Abstract
One in four college women experience sexual assault on campus; yet, campuses rarely provide the in-depth self-defense programs needed to reduce sexual assault risk. Further, little is known about the range of possible behaviors elicited by sexual assault threat stimuli besides assertion. To fill this gap, the aim of the current study was to explore qualitative themes in women’s intended behavioral responses to a hypothetical sexual assault threat, date rape, by using a laboratory-controlled threat. College women (N = 139) were randomly assigned to one of four different levels of sexual assault threat presented via an audio-recorded vignette. Participants articulated how they would hypothetically respond to the experimentally assigned threat. Responses were blinded and analyzed using Consensual Qualitative Research methodology. Six major themes emerged: assertion, compliance/acceptance, conditional decision making, avoidance, expressions of discomfort, and allusion to future contact. Although almost all participants described assertion, a number of non-assertive responses were described that are not currently recognized in the literature. These non-assertive responses, including compliance/acceptance, conditional decision making, and avoidance, may represent unique behavioral response styles and likely reflect the complex psychological process of behavioral response to threat. The variety of themes found illustrates the great range of behavioral responses to threat. This broad range is not currently well represented or measured in the literature and better understanding of these responses can inform future interventions, advocacy efforts, and policies focused on sexual assault.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. E., & Cahill, S. P. (2014). Use of the response-latency paradigm for eliciting and evaluating women’s responses to the threat of date rape. Violence and Victims, 29, 248–261. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.
Bart, P. B., & O’Brien, P. H. (1984). Stopping rape: Effective avoidance strategies. Signs, 10, 83–101. doi:10.1086/494115.
Brecklin, L. R. (2004). Self-defense/assertiveness training, women’s assault history, and psychological characteristics. Violence Against Women, 10, 479–497. doi:10.1177/1077801204264296.
Byers, E. S., Giles, B. L., & Price, D. L. (1987). Definiteness and effectiveness of women’s responses to unwanted sexual advances: A laboratory investigation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 321–338. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0804_5.
Classen, C., Field, N. P., Koopman, C., Nevill-Manning, K., & Spiegel, D. (2001). Interpersonal problems and their relationship to sexual reassault among women sexually abused in childhood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 495–509. doi:10.1177/088626001016006001.
Clay-Warner, J. (2002). Avoiding rape: The effect of protective actions and situational factors on rape outcome. Violence and Victims, 17, 691–705. doi:10.1891/vivi.17.6.691.33723.
Dworkin, S. L., Treves-Kagan, S., & Lippman, S. A. (2013). Gender-transformative interventions to reduce HIV risks and violence with heterosexually-active men: A review of the global evidence. AIDS and Behavior, 17, 2845–2863. doi:10.1007/s10461-013-0565-2.
Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Santana, S. A. (2007). Assessing the efficacy of the protective action-completion nexus for sexual assaults. Violence and Victims, 22, 18–42. doi:10.1891/vv-v22i1a002.
Flood, M. (2003, October). Addressing the sexual cultures of heterosexual men: Key strategies in involving men and boys in HIV/AIDS prevention. United Nations Expert Group Meeting on: The role of men and boys in achieving gender equality. Brasilia, Brazil. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255604770_Addressing_the_sexual_cultures_of_heterosexual_men_Key_strategies_in_involving_men_and_boys_in_HIVAIDS_prevention.
Gidycz, C. A., McNamara, J. R., & Edwards, K. M. (2006). Women’s risk perception and sexual assault: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 441–456. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.004.
Gidycz, C. A., Orchowski, L. M., & Edwards, K. M. (2011). Primary prevention of sexual violence. In J. M. White, M. P. Koss, & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Violence against women and children: Consensus, critical analysis, and emergent priorities (pp. 159–179). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gidycz, C. A., Van Wynsberghe, A., & Edwards, K. M. (2008). Prediction of women’s utilization of resistance strategies in a sexual assault situation A prospective study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 571–588. doi:10.1177/0886260507313531.
Gross, A. M., Winslett, A., Roberts, M., & Gohm, C. L. (2006). An examination of sexual violence against college women. Violence Against Women, 12, 288–300. doi:10.1177/1077801205277358.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., Hess, S. A., Knox, S., Williams, E. N., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196–205. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517–572.
Hollander, J. A. (2004). “I can take care of myself”: The impact of self-defense training on women’s lives. Violence Against Women, 10, 205–235. doi:10.1177/1077801203256202.
Koss, M. P. (1993). Rape: Scope, impact, interventions, and public policy responses. American Psychologist, 48, 1062–1069. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.10.1062.
Ladany, N., Thompson, B. J., & Hill, C. E. (2012). Cross-analysis. In C. E. Hill (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 117–144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Macy, R. J., Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (2006). Responding in their best interests contextualizing women’s coping with acquaintance sexual aggression. Violence Against Women, 12, 478–500. doi:10.1177/1077801206288104.
Macy, R. J., Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (2007). Latent profiles among sexual assault survivors: Implications for defensive coping and resistance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 543–565. doi:10.1177/0886260506298841.
Marx, B., & Gross, A. (1995). An analysis of two contextual variables. Behavior Modification, 19, 451–463. doi:10.1177/01454455950194003.
Marx, B. P., & Soler-Baillo, J. M. (2005). The relationships among risk recognition, autonomic and self-reported arousal, and posttraumatic stress symptomatology in acknowledged and unacknowledged victims of sexual assault. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 618–624. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000171809.12117.79.
Masters, N. T., Norris, J., Stoner, S. A., & George, W. H. (2006). How does it end? Women project the outcome of a sexual assault scenario. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 291–302. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00297.x.
Norris, J., Nurius, P. S., & Graham, T. L. (1999). When a date changes from fun to dangerous: Factors affecting women’s ability to distinguish. Violence Against Women, 5, 230–250. doi:10.1177/10778019922181202.
Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (1995). A cognitive ecological model of women’s response to male sexual coercion in dating. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8, 117–139. doi:10.1300/J056v08n01.
Orchowski, L. M., Gidycz, C. A., & Raffle, H. (2008). Evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction and self-defense program: A prospective analysis of a revised protocol. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 204–218. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00425.x.
Parrot, A. (1996). Sexually assertive communication training. In T. Jackson (Ed.), Acquaintance rape: Assessment, treatment and prevention (pp. 215–242). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
Paul, C. L., Ross, S., Bryant, J., Hill, W., Bonevski, B., & Keevy, N. (2010). The social context of smoking: A qualitative study comparing smokers high versus low socioeconomic position. BMC Public Health, 10, 211–217. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-211.
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 72–88. doi:10.1080/00224490709336794.
Pulerwitz, J., & Barker, G. (2008). Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil development and psychometric evaluation of the GEM scale. Men and Masculinities, 10, 322–338. doi:10.1177/1097184X06298778.
Rozee, P. D. (2000). Sexual victimization: Harassment and rape. In M. Biaggio & M. Hersen (Eds.), Issues in the psychology of women (pp. 93–113). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey: Research Report. (NCJ: 183781). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183781.pdf.
Turchik, J. A., Probst, D. R., Chau, M., Nigoff, A., & Gidycz, C. A. (2007). Factors predicting the type of tactics used to resist sexual assault: A prospective study of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 605–614. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.605.
Vitellone, N. (2000). Condoms and the making of “testosterone man”: A cultural analysis of the male sex drive in AIDS research on safer heterosex. Men and Masculinities, 3, 152–167. doi:10.1177/1097184X00003002002.
Williams, E. N., & Hill, C. E. (2012). Establishing trustworthiness in consensual qualitative research studies. In C. E. Hill (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 175–186). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yeater, E. A., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2010). Cognitive processes underlying women’s risk judgments: Associations with sexual victimization history and rape myth acceptance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 375–386. doi:10.1037/a0019297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, R.E., Brouwer, A.M., Wendorf, A.R. et al. Women’s Behavioral Responses to the Threat of a Hypothetical Date Rape Stimulus: A Qualitative Analysis. Arch Sex Behav 45, 793–805 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0682-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0682-2