link between emotion regulation and CDA perpetration. Implications for preventing CDA through targeting emotion regulation skills and healthy romantic relationships are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research supporting data is not available.
References
Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R., & Sugimura, K. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00080-7.
Backer-Fulghum, & Sanford, K. (2015). The validity of retrospectively reported conflict interactions in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000057.
Birkley, E. L., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2015). Anger, hostility, internalizing negative emotions, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 37, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.002.
Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levensen, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034272.
Borrajo, E., Gámez-Guadix, M., & Calvete, E. (2015). Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychological Reports, 116(2), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.16.PR0.116k22w4.
Braithwaite, S., & Holt-Lunstad, J. (2017). Romantic relationships and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.001Get.
Brem, M. J., Stuart, G. L., Cornelius, T. L., & Shorey, R. C. (2019). A longitudinal examination of alcohol problems and cyber, psychological, and physical dating abuse: The moderating role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), 10499–10519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519876029.
Brown, C., & Hegarty, K. (2018). Digital dating abuse measures: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.003.
Cano-Gonzalez, I., Charak, R., Chen, P. Y., & Cantos, A. (2022). Patterns, risk factors, and mental health correlates of cyber intimate partner violence in hispanic emerging adults. Journal of Family Violence, 38, 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00434-1.
Caridade, S., Braga, T., & Borrajo, E. (2019). Cyber dating abuse (CDA): Evidence from a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.018.
Dardis, C. M. (2023). Coping with relationship loss by denial and acceptance: Direct and indirect associations with engagement in post-relationship pursuit behaviors among college men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 38, 1663–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00482-7.
Deans, H., & Bhogal, M. S. (2019). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: A brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9715-4.
Dreke, R. J., Johnson, L., & Landhuis, J. (2020). Challenges with and recommendations for intimate partner stalking policy and practice: A practitioner perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 35, 769–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00164-2.
Eckhardt, C. I., Murphy, C. M., Whitaker, D. J., Sprunger, J., Dykstra, R., & Woodard, K. (2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4(2), 196–231. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.4.2.196.
Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00722.x.
Galende, N., Ozamiz-Etxebarria, N., Jaureguizar, J., & Redondo, I. (2020). Cyber dating violence prevention programs in universal populations: A systematic review. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S275414.
Gottman, J., Ryan, K., Swanson, C., & Swanson, K. (2005). Proximal change experiments with couples: A methodology for empirically building a science of effective interventions for changing couples’ interaction. The Journal of Family Communication, 5(3), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0503_1.
Gratz, K. L., Weiss, N. H., & Tull, M. T. (2015). Examining emotion regulation as an outcome, mechanism, or target of psychological treatments. Current Opinion in Psychology, 3, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.02.010.
Halmos, M. B., Leone, R. M., Parrott, D. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2021). Relationship dissatisfaction, emotion regulation, and physical intimate partner aggression in heavy-drinking, conflict-prone couples: A dyadic analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), NP5385–NP5406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518801019.
Hamby, S. (2013). The Partner Cyber Abuse Questionnaire: Preliminary psychometrics of technology-based intimate partner violence [Paper presented]. Annual Convention of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Hertlein, K. M. (2018). Technology in relational systems: Roles, rules, and boundaries. In J. Van Hook, S. McHale, & V. King (Eds.), Families and technology (Vol. 9, pp. 89–102). Spring International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95540-7_5.
Hertlein, K. M., & van Dyck, L. E. (2020). Predicting engagement in electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology Behavior Social Networking, 23(9), 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0424.
Hertlein, K. M., Eddy, B. P., & Lancaster Strickland, M. (2020). A Framework for assessing technology-mediated IPV. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 19(4), 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2020.1838377.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R.
Jin, B., & Peña, J. F. (2010). Mobile communication in romantic relationships: Mobile phone use, relational uncertainty, love, commitment, and attachment styles. Communication Reports, 23(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934211003598742.
Johnson, W. L., Giordano, P. C., Longmore, M. A., & Manning, W. D. (2014). Intimate partner violence and depressive symptoms during adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513520430.
Kellerman, I., Margolin, G., Borofsky, L. A., Baucom, B. R., & Iturralde, E. (2013). Electronic aggression among emerging adults: Motivations and contextual factors. Emerging Adulthood, 1(4), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813490159.
Kinkead, A., Salas, C., & Ewert, C. P. (2022). Couples’ extrinsic emotion regulation and dyadic adjustment: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis. Current Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04188-3.
Kirby, J. S., & Baucom, D. H. (2007). Treating emotion dysregulation in a couples context: A pilot study of a couples skills group intervention. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(375), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00037.x.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.).). Guilford Press.
Lantagne, A., & Furman, W. (2020). More than the sum of two partners: A dyadic perspective on young adult physical dating aggression. Psychology of Violence, 10(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000267.
Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Analyzing dyadic data with multilevel modeling versus structural equation modeling: A tale of two methods. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(4), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000290.
Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099.
Levenson, R. W., Haase, C. M., Bloch, L., Holley, S. R., & Seider, B. H. (2014). Emotion regulation in couples. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 267–283). The Guilford.
Li, J., Ran, G., Zhang, Q., & He, X. (2023). The prevalence of cyber dating abuse among adolescents and emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 144(104), 107726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107726.
Lindsey, E. W. (2020). Relationship context and emotion regulation across the life span. Emotion, 20(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000666.
Luginbuehl, T., & Schoebi, D. (2018). Emotional dynamics and emotion regulation in intimate relationships. In P. M. Cole, & T. Hollenstein (Eds.), Emotion regulation (pp. 208–225). Routledge.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
Mahoney, J. C., Farrell, D. M., & Murphy, C. M. (2022). Prevalence and predictors of cyber psychological abuse among adults. Journal of Family Violence, 37(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00317-x.
Mahvelati, A., Sepehrishamloo, Z., & Pourshahriyari, M. (2023). Comparing the effectiveness of Gottman and Dattilio couples therapy methods for mitigating difficulties in emotion regulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 150(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2021.1959290.
Marshall, T. C., Bejanyan, K., Di Castro, G., & Lee, R. A. (2013). Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01393.x.
Mazzuca, S., Kafetsios, K., Livi, S., & Presaghi, F. (2019). Emotion regulation and satisfaction in long-term marital relationships: The role of emotional contagion. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(9), 2880–2895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518804452.
Melander, L. A. (2010). College students’ perceptions of intimate partner cyber harassment. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 13(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0221.
Messinger, A. M., Birmingham, R. S., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2021). Perceptions of same-gender and different-gender intimate partner cyber-monitoring. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0221. NP4315-NP4335.
Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.127.
Peskin, M. F., Markham, C. M., Shegog, R., Temple, J. R., Baumler, E. R., Addy, R. C., & Emery, S. T. (2017). Prevalence and correlates of the perpetration of cyber dating abuse among early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0568-1.
Pettigrew, J. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6–8), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920903224269.
Powell, A., Henry, N., & Flynn, A. (2018). Image-based sexual abuse. In W. DeKeseredy, & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of critical criminology (pp. 305–3015). Routledge.
Rajendrakumar, J., Manjula, V., & Rajan, S. K. (2023). Process of emotion regulation in Indian couples during Gottman’s dreams-within-conflict intervention: A mixed-methods design study. Contemporary Family Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-023-09671-y. Advance online publication.
Riahi, F., Golzari, M., & Mootabi, F. (2020). The relationship between emotion regulation and marital satisfaction using the actor-partner interdependence model. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 26(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.32598/ijpcp.26.1.3038.1.
Roberson, P. N., Norona, J. C., Lenger, K. A., & Olmstead, S. B. (2018). How do relationship stability and quality affect wellbeing? Romantic relationship trajectories, depressive symptoms, and life satisfaction across 30 years. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 2171–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1052-1.
Rogge, R. D., Fincham, F. D., Crasta, D., & Maniaci, M. R. (2017). Positive and negative evaluation of relationships: Development and validation of the positive–negative relationship quality (PN-RQ) scale. Psychological Assessment, 29(8), 1028–1043. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000392.
Rusbult, C. E., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Interdependence in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher, & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359–387). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998557.ch14.
Schnurr, M. P., Mahatmya, D., & Basche, R. A. (2013). The role of dominance, cyber aggression perpetration, and gender on emerging adults’ perpetration of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030601.
Shields, A., & Cicchetti, D. (1997). Emotion regulation among school-aged children. The development and validation of new criterion Q-sort scale. Developmental Psychology, 33, 906–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.906.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.
Simpson, D. M., Leonhardt, N. D., & Hawkins, A. J. (2018). Learning about love: A meta analytic study of individually-oriented relationship education programs for adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0725-1.
Sumter, S. R., & Vandenbosch, L. (2019). Dating gone mobile: Demographic and personality-based correlates of using smartphone-based dating applications among emerging adults. New Media & Society, 21(3), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818804773.
Tani, F., Pascuzzi, D., & Raffagnino, R. (2015). Emotion regulation and quality of close relationship: The effects of emotion dysregulation processes on couple intimacy. Applied Psychology Bulletin, 272(63), 3–15.
Tashiro, & Frazier, P. (2007). The causal effects of emotion on couples’ cognition and behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.4.409.
Toplu-Demirtaş, E., Akcabozan-Kayabol, N. B., Araci-Iyiaydin, A., & Fincham, F. D. (2022). Unraveling the roles of distrust, suspicion of infidelity, and jealousy in cyber dating abuse perpetration: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520927505. Article NP1432-NP1462.
Umberson, D., Donnelly, R., & Pollitt, A. M. (2018). Marriage, social control, and health behavior: A dyadic analysis of same-sex and different-sex couples. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 59(3), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146518790560.
Van Lange, P. A., & Balliet, D. (2015). Interdependence theory. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3, interpersonal relations (pp. 65–92). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-003.
Viejo, C., Monks, C. P., Sanchez, V., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2016). Physical dating violence in Spain and the United Kingdom and the importance of relationship quality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(8), 1453–1475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514567963.
Wiebe, S. A., Johnson, S. M., Burgess Moser, M., Dalgleish, T. L., & Tasca, G. A. (2017). Predicting follow-up outcomes in emotionally focused couple therapy: The role of change in trust, relationship‐specific attachment, and emotional engagement. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12199.
Wolford-Clevenger, C., Zapor, H., Brasfield, H., Febres, J., Elmquist, J., Brem, M., Shorey, R. C., & Stuart, G. L. (2016). An examination of the Partner Cyber abuse questionnaire in a college student sample. Psychology of Violence, 6(1), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039442.
Zweig, J., Dank, M., Yahner, J., & Lachman, P. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Matthew E. Jaurequi and Morgan L. Lancaster contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Morgan L. Lancaster. Matthew E. Jaurequi and Morgan L. Lancaster conducted the formal analysis. The initial draft of the manuscript was written by Matthew E. Jaurequi, Morgan L. Lancaster, and Sarah Taylor. All authors commented and edited previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jaurequi, M.E., Strickland, M.L. & Taylor, S. Actor-Partner Associations of Emotion Regulation, Relationship Quality, and Cyber Dating Abuse among Heterosexual Emerging Adult Couples. J Fam Viol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00694-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00694-z