Abstract
This commentary highlights the impact of Michael Johnson’s work, and the concept that intimate partner violence (IPV) is not a “one-size fits all” phenomena, on the mental health field. Johnson’s, 1995 typology led to a paradigm shift in research and the clinical work of many mental health providers who seek to prevent or treat IPV. Johnson’s idea that there is more than one type of violence, i.e., situational couple violence and intimate terrorism, moved many from the idea that it is never appropriate to offer conjoint treatment to couples who have experienced IPV. Instead, it became increasingly clear that clinicians have a responsibility to provide a clear determination of if there has been IPV in the couple we are treating, and if so, to determine the type of IPV to individualize treatment based on the IPV type. In this commentary, we also address the impact of Johnson’s work on our own clinical work and on the mental health field. Finally, as we review Johnson’s work and the work of other scholars in this special issue, we focus on how this can guide clinical work to improve the lives of clients who have experienced IPV (either as victims, offenders, or both).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banard, G. W., Vera, H., Vera, M. I., & Newman, G. (1982). Till death do us part: A study of spouse murder. The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 10, 271–280.
Bermea, A. M., & van Eeden-Moorefield, B. (2023). Conceptualizing Johnson’s typology of intimate partner violence in queer relationships. Journal of Family Violence Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00494-x.
Cleghorn, L. L., Cummings, C. A., & County, K. (2022). Experiences of intimate partner violence in same-gender relationships: A study of narratives from a caribbean context. Journal of Family Violence Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00427-0.
Conroy, N. E., Crowley, C. G., & DeSanto, D. L. (2022). Assessing the state of empirical research on Johnson’s typology of violence: A systematic review. Journal of Family Violence Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00416-3.
Conroy, N. E., Griffin, S. M., Crowley, C. G., & DeSanto, D. L. (2023). Conceptual misrepresentations and methodological misapplications: A systematic review of misuses of Johnson’s typology of violence. Journal of Family Violence Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00514-w.
Cunningham, M., & Anderson, K. L. (2022). Union status, union dissolution, and intimate partner violence: Investigating Johnson’s typology among heterosexual dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00448-9. Advanced online publication.
Hardesty, J. L., Crossman, K. A., Haselschwerdt, M. L., Raffaelli, M., Ogolsky, B. G., & Johnson, M. P. (2015). Toward a standard approach to operationalizing coercive control and classifying violence types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12201.
Johnson, M. P. (1993). Violence Against Women in the American Family: Are there two forms? Paper presented at the Annual Pre-Conference Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, National Conference on Family Relations, Baltimore.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.
Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293328.
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University Press.
Johnson, M. P. (2017). A personal social history of a typology of intimate partner violence, Journal of Family Theory and Review, 150–164.https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12187
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. L. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990’s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.
Jose, A., & O’Leary, K. D. (2009). Prevalence of partner aggression in representative and clinic samples. In K. D. O’Leary, & E. M. Woodin (Eds.), Psychological and physical aggression in couples: Causes and interventions (pp. 15–35). American Psychological Association.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
Leone, J. M., & Beeble, M. L. (2022). Incarcerated women’s strategic responses to intimate terrorism. Journal of Family Violence Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00400-x.
Love, H., Spencer, C., May, S., Mendez, M., & Stith, S. (2020). Perpetrator risk markers for intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: A meta-analysis. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 21(5), 922–931. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018801331.
McKay, T. (2022). Toward a social ecology of Johnson’s types: Exploring pathways to situational couple violence and coercive controlling violence among returning prisoners. Journal of Family Violence Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00444-z.
Nawaz, B., & Johnson, M. P. (2022). Types of domestic violence in Pakistan: Elaborating on Johnson’s typology. Journal of Family Violence Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00420-7.
Rosen, K. H., Stith, S. M., Few, A. L., Daly, K. L., & Tritt, D. R. (2005). A qualitative investigation of Johnson’s typology. Violence and Victims, 20, 3, 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.20.3.319.
Schecter, S. (1987). Guide for Mental Health Practitioners in domestic violence. published by the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
Simpson, L. E., Doss, D. B., Wheeler, J., & Christensen, A. (2007). Relationship violence among couples seeking therapy: Common couple violence or battering? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(2), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00021.x
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., & McCollum, E. E. (2003). Effectiveness of couples treatment for spouse abuse. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01215.x.
Stith, S. M., McCollum, E. E., & Rosen, K. H. (2011a). Couples treatment for domestic violence: Finding safe solutions. American Psychological Association.
Stith, S. M., Amanor-Boadu, Y., Strachman Miller, M., Menhusen, E., Morgan, C., & Few-Demo, A. (2011b). Vulnerabilities, stressors, and adaptations in situationally violent relationships. Family Relations, 60, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00634.x.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316. 10.1117.019251396017003001.
Tolman, R. M. (1992). Psychological abuse of women. In R. T. Ammerman, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook (pp. 291–310). Wiley.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3–16.
Woulfe, J. M., & Goodman, L. A. (2021). Identity abuse as a tactic of violence in LGBTQ communities: Initial validation of the identity abuse measure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), 2656–2676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Stith, S.M., Spencer, C. Commentary: 25 Years After Johnson’s Typology of Intimate Partner Violence the Impact of Johnson’s Typology on Clinical Work. J Fam Viol 39, 143–148 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00654-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00654-z