Abstract
Recent research has begun to examine whether participants in dating violence studies perceive any benefit from the research and/or experience emotional distress as a result of having participated. Such information is important for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and researchers in determining ethical and appropriate protections for participants. In the current study, we examined participants’ reactions to answering questions on dating violence victimization and perpetration utilizing a sample of female college students (N = 282). We also examined whether distress tolerance was associated with research reactions and moderated the relation between reports of victimization/perpetration and negative emotional reactions to the research. Findings demonstrated that negative emotional reactions to the research did not differ between individuals with or without previous dating violence. Further, distress tolerance had a main effect, but not a moderating effect, on negative emotional reactions to research participation. Implications of these findings for future research and IRBs are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
Becker-Blease, K. A., & Freyd, J. J. (2006). Research participants telling the truth about their lives: the ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. American Psychologist, 61(3), 218–226.
Bell, K. M., & Naugle, A. E. (2007). Effects of social desirability on students’ self-reporting of partner abuse perpetration and victimization. Violence and Victims, 22, 243–256.
Carter-Visscher, R. M., Naugle, A. E., Bell, K. M., & Suvak, M. K. (2007). Ethics of asking trauma-related questions and exposing participants to arousal-inducing stimuli. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 8, 27–55.
Cornelius, T. L., Shorey, R. C., & Beebe, S. M. (2010). Self-reported communication variables and dating violence: using Gottman’s martial communication conceptualization. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 439–448.
Cromer, L. D., Freyd, J. J., Binder, A. K., DePrince, A. P., & Becker-Blease, K. (2006). What’s the risk in asking? Participant reaction to trauma history questions compared with reaction to other personal questions. Ethics & Behavior, 16, 347–362.
DePrince, A. P., & Chu, A. (2008). Perceived benefits of trauma research: examining methodological and individual difference factors in responses to research participation. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1556, 35–47.
DePrince, A. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2004). Forgetting trauma stimuli. Psychological Science, 15, 488–492.
Edwards, K.M., Probst, D.R., Tansill, E.C., & Gidycz, C.A. (2013). Women’s reactions to participation in interpersonal trauma research: a longitudinal study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Griffin, M. G., Resick, P. A., Waldrop, A. E., & Mechanic, M. B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 221–227.
Kaura, S. A., & Lohman, B. J. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: a comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 367–381.
Leyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010). Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: a review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 576–600.
Logan, T. L., Walker, R., Shannon, L., & Cole, J. (2008). Combining ethical considerations with recruitment and follow-up strategies for partner violence victimization research. Violence Against Women, 14, 1226–1251.
Newman, E., & Kaloupek, D. G. (2004). The risks and benefits of participating in trauma- focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 383–394.
Newman, E., Walker, E. A., & Gefland, A. (1999). Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21, 187–196.
Newman, E., Willard, T., Sinclair, R., & Kaloupek, D. (2001). Empirically supported ethical research practice: the costs and benefits of research from the participants’ views. Accountability in Research, 8, 309–329.
O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Psychological abuse: a variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. Violence and Victims, 14, 3–23.
Rhatigan, D. L., & Street, A. E. (2005). The impact of intimate partner violence on decisions to leave dating relationships: a test of the investment model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1580–1597.
Shook, N. J., Gerrity, D. A., Jurich, J., & Segrist, A. E. (2000). Courtship violence among college students: a comparison of verbally and physically abusive couples. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 1–22.
Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L., & Bell, K. M. (2008). A critical review of theoretical frameworks for dating violence: comparing the dating and marital fields. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 185–194.
Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L., & Bell, K. M. (2011a). Reactions to participating in dating violence research: Are our questions distressing participants? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2890–2907.
Shorey, R. C., Rhatigan, D. L., Fite, P. J., & Stuart, G. L. (2011b). Dating violence victimization and alcohol problems: an examination of the stress-buffering hypothesis for perceived support. Partner Abuse, 2, 31–45.
Shorey, R. C., Sherman, A. E., Kivisto, A. J., Elkins, S. R., Rhatigan, D. L., & Moore, T. M. (2011c). Gender differences in depression and anxiety among victims of intimate partner violence: the moderating effect of shame-proneness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1834–1850.
Simons, J., & Gaher, R. (2005). The distress tolerance scale: development and validation of a self-report measure. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 83–102.
Straight, E. S., Harper, F. W. K., & Arias, I. (2003). The impact of partner psychological abuse on health behaviors and health status in college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1035–1054.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scale (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., & Warren, W. L. (2003). The conflict tactics scales handbook. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported, in part, by grants F31AA020131 and K24AA019707 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) awarded to the first and last authors, respectively. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIAAA or the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shorey, R.C., Febres, J., Brasfield, H. et al. Reactions to Dating Violence Research: Do Difficulties with Distress Tolerance Increase Negative Reactions?. J Fam Viol 28, 479–487 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9519-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9519-8